Biology of Sarcomas “The first thing that the general medical oncologist has to realize is that the parallel word to sarcoma is actually carcinoma,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Advertisements

Paz-Ares LG et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract CRA7510.
William J. Gradishar MD, FACP Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology Director, Maggie Daley Center For Women's Cancer Care Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib (E) Alone or in Combination with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (CP) in Never or Light Former Smokers with Advanced Lung.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Randomized phase III trial of trabectedin versus doxorubicin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in translocation-related sarcomas (TRS) Sant P. Chawla,
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
A Phase III Study (EMBRACE) of Eribulin Mesylate versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Patients with Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
PALOMA-2: Addition of Palbociclib to Frontline Letrozole Significantly Improves PFS in Postmenopausal ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer CCO Independent.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
ABRAMYO Phase I-II study of weekly nab paclitaxel in combination with liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with HER2 negative MBC Alessandra.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Attal M et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8018.
Erba HP et al. Blood 2008;112: Abstract 558
Regorafenib TAS-102 or TAS-102 Regorafenib
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
What's on the Horizon for Soft Tissue Sarcoma?
Ansell SM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 798.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Expert Insights Into the Latest Treatment of Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.
Personalizing Management in the Care of Patients With Advanced Sarcoma
Gordon LI et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 415.
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Ipilimumab plus Dacarbazine for Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma1 Phase 3 Randomized Study of Ipilimumab (IPI) plus Dacarbazine (DTIC) vs DTIC.
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
Presentation transcript:

Biology of Sarcomas “The first thing that the general medical oncologist has to realize is that the parallel word to sarcoma is actually carcinoma, not, say, breast cancer or lung cancer. Sarcomas represent a group of up to 100 different diseases, depending on how they count them – some benign, some heavily aggressively malignant – that all have different biology, have underlying different genetics and actually are just, frankly, very different diseases with different approaches. And so as you kind of get down to the next level of ‘what do they have in common,’ the only thing they have in common is the mesenchymal origin.” Brian A Van Tine, MD, PhD

Management of Sarcomas One would not administer a single agent for prostate, lung and breast cancer as a whole and expect to see a lot of activity. However, this is what has been traditionally done in sarcoma with agents like doxorubicin, resulting in low response rates. Brian A Van Tine, MD, PhD

Management of Sarcomas One would not administer a single agent for prostate, lung and breast cancer as a whole and expect to see a lot of activity. However, this is what has been traditionally done in sarcoma with agents like doxorubicin, resulting in low response rates. According to the NCCN Guidelines, “Prior to the initiation of therapy, all patients should be evaluated and managed by a multidisciplinary team with expertise and experience in sarcoma.” I believe that this is really important. Brian A Van Tine, MD, PhD

Results from the Phase II Trial of Olaratumab and Doxorubicin in Sarcoma Olaratumab + doxorubicin (n = 66) Olaratumab until progression Eligibility (n = 133) Advanced soft tissue sarcoma ECOG PS ≤2 No previous anthracycline R Optional olaratumab until progression Doxorubicin (n = 67) Outcome Olaratumab + doxorubicin Doxorubicin HR p-value Median OS 26.5 mo 14.7 mo 0.46 0.0003 OS = overall survival Phase III ANNOUNCE trial of olaratumub/doxorubicin is ongoing Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016;388(10043):488-97.

Treatment Options for Sarcoma Stage I sarcoma tumors are usually more appropriate for surgery. In Stage II and III sarcoma, the first question is diagnosis. Depending on the diagnosis, treatment may involve neoadjuvant therapy, radiation therapy and/or surgery. This is why experience with multidisciplinary team planning of the appropriate treatment approach is so important. For Stage IV disease, several questions need to be answered, such as the type of Stage IV sarcoma, how extensive the disease is and how therapy can be personalized. Brian A Van Tine, MD, PhD

Mechanism of Action of Trabectedin Trabectedin is a marine alkaloid isolate with a chemical structure characterized by 3 fused tetrahydroisoquinoline rings: Two of these rings provide the framework for covalent interaction with the minor groove of the DNA double helix. The third ring protrudes from the DNA duplex, apparently allowing interactions with adjacent nuclear proteins. Several clinical studies of the combination of trabectedin with other anticancer agents are ongoing. D'Incalci M, Galmarini CM. Mol Cancer Ther 2010;9(8):2157-63.

Phase III ET743-SAR-3007 Trial: Incidence of  Select Adverse Events with Trabectedin for Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma After Chemotherapy Trabectedin (n = 340) Dacarbazine (n = 155) All grades Grade 3 or 4 Neutropenia 49% 37% 29% 21% ALT increase 45% 26% 6% 1% Anemia 39% 14% 12% AST increase 35% 13% 5% 0% Thrombocytopenia 30% 17% 36% 18% Blood alkaline phosphatase increase 20% 7% Demetri GD et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(8):786-93.

ET743-SAR-3007: Trial Schema and Results Eligibility (n = 518) Advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma Failure of an anthracycline and ≥1 additional systemic regimen Trabectedin (n = 345) R Dacarbazine (n = 173) Survival Trabectedin Dacarbazine HR p-value Median OS 12.4 mo 12.9 mo 0.87 0.37 Median PFS 4.2 mo 1.5 mo 0.55 <0.001 Demetri GD et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(8):786-93.

ET743-SAR-3007 and E7389-G000-309 Phase III Trials for Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcomas Trabectedin (n = 345) Dacarbazine (n = 173) HR p-value Median OS 12.4 mo 12.9 mo 0.87 0.37 Median PFS 4.2 mo 1.5 mo 0.55 <0.001 E7389-G000-3092 Eribulin (n = 228) (n = 224) 13.5 mo 11.5 mo 0.77 0.0169 2.6 mo 0.88 0.23 E7389-G000-309 trial2: Median OS with eribulin versus dacarbazine was longer for patients with liposarcoma (median OS 15.6 vs 8.4 mo) than for those with leiomyosarcoma (12.7 vs 13.0 mo). 1 Demetri GD et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(8):786-93; 2 Schoffski P et al. Lancet 2016;387(10028):1629-37.

Results from the REGOSARC Phase II Trial for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas Regorafenib Placebo HR p-value Liposarcomas n = 20 n = 23 Median PFS 1.1 mo 1.7 mo 0.89 0.70 Leiomyosarcomas n = 28 3.7 mo 1.8 mo 0.46 0.0045 Synovial sarcomas n = 13 n = 14 5.6 mo 1.0 mo 0.10 <0.0001 Other sarcomas n = 27 2.9 mo 0.0061 Mir O et al. Lancet Oncol 2016;17(12):1732-42.

Perspective on the Utility of Pazopanib in the Management of Sarcoma “I think pazopanib is a really useful drug. I think it’s got some dosing complications in the soft tissue sarcoma realm that I think are soon to be addressed with new trials. But I think it causes diarrhea. I think it causes fatigue. And I think that there’s a hepatotoxicity that has a black box warning. But beyond that, if you can get the dosing right — I personally use a dose escalation that’s not on label to get the tolerability in my patients to where it needs to be. I think it’s a good drug. And there is a subset of patients where that is a really good drug.” Brian A Van Tine, MD, PhD

Results from the Phase II Trial of Olaratumab and Doxorubicin in Sarcoma Olaratumab + doxorubicin (n = 66) Olaratumab until progression Eligibility (n = 133) Advanced soft tissue sarcoma ECOG PS ≤2 No previous anthracycline R Optional olaratumab until progression Doxorubicin (n = 67) Outcome Olaratumab + doxorubicin Doxorubicin HR p-value Median OS 26.5 mo 14.7 mo 0.46 0.0003 Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016;388(10043):488-97.

Ongoing Phase III ANNOUNCE Trial Schema Olaratumab + doxorubicin Olaratumab until progression Eligibility (n = 460) Advanced unresectable soft tissue sarcoma ECOG PS ≤1 No previous anthracycline therapy R Placebo + doxorubicin Placebo until progression Primary endpoint: Overall survival www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT02451943 (Accessed April 2017).

Olaratumab/doxorubicin (n = 64) Phase II Trial: Select Side Effects of Olaratumab/Doxorubicin versus Doxorubicin Alone Event Olaratumab/doxorubicin (n = 64) Doxorubicin (n = 65) Any grade Grade ≥3 Nausea 73% 2% 52% 3% Neutropenia 58% 53% 35% 33% Mucositis 5% Vomiting 45% 0% 18% Diarrhea 34% 23% Febrile neutropenia 13% 14% Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016;388(10043):488-97.

Risk Factors and Types of Sarcoma Risk factors that predispose to sarcoma: Li-Fraumeni syndrome Adults with a childhood history of retinoblastoma Several other genetic syndromes Types of sarcoma: Genetically complex sarcomas, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas and leiomyosarcoma Genetically simple translocation-associated sarcomas, including myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, synovial sarcoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma Others, such as dedifferentiated liposarcoma Seth M Pollack, MD

What are the therapeutic options? Case Discussion A 55-year-old woman with Li-Fraumeni syndrome History of sarcoma: 2 sarcoma diagnoses as a child and as an adolescent Previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy, radiation therapy and several surgical procedures At 53, she developed a 12-cm high-grade, unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma in her mediastinum What are the therapeutic options?

Patient received trabectedin on the expanded access trabectedin trial Case Discussion A 55-year-old woman with Li-Fraumeni syndrome History of sarcoma: 2 sarcoma diagnoses as a child and as an adolescent Previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy, radiation therapy and several surgical procedures At 53, she developed a 12-cm high-grade, unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma in her mediastinum Patient received trabectedin on the expanded access trabectedin trial

Case Discussion A 55-year-old woman with Li-Fraumeni syndrome History of sarcoma: 2 sarcoma diagnoses as a child and as an adolescent Previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy, radiation therapy and several surgical procedures At 53, she developed a 12-cm high-grade, unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma in her mediastinum Trabectedin x 16 on the expanded access trabectedin trial  stable disease (SD) with several tolerability issues  disease progression  eribulin and SD for 12 months

Phase III E7389-G000-309 Trial for Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma Outcome Eribulin (n = 228) Dacarbazine (n = 224) HR p-value Median OS 13.5 mo 11.5 mo 0.77 0.0169 Median PFS 2.6 mo 0.88 0.23 Median OS with eribulin versus dacarbazine was longer for patients with liposarcoma than for those with leiomyosarcoma: Liposarcoma 15.6 mo versus 8.4 mo Leiomyosarcoma 12.7 mo versus 13.0 mo Schoffski P et al. Lancet 2016;387(10028):1629-37.

Phase III ET743-SAR-3007 Trial Results Eligibility (n = 518) Advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma Failure of an anthracycline and ≥1 additional systemic regimen Trabectedin (n = 345) R Dacarbazine (n = 173) Survival Trabectedin Dacarbazine HR p-value Median OS 12.4 mo 12.9 mo 0.87 0.37 Median PFS 4.2 mo 1.5 mo 0.55 <0.001 Demetri GD et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(8):786-93.

Results form the Phase II Trial of Olaratumab and Doxorubicin in Sarcoma Olaratumab + doxorubicin (n = 66) Olaratumab until progression Eligibility (n = 133) Advanced soft tissue sarcoma ECOG PS ≤2 No previous anthracycline R Optional olaratumab until progression Doxorubicin (n = 67) Outcome Olaratumab + doxorubicin Doxorubicin HR p-value Median OS 26.5 mo 14.7 mo 0.46 0.0003 Median PFS 6.6 mo 4.1 mo 0.67 0.0615 Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016;388(10043):488-97.

Olaratumab/Doxorubicin Phase II Trial: Select Side Effects of Olaratumab/Doxorubicin versus Doxorubicin Alone Event Olaratumab/Doxorubicin (n = 64) Doxorubicin (n = 65) Any grade Grade ≥3 Nausea 73% 2% 52% 3% Fatigue 69% 9% Neutropenia 58% 53% 35% 33% Anemia 41% 13% 37% Leukopenia 36% 18% 17% Diarrhea 34% 23% 0% Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016;388(10043):488-97.

Ongoing Phase III ANNOUNCE Trial Schema Olaratumab + doxorubicin Olaratumab until progression Eligibility (n = 460) Advanced unresectable soft tissue sarcoma ECOG PS ≤1 No previous anthracycline therapy R Placebo + doxorubicin Placebo until progression Primary endpoint: Overall survival Secondary endpoints include PFS, response and quality of life www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT02451943 (Accessed April 2017).

SARC 028: A Phase II Trial of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma 40 patients with soft tissue sarcoma enrolled on study Sarcoma type PR SD Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 9) 4 (44%) 3 (33%) Liposarcoma (n = 9) 2 (22%) Synovial sarcoma (n = 9) 1 (11%) Leiomyosarcoma (n = 10) 6 (60%) Three patients have not reached first scan assessment. Abdul-Hassan H et al. Proc ASCO 2016;Abstract 11006.