Financial and Operational Performance Improvement Programe (FOPIP) Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna, May 18 Training session on Local governments’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Advertisements

Sustainable Management of Rural and Small Systems Workshop Multi System Workshop.
INTRODUCTION TO ISO Joan Kithika. OUTLINE DEFINITIONS WHY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT? LEGAL OVERVIEW HOW TO MANAGE THE ENVIRONMENT-AN ENVIRONMENTAL.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
Workforce Planning Training for Supervisors Presentation Subtitle/Description Presenter’s Name Date.
The Impact of Economic Regulation Cathy Mannion Director Water Commission for Energy Regulation Local Authority Services National Training Group Conference.
Sultanate of Oman Oman Drinking Water Safety Plan.
Water Services Trust Fund Social Animators & Field Monitors Training Workshop The Water Services Trust Fund: Functions, Mandate, Urban Window, WSTF Support,
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
IN YEAR MONITORING & BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP PREPARED BY BUDGET OFFICE MAY
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Presented by: Meg Boyd The Blue Mountains Drinking Water System: DWQMS Overview.
1 PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT Gilles Ceralli TR Methodology – HI Luxembourg 06/2008.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
Supporting community action on AIDS in developing countries ‘Evaluating HIV and AIDS-related advocacy’ Skills Building Session International.
WASH Enabling Environment Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning.
WASH Enabling Environment Service Delivery Arrangement.
Case study of Velika Kladusha (B&H), Lipjan (Kosovo) and Kochani (Macedonia) Vienna, 13 May 2016.
Non-Revenue Water: The cornerstone in delivering efficient and effective water services by Bambos Charalambous Past Chair of the IWA WLSG Chair of the.
Road Owners and PMS Christopher R. Bennett Senior Transport Specialist East Asia and Pacific Transport The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Module 9: Transition and Exit Strategy ASEAN Training of Trainers (TOT) on Disaster Recovery.
Building an ENI CBC project
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Country, Date, Presenter
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Donor Coordination Process
Local Leaders in South East Europe: Lead for Change
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Audit of predetermined objectives
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
ISO 14001: 2004 Environmental Management Review Presentation
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Project Cycle Management
Association of providers of communal services in Republic of Macedonia - ADKOM Business planning in Macedonia – process starting as a request of the Regulator.
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING.
The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations.
Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions
Danube Water Conference, Vienna, May 2017
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
Program Management Office (PMO)
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
Using the EFQM Excellence Model to support the role of a trustee
Sustainability Reporting
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Training session: Local governments’ role in planning investments and improving performance of WSS services Interactive exercise on the key indicators.
Program Management Office (PMO)
Program Management Office (PMO)
Training session: Local governments’ role in planning investments and improving performance of WSS services Public Service Agreement (PSA) Trainers:
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Association for Water and Environmental Protection Sector
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
2018 Danube Water Conference 2-3 May, Vienna
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Utility Management Training PollEv Session 1
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Driving Successful Projects
Presentation transcript:

Financial and Operational Performance Improvement Programe (FOPIP) Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna, May 18 Training session on Local governments’ role in planning investments and improving performance of WSS services Trainers: Mr. Jane Vrteski, ADKOM, Macedonia and Ms. Aida Jusufhodzic, AQUASAN, B&H

Learning objectives Session’s learning objectives: To familiarize with the purpose, concept and methodology of the Financial and Operational Performance Improvement Programme (FOPIP). To be able to prioritize the Management Areas, those are in need of improvement. To familiarize with the development of the Improvement plan for prioritized management areas.

The need for FOPIP Inadequate HRM low productivity; staff performance not evaluated; insufficient internal communication. Inadequate customer relations unsatisfied customers; unpaid bills; tools for customer relations not used. Low operational efficiency rising costs; high level on NRW; unreliable and low level of service. Tariffs below cost-recovery: insufficient revenues; poor maintenance; under-investment in infrastructure.

Why FOPIP? It is a systematic approach for achieving effective utility management that can help PUCs improve their services, increase community support, and ensure a strong and viable utility long into the future. It is often required by international financial institutions, to improve a utility’s performance, and capacity to sustain that performance, prior to becoming eligable for international funding.

Key Management Areas of improvement Effective Utility Management Water resource adequacy Product quality Mapping and measure-ments Non-revenue water Infrastru-cture stability Customer relations Organistion and employees Tariff policy Financial manage-ment Business planning and budgeting

Conducting assessment and developing Action plan 1 Assessment of current situation regarding the institutional, financial and operational performance, identify the problems and their causes; Prioritisation of key areas of improvement according to importance of each area to the Utility. Develop an overall and prioritized Utility Improvement Plan.

Conducting assessment and developing Action plan 2 Definition of real and measurable objectives; Proposal of activities/measures; Allocation of responsibilities for the proposed activities; Defining a time-frame for the actions; Assessment of the necessary lines of communication; Assessment of the optimal ways to measure and analyse progress made (selection of key performance indicators).

Benefits of FOPIP It can educate utility staff and stakeholders regarding the range of responsibilities faced by Utility managers. It can provide an additional framework for Utility’s long- term planning efforts.

“Plan-Do-Check-Act” methodology of FOPIP

Interactive training exercise Self-assessment for PUCs Assessing the current level of achievement for each management area of Public Utility Company Tool: Self-assessment sheet for PUCs

Step 1 - Rating Areas Performance score 15 Water resource adequacy and product quality (e.g. clean & safe water) Performance score 15 a. The system is able to meet the water needs of its customers now and for the reasonable future (in terms of quantities for customers). 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☒ b. The utility or community has performed a long-term water supply and demand analysis. 1 ☒ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ c. The utility regularly monitors water quality, in accordance with regulatory requirements. d. The system is in compliance with regulatory requirements related to water quality. e. The system is in compliance with service reliability requirements (24 hours service). f. Rural water systems are under management and control of PUC. 1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3 ☐

Performance score:Summarize the score for each management area and look at the table below to see the overall performance score for PUC – low, medium and high. No. Management area Low Medium High 1 Water resource adequacy and product quality 1-6 7-12 13-18 2 Network mapping and measurements 1-9 10-18 19-27 3 Non-revenue water 4 Infrastructure stability 1-4 5-8 9-12 5 Customer relations 1-8 9-16 17-24 6 Organisation and employees 7 Tariff policy 1-5 6-10 11-15 8 Financial management 1-3 4-6 7-9 9 Business planning and budgeting

Management Area Description Performance score No. Key Management Area Management Area Description Performance score (Low - Medium - High) Rank priority (Low – Medium - High) 1 Water resource adequacy and product quality The system is able to meet the water needs of its customers now and for the reasonable future (in terms of quantities for customers). The utility or community has performed a long-term water supply and demand analysis. The utility regularly monitors water quality. The system is in compliance with regulatory requirements related to water quality. The system is in compliance with service reliability requirements (24 hours service). Rural water systems are under management and control of PUC. H  2 Network mapping and measurements The utility has electronic maps of primary water network developed. The utility has electronic maps of secondary water network developed. The utility has electronic maps of sewage network developed. The utility has human capacities for mapping and GIS. Water meters on all water connections established. Water meters are regularly maintained and replaced. Flow meters on water intake established. The utility understands, has documented, and monitors key operational aspects of the system (e.g., pressure, flow). M   

Management Area Description Step 2 - Ranking Areas No. Key Management Area Management Area Description Performance score (Low - Medium - High) Rank priority (Low – Medium - High) 1 Water resource adequacy and product quality The system is able to meet the water needs of its customers now and for the reasonable future (in terms of quantities for customers). The utility or community has performed a long-term water supply and demand analysis. The utility regularly monitors water quality. The system is in compliance with regulatory requirements related to water quality. The system is in compliance with service reliability requirements (24 hours service). Rural water systems are under management and control of PUC. H  2 Network mapping and measurements The utility has electronic maps of primary water network developed. The utility has electronic maps of secondary water network developed. The utility has electronic maps of sewage network developed. The utility has human capacities for mapping and GIS. Water meters on all water connections established. Water meters are regularly maintained and replaced. Flow meters on water intake established. The utility understands, has documented, and monitors key operational aspects of the system (e.g., pressure, flow). M 

Step 3 - Match Results Performance score High 1 Medium 2 Low Ranking    1 Medium  2 Low Ranking (Priority)

Step 3 - Match Results

Priority Management Areas: Step 4 - Management Area Improvement Plan List your top three Priority Management Areas – these should be drawn from the self-assessment activity. List the Improvement Actions that you will undertake to address the priority management areas – you should have at least one action for each priority management area (actions may address multiple management areas). Priority Management Areas: Improvement Actions 1. Network mapping and measurements 1. To develop electronic maps of secondary water network 2. 3.

Step 4 - Management Area Improvement Plan Improvement Action: To develop electronic maps of secondary water network Description: Action Management Area(s) addressed Objective(s) To develop electronic maps of secondary water network… Network mapping and measurements Timeline: Start date Milestones Target completion date   Responsible Party (or Parties): Relevant Resources (on-hand or needed): Challenges to Address: Review Process: Performance indicators or measures Status reports and updates frequency/cycle Other Notes:

Thanks a lot for your attention!