Paul Urayama, George N. Phillips, Sol M. Gruner  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Advertisements

Molecular Mechanism of Antibody-Mediated Activation of β-galactosidase
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Modeling Zymogen Protein C
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Structural and Dynamic Properties of the Human Prion Protein
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Mechanism and Energetics of Charybdotoxin Unbinding from a Potassium Channel from Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Po-chia Chen, Serdar Kuyucak  Biophysical.
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Exterior Site Occupancy Infers Chloride-Induced Proton Gating in a Prokaryotic Homolog of the ClC Chloride Channel  David L. Bostick, Max L. Berkowitz 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Michael E Wall, James B Clarage, George N Phillips  Structure 
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Probing the “Dark Matter” of Protein Fold Space
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Sequence and Crowding Effects in the Aggregation of a 10-Residue Fragment Derived from Islet Amyloid Polypeptide  Eva Rivera, John Straub, D. Thirumalai 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Hydrogen Bonding in Helical Polypeptides from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Amide Hydrogen Exchange Analysis: Alamethicin and Melittin in Methanol 
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (May 1996)
Three-dimensional structure of the human protective protein: structure of the precursor form suggests a complex activation mechanism  Gabby Rudenko, Erik.
The Role of Higher CO-Multipole Moments in Understanding the Dynamics of Photodissociated Carbonmonoxide in Myoglobin  Nuria Plattner, Markus Meuwly 
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Folding by Essential Dynamics Sampling: Folding Landscape of Horse Heart Cytochrome c  Isabella Daidone, Andrea.
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Open-State Models of a Potassium Channel
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Demian Riccardi, Qiang Cui, George N. Phillips  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Synthetic Ion Channel
Presentation transcript:

Probing Substates in Sperm Whale Myoglobin Using High-Pressure Crystallography  Paul Urayama, George N. Phillips, Sol M. Gruner  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 51-60 (January 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2

Figure 1 Radius of Gyration before Isotropic Scaling Calculated Using Extended Main Chain Atoms of the First 151 Residues The pressures were as follows: 0.1 MPa (upside down triangle, square), 150 MPa (right side up triangle, diamond), and 200 MPa (circle). Structure 2002 10, 51-60DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2)

Figure 2 Change in Position of the Center of Mass of Residue i Calculated from Extended Main Chain Atoms of the First 151 Residues after Isotropic Scaling Changes are differences in residue positions after least squares superpositioning. The top figures show pressure comparison and control at room temperature. Structures superposed were RTHP(MYOCE) and RTRP(MYO2), and RTRP(MYO2) and RTRP(r1VXH), respectively. The bottom figures show the pressure comparison and control for low-temperature structures. Comparisons were between LTHP(MYO3) and LTRP(1A6K), and LTHP(MYO3) and LTHP(MYO4), respectively. Structure 2002 10, 51-60DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2)

Figure 3 Robust Displacements Are Identified by Smoothing (See Text for Procedure) Zero and two neighbors (one and five residues total, respectively) were used to calculate the COM. Coordinates have been isotropically scaled to RTRP(MYO2). The 0.1 Å detectability estimate is drawn in for comparison. The thick line is between RTRP(MYO2) and RTHP(MYOCE), and the thin line is between LTRP(1A6K) and LTHP(MYO3). Structure 2002 10, 51-60DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2)

Figure 4 Comparison of Pressure-Induced Displacements at Room Temperature (Top, Left) and Low Temperature (Top, Right) Regions rendered as ribbons are residues 3–24, 40–52, 79–94, and 115–147. Only extended main chain atoms are shown for all other residues. Structures are orthogonally oriented along principal axes, with the structures (middle) rotated 90° along the horizontal axis. Displacements have been amplified by a factor of 15. Light shading indicates ambient pressure positions. Dark shading indicates high-pressure positions. The figures at the bottom are a key to the labeling of the helices. Structure 2002 10, 51-60DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2)

Figure 5 Displacement in Backbone Positions upon Change in pH and Pressure Robust displacements are identified by smoothing (see text for procedure). Two neighbors (top) are used to calculate the COM. Coordinates have been isotropically scaled to RTRP(MYO2). The thick line is between RTRP(MYO2) and RTHP(MYOCE), and the thin line is between RTRP(1VXB) and RTRP(1VXH). The bottom figure shows the displacements after scaling rmsd's. Structure 2002 10, 51-60DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2)

Figure 6 Comparison of Displacements at Low pH (Top, Left) and High Pressure (Top, Right) Regions rendered as ribbons are residues 3–24, 40–52, 79–94, and 115–147. Only extended main chain atoms are shown for all other residues. Structures are orthogonally oriented along principal axes, with the structure (middle) rotated 90° along the horizontal axis. Displacements have been amplified by a factor of 6.2 (left) and 15 (right). Light shading indicates ambient pressure positions. Dark shading indicates low-pH or high-pressure positions. The figures at the bottom are a key to the labeling of the helices. Structure 2002 10, 51-60DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00699-2)