Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine as Long-Acting Maintenance Therapy: LATTE‑2 Week 48 Results David A. Margolis,1 Daniel Podzamczer,2 Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink,3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Advertisements

Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
23rd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; February 22-25, 2016; Boston, MA 1 ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC; 2 Hospital.
VIKING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects SE/HIV/0023/14b January 2014.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
21st International AIDS Conference; July 18-22, 2016; Durban, South Africa 1 ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 2 Ciudad Sanitaria y Universitaria.
PPD Global Feasibility Services
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Treatment-Naïve Adults
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Volume 390, Issue 10101, Pages (September 2017)
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Safety and Efficacy of Long-Acting CAB and RPV as Two Drug IM Maintenance Therapy: LATTE-2 Week 96 Results J Eron,1 D Margolis,2 J Gonzalez-Garcia,3 H-J.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Comparison of NRTI combinations
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
DTG + 3TC vs DTG + TDF/FTC GEMINI.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine as Long-Acting Maintenance Therapy: LATTE‑2 Week 48 Results David A. Margolis,1 Daniel Podzamczer,2 Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink,3 Thomas Lutz,4 Jonathan B. Angel,5 Gary Richmond,6 Bonaventura Clotet,7 Felix Gutierrez,8 Louis Sloan,9 Sandy K. Griffith,1 Marty St Clair,1 David Dorey,10 Susan Ford,11 Joseph Mrus,12 Herta Crauwels,12 Kimberly Y. Smith,1 Peter E. Williams,12 William R. Spreen1 1ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 2Ciudad Sanitaria y Universitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; 3ICH Study Center, Hamburg, Germany; 4Infektio Research, Frankfurt, Germany; 5The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada; 6Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA; 7Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; 8Hospital General de Elche & Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain; 9North Texas Infectious Disease Consultants, Dallas, TX, USA; 10GlaxoSmithKline, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; 11PAREXEL International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 12Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium

Disclosures Dr. David A. Margolis is an employee of ViiV Healthcare Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Background CAB is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor RPV is an HIV-1 NNRTI Oral 30 mg tablet (t½, ~40 hours) LA nanosuspension 200 mg/mL (t½, ~20-40 days) RPV is an HIV-1 NNRTI Oral 25 mg tablet (t½, ~50 hours) LA nanosuspension 300 mg/mL (t½, ~30-90 days) Oral 2-drug CAB + RPV proof of efficacy through Week 96 in LATTE-1 12 16 8 4 BL 2 242628 32 36 40 48 60 72 84 96 Proportion, % (95% CI) BL, baseline; CAB, cabotegravir; CI, confidence interval; EFV, efavirenz; LA, long-acting; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; RPV, rilpivirine; t½, half-life. Margolis et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:1145-1155. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

LATTE-2 Objectives Establish proof of principle for the first ever long-acting (LA) injectable HIV treatment regimen Primary Objectives Evaluate the safety and efficacy of CAB LA + RPV LA as maintenance therapy Select a dosing schedule of CAB LA + RPV LA for progression into phase III studies Key Secondary Objectives Characterize pharmacokinetics after depot injections Evaluate the tolerability and acceptability of intramuscular dosing Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

CAB 30 mg + ABC/3TC PO QD for 20 weeks Draft version 1-5 LATTE-2 Study Design Induction period Inclusion criteria >18 years old Naive to antiretroviral therapy CD4+ >200 cells/mm3 Exclusion criteria Positive for hepatitis B ALT ≥5 × ULN Creatinine clearance <50 mL/min Qualification for maintenance HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL between Week -4 and Day 1 CAB 30 mg + ABC/3TC PO QD for 20 weeks (N=309) Add RPV PO QD 4 weeks ABC/3TC, abacavir/lamivudine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; IM, intramuscular; PO, orally; QD, once daily; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; ULN, upper limit of normal. aSubjects who withdrew after at least 1 IM dose entered the long-term follow-up period. bSubjects can elect to enter Q4W and Q8W LA Extension Phase beyond Week 96. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

CAB 30 mg + ABC/3TC for 20 weeks Draft version 1-5 LATTE-2 Study Design Induction period Maintenance perioda CAB 400 mg IM + RPV 600 mg IM Q4W (n=115) CAB 30 mg + ABC/3TC for 20 weeks CAB loading dose at Day 1 CAB 600 mg IM + RPV 900 mg IM Q8W (n=115) CAB loading doses at Day 1 and Week 4 CAB 30 mg + ABC/3TC PO QD (n=56) Add RPV PO QD 4 weeks Day 1 Randomization 2:2:1 Week 32 Primary analysis Dosing regimen selection Week 48 Analysis Dosing regimen confirmation Week 96b ABC/3TC, abacavir/lamivudine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; IM, intramuscular; PO, orally; QD, once daily; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; ULN, upper limit of normal. aSubjects who withdrew after at least 1 IM dose entered the long-term follow-up period. bSubjects can elect to enter Q4W and Q8W LA Extension Phase beyond Week 96. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Baseline Characteristics: ITT-ME Population Q8W IM (n=115) Q4W IM (n=115) Oral CAB (n=56) Total (N=286) Median age, years 35.0 36.0 Female, n (%) 8 (7) 6 (5) 10 (18) 24 (8) African American/African heritage, n (%) 17 (15) 12 (10) 15 (27) 44 (15) CDC class C, n (%) 1 (<1) 2 (2) 3 (1) Median HIV-1 RNA, log10 c/mL 4.4 4.5 4.3 ≥100,000, n (%) 16 (14) 28 (24) 7 (12) 51 (18) Median CD4+, cells/mm3 449.0 499.0 517.5 489.0 CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ITT-ME, intent-to-treat maintenance exposed. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

LATTE-2 Week 48 Results: HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL by Snapshot (ITT-ME) Induction period Maintenance period Snapshot success D1 W32 Q4W 99% 95% Q8W 94% Oral 98% 91% Proportion of patients with virological suppression, % BL W-16 W-12 W-8 W-4 D1 W4 W8 W12 W16 W20 W24 W28 W32 W36 W40 W44 W48 Study visit Oral CAB induction (ME population) Oral CAB (n=56) Q4W IM (n=115) Q8W IM (n=115) Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48 ITT-ME (Snapshot) Virologic outcomes Treatment differences (95% CI) Oral IM Q8W IM -6.6 12.4 -7.6 11.6 Q4W IM Both Q8W and Q4W comparable to Oral CAB at Week 48a aMet prespecified threshold for concluding IM regimen is comparable to oral regimen (Bayesian Posterior Probability >90% that true IM response rate is no worse than -10% compared to the oral regimen). Observed Bayesian Probabilities: Q8W vs Oral = 99.7%; Q4W vs Oral = 99.4%. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Snapshot Outcomes: HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48 (ITT-ME) Week 48 outcome Q8W IM (n=115) Q4W IM (n=115) Oral CAB (n=56) Virologic success 106 (92%) 105 (91%) 50 (89%) Virologic non-response 8 (7%) 1 (<1%) 1 (2%) Data in window not <50 c/mLa 6 (5%) Discontinued for lack of efficacy Discontinued for other reason while not <50 c/mL 1 (<1%) b No virologic data in window 9 (8%) 5 (9%) Discontinued due to adverse event or deathc 2 (4%) Discontinued for other reasonsd 3 (3%) 3 (5%) aWeek 48 HIV-1 RNA Q8W: 50 c/mL, 57 c/mL, 97 c/mL, 110 c/mL, 135 c/mL, 463/205 c/mL; Q4W: 59 c/mL; Q8W: 5 of 6 remain in the study, 4 of 6 have HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at all subsequent visits through W80. bWithdrew consent: intolerability of injections. cQ4W: hepatitis C, rash, depression, psychosis, epilepsy, and Churg-Strauss vasculitis; oral CAB: hepatitis C, DILI. dQ8W: ISR; Q4W: pregnancy, prohibited medication, relocation; oral CAB: lost to follow-up, relocation, withdrew consent (wanted injections rather than oral tablets). Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Protocol-Defined Virologic Failure (PDVF): Genotype Maintenance perioda Q8W IM (n=115) Q4W IM (n=115) Oral CAB (n=56) Subjects with PDVF 2 (1%)b 1 (2%) INI-r mutations 1c NRTI-r mutations NNRTI-r mutations NNRTI—K103N, E138G, and K238T (FC RPV=3.3; Etravirine=1.9); INI—Q148R (FC CAB=5.1; Dolutegravir=1.38)c No additional PDVFs beyond W48 on any arm (all subjects through W72)d PDVF: <1.0 log10 c/mL decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA by Week 4, OR confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥200 c/mL after prior suppression to <200 c/mL, OR >0.5 log10 c/mL increase from nadir HIV-1 RNA value ≥200 c/mL. aOne additional PDVF without treatment-emergent resistance occurred during oral Induction Period due to oral medication non-adherence. bOne PDVF at Week 4: no detectable RPV at Week 4 and Week 8, suggesting maladministration. cOne PDVF at Week 48 at HIV-1 RNA 463 c/mL (confirmed at 205 c/mL). dContains data beyond W48. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Adverse Events and Labs— Maintenance Period ITT-ME population, n (%) Q8W IM (n=115) Q4W IM (n=115) Oral CAB (n=56) IM subtotal (N=230) Drug-related AEs, excluding ISRs (≥3%) Pyrexia 3 (3) 5 (4) 8 (3) Fatigue 2 (2) 4 (3) 1 (2) 6 (3) Influenza-like illness 5 (2) Headache 2 (4) 4 (2) Rash 3 (1) Grade 3 and 4 AEs, excluding ISRs 10 (9%) 13 (11%) 2 (4%) 23 (10%) Drug-related Grade 3/4 AEs, excluding ISRsa Serious AEs (none drug related) 8 (7%) 8 (7%) b 3 (5%) 16 (7%) AEs leading to withdrawalc 2 (2%) 7 (6%) 1 (2%) 9 (4%) Grade 3 and 4 labsd 18 (16) 23 (20) 9 (16) 41 (18) AE, adverse event; ISR, injection-site reaction. aQ8W: influenza-like illness, chills and pain; Q4W: influenza-like illness, rash, depression, and psychosis. bone death (epilepsy). cQ8W: ISR, ISR/chills/body pain; Q4W: Churg-Strauss vasculitis, hepatitis C, depression, epilepsy, psychosis, rash, and mesenteric vein thrombosis; oral CAB: hepatitis C. dMaintenance emergent. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

ISRs for CAB LA or RPV LA Over Time Draft version 1-5 ISRs for CAB LA or RPV LA Over Time Overall ISR AE Incidence Day 1 W 4 W 8 W 12 W 16 W 20 W 24 W 28 W 32 W 36 W 40 W 44 W 48 Weeks Subjects at visit Q8W IM 115 115 114 113 113 113 113 112 112 112 112 112 111 Q4W IM 115 115 115 114 112 111 109 109 108 107 106 105 104 99% of ISRs were mild (82%) or moderate (17%), and 90% resolved within 7 days Most common ISR events overall were pain (67%), nodules (7%), and swelling (6%) 2/230 subjects (<1%) withdrew as a result of injection reactions (Q8W) Bars represent incidence of onset ISR events relative to the most recent IM injection visit. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Patient-Reported Outcomes at Week 48: Maintenance Treatmenta How satisfied are you with your current treatment? How satisfied would you be to continue with your present form of treatment? 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 1% 1% 2% 8% 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 very satisfied very dissatisfied Note: based on observed case data set of subjects who completed Week 48 questionnaires. aHIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (HIVTSQs). Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Pharmacokinetics Both Q4W and Q8W steady state exposures approximate once-daily oral dosing Cτ, trough concentration; PA-IC90, protein binding–adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration; SD, standard deviation. Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Conclusions LATTE-2 results successfully demonstrate ability to maintain HIV-1 viral load <50 c/mL with LA IM CAB + RPV, dosed every 4 or 8 weeks Three subjects met PDVF criteria during maintenance Q8W (n=2), oral CAB (n=1); one Q8W subject with emergent RPV and CAB resistance Injection tolerability Majority of ISRs were Grade 1 to 2 pain, with a median duration of 3 days Few subjects had an ISR that led to discontinuation High overall reported satisfaction Dose selection Q4W dosing resulted in lower rates of virologic non-response with similar safety to Q8W Q4W dosing was selected for pivotal phase III studies Q8W dosing remains under evaluation within LATTE-2 Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.

Acknowledgments We thank everyone who has contributed to the success of the study All study participants and their families The LATTE-2 clinical investigators and their staff in Spain, Germany, France, Canada, and the United States The ViiV Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, PAREXEL, and Janssen study team members LATTE-2 was sponsored by ViiV Healthcare Margolis et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0206LB.