SNRPDP Self Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Advertisements

McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
Learning Communities in Nevada MPAEA 2009 Claudia Bianca-DeBay 1.
Action Research Opportunity Or Research Based Action.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Multiple Measures for Teacher Effectiveness
Issues Surrounding the Evaluation of Teacher Internship Programs Donna Barrett Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing Georgia.
Jefferson County Public Schools University of Louisville.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Evaluating Your STEM Outreach Program MISO Spring Workshop May 7, 2012 MISO Data Analytics Team Jeni Corn, Tricia Townsend, Alana Unfried
Local Evaluation Overview and Preliminary Findings Diane Schilder, EdD.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
St. Cloud Partnership in Mathematics Grant Presented by: Jona Deavel, Math Coach/7-8 th Grade Math Teacher and Jenny Merriam, Grant Coordinator.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.
Linking a Comprehensive Professional Development Literacy Program to Student Achievement Edmonds School District WERA December 4, 2008.
Copyright © 2011, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. SAS ® Curriculum Pathways ® Ralph Moore
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Projects #9, 17, 29, and 32 Mentor: Helga Bernard, Ph. D. Clark County School District School Improvement and Research.
Passport to Science MSP Science Program Indianapolis Public Schools.
Vae View Elementary School Improvement Plan
MSP Program Evaluation Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings 1/27/09 and 2/5/09 Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings.
Learning in Physical Science (LeaPs) Administrator Session Kim Zeidler-Watters – UK PIMSER 1/21/2010.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Lesson Study Lesson study is a particular form of job-embedded professional development that involves collaborative discourse among teachers over an extended.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching An overview by Olivia L. Boucher Robert J. Marzano Tony Frontier David Livingston Robert.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
TEACHER ORIENTATION BEGINNING TEACHERS AND TEACHERS NEW TO SCS.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Performance Goals Samples (Please note, these goals are not proficient- they are for training purposes) What do you think?
Jackie Wilson Gary Bloom Jill Baker Kelly An Damaries Blondonville
Cambridge Primary Parent Information Night
TEACHER ORIENTATION BEGINNING TEACHERS AND TEACHERS NEW TO SCS
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)
Designing Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Washington Township Public Schools
Model Demonstration Projects
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
What can be learned from CAL’s latest research on the SIOP model?
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation
Texas Regional Collaboratives
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
©Joan Sedita, Kinds of PD Follow Up ©Joan Sedita,
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Building Academic Language
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Presentation transcript:

SNRPDP 2016-2017 Self Evaluation Chelli Smith smithc@rpdp.net

Analysis Background & Framework To relate PD activities to student achievement, SNRPDP’s evaluation follows a four tier approach (Guskey, 2000) Participant Reactions Organizational Support and Change Participant Learning Participant Use of New Knowledge and Skills

Data Collection Efforts RPDP Trainers collected an appreciable amount of data throughout 2016-2017 that relate to the model: Detailed contacts logs Activity evaluations Pre and post test scores Qualitative artifacts and testimonials

Participant Counts 32,881 teachers and administrators were impacted by the Southern Nevada RPDP trainers 17,409 participants attended professional development offerings (classes, in service sessions, presentations, and workshops at a specific site), of which, about 52 are unique (unduplicated) participants (9,053). Regional trainers met with 1,273 teachers and administrators in planning sessions at the school, region, and district level to support planning to increase student achievement. 8,041 teachers and administrators had trainers model lessons in their classrooms, were observed by trainers to receive feedback on use of specific strategies, and/or experienced mentoring by SNRPDP trainers with about 2.4% (192)of these sessions providing NEPF-specific teacher assistance. Our trainers contacted and provided professional development for 3,570 administrators. Over 700 teachers were assisted by regional trainers through e-mail. This support ranged from answering planning and strategy questions to finding materials and strategies to support specific struggling students within the classroom. 7,491 contacts were made in rural counties (Douglas, Esmeralda, Lincoln, Mineral, Nye, and Washoe). These contacts included staff in service sessions, individual teacher assists, and planning both at the site and district level. 362 contacts were made during parental engagement sessions.

Training sessions by content area Literacy, English-Language Arts/ 198 TESL 6 Mathematics 238 Science 64 Technology & Multiple Content Areas 111 Administration 62 NEPF-specific Training Sessions 61 Total Number 740

Number of Participants Content Area Number of Participants Percent of Total Literacy-ELA 4668 27% TESL 149 1% Mathematics 5236 30% Science 2738 16% Technology/Online/ Distance/Multiple Content Areas 2631 15% Administrative 1007 6% NEPF Specific Training Sessions 980 5% TOTAL 17,409  

Professional Development Duration Number of Sessions Weighted Impact Factor (no. of session × hours) Percent of Total Weighted Impact Factors Less than 1 hour 21 0.4% 1 to 3 hours 188 564 11% Half day (4 hours) 192 768 15% Full day (6-8 hours) 178 1,424 27% 2 days or greater, including 1, 2, and 3 credit classes (15 hours or greater) 161 2,415 46%

Participant Satisfaction RPDP Activity Evaluation Questions Average 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 #1: The activity matched my needs. 4.6 4.7 #2: The activity provided opportunities for interactions and reflections. 4.8 #3: The presenter/facilitator’s experience and expertise enhanced the quality of the activity. #4: The presenter/facilitator efficiently managed time and pacing of activities. #5: The presenter/facilitator modeled effective teaching strategies. #6: This activity added to my knowledge of standards and subject matter content. #7: This activity will improve my teaching skills. #8: I will use the knowledge and skills from this activity in my classroom or professional duties.   #9: This activity will help me meet the needs of diverse student populations. Range: Score of 1 = Not at All Score of 3 = To Some Extent Score of 5 = To A Great Extent

Participant Learning   Average Normalized Pre/Post Content Survey Results Level and Content Area Mean Pre Test Mean Post Normalized Gain N Elementary School Literacy-English Language Arts 57% 76% 44% 276 Middle School Literacy-English Language Arts 54% 92% 83% 10 High School Literacy-English Language Arts 55% 94% 87% 44 Middle School Mathematics 89% 80% 29 High School Mathematics 74% 96% 85% 56 Middle School Science 66% 50% 16 High School Science 63% 75% 32% 30 TESL 58% 81% 296 Note: All posttest scores are significantly different from pretest scores and have less than a 1% probability of being due to chance variations (p ≤ 0.002).

Summary SNRPDP professional development activities result in increased teacher learning when: content training is supported at the school, region, and district level. Teachers reflect on their practice while undergoing sustained professional development. Sustained professional development focuses on the content teachers teach.