TMDL Implementation: Now What?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NPDES Phase II Permit City of St. Louis Park Annual Storm Water Informational Meeting April 16, 2009 Scott Anderson Superintendent of Utilities.
Advertisements

Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Burandt Lake TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Water quality in an urban lake 2/7/2008.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 Green Infrastructure – Community Vision March 14, 2013 Ensuring safe and clean water for all Americans Ensuring.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan CAC Meeting 2 - Implementation.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions CAC Meeting #3 July 30, 2012.
Golden Lake TMDL Critique Mayank Gupta & Karla Bussen.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Morgan and Little Creeks Local Watershed Plan Totten Center, NC Botanical Garden 3 November 2004 Chapel Hill, NC
Source Water Protection Plans A case study of the Ross Barnett Reservoir in Central MS.
Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Watershed Planning Group Meeting June 5, 2008 Carlsbad, CA.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
MS4 Permitting Process William Creal Water Bureau Permits Section Chief.
1 Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG) A Program that works to: – Streamline assistance and $$ to landowners – Coordinate activities of federal and state.
Karen Bickford, TMDL Coordinator
Julie Conroy, AICP, Senior Environmental Planner Metropolitan Area Planning Council.
Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Section 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Grants. Mission --- protect the quality of Nebraska’s water resources from nonpoint source pollution and improve.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
Bald Eagle Lake Watershed Stormwater Reuse/Phosphorus Reduction Project February 3, 2016 Kyle Axtell Water Resource Specialist & Project Manager Rice Creek.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Watershed Section Funding Pete Fastner Grants Coordinator Watershed Division February 3, 2015.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
© Amec Foster Wheeler Business Analysis for Canal Management Principles, Experience and Key Decision Points.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
Why the Need for Increased Stormwater Funding? Citizens expect a higher level of protection from flooding Increased development.
Bass Lake Protection Activity
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Storm Water Utility City of Durand.
Preventing and Reducing Pollution From MS4 Activities
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Metro’s Natural Areas: Maintenance Strategy Needed
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Development
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Watershed Section Funding
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Regulatory Requirements Background
Town of Melbourne Beach
MACo Winter Conference
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
City of Forest Lake MS4 Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
11/21/2018.
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
Watershed Management Plan Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2011
2016 BMP Incentive Program Proposed Changes
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Protecting Non-Impaired Resources
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Alternative Compliance for New Developments
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN
Presentation transcript:

TMDL Implementation: Now What? West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 TMDL Implementation: Now What? Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.

Outline What are the implementation requirements? Incorporating implementation plans into watershed and local water management Paying for implementation activities Adaptive management

Implementation Plans Every TMDL must have an associated TMDL Implementation Plan approved by MPCA The TMDL is one-time; the IP is a “living document” The IP identifies specific policies, activities, projects, and programs; costs; timelines; and responsibilities

Implementation Requirements Clean Water Act: carrot, not stick No specific timeline requirements: “adequate progress” MS4s have 18 months to incorporate implementation into their SWPPPs

Implementation Activities One-time or periodic Capital projects Maintenance projects Regulatory revisions Ongoing Public projects Maintenance Education and outreach programs Monitoring Land use planning & development Retrofit BMPs

Bald Eagle Lake Implementation Plan Implementation Action Responsible Party Schedule Estimated Cost Estimated Phosphorus Removal Coordination of Efforts RCWD Ongoing Varies N/A Annual Report RCWD, MS4s Every year $1,000 annually Rules and Standards Maximize Reduction Through Development RCWD, cities Promote Better Site Design  Ongoing Public Education RCWD, cities, property owners $2,500 annually Cost Share Assistance Current budget - $365,000 Monitoring RCWD, county $20,000 annually Watershed-External Load Reductions Publicly Owned and Institutional Properties BMPs Cities, counties property owners 0-20 years $2,500 - $25,000 each Residential Rain Gardens Property owners, RCWD $200 to $2,000 each; $75,600 - $189,000 to treat 15% of annual runoff 41 pounds/year when 15% annual runoff is treated Street and Highway Projects Cities, counties

Bald Eagle Lake Implementation Plan Implementation Action Responsible Party Schedule Estimated Cost Estimated Phosphorus Removal Golf Course Management Plans Golf course owners and managers, RCWD 5-10 years $20,000 each, $60,000 total Goal is zero discharge Improve Agricultural Management SWCDs, property owners 0-10 years Varies Complete Fish Lake TMDL MPCA 0-5 years $25,000 Load reductions to achieve the state standard of 40 µg/L Protect High Value Wetlands RCWD Ongoing N/A Monitor Outlet Wetlands $35,000 CD 11 Channel Stabilization Cities, RCWD $15,000 to $55,000 Storm Sewer In-line Treatment City of White Bear Lake, town of White Bear Lake $10,000 to $15,000 each White Bear Lake Commercial Area BMPs City of White Bear Lake $35,000 for assessment, $5-25,000 each for BMPs 17 lbs/year for sweeping 5-10 lbs per site for BMPs Pipe Outfalls In-line Treatment $31,200 each + $3,000 O&M <1 pound/year per device Highway 61 Linear BMPs Mn/DOT 10+ years Stillwater Street Reconstruction BMPs White Bear Township $486,000 28 pounds/year Regional Park Boat Landing BMP Ramsey County $19,800 + $1,800 O & M <1 pound/year High School Parking Lot Runoff School District, RCWD 14 pounds/year Shoreline Restoration Property owners 0-20 years $500,000 - $835,500 Internal Load– Alum Treatment $870,000 1,800 pounds/year Aquatic Vegetation Management Lake Association $20,000 annually

Implementation Planning An Implementation Plan is not a resource plan, it’s a watershed plan May need to rethink routine planning and maintenance activities Will need to spend more money May need additional planning or analysis to identify retrofit BMPs

Retrofitting Small BMPs Planning for small BMPs Detailed analysis by subwatershed Identifies most cost-effective BMPs and locations on a neighborhood or site scale Stormwater Retrofit Protocol-Metro Conservation Districts

Paying for Implementation Grant Funds Clean Water Fund (BWSR) Section 319 (MPCA) Total Maximum Daily Load Grants (Public Facilities Authority) Partnerships Storm Drainage Districts Storm Water Utilities Special Assessments County Tax Levy

Adaptive Management Adaptive Management Design Strategy Implement Monitor Evaluate Assess Progress Adaptive Management

Thank you!