Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation
Advertisements

ACTIVELY ENGAGING THE STAKEHOLDER IN DEFINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BUSINESS, THE STAKEHOLDER, SOLUTION OR TRANSITION Requirements Elicitation.
Overview of Nursing Informatics
1 User-Centered Design CSSE 376, Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology April 17, 2007.
Part 4: Evaluation Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what, where, and when Chapter.
Design and Evaluation of Iterative Systems n For most interactive systems, the ‘design it right first’ approach is not useful. n The 3 basic steps in the.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Analytical Evaluations 2. Field Studies
Usability Evaluation Methods Computer-Mediated Communication Lab week 10; Tuesday 7/11/06.
Joy Hamerman Matsumoto.  St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division manufactures implantable cardiac devices ◦ Pacemakers ◦ Implanted defibrillators.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
Evaluation Framework Prevention vs. Intervention CHONG POH WAN 21 JUNE 2011.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
Measuring the Effort for Creating and Using Domain-Specific Models Yali Wu PhD Candidate 18 October 2010.
UNDERSTANDING USERS: MODELING TASKS AND LOW- LEVEL INTERACTION Human-Computer Interaction
Ch 14. Testing & modeling users
Lecture 9 Usability of Health Informatics Applications (Chapter 9)
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2013 / Semester 1 / week 9 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Overview of the rest of the semester Building on Assignment 1 Using iterative prototyping.
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
Evaluation Paradigms & Techniques IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
Evaluation approaches Text p Text p
Overview of the rest of the semester Iteratively design interface to help people log their food intake over the long term.
Chapter 11 Analysis Concepts and Principles
Usability Testing CS774 Human Computer Interaction Spring 2004.
Comp 15 - Usability & Human Factors Unit 8a - Approaches to Design This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health.
Chapter 5 by Judith A. Effken
Innovation insight Peter H. Jones, Ph.D. Dayton, Toronto redesignresearch.com designdialogues.net A Bag of Tricks: What is the Right Mix of Methods?
Identifying needs and establishing requirements
Component 6 - Health Management Information Systems Unit 1-2 What is Health Informatics?
COMPSCI 345 / SOFTENG 350 Review for mid-semester test AProf Beryl Plimmer.
Chapter 12: Introducing Evaluation. The aims To illustrate how observation, interviews and questionnaires that you encountered in Chapters 7 and 8 are.
EHR Usability Standards, Tools and Frameworks Muhammad F Walji, PhD University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2006.
Design of Work for Patient Safety Pascale Carayon, Ph.D. Procter & Gamble Bascom Professor in Total Quality Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering.
User and Task Analysis © Ed Green Penn State University Penn State University All Rights Reserved All Rights Reserved 12/5/2015User and Task Analysis 1.
EVALUATION PROfessional network of Master’s degrees in Informatics as a Second Competence – PROMIS ( TEMPUS FR-TEMPUS-JPCR)
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 592 Spring 2005.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
1 Usability Analysis n Why Analyze n Types of Usability Analysis n Human Subjects Research n Project 3: Heuristic Evaluation.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
1 Design and evaluation methods: Objectives n Design life cycle: HF input and neglect n Levels of system design: Going beyond the interface n Sources of.
1 Presentation by I.D. PRASAD Chief Consultant (Corporate Development) APITCO Limited 8 th Floor, Parisrama Bhavanam, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. Ph: ,
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 15 Usability Evaluation
Sales Proposal for Prospect
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
Introducing Evaluation
Informatics 121 Software Design I
SY DE 542 User Testing March 7, 2005 R. Chow
Model based design.
Evaluation technique Heuristic Evaluation.
A review of ontology editor evaluation Presenter: Yujie Cao
Analysis of Software Usability Evaluation Methods
CS 522: Human-Computer Interaction Lab: Formative Evaluation
Evaluation Paradigms & Techniques
Usability Techniques Lecture 13.
Fundamentals of Human Computer Interaction (HCI)
Behavioral Assessment: Initial Considerations
Chapter 26 Inspections of the user interface
Comp 15 - Usability & Human Factors
Evaluation.
Human-Computer Interaction: Overview of User Studies
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5 Evaluation of Health Information Technology: Methods, Frameworks and Challenges By – Utkrisht Rajkumar Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5 Background An increase in Healthcare Information Technology spurred by American Reinvestment and Recovery Act Health information technology (HIT) implementation  mixed results Two main evaluation methods: Evaluation of systems: usability and human computer interaction Generic usability: comprehensive perspective of HIT systems in clinics Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

HIT Evaluation components: How we study effects of HIT on structure, processes, or outcomes? System functionality Impact of user interface on work activities Discovering specific interface and system issues that affect work Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Classification of evaluation methods Cognitive Information for Biomedicine – pg. 84 Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical Approaches Using usability experts, domain experts, software designers, etc. Three types: Task-analytic Inspection-based Model-based Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical Approaches Task Analytics Evaluate existing techniques to better understand rational behind: People’s goals of performing a task Motivations behind their goals How they perform these tasks Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical Approaches Task Analytics Hierarchical Task Analysis: Break into sub-tasks. Designed to identify specific training needs Used extensively in the design and evaluation of interfaces Cognitive Task Analysis Extension of general task analysis Used to develop a comprehensive understanding of thought process Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Classification of evaluation methods Cognitive Information for Biomedicine – pg. 84 Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical  Inspection based analysis Involves one or more experts playing the role of a user Used to identify potential usability and interaction problems Alternative to recruiting potential users to test the usability of a system. Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical  Inspection based analysis Heuristic Evaluation: Utilize a small set of experts to evaluate a user interface Based on their understanding of a set of heuristic principles Cognitive Walkthrough: Analyzing the behaviors of users as they complete a scenario of use Focused on identifying the usability and comprehensibility of a system Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Classification of evaluation methods Cognitive Information for Biomedicine – pg. 84 Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical  Model based Uses predictive modeling to measure efficiency of interfaces. Used for evaluating routine, expert task performance. Ex: How can the keys of a medical device interface by optimally organized? Used to compare the data entry efficiency between different interfaces Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Analytical  Model based Goals, Operators, Methods and Selection Rules (GOMS) predict the time taken to complete a task by a skilled/expert user Execution of tasks can be represented as a sequence of cognitive operations Fitts Law Predict human motor behavior Predict time taken to acquire target Ex: Develop predictive model of time to acquire a target using a mouse Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Classification of evaluation methods Cognitive Information for Biomedicine – pg. 84 Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5 Usability Testing Used for evaluating the usability of HIT systems Two types: Field/Observational studies General approaches Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Usability  Field Observational Shadowing A researcher following a participant over an extended period of time Focus on collecting data about a single participant Time and Motion Studies Deeper understanding of the impact of clinical work activities; Ex: changes on clinical efficiency due to the implementation of a new EHR system Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Usability  General Approaches Interviews Elicit information about opinions and perspectives of participants Opinion of the clinical workflow and opportunities for improvement Verbal think aloud Data on the thought processes that underlie human actions Surveys Widespread use to ease of administration and limited time required to complete Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5

Considerations for HIT Evaluation Integrated approach of multiple evaluation studies Preliminary considerations for evaluations: Environment of evaluation study Use of a framework to guide the evaluation process Challenges for conducting HIT evaluation studies Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5