Dr. Marty Hougen, CEEDAR Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
A Guide to Implementation
Parents as Partners in Education
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Response to Intervention: Tier 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators 1.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
National Center on Intensive Intervention Overview and Resources April 8, 2014 This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
Teacher Education Division Conference Tempe, AZ November 6, 2015
OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Leaders for All Learners: Reforming Leadership Preparation in Oregon
Georgia State University
Cross-Institutional Collaboration for Sustainability
Guidance on Construction
Practice-Based Approaches to Improving Teacher Education
NC State Improvement Project
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Practice-Based Approaches to Improving Teacher Education
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
The Year of Core Instruction
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Universal Design for Learning
How are HLPs used? Components of HLP identified.
Making All Teachers Better Teachers for Students with Disabilities
Visions of Community 2012 March 10, 2012
Meg Kamman & Erica McCray University of Florida Nichelle Robinson
Ohio Deans Compact Overview CEEDAR Webinar June 21, 2018
Lesson study: A practice-based approach for increasing preservice teachers’ instructional and collaborative skill for inclusive teaching.
Ohio Dean’s Compact Meeting September 14, 2018 ceedar.org
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Mary T. Brownell, Director
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
MTSS It’s Not Easy Being Green
Gifted Education Integrated in RtI Instruction Systems
Integrating Practice and coursework
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Ohio Presentation Building Ohio’s Community of Practice to Meet the Needs of All Learners.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Introductions Introduction
An Overview April 2012.
Integrating Quality Practice-based Opportunities within Campus-based Coursework and Field Experiences H325A
Essential Questions How can states, districts, and educator preparation programs work together to ensure equitable outcomes for diverse learners? What.
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

Cross-Institution Collaboration Focused on Educator Preparation and Effective Instruction Dr. Marty Hougen, CEEDAR Center Dr. Laurie Daily, Augustana University, South Dakota Dr. Andrea Zetlin, California State University Los Angeles www.ceedar.org H325A120003

Disclaimer This presentation was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H325A120003. Bonnie Jones and David Guardino serve as the project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or polices of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service, or enterprise mentioned in this presentation is intended or should be inferred.

Center for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform CEEDAR Center for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform OSEP funded 2012-2017 20 states

CEEDAR Center www.ceedar.org Mission: To improve core and specialized instruction in inclusive settings to improve achievement of students with disabilities

Goals Reform educator preparation Revise licensing standards Foster an aligned professional learning system COLLABORATE!!

Reading K-5 CEM Link to Reading CEM Videos & Handouts Slides with notes Features of Effective Instruction MTSS Instruction at Tier 1, 2 and 3 Data-based decision making Time permitting, show video of Ms. Pink

Cross-Institution Collaboration Focused on Educator Preparation and Effective Instruction Dr. Marty Hougen Dr. Laurie Daily Dr. Andrea Zetlin

CEEDAR Grant-South Dakota Broad SD Goal: Increase the ability of teachers and teacher candidates to [successfully/inclusively] address the needs of all learners through education, assessment, and accountability. Specific Target: Increased literacy rates for students with disabilities in grades 4-12

Augustana University 1 of 4 IHEs involved in the CEEDAR Grant work (Only Private University) Primary focus on in-service professional development Initial work

Collaborative Approach Expanded partnerships Expanding partnership with Learner’s Edge

Design Plan and Process CEEDAR Statewide Planning Meeting First steps New focus-Features of Effective Instruction

Seeing the workshops Main page Accessing the workshops

Data on Participation: 49 completers as of 3/31 By Course By number of workshops SD101-Explicit and Systematic Instruction with Modeling (47) SD102 Scaffolding Instruction (36) SD103 Multiple Opportunities to Practice and Respond (38) SD104 Immediate Corrective Feedback (36) Number of workshops completed Number of students All 4 workshops 32 3 5 2 1 12

More info on completers Majority from SD – About 90%; Of those 66% from Southeast region of the state 33% from all across the state Other places represented-About 10% Texas Nebraska New York Washington DC

Assessment Pre and post assessment (10 MC questions) Completed analysis mid-year Will complete end of year analysis 2 open ended questions on the final assessment What were the most important ideas that you learned from the workshop? (Quotes) How might you apply what you learned in your particular context? (Quotes)

Lessons Learned Marketing Delivery Assessment data collected Determining impact

Improving Instruction, Accessibility, and Outcomes Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS)   Universal Design for Learning (UDL)  Differentiated Instruction (DI)   Andrea Zetlin Ed.D. California State University, Los Angeles Division of Special Education and Counseling Annual Meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children Boston, MA April, 2017

Professional Development Module Objectives: Give instructors of candidates in teacher and administration preparation programs the opportunity to develop the knowledge and skills necessary to equip candidates with the practice of providing multi-tier instruction and interventions matched to students’ needs. Provide comprehensive PD in terms of three chapters: Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS), Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Differentiated Instruction ( DI). Each chapter features: principles and framework tips and strategies case studies and activities.

Professional Development Module (cont) All materials and resources in each of the 3 chapters are included for the dual purpose of: instructor professional development effective preparation of teacher and administration candidates in the skills needed to instruct and support all preK - HS students including: students with disabilities students who are English learners advanced students

MTSS – UDL – DI Overview MTSS provides a system and process for teams of general education teachers, special education teachers, parents, administrators and service providers to work together to address the needs of and personalize learning for all students so they can learn effectively, regardless of differences in ability. UDL is a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. “UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone--not a single, one-size-fits-all solution; but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs (National Center on Universal Design for Learning).” DI and assessment is a framework for effective teaching that involves providing diverse students with different avenues to learning (often in the same classroom) in terms of: acquiring content, processing and constructing ideas developing teaching materials and assessment measures

Multi-Tier Systems of Support (MTSS) Chapter MTSS Pre-Assessment Introduction MTSS Definition, Components, and Benefits Comparison of MTSS and RtI Example of Implementation Behavioral Tiered Support For Administrators Post-Assessment Measure Videos and Additional Resources

Multi-Tier Systems of Support (MTSS) Chapter (cont.) Critical Features of the MTSS Framework Universal screening Data-based decision-making and problem-solving Continuous progress monitoring Continuum of evidence-based interventions A core curriculum is provided for all students A modification of this core is arranged for students who are identified as non-responsive A specialized and intensive curriculum for students with intensive needs Focus on successful student outcomes

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Chapter Pre-Assessment What is UDL? Three Fundamental Principles of UDL Multiple Means of Representation Multiple Means of Action and Expression Multiple Means of Engagement Guidelines for UDL Implementation Activities Compare and Contrast Model UDL Lesson Plans Analyze one of your own lesson plans using the UDL self-assessment tool Videos and Additional Resources For Administrators Post-Assessment

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) What, How and Why UDL is a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. “UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone--not a single, one-size-fits-all solution; but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs.” –National Center on Universal Design for Learning "The term UDL means a scientifically valid framework for guiding educational practice that: Provides flexibility in the ways students are engaged (engagement), information is presented (recognition), and in the ways students respond or demonstrate knowledge and skills (action and expression), and..." -UDL: Theory and Practice, 2014

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Chapter DI Self-Assessment Overview of DI Principles of DI Ways to Differentiate Content Process Product Affect Learning Environment Misconceptions about DI DI in practice – Tips and Strategies Videos and Activities Critique sample lesson plan

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Chapter (cont.) Four general principles of Differentiated Instruction (C. A. Tomlinson, 1999): In differentiated classrooms, teachers... Create and sustain a responsive learning environment, providing the foundation for long-term learning and positive connections to take place among students and adults. Have clarity about the learning goals, sharing, with students, what they should know, understand, and be able to do as a result of their learning. Continuously assess student learning, using information about what students already know, understand, and are able to do to make ongoing instructional decisions. Establish flexible student groups and respectful tasks, providing rigorous and engaging instruction matched to student needs.

MTSS Module Link Link to the MTSS Module 

CEEDAR Resources/Tools Archived Webinars Innovation Configurations (IC) Reports & Briefs Course Enhancement Modules (CEM) Newsletter Conference Presentations Policy Tools

Closer Look: CEMS Disciplinary Literacy Classroom & Behavior Management Universal Design for Learning EBP for Students with Severe Disabilities Inclusive Education MTSS for Mathematics EB Reading Instruction K-5 School Leadership for SWD

Links to Modules MTSS: MTSS Module Effective Instruction: Learners Edge CEEDAR: www.ceedar.org

Thank you! www.ceedar.org Marty Hougen Laurie Daily Andrea Zetlin mchougen@ufl.coe.edu Laurie Daily ldaily@augie.edu Andrea Zetlin azetlin@exchange.calstatela.edu www.ceedar.org