NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department August 21, 2012.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Lincoln Public Schools Testing Year Scores New England Common Assessment Program Grades 3-8 and 11 Reading Math Writing.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Subgroup Performance Evaluation Using NYSED Accountability Data Elem/Middle Level Version Timothy Johnson Erie 1 BOCES.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
2012 Accountability Determinations
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Michigan School Report Card Update
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Texas State Accountability
Data Overview Sandtown Middle School
Rockville Centre Schools
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014

NYS School Report Cards Released late spring; initially embargoed and not to be shared with public Based upon student performance data for the 2012-13 school year Reflects the 3-8 NYS assessment outcomes presented at the September 10, 2013 BOE meeting

Understanding the School Report Card Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – indicates satisfactory progress by a district/school toward the goal of proficiency for all students Accountability group – a sub-group of students with similar identifying characteristics Students with disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically disadvantaged Racial sub-groups Performance Index (PI) – a value from 0 to 200 assigned to an accountability group, indicating how a group performed on a required state test. PI Calculation = 100 x levels 2, 3, 4 + 3, 4

District Facts Total K-12 enrollment 5,066 Number & Percent eligible for Free Lunch 283 or 6% Number & Percent eligible for Reduced-priced Lunch 101 or 2% Number & Percent Limited English Proficient 16 or >1% Number & Percent Students with Disabilities 655 or 13%

Elementary & Middle Level ELA Results for Accountability Student group Students enrolled Made AYP Tested 95% PI PI Target Met All students 2,456 ✓ 140 Native American or Alaskan Native 10 N/A Black or African American 36 100 Hispanic or Latino 118 Asian/Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Islander 39 145 White 2,324 141 Multiracial 11 Students with Disabilities 363 70 Limited English Proficient 5 Economically Disadvantaged 230 94 N/A = there were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period or there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data or the PI data is suppressed

Elementary & Middle Level Math Results for Accountability Student group Students enrolled Made AYP Tested 95% PI PI Target Met All students 2,453 ✓ 133 Native American or Alaskan Native 10 N/A Black or African American 36 83 Hispanic or Latino 97 Asian/Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Islander 39 132 White 2,321 134 Multiracial 11 Students with Disabilities 363 71 Limited English Proficient 5 Economically Disadvantaged 230 85 N/A = there were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period or there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data or the PI data is suppressed

Elementary & Middle Level Science Results for Accountability Student group Students enrolled Made AYP Tested 95% PI PI Target Met All students 820 ✓ 197 Native American or Alaskan Native 3 N/A Black or African American 10 Hispanic or Latino 9 Asian/Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Islander White 785 Multiracial 4 Students with Disabilities 112 185 Limited English Proficient 1 Economically Disadvantaged 68 190 N/A = there were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period or there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data or the PI data is suppressed

Secondary Level ELA Results for Accountability Student group Students enrolled Made AYP Tested 95% PI PI Target Met All students 423 ✓ 174 Native American or Alaskan Native N/A Black or African American 7 Hispanic or Latino 6 Asian/Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Islander 5 White 405 176 Multiracial Students with Disabilities 48 111 Limited English Proficient 1 Economically Disadvantaged 32 137 N/A = there were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed or there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort so PI Target data are suppressed.

Secondary Level Math Results for Accountability Student group Students enrolled Made AYP Tested 95% PI PI Target Met All students 423 ✓ 176 Native American or Alaskan Native N/A Black or African American 7 Hispanic or Latino 6 Asian/Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Islander 5 White 405 177 Multiracial Students with Disabilities 48 122 Limited English Proficient 1 Economically Disadvantaged 32 137

Spring 2014 3-8 NYS Assessments 3-8th grade ELA Assessments 3-8th grade Math Assessments 4th & 8th grade Science Assessments

Science Assessment Results Proficiency 2013 Proficiency 2014 Mastery 2013 2014 Grade 4 99% 97% 81% 78% Grade 8 96% 88% 64% 45%

2014 English Language Arts (ELA) & Mathematics Assessments Noteworthy to the 2014 assessments: Second year of assessments based on the new Common Core Learning Standards; State Comparison Charts (TBD by BOR) Test refusals

NYS 3-8 ELA Assessments % at proficiency (level 3 or 4) Grade 2013 2014 3 46% 52% 4 43% 47% 5 42% 41% 6 54% 40% 7 8 58%

NYS 3-8 Math Assessments % at proficiency (level 3 or 4) Grade 2013 2014 3 52% 65% 4 58% 62% 5 38% 6 43% 54% 7 37% 53% 8 26%

CDEP Goal: Increase the WNY ranking of students scoring at the mastery level on 3-8 state assessments (attain top 5 in Erie County) ELA Proficiency Rank Grade 3 4 Grade 4 6 Grade 5 5 Grade 6 9 Grade 7 Grade 8

CDEP Goal: Increase the WNY ranking of students scoring at the mastery level on 3-8 state assessments (attain top 5 in Erie County) Math Proficiency Rank Grade 3 3 Grade 4 5 Grade 5 4 Grade 6 Grade 7 2 Grade 8 7

Next Steps Provide academic support (i.e. AIS) to students scoring below proficiency levels Continue to implement the Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS) Modules as they are released by New York State Department of Education; Continue to secure resources and offer professional development to support the implementation of the CCLS; Analyze current assessment practices, and revise as needed to ensure the rigor and alignment expected through the CCLS; Utilize the Differentiated Instruction Coaches to help teachers to challenge students and increase our mastery rates; Focus on increasing mastery rates through expanding Honors and Accelerated placement opportunities.