Inspection Briefing SSCB Tuesday 21 March 2017

Agenda David - opening remarks Process to date and next steps Findings so far strengths, challenges, Key lines of enquiry (no surprises – they are our priorities!) Call for best evidence Remember YOUR SUCCESSES Breakout – dress rehearsal

Process to date DCS scene setting - strengths and weaknesses Front door and early help Last 10 into care/gone home, PLO Cultural safeguarding – private fostering, HBV, FGM CSE and missing Daily KiTs Met with SSCB Chair and other key leadership figures Identified 20 cases for audit and initial case tracking Clarification – Information v Documentation – ready to handover supervision files – always tell central team in debrief

Process – weeks 2 - 4 Week 2 Inspectors off-site Timetable planning and confirmation (Natasha Sharmah) Case auditing (both) Reviewing evidence (them) Week 3 More inspectors (6) EH, Child protection, care, care leavers, fostering and adoption Predominantly case sampling and leadership focus groups SSCB inspection (and week 4) Week 4 Bottoming out facts, figures for narrative “mopping up”

“How effectively the LSCB evaluates and monitors the quality and performance of local authority and voluntary partners in participating and caring for children, including provision of improvement advice”

Strengths – feedback so far Child focused evidence of child’s voice shaping practice and decisions SWM – clinical practitioners, direct work, group supervision, evidence based working (SofS) MASH arrangements and A&I including threshold application and decision making across contact, referral and S.47 Court work especially timeliness, appropriateness of CLA threshold, PAUSE and return home work Cultural safeguarding – FGM, HBV, Gangs Private Fostering

Challenges – Feedback so far Timeliness – contacts taking too long, children taken into care urgently and risk of immediate harm Missing and CSE work – practice is variable, evidence of intervention working but risk assessment and screening underutilised Strategy meetings – quality and too limited CAF – poor quality, being used as a referral form not an assessment Early Help – school facing, underdeveloped processes - is it “social worky enough?”

Key lines of enquiry – help and protection (…..and our priorities ) Early Help – is it “social worky enough?”, cusp of care, child U, step down from CIN, early neglect Quality of strategy meetings – limited agency involvement other than police and health and by phone Partners understand thresholds – contacts NFA, single front door, poor use of CAF Domestic abuse – impact on most vulnerable (CPP), intervention for perpetrators and engagement of fathers Child U – knife crime, youth violence, recognise that we need to overhaul our pathway early help to residential care for vulnerable adolescents

Key lines of enquiry – care and Careleavers (…..and our priorities ) Child’s journey to care – some needing to be accommodated under urgent care Stability and sufficiency of the right placements – especially for teenagers Mental and emotional health – what’s our offer, especially for tier 2? Variability and compliance of practice – PEPS, health assessments, care leaver annual review, etc

Key lines of enquiry – Leadership & management (…and our priorities ) Core Safeguarding work – section 11, LADO, performance management of quality of practice – front door, CIN, CP and LAC Responding to child U and adolescents at risk – early help offer for adolescents, knife crime, highly vulnerable and complex cohorts in care (youth violence, gangs, CSE and missing, and mental health issues) Impact of early help on reducing demand of statutory services – CIN step down, service offer for those most at risk, TAC/F, lead professional, etc Working together on shared priorities across adult’s and children’s board – vulnerable parents (domestic abuse, substance misuse, mental health), young carers, knife crime, PREVENT

Call for Best Evidence Bring your A – Game - preparing best evidence (narrative, documents, cases, data) Understand and align to what good looks like (grade descriptors) Make sure you can answer questions that demonstrate How we work us partners to safeguard children Training and development of staff within our agencies Compliance and development of policies and procedures How we challenge each other What we have learnt and done differently as a result of SCR and MRs How we use performance management and audit to shape priorities and challenge practice

REMEMBER YOUR SUCESSES Root and Branch of CSE – an example of great joint working to understand an issue and change the way we work as result FGM - engaging with community, adapting to new challenges as partners MASH – launch, development including of MAISY and review of effectiveness audit resulting in a new set up Private fostering – health and education subgroup improving practice in this area Core child protection – section 11, performance framework mutually challenging each other and setting priorities for us as partners All of the above underpinned by multiagency training offer and subgroup work

Best Evidence Rapid Round Successes (15 minutes followed by quick fire feedback) Best evidence Partnership working, subgroups, impact Priorities (and future work plan for board) What do you hope we achieve during this year? What it will mean for your agency? What it will mean for your subgroup?