EE379K/EE394V Smart Grids: Smart Grid, A Contrarian View

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Regulatory Assistance Project 110 B Water St. Hallowell, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
Advertisements

Efficient Pricing of Energy Conservation and Load Management Programs. August 9 th,2006 Kansas Corporation Commission Staff.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Smart Grid Primer Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Bar Association – Primer for Lawyers.
John B. Wharton, PE Technical Executive Baltimore, Maryland October 16, 2013 Perspectives on Grid-Integrated Microgrids Maryland Clean Energy Summit.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
1 Total Resource Cost Effectiveness Test Utility Brown Bag Series by Tom Eckman, NWPCC Ken Keating, BPA October 4, 2006.
Regulatory View of DSM/EE David Drooz Public Staff – N.C. Utilities Commission April 2015.
A Survey of Home Energy Management Systems in Future Smart Grid Communications By Muhammad Ishfaq Khan.
Value of Solar Tariff Will it work in Washington State? Ahlmahz Negash
Value and Cost of Distributed Generation ACC Staff Workshop #1 – May 7, 2014 Docket No. E-00000J DG Valuation ─ Lessons from the APS Distributed.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
Smart Grid Overview Ryan Egidi Integrated Electric Power Systems 11 th Annual SECA Workshop July 27, 2010.
Role and Components of Project Evaluation
Vermont Electric Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Draft Findings April 10, 2006.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
Smart Grid - Developments and Implementations Prof. Gady Golan – HIT, Israel Dr. Yuval Beck – HIT, Israel , Electricity 2012, Eilat.
Distributed Energy Resources The Energy Challenge of the 21 st Century.
Power IT Solution in KEPCO. com Contents Introduction 1 EIS in KEPCO 2 Results of EIS 3 Future Expansion 4 You can briefly add outline.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Overview of DSM Cost Tests June 25, Background Parties developed demand side resource performance standards for post 1994 program cost recovery.
Cost Benefit Analysis Costs Administration Equipment Incentives
Andrea Ricci - ISIS Brussels, 12 April 2012 Policy conclusions and way forward.
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
The Duke Save-A-Watt Proposal: An Economist’s Look James A. Polito, Ph.D. Director, Economic and Regulatory Analysis Indiana Office of Utility Consumer.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of BGE’s DSM Programs Marshall Keneipp, PE Summit Blue Consulting, LLC Prepared for: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Stakeholders.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
THE NEW GENERATION TRANSMISSION By Ashroo M. Das 6 th sem, EEE & Deepak Kumar 6 th sem, EEE.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
MTS Working Group DER Value Components (draft rev 2) Jan. 20, 2015.
© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Salvador A. Casente, Jr. Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer.
1. 2 Residential Solar Valuation Project SPI 2012: Solar Energy's Positive Impacts on the Electric System Karl R. Rábago Rábago Energy LLC.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
The Impact of Electric Utility Rate Structures on Renewable Energy
Energy Efficiency in the Developing World
Global Energy Problems and Counter Policies and Measures of Korea
RENEWABLES AND RELIABILITY
California Product Offerings
SMECO Demand Response filing
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Energy Saving Bureau Industrial energy audits in coherence with Directive on the promotion of end-use efficiency and energy services.
Matthew Wittenstein Electricity Analyst, International Energy Agency
Alternative Transactive Electricity Market Models
Presented to the NARUC 2013 Winter Meeting
NWA Suitability Criteria
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
Economic Operation of Power Systems
Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy
The Transition to a High DER Future
Sahar Rahim MS-Electrical Engineering Supervisor: Dr. Nadeem Javaid
Opportunities in the Changing Energy System
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
Distributed Solar Energy California´s Experience
Smart Grid Primer Energy Bar Association – Primer for Lawyers
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
California Solar Initiative RD&D PV Integrated Storage: Demonstrating Mutually Beneficial Utility-Customer Business Partnerships Deepak Aswani May 4, 2017.
EE362G Smart Grids: Architecture
Infrastructure Needs and Our Electric Grid for the 21st Century
DECISION
Konsta Ruokosuo Aitor Ossa
The Status of State Grid Modernization Efforts
Presentation transcript:

EE379K/EE394V Smart Grids: Smart Grid, A Contrarian View Roger Duncan Research Fellow Energy Institute Ross Baldick, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Spring 2017

Outline Smart Grid and Complexity Valuation of DG/Smart Grid Platform Model Issues AI and Autonomy Conclusions

Complexity and Smart Grid Failure due to complexity Flash Crash like NYSE Uber “surge” pricing Complicated rate structures Emergent behavior Privacy Ownership and control

Valuation of Distributed Generation and Smart Grid Benefit Cost Analysis California Standard Manual Participant Test Ratepayer Impact Measure Societal Test Utility Test

Background: Demand-Side Management (DSM) DSM encompasses mainly three energy and demand-reducing activities: Conservation: Using less of a resource By making a behavioral choice or change last for a short duration or may be incorporated into a habit or lifestyle Energy Efficiency: permanent installation of energy efficient technologies / elimination of energy losses in existing systems Demand Response/ Load Management: changing the patterns of energy use, at times of peak demand

California Standard Practice Manual (Oct, 2001) on behalf of different stakeholders’ interests conservation and load management (C&LM) programs five tests to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of programs Purposes: To help ensure that ratepayer dollars are prudently spent (if the benefit/cost ratio is larger than or equal to one, then the program is cost-effective) To help program managers make decision among resource/program options (larger benefit/cost ratios deliver more benefits per dollar)

Five Cost Effectiveness Tests Participant Test (PT) Ratepayer Impact Measure Test (RIM) Total Resource Cost (TRC) Societal Cost Test (SCT) Program Administrative Cost Test (PACT)

1. Participant Test (PT) Evaluates from the perspective of the participant (customer) compares bill savings against incremental costs of the efficient equipment measures a program’s economic attractiveness to customers used to set rebate levels and forecast participation Ignores benefit to the Utility or Society

1. Participant Test (PT)    

2. Ratepayer Impact Measure Test (RIM) Evaluates from the perspective of the non-participate of DSM program What happens to average price levels due to changes in utility revenues and operating costs caused by a program.

2. Ratepayer Impact Measure Test (RIM)    

3. Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) Evaluates from the perspective of an entire service territory a program passes the test indicates total resource costs will drop, and the total cost of energy services for an average customer will fall Most widely used test by regulatory bodies

3. Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)    

4. Societal Cost Test (SCT) Evaluates from the perspective of the whole society A variation of the TRC with the exception of including environmental externalities avoided pollutants water savings detergent savings other non-energy benefits

4. Societal Cost Test (SCT)    

5. Program Administrator Cost Test (PACT) Also known as the Utility Cost Test (UCT) Evaluates from the perspective of the sponsoring utility or program administrator Based on costs incurred by the utility Excludes net costs incurred by the participant The test ensures that the benefits to ratepayers will exceed the costs

5. Program Administrator Cost Test (PACT)    

Conclusion Benefit-cost testing can be informative, and useful for decision-making Reliance upon TRC for cost-effectiveness screening is very widespread, and it is the primary benefit cost test Combines most of the perspectives: participant, rate payer, and utility customers may be motivated by factors other than energy savings, and costs used in the tests are not necessarily directly tied to the energy benefits.

Value of DER Capacity Energy Reliability Ancillary Services Storage Demand Response Energy Efficiency

Value of DER to D Generally small Location Dependent Characteristics

Individual DER Value Decreases Distance Market Penetration Granularity of Measurement “Greening” of the Grid

Value of Solar Tariff Avoided Peaker Avoided Transmission Avoided Fuel Avoided Line Loss

Energy Efficiency and Smart Grid Main Components of Building Energy Efficiency, in order of importance: Building Envelope Appliance Efficiency Turning appliances on and off (Smart Grid)

Platform Business Model Platform for services Individual product increases in value with number of connections Customer growth Collect from both buyer and seller Reduce transaction costs New Products and Services

Platform Model in new Utility Business Models New York Reforming Energy Vision LBNL Studies Rocky Mountain Institute California Proceedings Transactive Energy model

Limited Applicability to Electric Distribution System Market Penetration and Value Customer Growth “Prosumer” – both buyer and seller New Products and Services

Smart Grid and distribution markets Facilitates markets Reduce transaction costs May not be robust Seasonal Minimal platform system revenues

Artificial Intelligence and Smart Grid Automation Autonomy Pass our ability to understand

Summary Reliability may go down due to complexity Value of DER will decrease as market penetration increases Integration of Smart Grid with IoT and AI may lead to security and privacy issues

Homework Exercise: Due April 27 4. In a high DER scenario values will move in the following direction: Savings on utility bills will move UP Financial incentives will move DOWN Saved taxes will move DOWN Customer Additional Cost Incurred will move DOWN Avoided supply Costs will move DOWN Program Administrative Costs will move UP

Homework Exercise: Due April 27 Revenue Losses will move UP Increased supply costs will move UP Avoided supply costs will move DOWN Avoided collection costs will move DOWN Revenue Savings will move DOWN Quantifiable Environmental Externalities will move DOWN

Homework Exercise: Due April 27 Given the above trends, review the following tests, assume the results are currently 1.0, and determine whether they would PASS (>1.0) or FAIL (<1.0) in a high DER scenario: Participant Test RIM test Societal Test Program Administrator (Utility) Test