Canadian Energy Research Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effects of Structural Change and Climate Policy on Long-Term Shifts in Lifecycle Energy Efficiency and Carbon Footprint Gouri Shankar Mishra Sonia Yeh,
Advertisements

IPCC Synthesis Report Part IV Costs of mitigation measures Jayant Sathaye.
The Economics of Energy Efficiency – Why It Makes Sense For Canada Carol Buckley Director General Office of Energy Efficiency April 12, 2013 Presentation.
Presentation to the Oslo City Working Group Meeting Session 5: Canada’s Energy Statistics John Appleby, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada February.
Energy Development in China - From a View Point of Sustainable Development Yang Hongwei, Zhou Dadi Energy Research Institute, P. R. China
Towards an electric-rail based transportation system for emission mitigation Dr Vaibhav Chaturvedi Research Fellow Council on Energy, Environment and Water.
Energy Security and Low Carbon Development in South Asia
The Canadian Economy in a Low Carbon World Sustainable Prosperity Big Ideas Conference Ottawa, April 28-29, 2014 Andrew Leach Enbridge Professor of Energy.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A Challenge for Engineers Ata M. Khan March 2002.
Modelling Long Term Hydrofluorocarbon Emissions Contribution to India's Global Warming Impact Mohit Sharma Junior Research Associate Council on Energy,
Developing the Next Generation of Energy Scenarios for California Guido Franco Team Lead for Climate Change and Environmental Research Sonya Ziaja Research.
Maryland Climate Change Commission USM Overview Session on Sustainability Don Boesch October 11, 2007.
Pathways Nebojsa Nakicenovic, IIASA and TU Wien On Behalf of Keywan Riahi.
Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Kyoto and Beyond.
The Virginia Energy Plan Overview and Climate Change Recommendations COG climate change Steering Committee November 28, 2007 Nikki Rovner Deputy Secretary.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY United The United States of America Schwartz, Swallow, and Wu Global Energy Consulting, Inc.
Policy questions to be addressed and structures of IMACLIM-CHINA Wang Yu Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy Tsinghua University 29 January 2015.
Greenhouse gas abatement, complementary policies and oil prices Paul Graham Manager Energy Futures Research, CSIRO IEW 2009, 19 June 2009.
1 Co-benefits of CO 2 Reduction in a Developing Country: Case of Thailand Ram M. Shrestha and Shreekar Pradhan Asian Institute of Technology Thailand INTERNATIONAL.
Energy Demand Analysis and Energy Saving Potentials in the Greek Road Transport Sector Dr. Spyros J. Kiartzis Director Alternative Energy Sources & New.
© OECD/IEA 2012 Washington DC, July 2012 Richard H. Jones, Deputy Executive Director Dr. Markus Wråke, ETP Project Leader, A clean energy future, is it.
The 2017 Update of the Vision Scenario
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
The Canadian Energy Research Institute and Friends of AIMS Present:
Kenya’s INDC: Actions in the Energy Sector
Dr. Gabrial Anandarajah, Dr. Neil Strachan King’s College London
Committee on Climate Change
Transport Emission Inventories & Projections
Global Energy Problems and Counter Policies and Measures of Korea
Betül Özer, Erdem Görgün, Selahattin İncecik
BIOENERGY IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION
Karl Vella - EURELECTRIC
Zero-Emission Transport for the “Coolest Little Capital”
International Renewable Energy Agency
Adequacy of Renewable Energy Policies: A Preliminary Assessment
LEVERAGING US EXPERIENCE: INDIA’s ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY ROAD MAP
Energy and Climate Outlook
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY SCENARIOS - BULGARIA
Clemens Schneider, Wuppertal Institute
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
Tracking fossil fuel subsidies in APEC economies
Trends in Energy and Transport
2-1 BAU Demand Atit Tippichai APERC Workshop at EWG 50
Robert Fabek Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, Zagreb
China’s climate policy initiative: an overview
Energy Technology Perspectives 2008
Sun Jae Professor of Engineering, Emeritus
Alternative scenarios
Energy demand modelling by IAMs
Illinois Climate Change Advisory Group (ICCAG) Modeling Sub-group An introduction to ENERGY 2020 April 26, 2007.
Energy in Denmark 2014 Danish Energy Agency.
MULTIPLE BENEFITS PATHWAYS APPROACH – EXPERIENCE FROM BANGLADESH
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
The Economics of Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS)
APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook 6th Edition 2-1 Introduction and Business as Usual Cecilia Tam, Special Adviser May 2016, EWG 51 Canberra.
Energy Efficiency and Renewables role in the future energy needs
36th USAEE/IAEE Conference Sept 23-26, 2018 Chris Nichols
Agriculture’s contribution to a carbon neutral Europe
Current State of Transportation Electrification
The Global Energy Outlook
The Unexpected Benefits of Climate Action
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Ontario Industrial EPS Proposal IETA Insights for Ontario Stakeholders Clean Economy Alliance Webinar 15 March 2019 Toronto, Canada.
India Energy Congress 2013 Sustainable Sources of Energy February 2013.
WECC 2019 Scenario Demand-Side Models
Implementation Update: 2017 Scoping Plan
June, 1st 2019 How to model the benefits of behavioral shifts in the transportation sector? Marianne Pedinotti-Castelle†1, Kathleen Vaillancourt2, Pierre-Olivier.
Industrial Value Chain: A Bridge Towards a Carbon Neutral Europe
A Clean Planet for all A European strategic long term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.
A Low Carbon Future of Transport: an Integrated Transport Model Coupling with Computable General Equilibrium Model Shiyu Yan (Economic and Social Research.
Presentation transcript:

Canadian Energy Research Institute Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions in Canada through Electrification of Energy Services Allan Fogwill November 2016 Relevant • Independent • Objective www.ceri.ca

Canadian Energy Research Institute Overview Founded in 1975, the Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) is an independent, non-profit research Institute specializing in the analysis of energy economics and related environmental policy issues in the energy production, transportation, and consumption sectors. Our mission is to provide relevant, independent, and objective economic research of energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, academia and the public.

Current Sponsors Supporters include: In-kind support is also provided:

Introduction Electrification of end use energy services is seen as a “technology path” to economy wide GHG emissions resections Manage emissions in hundreds of point sources – not several thousands of distributed emitters (buildings, vehicles, etc.) Proven technology exists to decarbonize power generation Such an economy wide energy transition requires: changing the existing infrastructure across all sectors of the economy (infrastructure inertia) much larger electricity generation and transmission infrastructure than today

Why Electrify ? A "Technology Path" for decarbonization Deeper emissions reductions require major transformations in way we source final energy services RCP 3PD/2.6 represents emissions trajectory that aligns with 1.5 degree global temperature stabilization. In order to follow that emissions path, carbon intensity of energy as well as energy intensity of the economy need to go down significantly by end of the century We are looking at an energy system that is very different that today. Figure source: Van Vuuren, P., et al. “The Representative Concentration Pathways: An Overview.” Climatic Change 109 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z

Why Electrify ? Technology push Evolution of the global electric car stock, 2010-15 Source: IEA Global EV Outlook, 2016 Source: CERI

Objectives To assess economic and environmental impacts of electrifying energy end use services in Canada: 10 provinces 3 sectors: residential, commercial, passenger transportation We focus on energy end use services that can be electrified by utilizing commercially ready technologies or ones that can be commercialized within a decade or less

Main Research Questions Is it technically feasible? With proven technologies What major transitions in the energy systems are required? How deeper the emissions reductions that can be achieved through electrification of energy services? What would it cost? This presentation is based on Alberta, Ontario, and Atlantic provinces

Methods A stock-rollover model that simulates physical infrastructure Annual time steps with equipment lifetimes: 2020-2050 Simulate energy consumption at an aggregated level (housing stock, vehicle stock, etc. ) Takes into account infrastructure inertia Build scenarios to explore emissions reduction options We mainly use a stock-rollover methodology that simulate physical infrastructure Simulate energy consumption at an aggregated level (housing stock, vehicle stock, etc. ) Build scenarios to explore emissions reduction options

Methods: Scenarios

Residential Sector Stock Rollover Model Track (by type and vintage) and simulate the infrastructure rollover & energy demand in four housing types and 4 energy end use services

Transportation Sector Due to data limitations, passenger road transportation sector energy consumption is tracked by vehicle miles travelled by mode of transportation and by fuel

Illustrative Stock Rollover Example Energy service demand x Energy service demand

Mitigation measures: Electrification Residential sector: Full stock rollover model, electrification implemented Commercial sector: Partial stock rollover model (by service sector & energy demand), electrification implemented Passenger transportation: Partial stock rollover model (by mode of transportation), electrification implemented Freight transportation: No electrification Industrial: No electrification

Results

Residential Sector: Fuel demand

Road Passenger Transportation: Fuel demand

Commercial Sector: Fuel demand

Electricity Demand: Electrified Sectors x 2 times x 1.5 times x 2.5 times

Emissions & Cost

GHG Emissions: Electrified Demand Sectors

GHG Emissions: All Demand Sectors Majority of demand side emissions are from non electrified sectors (ie. industrial, freight transportation)

Mitigated and Remaining Emissions Emissions reductions achievable by electrifying following sectors: Remaining emissions are from industrial, freight transportation, electricity, and not electrified stock of residential, commercial, and passenger transportation sectors

What Would it Cost (in Alberta)? By 2050, Under electrification scenario, electricity generation infrastructure is 2 times that of BAU scenario Scenario Demand side Electricity supply Cumulative cost of electricity1 (billion 2014 CAD) Cumulative GHG emissions2 (million tCO2eq) Cost of avoided GHG emissions3 (CAD/tCO2eq) Increase in average cost of electricity in 2050 (% of S0) S0 Not electrify BAU 108 7551   S1 Electrify High renewables 244 (126% higher than S0) 6992 (7% lower than S0) 198 33% S2 High renewables + GAS CCS 234 (118% higher than S0) 7008 186 28% 0.4%/ year 0.9%/ year 1 Cumulative cost of adding new capacity and operating electricity infrastructure in the period of 2020-2050 2 In the period of 2020-2050 3 Calculated by taking into account capital cost of demand side mitigation measures and fuel cost savings.

What Would it Cost (in Ontario)? By 2050, Under electrification scenario, electricity generation infrastructure is 2.4 times that of BAU scenario Scenario Demand side Electricity supply Cumulative cost of electricity1 (billion 2014 CAD) Cumulative GHG emissions2 (million tCO2eq) Cost of avoided GHG emissions3 (CAD/tCO2eq) Increase in average cost of electricity in 2050 (% of S0) S0 Not electrify BAU 100 5022   S1 Electrify High renewables 271 (170% higher than S0) 3898 (22% lower than S0) 50 47% S2 High renewables + GAS CCS No improvement 0.4%/ year 0.9%/ year 1 Cumulative cost of adding new capacity and operating electricity infrastructure in the period of 2020-2050 2 In the period of 2020-2050 3 Calculated by taking into account capital cost of demand side mitigation measures and fuel cost savings.

What Would it Cost (in Atlantic Canada)? By 2050, Under electrification scenario, electricity generation infrastructure is 1.5 times that of BAU scenario Scenario Demand side Electricity supply Cumulative cost of electricity1 (billion 2014 CAD) Cumulative GHG emissions2 (million tCO2eq) Cost of avoided GHG emissions3 (CAD/tCO2eq) Increase in average cost of electricity in 2050 (% of S0) S0 Not electrify BAU 29 902   S1 Electrify High renewables 54 (86% higher than S0) 764 (15% lower than S0) 14 48% S2 High renewables + GAS CCS No improvement 0.4%/ year 0.9%/ year 1 Cumulative cost of adding new capacity and operating electricity infrastructure in the period of 2020-2050 2 In the period of 2020-2050 3 Calculated by taking into account capital cost of demand side mitigation measures and fuel cost savings.

Concluding Remarks Electrification provides a viable option to decarbonize residential, commercial, and passenger transportation sectors with current technologies Industrial sector remains the most significant contributor – we did not assess mitigation measures Electrification will profoundly transform the physical energy system Level of end-use energy services remains relatively unchanged

Concluding Remarks Cumulative emissions (2020-2050) reductions are: AB: 7%, ON: 22%, Atlantic Canada: 15% Viability of electrification as an emissions reduction measure depends largely on decarbonizing the power sector Coal to standard gas transition is not sufficient Availability Gas CCS lowered the abatement cost and total cost in Alberta Deeper reductions require mitigation measures in the industrial sector, freight transportation and further decarburization of the electricity sector

Canadian Energy Research Institute Thank you for your time Study will be out at the end of November www.ceri.ca Canadian Energy Research Institute on LinkedIn Twitter @ceri_canada