2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gallup Q12 Definitions Notes to Managers
Advertisements

Close Hold – Company Confidential – Not for Distribution Engagement Every Day: 2011 Engagement Survey – List of Q12 & SAIC-specific 2011 Engagement Survey.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
The Power of Employee Engagement
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Managers roundtable 9/25/2013
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Who is Sinking Your Boat?
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
The State of Maine Managerial Effectiveness Survey Results.
SOLUTIONS FOR YOU: The Belief System of Motivation and Performance  The foundation of Green’s Motivation Management  Based on Victor Vroom’s expectancy.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Motivating Employees Tips and Tactics for Supervisors.
Team assignment 12 TEAM 3 – K15T1 Hanh Luong – Leader – T Hao Tran – T Huy Nguyen – T Hieu Le – T Quang Nguyen – T
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 23, 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) From Results to Action Presented by: Kim Haney-Brown.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
2012 Employee Engagement Survey September What is Employee Engagement? Employee engagement is about: Motivated employees Employees who are passionate.
Engagement Reflection and Planning
Gallup Employee Engagement Survey 2015
The High Cost of Low Morale
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Items in red require your input
MHCC Employee Satisfaction Survey
Monitor Pulse Survey 2014 Results
Engaging Constituents: Using Assessment Data to Inform Practice
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
UCSF Campus Life Services Organizational Climate Survey
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Strategic Performance Management
How to “Really” Put Your Employees First
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Change is Hard! Incorporating Values to Keep Staff Motivated
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Items in red require your input
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006
Employee Engagement 2018 Example of analysis report
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Senate Ad hoc Committee for the Assessment of the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) Faculty Survey Report on Findings Felicia Lassk, Associate.
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey
Departure View Glossary
Employee Engagement Defined
Organization-level Results
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
BUSINESS LEADERSHIP Describe leadership traits and actions
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Employee Engagement Survey 2015 Town of Chapel Hill
Presentation transcript:

2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey August, 2016 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Survey Objectives Determine… overall employee satisfaction key drivers of satisfaction interdepartmental satisfaction levels district satisfaction levels employee perceptions of key issues NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Methodology Online survey sent to 133 employees Paper surveys for 36 employees without email Three reminders sent to increase participation 77% of employees completed the survey Analyzed two tenure groups Short tenure = Under 7 years with DREMC Long tenure = Over 7 years with DREMC NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Overall Satisfaction

Overall Satisfaction is Good Majority of employees are satisfied Only one-tenth are dissatisfied Shorter tenured employees are more satisfied than longer tenured Overall Mean = 4.01 Shorter Tenure = 4.19 Longer Tenure = 3.92 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Key Drivers of Satisfaction Valued Employee – 0.27 Had opportunities at work to learn and grow in the last year I enjoy coming to work My work is valued by the Cooperative My work is rewarding My opinion seems to count at work I feel like a valued member of my team I have input into the decision-making process Management listens to my ideas Management respects me and treats me well I see an opportunity for advancement/ promotion here Pride in Job and Co-op – 0.27 I am proud to work for Duck River EMC I am motivated to work together with other employees and departments to achieve the strategic plan The mission and purpose of DREMC makes me feel my job is important I would like to continue working at Duck River EMC until I reach retirement I think DREMC’s plans for the future are going in the right direction Work Responsibilities – 0.20 My work responsibilities are realistic My work responsibilities are well defined NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Valued Employee Low ratings on most, 8 of 10 have means below 4.0 Perceptions of value and empowerment impact satisfaction Large differences between tenure groups Shorter tenure – good agreement with seven of ten statements Longer tenure – good agreement with only one statement Agreement is strong for… My work is rewarding (4.12) I enjoy coming to work (4.01) Biggest opportunities for improvement are… I see an opportunity for advancement/promotion here (3.15) I have input into the decision-making process (3.17) NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Valued Employee - continued Remainder of statements would benefit from improvement I have had opportunities at work to learn and grow in the last year (3.86) Management respects me and treats me well (3.81) My work is valued by this Cooperative (3.81) I feel like a valued member of my team/work group (3.72) Management listens to my ideas (3.51) My opinion seems to count at work (3.36) NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Pride in Job and Co-op Four of five statements rated positively I would like to continue working for DREMC until I retirement (4.50) I am proud to work for Duck River EMC (4.39) I'm motivated to work with other employees/departments to achieve strategic plan (4.23) The mission and purpose of the co-op makes me feel my job is important (3.98) Low rating indicates opportunity Plans for the future are going in the right direction (3.48) Smaller differences between tenures Keep up the good work NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Work Responsibilities Big differences between tenure groups Shorter tenure employees agree with both statements Longer tenure employees’ ratings indicate opportunity My work responsibilities are well defined All Employees – mean rating = 3.98 Shorter tenure – mean rating = 4.24 Longer tenure – mean rating = 3.88 My work responsibilities are realistic All Employees – mean rating = 3.85 Shorter tenure – mean rating = 4.22 Longer tenure – mean rating = 3.70 Employees identify equitable treatment as an issue NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Strengths and Weaknesses

Indicators of Engagement Overall Strengths Mean ratings close to or above 4.0 for 18 of 41 statements Four highest rated statements are: I would like to continue working at Duck River EMC until I reach retirement (4.50) I represent my cooperative even when I am off the job (4.46) My job is important to the overall success of my cooperative (4.45) I am proud to work for Duck River EMC (4.39) Receive positive ratings from both tenure groups Indicators of Engagement NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Strengths Among Shorter Tenured Employees Six statements with strongest agreement: My job is important to the overall success of my cooperative (4.59) I represent my cooperative even when I am off the job (4.58) My work is rewarding (4.54) My supervisor is very committed to our cooperative (4.51) I am willing to give some of my own time to improve my skills/job knowledge (4.51) I enjoy coming to work (4.49) Areas with the highest overall ratings are related to… My Job – average rating of 4.28 Our Mission and Strategic Plan – average rating of 4.18 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Strengths Among Longer Tenured Employees Four statements with strongest agreement: I would like to continue working at Duck River EMC until I reach retirement (4.59) I represent my cooperative even when I am off the job (4.47) My work is rewarding (4.54) I am proud to work for Duck River EMC (4.45) My job is important to the overall success of my cooperative (4.40) Areas with the highest overall ratings are related to… Our Mission and Strategic Plan – average rating of 3.97 My Job – average rating of 3.95 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Opportunities for Improvement Mean ratings close to or below 3.5 for 10 of 41 statements Lowest rated statements are: There is a great deal of cooperation/teamwork among departments here (3.08) I see an opportunity for advancement/promotion here (3.15) I have input into the decision-making process (3.17) I regularly receive recognition/praise for good work (3.21) Management has a positive working relationship with employees (3.22) Low ratings from both tenure groups, very low for longer tenure NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Opportunities – Shorter Tenured Employees Generally have higher levels of satisfaction compared to longer tenure employees Only three statement close to or below 3.50 Employees are kept informed of cooperative goals/objectives (3.43) I regularly receive recognition/praise for good work (3.49) I have input into the decision-making process (3.51) Areas with the lowest overall ratings are related to… Cooperative Management, Culture, and Communication – average rating of 3.88 Recognition, Development, & Opportunity – average rating of 4.04 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Opportunities – Longer Tenured Employees See Notes Opportunities – Longer Tenured Employees A number of opportunities for improvement exist Ten statement below 3.50, two under 3.0 There is a great deal of cooperation/teamwork among departments (2.92) I see an opportunity for advancement/promotion here (2.99) I regularly receive recognition/praise for good work (3.08) I have input into the decision-making process (3.08) Areas with the lowest overall ratings are related to… Cooperative Management, Culture, and Communication – average rating of 3.47 Recognition, Development, & Opportunity – average rating of 3.61 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Pay and Benefits Satisfaction Satisfaction with Pay is low 72% somewhat or completely satisfied Mean rating of 3.85 = opportunity to improve Shorter tenure = more satisfied Satisfaction with Benefits is very low 59% somewhat or completely satisfied Mean rating of 3.54 = opportunity to improve Long tenure = more satisfied Insurance/Benefits identified as an issue by employees NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Improvements Are Noticed, More To Do Fifty-nine percent of employees have seen improvements Tool & Technology Upgrades – 40% Safety Focus – 36% Employee Engagement – 32% Health / Medical Clinics – 30% Forty-five percent identified issues, most often… Equitable treatment of employees – 29% Communication issues – 17% Insurance/Benefits – 15% Poor employee interactions/morale – 12% Too much change – 12% NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Next Steps NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Where to Focus Satisfaction is good Foundation of an engaged workforce is present Key drivers identify areas of greatest impact Opportunities to learn and grow Employees want to feel valued Listen to employee feedback and input Empower employees where it makes sense Build unity, cooperation Make sure everyone knows and understands the plan Understand and address opinion gaps between tenures Benefits and insurance are a concern NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES

Market Research Manager 712-477-2617 Mike.Sassman@nreca.coop Questions? Mike Sassman Market Research Manager 712-477-2617 Mike.Sassman@nreca.coop NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES