F32 Postdoctoral Fellowship Panel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing a Fellowship Part 1. My Fellowship History In my third year as a post-doc fellow I received a Leukemia and Lymphoma fellowship for senior fellows.
Advertisements

NIH T-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Institutional Research Training Grants
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Grants (R15) SOT 2010 Mike Humble, PhD Program Administrator Division of Extramural Research and Training.
Early Stage Investigators and the Program Perspective
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
DIVISION OF LOAN REPAYMENT Milton J. Hernández, Ph.D. Director Division of Loan Repayment OEP, OER Mapping your Career with NIH.
Overview of Mentored K Awards Shawna V. Hudson, PhD Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health UMDNJ-RWJMS The Cancer Institute of New.
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R15 AASCU November 5, 2009 Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Environment - Facilities/Equipment Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Fundamentals of NLM Grants National Library of Medicine Extramural Programs Updated 2015.
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
1 NIH Grant-Writing Workshop Leora Lawton, Ph.D. Executive Director, Berkeley Population Center Summer 2015 Dlab Workshop Session 5: Human Subjects and.
4/17/2017 Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for New and Early Stage Investigators (R35) Jon Lorsch, Director, NIGMS Peter Preusch, Program Director,
New Investigator (NI)  Has not been PI on a significant NIH research grant (R01)  Can have obtained small research grants (e.g., R03, R21), previous.
Mentor’s advice Peer advice Why a fellowship Write a Compelling story Pilot data Letters of recommendation What budget can be used for Goal setting MSTP.
SPA Updates 1 st Quarter 2015 February 19, :30 – 4:00 pm SOP N103.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
MAY 9, 2012 GRAFTON CAMPUS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES NIH Training & Career Development Awards - Fs & Ks.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
 Getting started  Elements of a research proposal  Tips  Timeline  Submitting your document as an NIH Individual Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research.
THE NIH SUBMISSION AND ASSIGNMENT PROCESS Suzanne E. Fisher, Ph.D Director, Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review January 2002.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Summary of NIH Enhancing Peer Review Implementation Changes to NIH Proposals due on or after January 25, 2010 Slide Content Provided by Dr. Michael Sesma,
NIH F-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Postdoctoral Fellowships
1 Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD NIH AREA Program Director NIH Regional Seminar Scottsdale, Arizona April 28, 2011.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Using the NCBI SciENcv application to generate NIH Biosketches in new format Hermanie Pierre-Noel and Silvia Pulido, Ph.D University of Central Florida.
Data provided by the Division of Information Services, Reporting Branch NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH) DATA BOOK Fiscal Year 2010.
Diego E. Rincon-Limas. Ph.D. GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant Writing for Biomedical Sciences University of Florida Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience.
JANUARY 10, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS – PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO GRANT MECHANISMS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
 Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D. Acting NIH Research.
Research Fellowships. Overview Introduction Why apply for a fellowship Finding the right fellowship The application process Assessment criteria for funding.
November 2015 The New NIH Biosketch. Outline  Formats/Templates  Rules  Instructions/Recommendations  NCBI Tools  SciENcv  My Bibliography.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
NIH Fellowships – Tips and Tricks for the Forms and Application Process Jenny Dahlberg, School of Veterinary Medicine
Michael Sesma, Ph.D. National Institute of Mental Health Early Stage Investigators and the Program Perspective.
NIH F31 Application Process
F32 Individual Fellowships, Early Independence Award
Early Career Research Funding
NIH Fellowships Overview
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Career Development Plan: the cornerstone of the K award
An Insider’s View: Writing Your Successful NIH Application
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Project Grant: Fall 2016 Competition
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
J. Kelly Byram, MS, MBA Program Planning Officer UNM HSC 10 April 2015
NIH Predoctoral Fellowship Information Session
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
K R Investigator Research Question
Successful Application
K Awards: Writing the Career Award Development Plan
NIH Predoctoral Fellowship Information Session
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Writing a Successful Career Development (K) Award. Paula Gregory, PhD
Presentation transcript:

F32 Postdoctoral Fellowship Panel Grantsmanship: F32 Postdoctoral Fellowship Panel May 27, 2016

http://bsdpostdoc.uchicago.edu/page/funding

NIH Research Funding Support by Career Stage Postdoc https://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/traincareer/pages/careerphd.aspx 3

F32: Ruth L. Kirschstein Postdoctoral Individual National Research Service Award The purpose of the Kirschstein-NRSA postdoctoral fellowship is to enhance the research training of promising postdoctoral candidates who have the potential to become productive, independent investigators in scientific health-related research fields relevant to the missions of the participating NIH Institutes and Centers. Due Dates: April 8, August 8, December 8 Eligibility: Permanent Resident or Citizen of the US Participating NIH institutes and centers: NCI, NEI, NHLBI, NHGRI, NIA, NIAAA, NIAID, NIBIB, NICHD, NIDCD, NIDCR, NIDDK, NIDA, NIEHS, NIGMS, NIMH, NINR, NCCIH (Check http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/contacts/parent_F32.html for details on institute participation and mission.) Duration: typically for 3 years. Awardees incur 2 years of payback. Repay year 1 by staying in research a 2nd year. https://researchtraining.nih.gov/programs/fellowships/F32 http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-14-149.html

F32: Competing applications, awards, and success rates Data and chart description for this slide can be located at http://report.nih.gov/NIHDatabook/Charts/Default.aspx?showm=Y&chartId=106&catId=13 FY 2015: 25% Success Rate http://report.nih.gov/NIHDatabook/Charts/Default.aspx?showm=Y&chartId=106&catId=13 5

Updates from the NIH Biosketch format - NOT-OD-16-080 Restructured application instructions - NOT-OD-16-084 How to Apply Application Guide - http://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide.htm#format# NINDS is restructuring their F and K awards. The last date of submission for standard F32 applications is Aug 8. New NINDS F32 only open to senior grad students and 1st year postdocs. K01 open to postdocs in years 2-4. NOT-NS-16-012

Grant Writing Resources NIAID Grant Resources https://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/traincareer/pages/default.aspx NIMH Grant Application Process http://www.nimh.nih.gov/funding/grant-writing-and-application-process/index.shtml FASEB Grantsmanship Training Program http://www.faseb.org/Professional-Development-and-Diversity-Resources/Professional-Development-and-Career-Resources/Grantsmanship-Training-Program.aspx

Application Components 1/3 Trainee 1/3 Mentor and Training Plan (incl environment) 1/3 Science (esp specific aims)

*More than Research  incorporate Training Goals Main Application Components Referees: 3 letters of reference are submitted by the writer on eRA Commons Letters of Support: from collaborators, co-mentors Mentor Statement Biosketch: yours and mentors. Includes grades and courses. Specific Aims - 1 page Research Strategy – 6 pages Responsible Conduct of Research – 1 page Goals – 1 page Activities planned – 1 page *More than Research  incorporate Training Goals

Review Process Center for Scientific Review (CSR) – Rosters are posted online with meeting dates http://public.csr.nih.gov/StudySections/Fellowship/Pages/default.aspx Assigned 3 reviewers (not familiar with details of your work, busy, overworked) from a study section Scientific Review Administrator Scores 1-9 are averaged to give an impact score Study section meets: best scored grants discussed first, final scores after discussion are given as a percentile Summary Statement of scores Institute Review Funding decision

Review Criteria Main Review Criteria Overall Impact Assessment of the likelihood that the proposed training will enhance the candidate’s potential for a productive, independent scientific career. Five Core Review Criteria Applicant Mentor(s), sponsors, collaborators Research Training Plan Training Potential Institutional Environment and Commitment to Training Additional Criteria – Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research

Five Core Review Criteria Fellowship Applicant Scholastic performance Productivity commensurate with career stage Aptitude and enthusiasm Clarity of stated career goals Letters of reference Mentoring committee for pre-docs is a plus 2. Sponsors, Collaborators, and Consultants Documented mentoring successes Expertise in the field Present productivity Funds available to cover research expenses Co-mentor to cover weaknesses Clearly defined roles for mentors and collaborators 3. Research Training Plan Significance & impact of the proposed research Logical hypothesis Clarity, feasibility and alternative strategies Stats, vertebrate animals, human subjects Sophisticated technologies and approaches Likelihood training will lead to publications and degree Appropriate for the applicant fellow’s stage of research development 4. Training Potential Is there individualized training that addresses weaknesses and career development needs? Will participants learn new technical skills, new design approaches? Do training activities match career goals? Will training confer an advantage to competitive? Will the applicant fellow receive requisite individualized and supervised experiences? 5. Institutional Environment and Commitment to Training Scientific environment Opportunities for collaborations within and outside institution if needed Resources available

What Reviewers Look for in Fellowship Applications Impact Exciting ideas Clarity of the research and training plans Realistic aims and timelines– Don’t be overly ambitious Brevity with things that everybody knows Noted limitations of the study A clean, well-written application

Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Reviewers are asked to state whether the proposed training is “Acceptable” or “Not Acceptable” Is there formal and face-to-face training? Are all ethical topics clearly depicted? Are faculty participating in the training? Will the total hours of training be at least 8 contact hours? Are future opportunities/refreshers for continued training listed? Does retraining occur every 4 years or at every career stage?

Details NIH Policies Stipend – follows NIH NRSA Levels FY 2016: $43,692 minimum Institutional Allowance - $7,850 includes health insurance Travel Allowance - $1,000 per year BSD Policies: Stipend supplement of $1,600 (increases to $1800 on 7/1/2016) Switch from Postdoctoral Scholar to Fellow http://bsdpostdoc.uchicago.edu/page/benefits-health-insurance

Extra slides

New NIH Format for CVs Important points are: Complete each section (A - Personal Statement; B – Positions and Honors; C – Contributions to Science; D – Research Support or Scholastic Performance) Include no more than 5 contributions to science with no more than 4 citations per contribution Ensure that if you include the optional link to a full list of your published work in a site like My Bibliography that the URL is public, does not require a login or personal information, and doesn’t link to websites that may violate page limit rules Do not include information, such as preliminary data, that belongs elsewhere in the application Follow NIH guidance on font type, font size, paper size, and margins (See section 2.6 of application guide) Use PDF format for your biosketch attachments Page limit is 5 pages or less Failure to follow the policy means NIH may withdraw your application from consideration (NOT-OD-15-095)

Section C: Briefly describe up to five of your most significant contributions to science. For each contribution indicate: Historical background that frames the scientific problem Central finding(s) Influence of the finding(s) on the progress of science or the application of those finding(s) to health or technology Your specific role in the described work   For each of these contributions reference: Up to four peer-reviewed publications Other non-publication research products, such as: Audio or video products Patents Data and research materials Databases Educational aids or curricula Instruments or equipment Models Protocols Software or netware that are relevant to the described contribution The description of each contribution should be no longer than one half page including figures and citations. Also provide a URL to a full list of your published work as found in a publicly available digital database such as SciENcv or My Bibliography, which are maintained by the US National Library of Medicine.

SciENcv – importing/populating

SciENcv – Citations/Support Output