Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: A, Frontal view. B, Right lateral view. C, Left lateral view. D, Basal view. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: A, Horizontal thirds of the face. B, The table compares the measurements of horizontal thirds in the present study with those of white subjects in the study of Farkas et al.2 Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: A, Vertical fifths of the face. The width of the eye is the measurement from the external canthus to the internal canthus; the intercanthal distance, the distance between the internal canthi; the nasal width, the distance between the alaa. B, The table compares the measurements of the present study with those of Farkas et al2 and Wang et al.3 Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: Width-length ratio, which is calculated as the nasal width (ala to ala) divided by the length of the nose (nasion to pronasion). The mean (SD) and median width-length ratios were 1.1 (0.2) and 1.1, respectively. Powell and Humphreys1 reported a mean width-length ratio of 0.7. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: In the present study, the mean (SD) and median nasolabial angles were 87.8° (8.87°) and 88°, with a range of 55° to 108°. According to Powell and Humphreys,1 the ideal nasolabial angle is 90° to 120° in whites. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: The Baum ratio, which is calculated by dividing the length of the nose, measured from the nasion to the subnasion, by the length of a perpendicular line from the pronasion to the vertical line joining the pronasion and the subnasion (X). Of the Chinese women in the present study, the mean (SD) and median of measurements using the Baum method were 3.0 (0.4) and 3.1, respectively, with a range of 1.2 to 3.9. According to Powell and Humphreys,1 the mean for whites is 2.8. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: Simons ratio, which is calculated by dividing the length from the subnasion to the pronasion by the length of the subnasion to the superior labium. Of the Chinese women in the present study, the mean (SD) and median measurements were 1.5 (0.4) and 1.4, respectively, with a range of 0.6 to 2.8. According to Powell and Humphreys,1 the mean for whites is 1. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: A, Columella proportions and lobule-base ratio, which is calculated by dividing the width of the lobule by the width of the base of the nose. B, The table shows the proportions for the Chinese women in the present study compared with those of whites.1 Ellipses indicate data not provided. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: Nostril orientation. Of the Chinese women in the present study, the mean (SD) and median orientation was 48.6° (10.9°) and 48°, respectively, with a range of 27° to 90° on the right side and 49° (10.9°) and 48.5°, respectively, with a range of 28° to 90° on the left side. The range for whites is 45° to 60° for both sides.1 Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: A, Aesthetic triangle. B, The table shows the angles in the present study compared with the white ideal of Powell and Humphreys.1 Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: The ideal white face has lips that are as wide as the distance between the medial limbi.1 Of the 100 Chinese women in the present study, the mouth was narrower than the medial limbi in 31, between the medial limbi in 61, and wider than the medial limbi in 8. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: Lower third of the face. The upper lip–lower third ratio is calculated by dividing the length between the subnasion and the stoma by the length of the stoma to the menton. Of the Chinese women in the present study, the mean (SD) and median upper lip–lower third ratios were 0.3 (0.1) and 0.3, respectively, which is the same as the ideal for whites,1 with a range of 0.2 to 0.6. Compared with the imaginary line, the upper lip was anterior to the Rickett line in 29, on the line in 32, and posterior to the line in 39, which is the ideal for whites; for the lower lip, it was anterior to the line in 49, on the line in 36, and posterior to the line in 15, which is ideal for whites. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: Of the Chinese women in the present study, the highest point of the eyebrows was at the midpupil in 5, the lateral limbus in 22, and beyond in 73. The lateral end of the eyebrow was medial to an imaginary line drawn from the alae to the lateral canthus in 5, on the line in 69, and beyond the line in 26. Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):113-120. Figure Legend: In the ideal mouth, the width of the lips (a) should be about 40% of the width of the lower face (b) (ie, a /b=0.4). Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © 2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.