Introduction to Coot Paul McEwan Ph.D. Evotec.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific & technical presentation Structure Visualization with MarvinSpace Oct 2006.
Advertisements

PLATON TUTORIAL A.L.Spek, National Single Crystal Service Facility,
CCP4 Molecular Graphics (CCP4MG)
Alexander J. Blake, School of Chemistry The University of Nottingham, Nottingham UK Refinement on weak or problematic small molecule data using SHELXL-97.
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. PDBeChem The Ligand Database.
Refinement procedure Copy your best coordinate file to “prok-native-r1.pdb”: cp yourname-coot-99.pdb prok-native-r1.pdb Start refinement phenix.refine.
Dictionary of ligands. Some of the web and other resources DrugBank: ZINC:
Recent developments 1) Tests (outlier analysis) and Bug fixing ( with Paul) 2) Regeneration of Values of Bonds and Bond-angles existing all structures.
Structure Validation using Coot Paul Emsley Mar 2007 York University of York.
Refinement of Macromolecular structures using REFMAC5 Garib N Murshudov York Structural Laboratory Chemistry Department University of York.
Chem Thermal Ellipsoids Remember that thermal ellipsoids can indicate problems with a refinement even when the R factors seem to indicate a reasonable.
Macromolecular structure refinement Garib N Murshudov York Structural Biology Laboratory Chemistry Department University of York.
Protein Primer. Outline n Protein representations n Structure of Proteins Structure of Proteins –Primary: amino acid sequence –Secondary:  -helices &
Ligands, dictionary and refinement Garib N Murshudov York Structural Biology Laboratory University of York.
Automated protein structure solution for weak SAD data Pavol Skubak and Navraj Pannu Automated protein structure solution for weak SAD data Pavol Skubak.
Refinement with REFMAC
Recommendations and Questions wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop Center for Integrative Proteomics Research, Rutgers 7/30-31/2015 Group D, Academic.
Bringing Structure to Biology: Small Molecules and the PDBe
CCP4mg Liz Potterton, Stuart McNicholas, Martin Noble, Jan Gruber.
Confab – Systematic generation of diverse low-energy conformers Noel M O’Boyle, 1 Tim Vandermeersch, 2 and Geoffrey R Hutchison. 3 1 Analytical and Biological.
Model-Building with Coot An Introduction Bernhard Lohkamp Karolinska Institute June 2009 Chicago (Paul Emsley) (University of Oxford)
Increasing the Value of Crystallographic Databases Derived knowledge bases Knowledge-based applications programs Data mining tools for protein-ligand complexes.
Authors Project Database Handler The project database handler dbCCP4i is a small server program that handles interactions between the job database and.
A Molecular Replacement Pipeline Garib Murshudov Chemistry Department, University of York 
BALBES (Current working name) A. Vagin, F. Long, J. Foadi, A. Lebedev G. Murshudov Chemistry Department, University of York.
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. A web service for the analysis of macromolecular interactions and complexes PDBe Protein.
Data quality and model parameterisation Martyn Winn CCP4, Daresbury Laboratory, U.K. Prague, April 2009.
Coot Tools for Model Building and Validation
Crystallographic Databases I590 Spring 2005 Based in part on slides from John C. Huffman.
REFMAC5 Roberto A. Steiner IFOM Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare Milan, Italy.
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. A web service for the analysis of macromolecular interactions and complexes PDBe Protein.
Ligand fitting and Validation with Coot Bernhard Lohkamp Karolinska Institute June 2009 Chicago (Paul Emsley) (University of Oxford)
Altman et al. JACS 2008, Presented By Swati Jain.
Virtual Screening C371 Fall INTRODUCTION Virtual screening – Computational or in silico analog of biological screening –Score, rank, and/or filter.
Protein Folding & Biospectroscopy Lecture 6 F14PFB David Robinson.
Ligand Building with ARP/wARP. Automated Model Building Given the native X-ray diffraction data and a phase-set To rapidly deliver a complete, accurate.
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. PDBeChem The Ligand Database.
Worldwide Protein Data Bank wwPDB Common D&A Project Full Project Team Meeting Rutgers March 16-19, 2010.
CCP4 Version The most recent version of the CCP4 suite is 4.1, which was released at the end of January 2001, with a minor patch release shortly.
How NMR is Used for the Study of Biomacromolecules Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis Interactions between biomolecules Structure determination.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Structural Bioinformatics.
Automated Refinement (distinct from manual building) Two TERMS: E total = E data ( w data ) + E stereochemistry E data describes the difference between.
Common Coot (Fulica atra) (Fulica atra) Common Coot (Fulica atra) (Fulica atra)
CommonCoot Common Coot (Fulica atra) (Fulica atra)
Common Coot (Fulica atra) (Fulica atra). More building with Coot クート オオバン.
PDBe Protein Interfaces, Surfaces and Assemblies
Common Coot (Fulica atra).
Refinement procedure for native structure
CCP4 6.1 and beyond: Tools for Macromolecular Crystallography
Complete automation in CCP4 What do we need and how to achieve it?
Structural Biology Laboratory
Protein Structure Prediction and Protein Homology modeling
Reduce the need for human intervention in protein model building
Crystal structure determination
1.b What are current best practices for selecting an initial target ligand atomic model(s) for structure refinement from X-ray diffraction data?
Virtual Screening.
CSc4730/6730 Scientific Visualization
Goals for Today Introduce automated refinement and validation.
Progress Report in REFMAC
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
Goals for Today Introduce automated refinement and validation.
Version 5.3 From SMILE string to dictionary (LIBCHECK): Now coot uses it Segment id is now used Automatic adjustment for weights Improved bond order extraction.
Garib Murshudov YSBL, Chemistry Department, University of York
Conformational Search
Atomic-Level Protein Structure Refinement Using Fragment-Guided Molecular Dynamics Conformation Sampling  Jian Zhang, Yu Liang, Yang Zhang  Structure 
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Coot Paul McEwan Ph.D. Evotec

Agenda Introduction The basics The various tool bars Ligands Starting out Obtaining the ligand structure Where are my ligands Fitting ligands Sources of help Tomorrows Practical Session

Coot Crystallographic Object-Oriented Toolkit A crystallographers workhorse interface Primarily developed by Paul Emsley (LMB) Contributions from numerous other authors Open source and designed to be easily learned Huge capability and this presentation will only skim the surface

Restraints Refinement Validation libcheck Acedrg cProdrg Grade AFITT Refinement Refmac Shelx Buster Phenix Validation Molprobity Mogul Refinement (restraints) and validation should go hand-in-hand. Not an afterthought

The Interface

The tool bar(model/fit/refine shortcuts) Which map? Additional restraints? Grab and drag Traffic light warnings

The tool bar(model/fit/refine shortcuts) Rotamers (low resolution “back rub” method) Extensions → Modelling → Rotamer Search “mutate” /change residue Add terminal residue Add conformation

Automation for bulk fitting tasks Secondary structures De novo modelling… Should you use Buccaneer? Waters Ligands… wait for it!

Validation Tools

Validation Tools

Validation Tools Ligands? Unmodelled protein? Incomplete model B- factors, weak density or poor fit? Probe/Reduce and Molprobity

Molprobity Amazing tool to look at geometry Coot plugin to interpret output and to make “problem-fixing” easier List of specific problems Coot visualisation

Ligands Building and obtaining restraint information for non-protein components

Ligand and Density... Protein-ligand complex models are often a result of subjective interpretation Combination of map quality and ligand restraints

Ligand Starting Point Drawing SMILES string For common “ligands” restraints may already be available in the CCP4 library

2D Ligand Builder External tools COOT Free sketch SBase search Eventually direct de novo Acedrg restraints from Coot ligand sketcher Stamp out fragments, change atom types, and has interactive SMILES string

2D Sketcher Structural Alerts

QED Score Quantitative Evaluation of Drug-likeness Bickerton et al (2012) Nature Chemistry

Ligand Utils “Get Drug” Get comp-id ligand-description from PDBe Uses network connection to Wikipedia Get comp-id ligand-description from PDBe downloads and reads (e.g.) AAA.cif (extracted from chemical component library) Drag and drop Uses network connection to get URLs or file-system files pyrogen restraints generation (Acedrg connection under development)

Ligand Utils – CCP4

Acedrg: Structural database is the Crystallography Online Database Bond and angle table generation Use tables to generate dictionaries Given a molecular description (mol, SMILES) Fei Long (Murshudov Group) Pyrogen: Based on: Refmac Monomer Library Base Tables MMFF94s Forcefield CCDC Mogul Available with Coot

AFITT AFITT (Openeye scientific) Combined automated fitting and restraint tool Most used restraint tool at Evotec Coot Plugin Utilisation of MMFF94 Steered towards low energy/strain conformations compatible with the density S. Wlodek, A.G. Skillman and A. Nicholls, "Automated ligand placement and refinement with a combined force field and shape potential", Acta Cryst., 2006, D62 (7), pp 741-749

Generating Conformers Using restraint information...

REFMAC Monomer Library chem_comp_bond loop_ _chem_comp_bond.comp_id _chem_comp_bond.atom_id_1 _chem_comp_bond.atom_id_2 _chem_comp_bond.type _chem_comp_bond.value_dist _chem_comp_bond.value_dist_esd ALA N H single 0.860 0.020 ALA N CA single 1.458 0.019 ALA CA HA single 0.980 0.020 ALA CA CB single 1.521 0.020 ALA CB HB1 single 0.960 0.020 ALA CB HB2 single 0.960 0.020

REFMAC Monomer Library chem_comp_tor loop_ _chem_comp_tor.comp_id _chem_comp_tor.id _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_1 _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_2 _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_3 _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_4 _chem_comp_tor.value_angle _chem_comp_tor.value_angle_esd _chem_comp_tor.period ADP var_1 O2A PA O3A PB 60.005 20.000 1 ADP var_2 PA O3A PB O1B 59.979 20.000 1 ADP var_3 O2A PA "O5'" "C5'" -59.942 20.000 1 ADP var_4 PA "O5'" "C5'" "C4'" 179.996 20.000 1 ADP var_5 "O5'" "C5'" "C4'" "C3'" 176.858 20.000 3 ADP var_6 "C5'" "C4'" "O4'" "C1'" 150.000 20.000 1 ADP var_7 "C5'" "C4'" "C3'" "C2'" -150.000 20.000 3

Ligand Torsionable Angle Probability from CIF file

Conformer Generation Non-Hydrogen Non-CONST Non-Ring

Chirality loop_ _chem_comp_chir.comp_id _chem_comp_chir.id _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_centre _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_1 _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_2 _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_3 _chem_comp_chir.volume_sign DRG chir_01 C7 C5 C8 O9 positiv Many compounds are chiral and will have a significant impact on the overall conformation

Chiral Centre Inversion Inverted chiral centre refinement pathology detection

Fitting Ligands Calculate> Other modelling tools> find ligands Simple interface Most recent interface is extended conformers automated real space refine

Cocktail Examples

Orienting the ligand

Orienting the ligand

Ligand Validation Mogul plugin in Coot Run mogul, graphical display of results Update/review restraints (target and esds for bonds and angles)

Why bother? 11,000 chemical compounds in the PDB! 1.65 Å 11,000 chemical compounds in the PDB! Analysis of structures in the public domain Iridium: A Highly Trustworthy Protein-Ligand Structure Database Drug Disc. Today, 12, 1270 (2012) 19% of the ligands in this data set contained errors wwPDB: Greater focus on validation tools for PDB

Parametisation issues... Perfect refinement with incorrect parameters → distorted structure Mogul - A knowledge-based library of molecular geometry derived from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) access to millions of chemically classified bond lengths, valence angles, acyclic torsion angles, and ring conformations

Assessing Ligand Geometry Accuracy CSD's Mogul Knowledge-base of geometric parameters based on the CSD Can be run as a “batch job” Mean, median, mode, quartiles, Z-scores.

Example Coot Ligand Distortion Score Residue Distortion List: plane O3 C19 C20 C18 C16 C15 C17 C13 C14 N2 C4 C5 O1 C3 C6 O2 penalty-score: 36.51 plane C2 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 penalty-score: 8.82 bond C13 to C4 target_value: 1.490 d: 1.432 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.058 penalty-score: 8.44 bond C4 to C3 target_value: 1.490 d: 1.436 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.054 penalty-score: 7.21 bond O3 to C19 target_value: 1.362 d: 1.318 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.044 penalty-score: 4.75 bond C19 to C20 target_value: 1.390 d: 1.433 sigma: 0.020 length-devi 0.043 penalty-score: 4.67 bond C1 to C2 target_value: 1.390 d: 1.428 sigma: 0.020 length-devi 0.038 penalty-score: 3.70 bond C4 to C5 target_value: 1.490 d: 1.454 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.036 penalty-score: 3.26 bond C13 to C14 target_value: 1.490 d: 1.456 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.034 penalty-score: 2.91 bond C15 to C13 target_value: 1.490 d: 1.458 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.032 penalty-score: 2.57 bond C16 to C15 target_value: 1.490 d: 1.459 sigma: 0.020 length-devi -0.031 penalty-score: 2.45 angle C13 - C4 - C5 target: 108.00 model_angle: 133.80 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 25.80 penalty-score: 73.93 angle O1 - C5 - C4 target: 108.00 model_angle: 126.59 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 18.59 penalty-score: 38.38 angle C13 - C15 - C16 target: 120.00 model_angle: 102.30 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 17.70 penalty-score: 34.83 angle O2 - C6 - N1 target: 108.00 model_angle: 122.80 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 14.80 penalty-score: 24.34 angle O2 - C6 - C3 target: 108.00 model_angle: 122.76 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 14.76 penalty-score: 24.19 angle C13 - C15 - C17 target: 120.00 model_angle: 133.33 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 13.33 penalty-score: 19.76 angle C4 - C13 - C15 target: 120.00 model_angle: 132.99 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 12.99 penalty-score: 18.76 angle N1 - C5 - O1 target: 108.00 model_angle: 120.48 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 12.48 penalty-score: 17.32 angle C15 - C13 - C14 target: 120.00 model_angle: 110.43 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi -9.57 penalty-score: 10.18 angle N1 - C6 - C3 target: 108.00 model_angle: 114.28 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi 6.28 penalty-score: 4.38 angle C6 - C3 - C4 target: 108.00 model_angle: 101.75 sigma: 3.00 angle-devi -6.25 penalty-score: 4.34 Residue Distortion Summary: 29 bond restraints 44 angle restraints sum of bond distortions penalties: 59.5697 sum of angle distortions penalties: 300.405 average bond distortion penalty: 2.05413 average angle distortion penalty: 6.82739 total distortion penalty: 405.304 average distortion penalty: 4.93116

Mogul Results Representation

Ligand Represenation Bond orders (from dictionary restraints) Be critical- are you sure? Check your chemistry Beware of issues such as tautomers, nitrogen hybridisation (planarity), protonation states… Are your assumptions correct for your restraints

Ligand Environment Layout 2d Ligand pocket layout (ligplot, poseview) New tools in Coot!

FLEV: Flatland Ligand Environment

Sources of help The Homepage, F.A.Q, documentation http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/Personal/pemsley/coot/ Coot Wiki http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/ccp4wiki/index.php/Coot The mailing list http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/coot.html Ligand validation (recommendations for best practise) Outcome of the First wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop. Structure. 2016 Apr 5;24(4):502-8. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.02.017.

Ligand Fitting Practical Handout with instructions Starting files Focus on Acedrg, jLigand and Coot Simple ligand fitting case If you have time please also give the in-built ligand sketcher to generate a *.mol file to feed into Acedrg More problematic case, restraint modification “Free play” opportunity to ask questions and try out other tools

Acknowledgements Paul Emsley Kevin Cowtan Bernhard Lohkamp Judit Debreczeni Libraries, Dictionaries Alexei Vagin Garib Murshudov Eugene Krissinel Greg Landrum Molprobity David Richardson Jane Richardson BBSRC & CCP4 Previous presentations