Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument ad Ignorantiam
Advertisements

Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Common Valid Deductive Forms: Dilemma P or q If p then r If q then s Therefore, r or s Example, Either George W. Bush will win the election or John Kerry.
1 Philosophy and Arguments. 2Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.
Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
1 Philosophy and Arguments. 2Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.
Arguments, Reasoning & Fallacies Robo Móro 13th PeWe Ontoparty, Gabčíkovo,
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Review: Logic. Fallacy: Appeal to Novelty New is better.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska. Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty.
The Bible is God’s message to all people. Lesson 1.
WELCOME! Course Expectations Respect  We will argue on a daily basis  Argue: Give reasons or provide evidence for an idea or theory, usually with the.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Rhetorical Devices Part 2
FALSE PREMISE.
The Science of Good Reasons
Term Review.  Using the same term/phrase with different meanings  Also known as “double speak”  Results in complete ambiguity ▪ It is the vocabulary,
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
Logic in Everyday Life.
The construction of a formal argument
Apologetics: Other Syllogisms Presented by Eric Douma.
LESSON 44 English 10H. WARM-UP Fighting the urge to crawl under her desk, Adriana looked at the clock, there was still a half hour left of class, more.
Effective Persuasion Avoiding Logical Fallacies. Avoid Logical Fallacies These are some common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your.
Don't Worry, Be Happy. Why You Need to Let Go of Worry 1.It's Unreasonable 2.It's Unnatural 3.It's Unhelpful 4.It's Unnecessary.
GGHS PHILOSOPHY 101 THE ARGUMENT FROM EVIL. FIRST VERSION (1)If God, were to exist then that being would be all-powerful, all knowing, and all loving.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. COINCIDENTAL CORRELATION Assumption that because one thing follows another that the one thing was caused by the other. Y follows X,
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Arguments
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Logical Fallacies.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
FALSE PREMISE.
Chapter 10 notes Logic and Reasoning.
How to Lie with Statistics
Deductive Arguments.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Fallacies of Logic A Mr. C Production.
Logical Fallacies ENGL 101.
Intro to Fallacies SASP Philosophy.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
How do we evaluate an argument for effectiveness?
Logical Fallacies Part 3.
Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Truth Tables Hurley
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
Midterm Discussion.
Lesson 44 English 10H.
Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions.
Logical Fallacies Part 3 “Non-logic”.
Intuitionism Explore and Evaluate the strengths and problems of Intuitionism as ethical language.
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
Patterns of Informal Non-Deductive Logic (Ch. 6)
God’s Word Part II.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Validity and Soundness, Again
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Reviewing last session: STRUCTURE OF AN ARGUMENT VALID ARGUMENT If premises are true, conclusion is true SOUND ARGUMENT A valid argument with true premises NECESSARY CONDITION Q is true only if P is true SUFFICIENT CONDITION If R is true, then S is true

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies fal·la·cy a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument. in logic: a failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Informal fallacy Formal fallacy

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Formal fallacy: Affirming the consequent Valid If P, then Q. P. Therefore, Q. Invalid If P, then Q. Q. Therefore, P.

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Formal fallacy: Denying the antecedent Invalid Valid If P, then Q. P. Therefore, Q. If P, then Q. not P. Therefore, not Q. P is sufficient for Q but P is not necessary for Q

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Informal fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: Peter is a bad person Premise 2: Peter says X Conclusion: X is wrong

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Subtypes of the ad hominem fallacy Poisoning the well – presenting adverse information about a target person with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says. Appeal to motive – dismissing an idea by questioning the motives of its proposer. Tone policing – focusing on emotion behind a message rather than the message itself as a discrediting tactic.

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: Peter is a genius Premise 2: Peter says X Conclusion: X is right

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: Everybody says that X Conclusion: X is right

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: You have said X Premise 2: X is not true Promise 3: People who say untrue things are liars Conclusion: You are a liar Response: No! You are a liar!

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: Peter says X Premise 2: X is wrong Conclusion: Peter is wrong

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: I don’t understand X Premise 2: What I don’t understand is wrong Conclusion: X is wrong

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: You can’t proof that not-X Premise 2: Things that you cannot proof are not true Conclusion: not-X is not true Premise 1: not-X is not true Premise 2: Either X is true or not-X is true Conclusion: X is true

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies If P, then Q. Q. Therefore, P. That’s a fallacy (affirming the consequent), but that doesn’t mean that “not P”

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies "Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?“ “Have you stopped beating your wife?”

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: All feathers are light Premise 2: What is light cannot be dark Conclusion: No feather is dark Refusing to give up personal freedom to help fight terrorism is un-American Giving up personal freedom to help fight terrorism is un-American

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: I am aware of X happening Premise 2: I am unaware of Y happening Conclusion: X is more likely than Y

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies 1. Erica: "How do you know that the bible is divinely inspired?" Pedro: "Because is says right in the third chapter of II Timothy that 'all scripture is given by divine inspiration of God.'" 2. Celibacy is an unnatural and unhealthy practice, since it is neither natural nor healthy to exclude sexual activity from one's life. 3. Thoughts are not part of the physical world, since thoughts are in their nature non-physical. 4. Happiness is the highest good for a human being, since all other values are inferior to it. 5. Of course smoking causes cancer. The smoke from cigarettes is a carcinogen.

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: X is f Premise 2: X is a part of Y Conclusion: Y is f

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Chen, Daniel; Moskowitz, Tobias J.; Shue, Kelly "Decision-Making Under the Gambler's Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires". The Quarterly Journal of Economics: qjw017.  related fallacies: the “hot hand” fallacy the “near miss” fallacy

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: A is too much Premise 2: B is not enough Conclusion: (A+B)/2 is the right amount also known as: Goldilock fallacy  Half way between the truth and a lie there is another lie 

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies Premise 1: If X happens, then Y will happen Premise 2: We don’t want Y to happen Conclusion: We don’t want X to happen

Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies