Bigtable, Hive, and Pig Based on the slides by Jimmy Lin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to cloud computing Jiaheng Lu Department of Computer Science Renmin University of China
Advertisements

Tomcy Thankachan  Introduction  Data model  Building Blocks  Implementation  Refinements  Performance Evaluation  Real applications  Conclusion.
CS525: Special Topics in DBs Large-Scale Data Management MapReduce High-Level Langauges Spring 2013 WPI, Mohamed Eltabakh 1.
Homework 2 What is the role of the secondary database that we have to create? What is the role of the secondary database that we have to create?  A relational.
Working with pig Cloud computing lecture. Purpose  Get familiar with the pig environment  Advanced features  Walk though some examples.
Parallel Computing MapReduce Examples Parallel Efficiency Assignment
Big Table Alon pluda.
Database and MapReduce Based on slides from Jimmy Lin’s lecture slides ( d-2010-Spring/index.html) (licensed under.
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Presenter: Guangdong Liu Jan 24 th, 2012.
Bigtable, Hive, and Pig Based on the slides by Jimmy Lin University of Maryland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share.
MapReduce and databases Data-Intensive Information Processing Applications ― Session #7 Jimmy Lin University of Maryland Tuesday, March 23, 2010 This work.
Hive: A data warehouse on Hadoop
Lecture 7 – Bigtable CSE 490h – Introduction to Distributed Computing, Winter 2008 Except as otherwise noted, the content of this presentation is licensed.
Google Bigtable A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Hadi Salimi, Distributed Systems Laboratory, School of Computer Engineering, Iran University.
7/2/2015EECS 584, Fall Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Jing Zhang Reference: Handling Large Datasets at Google: Current.
Bigtable, Hive, and Pig Data-Intensive Information Processing Applications ― Session #12 Jimmy Lin University of Maryland Tuesday, April 27, 2010 This.
 Pouria Pirzadeh  3 rd year student in CS  PhD  Vandana Ayyalasomayajula  1 st year student in CS  Masters.
CS525: Big Data Analytics MapReduce Languages Fall 2013 Elke A. Rundensteiner 1.
Distributed storage for structured data
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data
BigTable CSE 490h, Autumn What is BigTable? z “A BigTable is a sparse, distributed, persistent multidimensional sorted map. The map is indexed by.
Hive – A Warehousing Solution Over a Map-Reduce Framework Presented by: Atul Bohara Feb 18, 2014.
Inexpensive Scalable Information Access Many Internet applications need to access data for millions of concurrent users Relational DBMS technology cannot.
Hive: A data warehouse on Hadoop Based on Facebook Team’s paperon Facebook Team’s paper 8/18/20151.
HADOOP ADMIN: Session -2
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data F. Chang, J. Dean, S. Ghemawat, W.C. Hsieh, D.A. Wallach M. Burrows, T. Chandra, A. Fikes, R.E.
Google Bigtable Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Mike Burrows, Tushar Chandra, Andrew Fikes, Robert E. Gruber.
HBase A column-centered database 1. Overview An Apache project Influenced by Google’s BigTable Built on Hadoop ▫A distributed file system ▫Supports Map-Reduce.
Presented by CH.Anusha.  Apache Hadoop framework  HDFS and MapReduce  Hadoop distributed file system  JobTracker and TaskTracker  Apache Hadoop NextGen.
Introduction to Hadoop and HDFS
Hive Facebook 2009.
Google’s Big Table 1 Source: Chang et al., 2006: Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data.
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Google’s NoSQL Solution 2013/4/1Title1 Chao Wang Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay.
MapReduce High-Level Languages Spring 2014 WPI, Mohamed Eltabakh 1.
Google Bigtable Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Mike Burrows, Tushar Chandra, Andrew Fikes, Robert E. Gruber.
1 Dennis Kafura – CS5204 – Operating Systems Big Table: Distributed Storage System For Structured Data Sergejs Melderis 1.
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data 1.
Google Bigtable Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Mike Burrows, Tushar Chandra, Andrew Fikes, Robert E. Gruber.
Big Table - Slides by Jatin. Goals wide applicability Scalability high performance and high availability.
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Mike Burrows,
Hive. What is Hive? Data warehousing layer on top of Hadoop – table abstractions SQL-like language (HiveQL) for “batch” data processing SQL is translated.
CSC590 Selected Topics Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A.
Bigtable : A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach Mike Burrows,
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data Google Inc. OSDI 2006.
Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University EN Instructor: Randal Burns 24 September 2013 NoSQL Data Models and Systems.
Bigtable A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data.
Big Data Infrastructure Week 10: Mutable State (1/2) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States.
Image taken from: slideshare
Mail call Us: / / Hadoop Training Sathya technologies is one of the best Software Training Institute.
Bigtable A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data
Lecture 7 Bigtable Instructor: Weidong Shi (Larry), PhD
Pig, Making Hadoop Easy Alan F. Gates Yahoo!.
Hadoop.
Unit 5 Working with pig.
Distributed Programming in “Big Data” Systems Pramod Bhatotia wp
Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data
How did it start? • At Google • • • • Lots of semi structured data
INTRODUCTION TO PIG, HIVE, HBASE and ZOOKEEPER
Data Management in the Cloud
Large-scale file systems and Map-Reduce
CSE-291 (Cloud Computing) Fall 2016
Pig Latin - A Not-So-Foreign Language for Data Processing
Data-Intensive Distributed Computing
Introduction to PIG, HIVE, HBASE & ZOOKEEPER
Cse 344 May 4th – Map/Reduce.
Introduction to Apache
CSE 491/891 Lecture 21 (Pig).
Cloud Computing for Data Analysis Pig|Hive|Hbase|Zookeeper
A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data
Presentation transcript:

Bigtable, Hive, and Pig Based on the slides by Jimmy Lin University of Maryland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ for details

Bigtable

Data Model A table in Bigtable is a sparse, distributed, persistent multidimensional sorted map Map indexed by a row key, column key, and a timestamp (row:string, column:string, time:int64)  uninterpreted byte array Supports lookups, inserts, deletes Single row transactions only Image Source: Chang et al., OSDI 2006

Rows and Columns Rows maintained in sorted lexicographic order Applications can exploit this property for efficient row scans Row ranges dynamically partitioned into tablets Columns grouped into column families Column key = family:qualifier Column families provide locality hints Unbounded number of columns

Bigtable Building Blocks GFS Chubby SSTable

SSTable Basic building block of Bigtable Persistent, ordered immutable map from keys to values Stored in GFS Sequence of blocks on disk plus an index for block lookup Can be completely mapped into memory Supported operations: Look up value associated with key Iterate key/value pairs within a key range SSTable 64K block 64K block 64K block Index Source: Graphic from slides by Erik Paulson

Tablet Dynamically partitioned range of rows Built from multiple SSTables Tablet Start:aardvark End:apple SSTable SSTable 64K block 64K block 64K block 64K block 64K block 64K block Index Index Source: Graphic from slides by Erik Paulson

Architecture Client library Single master server Tablet servers

Bigtable Master Assigns tablets to tablet servers Detects addition and expiration of tablet servers Balances tablet server load. Tablets are distributed randomly on nodes of the cluster for load balancing. Handles garbage collection Handles schema changes

Bigtable Tablet Servers Each tablet server manages a set of tablets Typically between ten to a thousand tablets Each 100-200 MB by default Handles read and write requests to the tablets Splits tablets that have grown too large

Tablet Location Upon discovery, clients cache tablet locations Using a 3-level B+-tree Upon discovery, clients cache tablet locations Image Source: Chang et al., OSDI 2006

Tablet Assignment Master keeps track of: Set of live tablet servers Assignment of tablets to tablet servers Unassigned tablets Each tablet is assigned to one tablet server at a time Tablet server maintains an exclusive lock on a file in Chubby Master monitors tablet servers and handles assignment Changes to tablet structure Table creation/deletion (master initiated) Tablet merging (master initiated) Tablet splitting (tablet server initiated)

Tablet Serving “Log Structured Merge Trees” Image Source: Chang et al., OSDI 2006

Compactions Minor compaction Merging compaction Major compaction Converts the memtable into an SSTable Reduces memory usage and log traffic on restart Merging compaction Reads the contents of a few SSTables and the memtable, and writes out a new SSTable Reduces number of SSTables Major compaction Merging compaction that results in only one SSTable No deletion records, only live data

Lock server Chubby – Highly-available & persistent distributed lock service – Five active replicas; one acts as master to serve requests Chubby is used to: – Ensure there is only one active master – Store bootstrap location of BigTable data – Discover tablet servers – Store BigTable schema information – Store access control lists If Chubby dies for a long period of time… Bigtable dies too…. But this almost never happens…

Optimizations Log of tablets in the same server are merged in one log per tablet server (node) Locality groups: separate SSTables are created for each locality group of column families that form the locality groups. Use efficient and lightweight compression to reduce the size of SSTable blocks. Since data are organized by column(s) very good compression is achieved (similar values together) Tablet servers use two levels of caching Bloom filters are used to skip some SSTables and reduce read overhead.

HBase Open-source clone of Bigtable Implementation hampered by lack of file append in HDFS Image Source: http://www.larsgeorge.com/2009/10/hbase-architecture-101-storage.html

Hive and Pig

Need for High-Level Languages Hadoop is great for large-data processing! But writing Java programs for everything is verbose and slow Not everyone wants to (or can) write Java code Solution: develop higher-level data processing languages Hive: HQL is like SQL Pig: Pig Latin is a bit like Perl

Hive and Pig Hive: data warehousing application in Hadoop Query language is HQL, variant of SQL Tables stored on HDFS as flat files Developed by Facebook, now open source Pig: large-scale data processing system Scripts are written in Pig Latin, a dataflow language Developed by Yahoo!, now open source Roughly 1/3 of all Yahoo! internal jobs Common idea: Provide higher-level language to facilitate large-data processing Higher-level language “compiles down” to Hadoop jobs

Hive: Background Started at Facebook Data was collected by nightly cron jobs into Oracle DB “ETL” via hand-coded python Grew from 10s of GBs (2006) to 1 TB/day new data (2007), now 10x that Source: cc-licensed slide by Cloudera

Hive Components Shell: allows interactive queries Driver: session handles, fetch, execute Compiler: parse, plan, optimize Execution engine: DAG of stages (MR, HDFS, metadata) Metastore: schema, location in HDFS, etc Source: cc-licensed slide by Cloudera

Data Model Tables Partitions Buckets Typed columns (int, float, string, boolean) Also, list: map (for JSON-like data) Partitions For example, range-partition tables by date Buckets Hash partitions within ranges (useful for sampling, join optimization) Source: cc-licensed slide by Cloudera

Metastore Database: namespace containing a set of tables Holds table definitions (column types, physical layout) Holds partitioning information Can be stored in Derby, MySQL, and many other relational databases Source: cc-licensed slide by Cloudera

Physical Layout Warehouse directory in HDFS E.g., /user/hive/warehouse Tables stored in subdirectories of warehouse Partitions form subdirectories of tables Actual data stored in flat files Control char-delimited text, or SequenceFiles With custom SerDe, can use arbitrary format Source: cc-licensed slide by Cloudera

Hive: Example Hive looks similar to an SQL database Relational join on two tables: Table of word counts from Shakespeare collection Table of word counts from Homer SELECT s.word, s.freq, k.freq FROM shakespeare s JOIN homer k ON (s.word = k.word) WHERE s.freq >= 1 AND k.freq >= 1 ORDER BY s.freq DESC LIMIT 10; the 25848 62394 I 23031 8854 and 19671 38985 to 18038 13526 of 16700 34654 a 14170 8057 you 12702 2720 my 11297 4135 in 10797 12445 is 8882 6884 Source: Material drawn from Cloudera training VM

Hive: Behind the Scenes SELECT s.word, s.freq, k.freq FROM shakespeare s JOIN homer k ON (s.word = k.word) WHERE s.freq >= 1 AND k.freq >= 1 ORDER BY s.freq DESC LIMIT 10; (Abstract Syntax Tree) (TOK_QUERY (TOK_FROM (TOK_JOIN (TOK_TABREF shakespeare s) (TOK_TABREF homer k) (= (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL s) word) (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL k) word)))) (TOK_INSERT (TOK_DESTINATION (TOK_DIR TOK_TMP_FILE)) (TOK_SELECT (TOK_SELEXPR (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL s) word)) (TOK_SELEXPR (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL s) freq)) (TOK_SELEXPR (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL k) freq))) (TOK_WHERE (AND (>= (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL s) freq) 1) (>= (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL k) freq) 1))) (TOK_ORDERBY (TOK_TABSORTCOLNAMEDESC (. (TOK_TABLE_OR_COL s) freq))) (TOK_LIMIT 10))) (one or more of MapReduce jobs)

Pig-Latin

Example Data Analysis Task Find users who tend to visit “good” pages. Visits Pages user url time Amy www.cnn.com 8:00 www.crap.com 8:05 www.myblog.com 10:00 www.flickr.com 10:05 Fred cnn.com/index.htm 12:00 url pagerank www.cnn.com 0.9 www.flickr.com www.myblog.com 0.7 www.crap.com 0.2 . . . . . . Pig Slides adapted from Olston et al.

Compute Average Pagerank Conceptual Dataflow Load Visits(user, url, time) Load Pages(url, pagerank) Canonicalize URLs Join url = url Group by user Compute Average Pagerank Filter avgPR > 0.5 Pig Slides adapted from Olston et al.

System-Level Dataflow Visits Pages . . . . . . load load canonicalize join by url . . . group by user compute average pagerank . . . filter the answer Pig Slides adapted from Olston et al.

MapReduce Code Pig Slides adapted from Olston et al.

Pig Latin Script Visits = load ‘/data/visits’ as (user, url, time); Visits = foreach Visits generate user, Canonicalize(url), time; Pages = load ‘/data/pages’ as (url, pagerank); VP = join Visits by url, Pages by url; UserVisits = group VP by user; UserPageranks = foreach UserVisits generate user, AVG(VP.pagerank) as avgpr; GoodUsers = filter UserPageranks by avgpr > ‘0.5’; store GoodUsers into '/data/good_users'; Pig Slides adapted from Olston et al.

Performance on par with raw Hadoop! Java vs. Pig Latin 1/20 the lines of code 1/16 the development time Performance on par with raw Hadoop! Pig Slides adapted from Olston et al.

Pig takes care of… Schema and type checking Translating into efficient physical dataflow (i.e., sequence of one or more MapReduce jobs) Exploiting data reduction opportunities (e.g., early partial aggregation via a combiner) Executing the system-level dataflow (i.e., running the MapReduce jobs) Tracking progress, errors, etc.

Another Pig Script: Pig Script 2: Temporal Query Phrase Popularity The Temporal Query Phrase Popularity script (script2-local.pig or script2-hadoop.pig) processes a search query log file from the Excite search engine and compares the occurrence of frequency of search phrases across two time periods separated by twelve hours.

Use the PigStorage function to load the excite log file (excite Use the PigStorage function to load the excite log file (excite.log or excite-small.log) into the “raw” bag as an array of records with the fields user, time, and query. raw = LOAD 'excite.log' USING PigStorage('\t') AS (user, time, query); Call the NonURLDetector UDF to remove records if the query field is empty or a URL. clean1 = FILTER raw BY org.apache.pig.tutorial.NonURLDetector(query); Call the ToLower UDF to change the query field to lowercase. clean2 = FOREACH clean1 GENERATE user, time, org.apache.pig.tutorial.ToLower(query) as query; Because the log file only contains queries for a single day, we are only interested in the hour. The excite query log timestamp format is YYMMDDHHMMSS. Call the ExtractHour UDF to extract the hour from the time field. houred = FOREACH clean2 GENERATE user, org.apache.pig.tutorial.ExtractHour(time) as hour, query; Call the NGramGenerator UDF to compose the n-grams of the query. ngramed1 = FOREACH houred GENERATE user, hour, flatten(org.apache.pig.tutorial.NGramGenerator(query)) as ngram; Use the DISTINCT operator to get the unique n-grams for all records. ngramed2 = DISTINCT ngramed1; Use the GROUP operator to group the records by n-gram and hour. hour_frequency1 = GROUP ngramed2 BY (ngram, hour); Use the COUNT function to get the count (occurrences) of each n-gram. hour_frequency2 = FOREACH hour_frequency1 GENERATE flatten($0), COUNT($1) as count;

Use the FOREACH-GENERATE operator to assign names to the fields. hour_frequency3 = FOREACH hour_frequency2 GENERATE $0 as ngram, $1 as hour, $2 as count; Use the FILTERoperator to get the n-grams for hour ‘00’ hour00 = FILTER hour_frequency2 BY hour eq '00'; Uses the FILTER operators to get the n-grams for hour ‘12’ hour12 = FILTER hour_frequency3 BY hour eq '12'; Use the JOIN operator to get the n-grams that appear in both hours. same = JOIN hour00 BY $0, hour12 BY $0; Use the FOREACH-GENERATE operator to record their frequency. same1 = FOREACH same GENERATE hour_frequency2::hour00::group::ngram as ngram, $2 as count00, $5 as count12; Use the PigStorage function to store the results. The output file contains a list of n-grams with the following fields: hour, count00, count12. STORE same1 INTO '/tmp/tutorial-join-results' USING PigStorage();