J.Yue, D. Doll, X. Peng, M.Rindfleisch, Mike Tomsic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnesium Diboride Program Hyper Tech Research Inc. Mike Tomsic Magnesium Diboride Workshop April 2003 Research Partners: Ohio State University-LASM National.
Advertisements

1 Applied Superconductivity Research - University of Cambridge Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
3nd KEK-CEA Workshop on Superconducting magnets and cryogenics for accelerator frontier - 24/03/2009 Ceramic insulation for Nb3Sn accelerator magnets F.Rondeaux.
Interim Design Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16.
4m Undulator Design Concepts Amanda J Brummitt CCLRC RAL On behalf of the HeLiCal Collaboration.
Undulator R & D Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK BAW-2 SLAC Jan 2011.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
ARIES-Stellerator studies Magnet issues L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Cambridge MA May 7, 2003.
Superconducting Solenoids for COMET KEK Cryogenics Center, Osaka Univ. Kuno-san’s Team, J-PARC MLF Muon Group.
Stellarator magnets L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting March 8-9, 2004.
Aug 29, 2006S. Kahn T HTS Solenoid1 A Proposal for a 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. August 29, 2006.
Department of Materials Science and Engineering The development of persistent joints for MgB 2 -based conductors D. Doll 2, J. Yue 2, C.J. Thong 2, M.A.
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
Eucard WP 7.3 HFM Winding and tooling tests Insulation choice F.Rondeaux /01/2011 Dipole design review- II-8 Winding and tooling tests – insulation.
1 A Joint Proposal for US-Japan Cooperation Program Proposal to JSPS US-Japan collaboration fund R&D of superconducting magnet technology for high intensity.
A novel model for Minimum Quench Energy calculation of impregnated Nb 3 Sn cables and verification on real conductors W.M. de Rapper, S. Le Naour and H.H.J.
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
LBNL Test Cryostat Preliminary Design Review Tuning – Field Correction Soren Prestemon, Diego Arbelaez, Heng Pan, Scott Myers, Taekyung Ki.
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
Superconducting R&D – Now Strand and Cable R&D FERMILAB Magnet Systems Department – Now SC Materials Department (TD) HTS Insert Coil Test in External Solenoid.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Effects of Core Type, Placement, and Width, on ICR of Nb 3 Sn Rutherford Cables E. W. Collings, M. D. Sumption,
Influence of Twisting and Bending on the Jc and n-value of Multifilamentary MgB2 Strands Y. Yang 1,G. Li 1, M.D. Susner 2, M. Rindfleisch 3, M.Tomsic 3,
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
Task 6: Short Period Nb3Sn Superconducting Helical Undulator George Ellwood
Stress review - CERN, Review on stress sensitivity Part I R. Flükiger B. Seeber Group of Applied Physics (GAP) University of Geneva 1.
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
-1- Steve Virostek (LBNL) and Li Wang (SINAP) Instrumentation for the MICE Coupling Coil Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February.
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
J. Polinski, B. Baudouy -The NED heat transfer program at CEA CEA Saclay, January 11th NED heat transfer program at CEA NED heat transfer program.
LQM01 Test Summary Guram Chlachidze LARP CM16 Montauk, NY May 16-18, 2011.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
Prototyping of Superconducting Magnets for RAON ECR IS S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science.
The development of persistent joints for MgB2-based conductors
C.J. Kovacs M.D. Sumption E.W. Collings
Superconducting Coils for Application
FCC Conductor Development at KAT-Korea
QXF Coil Fabrication & Tooling Reaction / Impregnation
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
A model superconducting helical undulators wound of wind and react MgB2 and Nb3Sn multifilamentary wires Center for Superconducting & Magnetic Materials.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Milan Majoros, Chris Kovacs, G. Li, Mike Sumption, and E.W. Collings
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
2012 Applied Superconductivity Conference, Portland, Oregon
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Magnetization, AC Loss, and Quench in YBCO Cables”
WP-7 / Task 4 Very high field magnet
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
C. J. Kovacs, M. Majoros, M. D. Sumption, E. Collings
Task 6: Short Period Nb3Sn Superconducting Helical Undulator
CERN Conductor and Cable Development for the 11T Dipole
M.D. Sumption, C. Myers, F. Wan, M. Majoros, E.W. Collings
Mike Sumption, M. Majoros, C. Myers, and E.W. Collings
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
The Quench Detection-Wire-Feedthrough Plug-In of W7-X
Preliminary study of HTS option for CEPC detector magnet
Measurements (to be made): About the device (in development):
X. Xu M. D. Sumption C. J. Kovacs E. W. Collings
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Optical fiber based sensors for low temperature and superconductors
Assessment of stability of fully-excited Nb3Sn Rutherford cable with modified ICR at 4.2 K and 12 T using a superconducting transformer and solenoidal.
Presentation transcript:

J.Yue, D. Doll, X. Peng, M.Rindfleisch, Mike Tomsic Demonstration of Conduction Cooled MgB2 and Nb3Sn Coil Segments for Magnet Applications Hyun Sung Kim, Chris Kovacs, Milan Majoros, Mike Sumption, E.W. Collings Center for Superconducting and Magnetic Materials, MSE, The Ohio State University J.Yue, D. Doll, X. Peng, M.Rindfleisch, Mike Tomsic Hyper Tech Research Funded by a National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering grant R01 grant, R01EB018363, and also an NIH bridge grant

Motivation MRI systems based on MgB2 are of significant interest as one way to develop liquid-cryogen-free MRI systems MgB2’s Tc of 39 K invites conduction cooling, and lower cost makes it an economically viable The low-Tc-like coherence length allows for persistent joints Intermediate Tc helpfully increases the minimum quench energy while not suppressing the normal zone velocity too much Conductor performance is at the level needed for MRI application, and conductor designs appropriate for MRIs can be made -- the need is for developing conduction cooled coil technology

Outline Conductor/Coil specification Instrumentation Facility and Cool down Ic measurement vs T Discussion and Conclusions If Time Nb3Sn Coil work Initial Persistent joint development

Conductor Name 3364 In-situ 36 filament Nb barriers # Mono Barrier Mono sheath Multi sheath Central fil(s) powder material Mg:B dia (mm) % powder 36 Nb Cu Monel MgB2_2%C 1:2 0.84 18.1 Name 3364 In-situ 36 filament Nb barriers Cu interfilamentay matrix Monel outer matrix SMI-2% C doped S-glass insulated Reacted at 675/90 min under Ar Optical Micrograph of MgB2 conductor cross section, shown at wire OD = 0.84 mm.

Coil Design Specifics Coil material Former : 101 OFE copper All fasteners : 316 stainless steel Lead Insulator : Garolite G-10 or ceramic standoff Lead connector : Alloy 101 OFE Copper Coil Parameters Winding pack OD : 482.2 mm Winding Pack ID : 457.2 mm (18”) Winding Pack Height : 19.685 mm (0.775”) WP cross sectional area : 246.06 mm2 No. Turns : 225 Total Conductor L 328.8 m (1078.7’) Turns/layer : 19 (approx.) No. Layers : 12 Final coil preparation Solder for leads : Pb-Sn (40/60) Epoxy CTD Resistance measurements (after winding, after epoxy) L1 to L2 41.9 Ohms After winding L1 to former OL L2 to former After CTD 528 Epoxy

FEM Simulation Ic(B) curve of a typical strand with the calculated load line of the coil Magnetic field map at the coil critical current. Coil critical current [A] Max. on-axis field at coil critical current [T] Max. field in the winding 273 0.14 1.43 200 0.10 1.05

Experimental Set up (2) Two stage GM cryocoolers (2) Cold heads attached to the copper ring Copper ring and coil are thermally connected with high purity copper strips 4 BSCCO leads for each current tap Heater attached in the copper ring to control the temperature of coil Data acquisition system: Nanovoltmeters (Keithley), Thermometers (Lakeshore), Data acquisition (Labview) Copper Ring MgB2 Coil Copper Strips

Voltage Taps Critical Current Measurement: I-V measurement Resistance @RT [Ω] Estimated length [cm] CTI – C1 0.00249 1.94 C1 – C2 0.135 105.6 C2 – C3 13.9 10849 C3 – C4 7.07 5522 C4 – C5 7.12 5559 C5 – C6 7.08 5526 C6 –C7 6.81 5313 C7 – CTO 0.00478 3.73 Whole coil resistance: 42.12 Ω, Total conductor length: 328.8 m Critical Current Measurement: I-V measurement

Location/Description Temperature Sensors   Location/Description CTI 1 1st Type-E Thermo. On “IN” current tap CTI 2 2nd Type-E Thermo. On “IN” current tap CTO 1 1st Type-E Thermo. On “OUT” current tap CTO 2 2nd Type-E Thermo. On “OUT” current tap C1 1st Type-E Thermo. On the top surface of coil C2 2nd Type-E Thermo. On the top surface of coil CS Type-E Thermo. On the side surface of coil CL1 1st Type-E Thermo. On BSCCO current lead CL2 2nd Type-E Thermo. On BSCCO current lead C1_cernox CERNOX. On the top surface of coil CR_cernox CERNOX. On the top surface of cold ring CTI_cernox CERNOX. On “IN” current tap CTO_cernox CERNOX. On “OUT” current tap

Cooldown Voltage signals Temperature signals

I – V curves: 20 K, 0.1 A/s A bit of coil heating

I – V curves: 20 K, 2A/s Less coil heating

I – V curves: 20 K, 5A/s Very little coil heating

Temp @ Current Tap IN (∆T) [K] Temp @ Current Tap OUT (∆T) [K] Ic vs T Temp Test # Ramping Rate Ic [A] Temp @ Coil (∆T) [K] Temp @ Current Tap IN (∆T) [K] Temp @ Current Tap OUT (∆T) [K] 30 K # 14 2 23.3 29.4 ~ 29.4 (0.0) 29.9 ~29.9 (0.0) 30.6 ~ 30.6 (0.0) # 15 0.1 17.6 29.6 ~ 9.9 (0.3) 30.1 ~ 30.4 (0.3) 30.8 ~ 31.0 (0.2) 27 K # 16 50.5 27.1 ~ 27.1 (0) 27.3 ~ 27.4 (0.1) 27.7 ~ 27.8 (0.1) # 17 50.1 27.3 ~ 27.8 (0.5) 27.9 ~28.2 (0.3) 22.5 K # 20 5 116 22.5 ~ 22.7 (0.2) 23.0 ~ 24.0 (1.0) 23.5 ~ 23.7 (0.2) # 18 116.5 22.6 ~ 22.8 (0.2) 22.6 ~ 24.2 (1.6) 23.1 ~ 23.9 (0.8) # 19 111.7 22.5 ~ 23.1 (0.6) 22.9 ~ 25.3 (2.4) 23.4 ~ 24.9 (1.5) 20 K # 23 152.4 20.0 ~ 20.5 (0.5) 20.6 ~ 23.1 (2.5) 21.0 ~ 22.3 (1.3) # 24 20.1 ~ 20.6 (0.5) 21.0 ~ 24.0 (3) 21.4 ~ 22.9 (1.5) # 26 140.6 20.1 ~ 21.4 (1.3) 20.5 ~ 24.2 (3.7) 20.9 ~ 23.1 (2.2) 17 K # 27 187.0 17.1 ~ 18.1 (1.0) 18.0 ~22.3 (4.3) 18.6 ~ 20.9 (2.3) # 28 183.8 17.4 ~ 18.6 (1.2) 16.7 ~ 22.6 (5.9) 16.9 ~ 20.7 (3.8) # 29 173.6 17.2 ~ 18.9 (1.7) 16.9 ~ 23.3 (6.4) 17.3 ~ 21.6 (4.3) 15 K # 34 204.6 15.1 ~ 16.8 (1.7) 16.6 ~ 22.7 (6.1) 17.3 ~ 20.9 (3.6) # 35 196.7 15.1 ~ 17.2 (2.1) 16.6 ~ 23.5 (6.9) 17.2 ~ 21.7 (4.5) # 36 191.7 16.5 ~ 23.5 (7.0) 17.2 ~ 21.4 (4.2) A key aspect -- to test the end transitions, thus no preferentially cooling Thus some current tap heating at lower T (where I higher) and for slower ramps. However, we could observe that the coil, as well as the current in and out junctions, were good. The coil transitioned by quench, and no resistive baseline was seen.

Summary An MgB2-based react and wind coil was made and tested as part of a technology development effort for MgB2-based, cryogen-free, MRI. A 36 filament MgB2 conductor was used to wind a small MRI- segment-like coil using a react and wind protocol. The coil was 457 mm ID and used a total length of conductor of 330 m. The coil was then epoxy impregnated, instrumented, and tested. After initial cool down the coil Ic was measured as a function of temperature. Both the coil itself and the terminations were seen to perform well -- A load line was generated – full analysis awaits 15 K measurement of this particular strand. The coil transitioned by quench, and no resistive baseline was seen. A coil Ic of 200 A was seen at 15 K.

Nb3Sn FEM Simulation_Magnetic Ic(B) curve of the strand measured at 4.2 K with the calculated load line of the coil Magnetic field map at the coil critical current. Coil critical current [A] Max. on-axis filed at coil critical current [T] Max. field in the winding 871 0.73 6.818 Physical parameters of the coil at 4.2 K

Nb3Sn FEM Simulation_Temp, Strain. Coil temperature distribution. No current in the coil. Maximum temperature in the winding = 4.2209 K. Volumetric strain distribution in the winding cross-section.

Other Coil Measurements – Future Reporting MgB2 Coil Nb3Sn Coil

New 1.7 M cryostat to be in place this fall! 8 in port for instrumentation Feedthroughs. About 8 – 18pin connectors will fit on one port and there’s 4 of these. Radiation shield for feedthrough (4) Swinging door cover to block shine but allow current leads to be pulled through Through-bolts; should be tapped holes 3 inch clearance w/o MLI New 1.7 M cryostat to be in place this fall!

Development of Persistent Joints Two styles of joints Superconducting solder type Direct MgB2-MgB2 In both cases, used already reacted wire Preliminary testing to date using direct I-V, R < 10-10  Decay Testing rig and samples in preparation for increased R sensitivity and decay test Working now to improve performance and measure to high sensitivity Superconducting Solder Type 4 K MgB2-MgB2Type 4 K

Moving from screening test to decay test While further improvement in critical current of joints is still in process, it is important to measure R at values below 10-10 ohm Thus, a decay rig was needed, as well as some initial testing and verification

New test arrangement for decay measurements – machine drawing

Test rig for decay measurements – with test NbTi joint mounted

Expansion of decay region NbTi test joint Results for a NbTi persistent joint (at the time of stage III, IV in overview result). Superconducting solder type.

Test of first persistent decay MgB2 sample Results for a MgB2 persistent joint (at the time of step III  IV along the lines of NbTi overview figure). Superconducting solder type.

Conclusions (II) Various MgB2 and Nb3Sn coil segments are being tested by conduction cooling For joints Initial screening results show good results R < 10-10 ohm, indicate that it is time to move to decay measurements The design of a new PJ decay rig is shown Initial tests with NbTi and MgB2 joints are shown, and the results where described Joint Testing and development (HTR-OSU) is in full swing, moving now to larger conductor joints for image guided system