Pole attachmentS Joint Accounting Conference may 12, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Renewals Review January Why are We Here Today ? During today’s web-conference, we’ll : Review the renewals “package” Discuss the process for.
Advertisements

The Contract Review & Approval Form FINANCE & OPERATIONS BUSINESS CONTRACTS JANUARY 15, 2015.
Auditor Responsibilities January 16, 2014 State Training Webinar 2014 CSP Contract Compliance Audit 1 AD14002.
TVA Distributor Assurance Update Central District Power Accountants Association Meeting Presented by: Autumn Burns March 19, 2015 TVA Restricted Information.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
IRBNet The implementation of IRBNet will assist the UTEP community to comply with UT System Policy UTS 108 on Affiliation Agreements. IRBNet will provide.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
Project Chartering & Approval Process
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Clinical Application.
1 Work Orders. 2 Generating a Work Order There are two methods to generating a Work Order in the WYNNE STSTEM. First method: Option 11 – 12 – 13 * Open.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LEAP) Lenore Dougan, Policy Advisor Regulatory Policy Ontario Energy Board Presentation to the Rental Housing Advisory.
Discussion Items Determining Operating Subsidy Eligibility
Contract Compliance Training
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
DETERMINING ALLOWABLE SALARY FOR A GRANT BUYOUT
Submitting a Proposal This document will guide you through submitting a proposal to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Access the form Access Carnegie Corporation.
Application of Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative PUE
Recommended Practices in Housing Credit Compliance
Public Participation Network
THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements
Public Participation Network
Resource Cost Working Group
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Local Government Street Light Update
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Henry Mukasa, Director of Portfolio Management MassHousing
IDEA-B LEA MOE Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting
2012 Business Guidelines for Association Membership
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Clinical Application
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
Conducting the performance appraisal
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Behavioral Application
Contract Compliance Training
Conducting the performance appraisal
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Community Aids Reporting System (CARS): Federal Reporting Requirements
Municipal Net Profit Tax
Office of Developmental Programs Quality Assessment & Improvement for HCBS Services SELF ASSESSMENTS June 23, 2017  11:00 AM June 26, 2017  1:00 PM.
2018 Clerks Summer Conference
2018 Instructional Material
Orders & Shipment Tracking
Internal/External Sales Activity related to:
Cameron Heck, Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy & Compliance
2018 District & State Supported Schools
09 Calculation
2018 Charter Schools Annual Report Instructional Material Bureau
Navya Thum February 13, 2013 Day 7: MICROSOFT EXCEL Navya Thum February 13, 2013.
Purchasing & Accounts Payable Tips and Tricks
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
2-1-1 Automated Verifications
Online Training Course
Process Overview for Service Providers
How to Prepare a Quality Modification Request
Introduction to Invoicing
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
TRTR Briefing September 2013
New York State Education Department Rate Setting Update
OPT Optional Practical Training Lindsey W. Hill
BCS Template Presentation February 22, 2018
FTE Recalibration Kendra Jahnke June 2018.
Senior Service America, Inc.
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
What To Expect In The Event Of An
Diversity management system (DMS)
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Presentation transcript:

Pole attachmentS Joint Accounting Conference may 12, 2017 Barry Barnett, Regulatory Assurance

Outline Pole Attachment Update Outliers Contract Amendment Highlights Status Rate Approval Process Guideline Adjustment Scale Escalation Options Approval Process DARS Page 36 Resources Q&A TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Pole attachment update

Pole Attachment Update Pole Attachment Rate Regulation 14 LPCs have executed a contract amendment to implement their new pole attachment rate; remaining LPCs will implement no later than January 2018 131 LPCs submitted their 2016 pole attachment templates TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

outliers

Outliers Maximum Valley Pole Attachment Rate $36 (1-Foot) and $39 (2-Foot) Outlier Approach Analysis of all 154 LPCs’ pole rates using standard 50% depreciation rate One standard deviation above the mean from this data set 50% depreciation represents the expected depreciation rate for a large set of data over a long period of time LPCs will continue to utilize actual data, including actual depreciation, to calculate their date; however, the LPC calculated rate will be subject to the established maximum rate TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Outliers Rationale for establishment and implementation of the maximum rate includes: Depreciation rates – Applying the 50% depreciation to the full cost recovery formula results in neither the under nor over-collection of revenue. Attaching parties will not be burdened with the cost of new plant, and LPCs with low depreciation rates are enabled to collect needed revenue for plant replacement. Limited historical reviews - TVA has not historically conducted detailed reviews of some key elements of the pole attachment rate calculation such as pole counts, pole costs, and numbers of attaching parties. The approach helps mitigate potentially less efficient LPC operations. Rate variability – Significant variations in pole attachment rates among neighboring LPCs can be mitigated by applying this approach. As part of the TVA Board’s 2016 adoption of the Determination on Regulation of Pole Attachment Rates, TVA has established a maximum valley pole attachment rate that LPCs may charge attaching parties This approach uses fair and reasonable measures to mitigate the impact of TVA’s full cost recovery methodology on some LPCs and normalize depreciation for the assets. Rationale for the establishment and implementation of the maximum rate includes:  Depreciation rates – Applying the 50% depreciation to the full cost recovery formula results in neither the under nor over-collection of revenue. Attaching parties will not be burdened with the cost of new plant, and LPCs with low depreciation rates are enabled to collect needed revenue for plant replacement.  Limited historical reviews - TVA has not historically conducted detailed reviews of some key elements of the pole attachment rate calculation such as pole counts, pole costs, and numbers of attaching parties. The approach helps mitigate potentially less efficient LPC operations.  Rate variability – Significant variations in pole attachment rates among neighboring LPCs can be mitigated by applying this approach. TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Outliers TVPPA’s Regulatory Advisory Group and Board had opportunity to review the outlier approach and provide feedback TVA may modify this approach and/or take other reasonable measures to ensure the approach is accurate and effectively accounting for LPC rates outside certain statistical parameters Impacted LPCs Rate outlier approach was shared with LPCs Customer Delivery discussed, in detail, with the 41 impacted LPCs As part of the TVA Board’s 2016 adoption of the Determination on Regulation of Pole Attachment Rates, TVA has established a maximum valley pole attachment rate that LPCs may charge attaching parties This approach uses fair and reasonable measures to mitigate the impact of TVA’s full cost recovery methodology on some LPCs and normalize depreciation for the assets. Rationale for the establishment and implementation of the maximum rate includes:  Depreciation rates – Applying the 50% depreciation to the full cost recovery formula results in neither the under nor over-collection of revenue. Attaching parties will not be burdened with the cost of new plant, and LPCs with low depreciation rates are enabled to collect needed revenue for plant replacement.  Limited historical reviews - TVA has not historically conducted detailed reviews of some key elements of the pole attachment rate calculation such as pole counts, pole costs, and numbers of attaching parties. The approach helps mitigate potentially less efficient LPC operations.  Rate variability – Significant variations in pole attachment rates among neighboring LPCs can be mitigated by applying this approach. TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Contract amendment Highlights

Contract Amendment Highlights Contract Amendment Status TVPPA is working to provide TVA with additional input on the proposed contract amendment (expected in early June) Once that input is received, TVA will need time to review the amendment with Rates and Contracts, and then finalize (expected in July) Rate Approval The contract envisions LPC submitting its Pole Attachment Template to TVA within 15 days of submitting its annual report Following both the execution of the contract amendment and LPC’s submittal of its pole attachment template, TVA will provide LPC with a letter documenting its TVA-approved pole attachment rate. Beginning in 2018, between January 1 and March 31 of each year, TVA will provide LPC with its most updated TVA-approved pole attachment rate That rate will be used by LPC in contracts with all new and renewing parties TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Contract Amendment Highlights Guideline Adjustment Scale In instances where there is a variance between the current pole attachment rate and the TVA-approved pole attachment rate, then LPC must use the Guideline Adjustment Scale to transition to the TVA approved rate TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Contract Amendment Highlights Escalation Options Once LPC’s Current Rate reaches the TVA-approved Pole Attachment Rate, after any necessary application of the Guideline Adjustment Scale, LPC must adjust its Pole Attachment Rate in accordance with either of the options below:   Handy-Whitman Index*, on a monthly, semi-monthly, or yearly basis (as determined by agreement between LPC, Attaching Parties, or LPC’s electric, broadband, and any other legally-affiliated divisions) Rate escalation may not exceed the maximum rate that may be established by TVA The most recent TVA-approved pole attachment rate. *Note: If adjustment of the pole attachment rate using the Handy-Whiteman Index results in a rate that exceeds the most recent TVA-approved pole attachment rate by 15% or more, then LPC must submit the Escalated Pole Attachment Rate to TVA for a new Pole Attachment Rate. In these cases, LPC will then use the new TVA-approved pole attachment rate in its agreements with those affected attaching parties. TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Rate Approval process

Rate Approval Process Beginning in Fall 2017: Pole Attachment template is due 15 days after DARS report is completed and submitted to TVA Regulatory Assurance will verify / review template inputs and required documentation Any modifications necessary will be addressed with the LPC to correct, etc. Deep dive by Regulatory Assurance Analyst, if necessary Approved rates will be provided to LPC between January and March 2018 TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Rate Approval Process TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

DARS Page 36

DARS Page 36 – Best Practices 2017 Annual Report Data Entry for DARS Page 36: DARS Page 36 serves as the document of record for each LPC’s pole attachment data Enter a separate record for all attachers (including joint use) Fully complete all fields for each attacher If the LPC does not have a contract with an attacher – get one! Once DARS Page 36 has been filled out by the LPC, the information on it will roll forward each year and only require the LPC to update (versus enter it from scratch) TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Data Inputs DARS Page 36 DARS Page 36 requires LPC input for 16 values on page 1 (highlighted cells) Standard – Rural/Urban Default 37.5 ft. Can change with proper documentation TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Pole Information DARS Page 36 Input #1 – Number of Poles No of distribution poles in Account 364 Input #2 – Attaching parties different from standard? Enter N if using the Standard Assumption Enter Y if using Probability Method or Actual System Data Note: If answer is Yes, then LPC must provide documentation Input #3a and Input #3b - Pole Height and Discount Factor different than standard assumption Y/N? Enter N in both fields if using the default pole height/discount factor Enter Y if using actual system data. Note: If LPC is using actual system data for either input, they must use it for both inputs and provide documentation for both numbers to TVA. DARS Page 36 TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Pole Information (continued) DARS Page 36 Input #4 – Customers per mile Enter the LPC’s number of customers per mile. Note: The number entered here determines which Standard Assumption option the LPC can use on their pole attachment template (Standard Assumption-Rural or Standard Assumption-Urban) Input #5 – Comment General comment field related to pole information Standard Assumption Rural is defined as <= 40 customers per mile Standard Assumption Urban is defined as > 40 customers per mile TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Attaching Entity Information Input #6 – Attaching entity NOTE: Enter ALL contracts with attaching parties (joint use, evergreen, term) Enter the name of each attaching entity in a separate record (for example, A&T, Charter, Comcast, etc.) Input #7 – Term of contract Enter the term of the contract with the attaching entity and give indication if contract is Evergreen or Joint-Use. Some examples: Automatically renews every year (evergreen) 10 years (joint use) 10 year contract with 1st renewal for 5 years, can be renewed until 2027 (term) DARS Page 36 TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Attaching Entity Information Input #8 – Early termination (Y/N)? Can the contract be terminated early (Y/N)?of each attaching entity in a separate record (for example, A&T, Charter, Comcast, etc.) Note: We expect there will be very few instances where the LPC cannot exit these contracts in certain conditions (such as nonpayment, for cause, etc.). Input #9 – Details Enter any other details about the contract and the details for early termination, such as: Early termination provisions are for cause and non-renewal, no other types of early out Cause and non-payment Can be terminated on the annual renewal date by either party with 60 days prior notice 6 months notice DARS Page 36 TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Attaching Entity Info (Continued) Input #10 – Beginning date The beginning date of the agreement the LPC has in place with the attaching party Input #11 – Ending date The ending date of the agreement the LPC has in place with the attaching party DARS Page 36 TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Attaching Entity Info (Continued) DARS Page 36 Input #12 – TVA Approved Date The date TVA approved the LPC’s pole attachment rate Input #13 – Current Rental Rate The rate the LPC is charging the attacher according to the current agreement in place TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Attaching Entity Info (Continued) Input #14 – Calculated Rental Rate - TVA Methodology Enter the calculated pole attachment rate after it is verified by TVA Input #15 – TVA Approved Rate Enter the TVA approved pole attachment rate Note: This will either be the calculated rate used as Input #14, or the TVA rate cap) Input #16 – Rate Escalation Method Enter the method of escalation (Handy Whitman or TVA Pole Attachment Template) and also indicate if LPC is using the Guideline Adjustment Scale to transition rate DARS Page 36 TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Pole Attachment Templates and Instructions Tips, Guidance, Resources Regulatory Assurance Staff Barry Barnett – 865-632-2107; jbbarnett@tva.gov Regulatory Assurance Field Accountants Customer Delivery Staff OnlineConnections Pole Attachment Tool Kit Pole Attachment Templates and Instructions Tips, Guidance, Resources TVA staff is available to assist you, please reach out to myself, your field accountant, or your customer service manager. You can also find today’s presentation and other helpful information on the Regulatory Assurance page of TVA’s OnlineConnections. Please take a copy of the “one-pager” provided for you at ???? (your tables/at the door) which includes TVA’s contact information, list of resources, and helpful hints. TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Questions? TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged

Thank you TVA Restricted Information - Deliberative and Pre-Decisional Privileged