Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIM MASON RENEWABLE RESOURCE INTEGRATION IEP ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING FALLEN LEAF LAKE 5 October 2011.
Advertisements

Will CO2 Change What We Do?
WinDS-H2 MODEL Wind Deployment Systems Hydrogen Model Workshop on Electrolysis Production of Hydrogen from Wind and Hydropower Walter Short Nate Blair.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
Capacity Valuation.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
ERCOT PUBLIC 8/19/ LTSA Scenario Results Updates August, 2014.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/22/2014 Updates for 2014 LTSA Scenario and Data Assumptions 4/22/2014.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update January 22, 2013.
1 18-Month Outlook October March 2005 Presented by Greg Hine IMO Long-Term Forecasts and Assessments.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
ENERGY CENTER State Utility Forecasting Group (SUFG) Alternative Resources and Energy Capacity Presented by: Douglas J. Gotham Purdue University Presented.
Energy procurement in the presence of intermittent sources Adam Wierman (Caltech) JK Nair (Caltech / CWI) Sachin Adlakha (Caltech)
Natural Gas and Power Generation Natural Gas and Power: A Look at Prices Carbon Legislation and Power Generation The future of Power Generation and the.
Ramping and Demand Shifting: A Case Study Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Demand Response.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
The Missing Money Problem
The Impact of Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources on Wholesale Electricity Prices Prof. Dr. Felix Müsgens, Thomas Möbius USAEE-Conference Pittsburgh,
Consumer Cost Effectiveness of Carbon Mitigation Policies in Restructured Electricity Market Jared Moore and Jay Apt (adviser) CMU Engineering and Public.
High Level Post Processing Cost Estimates MWG SSC Meeting September 26, 2011.
PEAK CAPACITY COST & DEMAND RESPONSE PACIFIC NORTHWEST DEMAND RESPONSE PLANNING COMMITTEE BILL DICKENS TACOMA POWER FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
Shaping Up The Duck Chart Independent Energy Producers Association Annual Meeting Mark Rothleder Vice President, Market Quality and Renewable Integration.
GRID INTEGRATION COST OF PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION G. Strbac, D. Pudjianto, P. Djapic, J. Dragovic Energy Futures Lab.
Energy Economics Group, TU Wien
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
LUCIANO LOSEKANN DIOGO LISBONA EDMAR DE ALMEIDA
“Other” Cost Estimates
XI KAZENERGY Eurasian Forum
Contents Introduction Focus area Wind scenarios
2018 LTSA Workshop August 2017 RPG Meeting Welcome to.
Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Eugene Preston,
IAAE International Conference Singapore June 18-21, 2017
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Benefits of ICAP Reliability Economics
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
ENTSO-E Winter outlook 17-18
penetration of wind power
CSP Grid Value of Energy Storage and LCOE Implications 26 August 2013
Results of Smart Charging Research
EU-IPA12/CS02 Development of the Renewable Energy Sector
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
Basin Electric SPP Market Update
100% Renewable Cities in Texas
Jose GONZALEZ PASTOR Economic & Adequacy Analyst - Elia
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Utilizing Renewable Energy Sources in Kosovo till 2020
HEADING TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND DEMOCRATIC ELECTRICITY SYSTEMS
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Ahmad Elberry, Abdelghani Aljayyousi
Planning Reserve Margin
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Joshua Linn (MIT and Resources for the Future)
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
SUMMER OUTLOOKS 2019 Lea Dehaudt, Moderator ENTSO-E
Weekly System Status week 34 (19/08/2019 – 25/08/2019) System Operator
Weekly System Status week 28 (08/07/2019 – 14/07/2019) System Operator
Weekly System Status week 37 (09/09/2019 – 15/09/2019) System Operator
Weekly System Status week 38 (16/09/2019 – 22/09/2019) System Operator
Putting Duct Tape on North America’s Last Energy-Only Market: ERCOT
Presentation transcript:

Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Austria June 2017

Resource Adequacy Problem Motivation Resource Adequacy Problem Insufficient investment in new non-renewable generation capacity Generators have difficulty to recover their investment cost 3 main reasons 1. Political or regulatory price interventions Bid cap or price cap suppresses scarcity (high) prices 2. Increasing investment risks Uncertainty in future market regulation and design

Motivation 3. Integration of large share of variable renewables leads to: 3.1. Lower prices (Fig.1) 3.2. Less utilization of conventional generators (Fig. 2) 3.3. More need for back up capacity to mitigate volatility of generation profile (Fig. 3 & 4) Renewables Nuclear Coal Gas Oil Price (€/MWh) Demand Quantity (MW) Solar + Wind   Peak Demand Fig. 1. Merit order effect of renewables

Motivation 3.2. Less utilization of conventional generators Capacity (MW) Dispatch time (hours) Residual Load Load Reduced dispatch of nuclear PPs 8760 Reduced dispatch of lignite PPs Reduced dispatch of gas PPs Reduced dispatch of coal PPs Dispatch of nuclear PPs Dispatch of lignite PPs Dispatch of coal PPs Dispatch of gas PPs Fig. 2. Reduced dispatch of conventional generation due to variable RES Definition: Residual load= load - RES generation

Motivation 3.3. More need for back up capacity to mitigate volatility of generation profile 3.3.1. Generation volatility Fig. 3. Volatility of variable RES generation in one hour in Germany in 2012 (share of variable RES is 20%)

Motivation 3.3. More need for back up capacity to mitigate volatility of generation profile 3.3.2. Generation forecast error Fig. 4. Day-ahead forecast error of variable RES generation in Germany in 2012 (share of variable RES is 20%)

Motivation Research Question: How much is the resource adequacy value of DR in the German electricity market? Resource adequacy value of DR = How much DR is available during peak load (as a percentage of DR capacity) System operators need to consider the risk of exceeding DR constraints by estimating resource adequacy value of DR.

Motivation Resource adequacy value of DR mainly depends on: Type of DR and DR dispatch constraints Share of RES in the market DR penetration Reserve margin Peak load season

Generation expansion model Probabilistic Model Uncertainty from variable RES, DR, … Resource inadequacy events are infrequent Approach Modeling generation and load uncertainty Monte Carlo samples from generation and load by considering the uncertainties. Capacity Credit of RES Forced outage of conventional generation Demand growth rate Load forecast error Weather-related uncertainty

Maximum DR-call hours per day Maximum DR-call hours per year Model DR capacity would be dispatched if the load exceeds the reserve margin. DR constraints: Maximum DR-call hours per day Maximum DR-call hours per year Maximum MWh dispatched DR per day Data: Day-ahead German electricity market in 2012 (Share of variable RES in generation profile: 20%) Fig. 5. Typical supply curve

Results DR utilization values reflect the probability-weighted average of DR utilization over a large number of scenarios. Fig 6. Average DR Dispatch hours per day at different reserve margins

Results At 6.5% reserve margin and in presence of 20% generation by variable RES total annual DR call is 29 hours maximum DR call hours per day : 5 hours maximum amount of dispatched DR per day : 1,760 MWh/day In order to maintain 100 % resource adequacy value for DR, the call limit should be as high as 5 hours per day at 6.5 % reserve margin. Fig. 7. Sorted average DR dispatch hours per day (hours/day)

Results By assuming a maximum 4 hours call per day limit, the resource adequacy value of DR is approximately 16 % at the 0 % reserve margin, and 65 % at 6.5 % reserve margin. At the same dispatch limit (4 hours/day): resource adequacy of DR in Germany is 65% and in Colorado 70%. Fig 8. Average volume of dispatched DR per day at different reserve margins

Conclusion and Policy Implications At 6.5% reserve margin and in presence of 20% generation by variable RES total annual DR call is 29 hours maximum DR call per day is 5 hours maximum amount of dispatched DR per day is 1,760 MWh/day Any DR dispatch constraint lower than these numbers will result in resource adequacy value of less than 100% for DR. System operators need to consider the risk of exceeding DR constraints by estimating resource adequacy value of DR.

Thank You!