C-CDA Encoding Issues and Solutions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional and Cognitive Status and Pressure Ulcer Templates Consolidation Updates April 2012.
Advertisements

Embrace the Elephant A few provocative questions….
QIDAM Issues and proposals for a logical model For discussion during HL7 WG Meeting in Jan 2014 Thursday Q3.
RSNA Reporting Templates: Representation of Findings in CDA R2 Instances Helmut Koenig Co-Chair DICOM WG20.
CTS2 Terminology Services
VSAC Users’ Forum Thursday, January 15 2:00 – 3:00 PM, EST.
FEBRUARY 4, 2015 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE Modeling and Terminology.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Dual-Conformant C-CDA
Public Health Data Element Standardization - A Framework for Modeling Data Elements Used for Public Health Case Reporting Case Reporting Standardization.
LifeSpan. Function Natural, required, or expected activity of a person based on stage of development Ability to exist with in environment Related to a.
Working Together to Advance Terminology Tooling Presentation to OHT Board, Birmingham Jennifer Zelmer & Karen Gibson.
CIMI REVIEW OF ACTION ITEMS June 2013 Meeting. June 2013 Action Items  Assess tooling requirements and options to generate example instances -- Harold.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
For Goal-Driven Business Process Modeling Saeed A.Behnam,  Daniel Amyot, Gunter Mussbacher SITE, University of.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR –Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts –Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
CIMI Survey results 1 Presented by Nicholas Oughtibridge.
Logical Model Collaboration Scope, proposal, and next steps.
1 / x CMMI Technical Solution Rob Vanden Meersche Dieter Van den Bulcke.
Adaptive data correction at remeasurement: What to do when errors are discovered? 2011 National FIA User Group Meeting Sacramento,
S&I PAS SWG March 20, 2012 Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Presentation 1.
NLM Value Set Authority Center Curation and delivery of value sets for eMeasures eMeasures Issues Group (eMIG) May 24, 2012 NLM.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
C-HOBIC FINDINGS VALIDATION - REPORT AND CONSENSUS ACTIVITY Kathryn Hannah, Anne Casey, Zac Whitewood-Moores C-HOBIC.
Collecting Copyright Transfers and Disclosures via Editorial Manager™ -- Editorial Office Guide 2015.
All Recurring Key Themes The below list includes themes across many of the different presentations to date. The next 2 slides address how these may be.
C-CDA Scorecard Rubrics Review of CDA R2.0 Smart C-CDA Scorecard Rules C. Beebe.
© University of Manchester Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 unported 3.0 license Quality Assurance, Ontology Engineering, and Semantic Interoperability.
LOINC-SNOMED CT Cooperation Project LOINC terms with component such as “xxx.identified”: Classification and answer list.
Developing a Plan for Accessibility The City of Brandon Accessibility Plan 2016.
AlphaFIM® Instrument Guided Self Study updated July 2013
HSPC Terminology and Information Model Initiative Susan Matney, PhD, RNC-OB, FAAN (Initiative Lead) Stan Huff, MD, FACMI, FHL7 11/6/2016.
Table core Part file Answer file Group file
Of Team-Meeting Criteria Gray Scott, Ph.D.,
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
W. Scott Campbell, MBA, PhD James R. Campbell, MD
Ted Klein Klein Consulting Informatics LLC
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Nursing Special Interest Subgroup – Observables Mapping
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
SNOMED CT, Synoptic Observables and Clinical Genomics
CIMI Semantics Roundup
Qualitative Data Collection: Accuracy, Credibility, Dependability
Clinical Assessment Instruments and the LOINC/SNOMED CT Relationship
WELCOME How do we define assessment?.
Functional status and activities of daily living concepts
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Chapter Thirteen Fieldwork Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
CAREER ASSESSMENTS: MAXIMIZING THE RESULTS FOR USERS
Chapter 8 Using secondary data
HN Accounting Network Kim Tree Writing an Alternative Assessment.
PC CIMI Proof of concept
CIMI/PC: Skin assessment Agenda 12 Sep 2017 (Tue Q1)
CIMI Semantic Binding Issue
Electronic Health Record Access Control 7
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS and PROJECT LEAD THE WAY
ESS VIP ICT Project Task Force Meeting 5-6 March 2013.
Module 8. Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences
Marketing Research: Course 4
Marketing Research: Course 3
National Clinical Terminology & Information Service Terminology Update
Chapter 8 Using secondary data
National Trauma Data Standard: CDA
Friday, 10 May h00 – 16h30 (Geneva time)
LIVD on FHIR Draft Discussion.
Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD
LIVD on FHIR Draft Discussion.
URLs and Screen shots updates
Future of EDAMIS Webforms
Presentation transcript:

C-CDA Encoding Issues and Solutions Susan Matney, PhD, rnc-ob, faan Rob mcclure, md

Value Sets Discussed Today Value Set name OID Link Code System ADL Result Type urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.47 http://www.hl7.org LOINC Wound Characteristic urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.11.20.9.58 https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov SNOMED CT Wound Type urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.20.2.6

When is it ok to reuse a LOINC question from an existing instrument When is it ok to reuse a LOINC question from an existing instrument? Guidance From Dan Vreeman’s Blog Be sure that you are asking the question in the same way If question matches a particular LOINC code - evaluate the answer list Normative – your answer list MUST match the selected answer list Preferred Lists contain a set of answers that users are strongly encouraged to use User could have alternate result values if necessary. Be aware of are external copyright notices Source: https://danielvreeman.com/proper-use-of-loinc-question-codes-with-assessment-instrument-methods/

Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Result Type

ADL Type Concept Details Issues with the use of survey concepts Code Descriptor Comment 28408-3 Toileting [QAM] A code restricted to use in the HIV-QAM questionnaire AND has a LOINC Normative Answer list for the answers that does not align with the “Ability” value set to be used per the template. There is no LOINC code available that can be substituted that meets the requirement. 28409-1 Dressing [QAM] Same issue as above 28413-3 Ambulation [QAM] Same Issue as above 46008-9 Bathing This is a unusual LOINC panel-type code that collects more specific MDS questionnaire concepts. While Susan will investigate, we do not think this concept is “designed” to be a stand alone code, even if it was not tied to the MDS instrument. 46482-6 Transferring Exact same situation as above but this is in the OASIS questionnaire. 46484-2 Feeding or eating Same OASIS questionnaire situation as above.

ADL C-CDA Mapping Issues and Proposed Solutions 46008-9 Bathing is an MDS Panel (not an observation) “Panel” is not in the LOINC component name 28409-1 Dressing, 28408-3; Toileting; 28413-3 Ambulation Comes from the QAM (Quality Audit Marker) Value sets are normative (not the C-CDA value set) 46482-6 Transferring and 46008-9 Bathing are OASIS Panels Solution LOINC include “Panel” in the component name where Panel Type = Panel Create a new ADL panel with the above observations Value set will not be normative and will include the values from the C-CDA ADL SNOMED CT value set will be placed in VSAC

Wound Characteristics Double check – update slide, this is probably observables Semantically incorrect created as a list of assertions with no observation Solution: use the LOINC specific observations for these (Wound odor, wound edge color, wound induration, etc.) with abov as values

Wound Type Incomplete value set The most complete set was created by the nurses but not in VSAC Solution – 1) ensure the value set contains the values above and 2) load value set

Moving Forward Discussion Make sure all Panel’s are labeled as such Balloted artifacts with terminology binding Need a formal QA and validation process prior to balloting Binding guidelines need to be established and published Pre vs. post coordination Normative vs. example value sets What terminology to use when and where Could possibly use the CIMI high level patterns to guide binding