Yueyang Jiang1, John B. Kim2, Christopher J

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Advertisements

Monitoring Effects of Interannual Variation in Climate and Fire Regime on Regional Net Ecosystem Production with Remote Sensing and Modeling D.P. Turner.
Soil CO 2 Efflux from a Subalpine Catchment Diego A. Riveros-Iregui 1, Brian L. McGlynn 1, Vincent J. Pacific 1, Howard E. Epstein 2, Daniel L. Welsch,
Carbon flux at the scale up field of GLBRC. The Eddy Covariance cluster towers Terenzio Zenone 1 Jiquan Chen 1 Burkhard Wilske 1 and Mike Deal 1 Kevin.
Jun-Aug/annual mean T precip.sum (degC) (mm) / / / / / / / /810 Jun-Aug/annual mean.
School Research Conference, March 2009 Jennifer Wright Supervisors: M.Williams, G. Starr, R.Mitchell, M.Mencuccini Fire and Forest Ecosystems in the Southeastern.
Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountains of Washington State, USA D. McKenzie, D. W. Peterson, D.L. Peterson USDA.
Anthropogenic Aerosol – A Cause Of The Weekend Effect? A significant weekly cycle has been found in diurnal temperature range (DTR). A candidate for causing.
Hydraulic redistribution of soil water in two old-growth coniferous forests: quantifying patterns and controls Principles underlying the hydraulic redistribution.
Figure 2 : Schematic diagram of the Vegetation Photosynthesis Respiration Model (VPRM). EVI- Enhanced Vegetation Index; LSWI-Land Surface Water Index;
Questions How do different methods of calculating LAI compare? Does varying Leaf mass per area (LMA) with height affect LAI estimates? LAI can be calculated.
Climatic variability, land-cover change, and forest hydrology in the Pacific Northwest David W. Peterson JISAO Climate Impacts Group Forest Hydrology.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Carbon Cycle Modeling Terrestrial Ecosystem Models W.M. Post, ORNL Atmospheric Measurements.
Ph. Wipfler and G.Deckmyn Kranzberg Forest Experiment : upscaling to the forest. From the empirical approach to the mechanistic simulation of ozone effects.
 Tropical montane cloud forests (TMCF) are unique ecosystems characterized by a highly variable weather conditions including strong.
Plant physiological responses to precipitation in the Amazon forest, an isotopic approach Universidade de São Paulo: Jean Pierre Ometto; Luiz Martinelli;
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
Modeling impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for climate change J.J. Reyes 1, J.C. Adam 1, C. L. Tague 2,
JULES: Joint UK Land Environment Simulator A community land surface scheme.
Science themes: 1.Improved understanding of the carbon cycle. 2.Constraints and feedbacks imposed by water. 3.Nutrient cycling and coupling with carbon.
The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.
Introduction To describe the dynamics of the global carbon cycle requires an accurate determination of the spatial and temporal distribution of photosynthetic.
Abstract Carbon Fluxes Across Four Land Use Types in New Hampshire Sean Z. Fogarty, Lucie C. Lepine, Andrew P. Ouimette — University of New Hampshire,
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Integrating Remote Sensing, Flux Measurements and Ecosystem Models Faith Ann Heinsch Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG) University of Montana.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
How Do Forests, Agriculture and Residential Neighborhoods Interact with Climate? Andrew Ouimette, Lucie Lepine, Mary Martin, Scott Ollinger Earth Systems.
Field Measurements of Leaf Mass Area (LMA) in Support of Remote Sensing Studies of a Pacific Northwest Old Growth Forest Canopy Katie Berger (UMASS-Amherst)
Feedbacks Between Tropical Forests, Climate, and Earth’s Carbon Budget Jacob Eisenberg Advised by David Medvigy, Geosciences.
VQ3a: How do changes in climate and atmospheric processes affect the physiology and biogeochemistry of ecosystems? [DS 194, 201] Science Issue: Changes.
Canopy Dynamics and Tree Well Size Does the canopy height and size of coniferous trees affect the size of the tree well at the snow surface? J. Kalin Puent.
Field research was conducted at the University of Minnesota Rosemount Research and Outreach Center. The experiment was conducted in a 17 ha agricultural.
Evapotranspiration Partitioning in Land Surface Models By: Ben Livneh.
Liebermann R 1, Kraft P 1, Houska T 1, Müller C 2,3, Haas E 4, Kraus D 4, Klatt S 4, Breuer L 1 1 Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management,
Flux observation: Integrating fluxes derived from ground station and satellite remote sensing 王鹤松 Hesong Wang Institute of atmospheric physics, Chinese.
Key information from FDOS Global distribution of plant communities as described by quantitative traits [and their association with phylogenetic composition??]
Comparison of water flux from Douglas-fir and Oregon white oak of varying age and stature Nathan Phillips, Barbara Bond Nate McDowell, Andrew Schauer,
Variations in Continental Terrestrial Primary Production, Evapotranspiration and Disturbance Faith Ann Heinsch, Maosheng Zhao, Qiaozhen Mu, David Mildrexler,
Predicting Current and Future Tree Diversity in the Pacific Northwest I R S S Richard Waring 1 Nicholas Coops 2 1 Oregon State University 2 University.
How Do Forests, Agriculture and Residential Neighborhoods Interact with Climate? Andrew Ouimette, Lucie Lepine, Mary Martin, Scott Ollinger Earth Systems.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Chronosequence of soil respiration in ChEAS sites (sub-topic of spatial upscaling of carbon measurement) Jim Tang Department of Forest Resources University.
University of California, Berkeley
Estimating the Reduction in Photosynthesis from Sapflow Data in a Throughfall Exclusion Experiment. Rosie Fisher 1, Mathew Williams 1, Patrick Meir 1,
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Zachos et al., 2001 CHALLENGE ONE Background: Global deep-sea oxygen (δ 18 O) and carbon (δ 13 C) isotopes from sediment cores taken from the bottom of.
Samuel T. Dunn 1, 2, Andrew G. Bunn 3, John D. Schade 1
Assessing the climate impacts of land cover and land management using an eddy flux tower cluster in New England Earth Systems Research Center Institute.
The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
Influence of tree crown parameters on the seasonal CO2-exchange of a pine forest in Brasschaat, Belgium. Jelle Hofman Promotor: Dr. Sebastiaan Luyssaert.
Jiquan Chen Kim Brosofske Asko Noormets Tom Crow Soung Ryu Many others
Western Mensurationists Meeting 2016
Andrew Haywood123, Andrew Mellor13,
Continental Modeling and Analysis of the North American Carbon Cycle
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Quantifying Direct and Indirect Effects of Elevated CO2 on Ecosystem Response Simone Fatichi Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
Tree-ring d13C and d18O responses to climate change and forest
Ecosystem Productivity
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Hydrologic Losses - Evaporation
Dennis Baldocchi & James Dorsey
Determining the Influence of Winter on Ecosystem
Species distribution by height in the canopy
Sources of Variability in Canopy Spectra and the Convergent Properties of Plants Funding From: S.V. Ollinger, L. Lepine, H. Wicklein, F. Sullivan, M. Day.
RC Izaurralde – JGCRI With contributions from NJ Rosenberg – JGCRI
Investigating land-climate interactions across land cover types
by Jin Wu, Loren P. Albert, Aline P
Presentation transcript:

Patterns and controls of water-use efficiency in an old-growth coniferous forest Yueyang Jiang1, John B. Kim2, Christopher J. Still1, Bharat Rastogi1, Steve Voelker3, Frederick Meinzer2 1Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; 2Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service; 3Department of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT Oregon State University Introduction Water use efficiency (WUE) has been widely recognized as an important physiological link between carbon and water cycling, and used to track forest ecosystem responses to climate change and rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Numerous studies have been conducted to estimate forest-scale WUE through either stable carbon isotope analyses composition or eddy covariance measurements. However, the sign and magnitude of WUE response to climate variability are still highly uncertain, and can vary with the time scale of analysis. This study employed the Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2) to explore patterns and physiological and biophysical controls of WUE in an old-growth coniferous forest in Pacific Northwest. Long-term eddy covariance flux measurements and the stable carbon isotope composition of CO2 collected at the Wind River AmeriFlux site were used to validate model performance. Results The calibrated ED2.1-WR model well captured carbon and water fluxes, and both model and eddy covariance data indicated that the Wind River forest functioned as carbon sink during 1998-2015. The unique physiological properties of Pacific Northwest late-successional conifer trees play an important role in determining old growth forest demography, thereby largely affecting ecosystem carbon budget. Figure 3. ED2.1-WR simulated and tower derived 18 years average daily GPP, Reco and NEP at the Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility site. Figure 4. Comparison of ED2 modeled and field measured daily transpiration (mmol/m2/s) for year 2002 at Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility site. Figure 5. The ED2.1-WR modeled Ci/Ca ratio under clear and cloudy sky conditions for northern pine (left) and late conifer (right) trees. ED2.1-WR Eddy covariance 52 m 19 m Douglas-fir W. hemlock Wind River tower Figure 1. The Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility, and species dominancy. Methods We calibrated the ED2 model to the Wind River forest site by adjusting several key physiological parameters for two dominant PFTs (further referred as ED2.1-WR). Based on eddy covariance, isotope data and ED2.1-WR simulations, we Tatm Tcanopy Tsurface Tsoil_1 Tsoil_i Tsoil_n eatm ecanopy esurface esoil_1 esoil_i esoil_n CO2 Rin Rout Evaluate ED2.1-WR performance in simulating carbon, water and energy fluxes. Characterize WUE, sapflow and stomatal responses (ci/ca) in wet and dry years. Contrast WUE, sapflow and stomatal response between species & between cohorts. Rank relative importance of varied predictors in determining WUE using machine learning methods. Figure 6. Relative importance of different predictors in determining WUE. Ongoing Work To explore how various WUE metrics (e.g., intrinsic WUE, inherent WUE) from both measurements and model predictions vary with meteorology through different time scales. To investigate the relative importance of different predictors in determining various WUE metrics, using machine learning methods. To scale up forest WUE across the Pacific Northwest and conducted model simulations (e.g., ED2.1-WR, 3-PG and FVS-Climate) to project future WUE under projected climate scenarios. Different PFTs have distinct WUE, sapflow and stomatal responses to short-term meteorology and radiation including clear and cloudy days, and long-term climate. Multiple linear regression and machine learning methods indicated that the relative importance of predictor for WUE shown different patterns in ED2.1-WR and eddy covariance data. Figure 2. ED2 framework derived from Medvigy et al. (2009).