BMRA Legislative Policy Group – Shredder Sub Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Permitting Process Overview Alasdair McKellar PPC Compliance Officer Environment Agency.
Advertisements

Best Available Techniques (BAT)
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Environmentally sound management of ship recycling- simple or complex? Roy Watkinson Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs UK Promoting Sustainable.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
IPPC and Industry By Dr. Ken Macken Dublin Regional Licensing Manager.
Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management: IPPC Neil Emmott Environment Directorate-General 7 April 2006.
GReening business through the Enterprise Europe Network EN Giovanni FRANCO European Commission Enterprise and Industry EN
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
WASTE MANAGEMENT I WASTE HIERARCHY EUROPEAN UNION FRAMEWORK WASTE DIRECTIVE DEFINITION OF WASTE + ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS 1 Environmental Law.
Practical use of newly developed BAT conclusions Valts Vilnītis.
IPPC IN MINING AND METALLURGY IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Bosko Nikov
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
Environmental Permitting Regulations Tom Fowler – Environment Officer
The Revision of the Waste Framework Directive Key suggested amendments by the Rapporteur.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
BAT as a main tool for minimisation of the negative impact of industrial activities Aivi Sissa Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries Regulation of non-Annex I activities in the CR and UK Monika P ř ibylová.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.
Directive 2000/53/EC on End-of-Life Vehicles
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
ÖKOTECH 2007 BUDAPEST European Commission DG Environment Sustainable Production and Consumption Directive 2000/53/EC on End-of-Life Vehicles and its implementation.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU Gabriella Gerzsenyi & Menno Verheij European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions Unit 03.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
IPPC vs Emissions Trading Lesley James Friends of the Earth (England, Wales & N.Ireland) and the European Environmental Bureau.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 1 Environmental Law. Environmental Permitting 2 Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 introduced a new.
3rd BERCEN Exchange Programme, Prague WASTE CONDITIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Mrs. Marianne Lindström, Finnish Environmental Institute,
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
The Permitting Process under the Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations Ian Halliday Senior Policy Officer.
Page 1 Annexes of the Directive 96/61/ES on IPPC Agency on Integrated Prevention Ms. Lucie Svobodová Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
The current legal situation
Paul Fernee - Technical Advisor Industry and Waste Tech Services National Operations Technical Services Management of Air Pollution Control Residues from.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Ministry for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Sea in charge of Green Technologies and Climate Negotiations
IPPC Permit Procedure in the UK Kiev, 26 January 2011 Alex Radway Senior Advisor Environment Agency for England & Wales, United Kingdom.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
Introduction to the philosophy
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Annexes of the Directive 96/61/ES on IPPC
INTEGRATED PERMITTING IPPC DIRECTIVE: BEST PRACTICE
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1136 on CSM Design Targets (CSM-DT)
Regional Workshop on e-waste
Anna Hall Senior Groundwater Advisor
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
EU action after Deepwater Horizon accident - Gulf of Mexico – April 2010
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

BMRA Legislative Policy Group – Shredder Sub Group IED and Permit template Conditions 23 May 2016

Metal Recycling and Hazardous Waste Transfer / Treatment Team – E&B SBR Paul Fernee – Team Leader Andy Bee – Metal Shredding Alan Owers - WEEE Tania Tucker– Sector Lead Metal Recycling Chris Hall – Hazardous Waste Jill Rooksby – Sector Lead Hazardous Waste Treatment Unfortunately Andy is moving on to the Non-hazardous waste sector…

EPR Shredder Permitting Objectives Constraints and Drivers Ensure that: we implement ‘General Principles’ whilst minimising impact we achieve a ‘Level regulatory playing field’ we align direction of travel with Bref Process operators don’t do things (spend) twice issued permits withstand public scrutiny

Legislative Principles Waste Directive 2008/98/EC Underlying principles of Article 13 of the revised Waste Directive (rWD) 2008/98/EC to take the ‘necessary measures’ to ensure that waste management is carried out without endangering human health, without harming the environment etc. Everyone is familiar with requirements of Waste Directive

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive (12) The permit should include all the measures necessary to achieve a high level of protection of the environment as a whole and to ensure that the installation is operated in accordance with the general principles governing the basic obligations of the operator. The permit should also include emission limit values for polluting substances, or equivalent parameters or technical measures, appropriate requirements to protect the soil and groundwater and monitoring requirements. Permit conditions should be set on the basis of best available techniques. See IED Pre-ample para 12.

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive Article 11 - General principles governing the basic obligations of the operator Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide that installations are operated in accordance with the following principles: (a) all the appropriate preventive measures are taken against pollution; (b) the best available techniques are applied; (c) no significant pollution is caused; (d) the generation of waste is prevented in accordance with Directive 2008/98/EC; See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive Article 11 - General principles governing the basic obligations of the operator (e) where waste is generated, it is, in order of priority and in accordance with Directive 2008/98/EC, prepared for re-use, recycled, recovered or, where that is technically and economically impossible, it is disposed of while avoiding or reducing any impact on the environment; (f) energy is used efficiently; (g) the necessary measures are taken to prevent accidents and limit their consequences; See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive The IPPC Directive (96/6//EC as amended) was replaced by Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) Previously member states had to have regard to the Bref, compliance with its requirements will now be mandatory. The contents of Annex IV 96/6//EC are now found in Annex III of 2010/75/EU. The main change is to point 12 which now states ’12. information published by public international organisations’ See http://ec.europa.eu/environment/industry/stationary/ied/legislation.htm

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive BAT - (10) ‘best available techniques’ means the most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing the basis for emission limit values and other permit conditions designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole: See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive (a) ‘techniques’ includes both the technology used and the way in which the installation is designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned; See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive (b) ‘available techniques’ means those developed on a scale which allows implementation in the relevant industrial sector, under economically and technically viable conditions, taking into consideration the costs and advantages, whether or not the techniques are used or produced inside the Member State in question, as long as they are reasonably accessible to the operator; See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive (c) ‘best’ means most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the environment as a whole; Also see Article 14 5. Where the competent authority sets permit conditions onthe basis of a best available technique not described in any of therelevant BAT conclusions, it shall ensure that: (a) that technique is determined by giving special considerationto the criteria listed in Annex III; and (b) the requirements of Article 15 are complied with. Where the BAT conclusions referred to in the first subparagraphdo not contain emission levels associated with the best availabletechniques, the competent authority shall ensure that the technique referred to in the first subparagraph ensures a level of environmental protection equivalent to the best available techniquesdescribed in the BAT conclusions. 6. Where an activity or a type of production process carriedout within an installation is not covered by any of the BAT conclusions or where those conclusions do not address all the potential environmental effects of the activity or process, the competentauthority shall, after prior consultations with the operator, set thepermit conditions on the basis of the best available techniquesthat it has determined for the activities or processes concerned, bygiving special consideration to the criteria listed in Annex III.

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive ANNEX III - Criteria for determining best available techniques 1. the use of low-waste technology; 2. the use of less hazardous substances; 3. the furthering of recovery and recycling of substances generated and used in the process and of waste, where appropriate; 4. comparable processes, facilities or methods of operation which have been tried with success on an industrial scale; See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive 5. technological advances and changes in scientific knowledge and understanding; 6. the nature, effects and volume of the emissions concerned; 7. the commissioning dates for new or existing installations; 8. the length of time needed to introduce the best available technique; 9. the consumption and nature of raw materials (including water) used in the process and energy efficiency; See

Legislative Principles Industrial Emissions Directive 10. the need to prevent or reduce to a minimum the overall impact of the emissions on the environment and the risks to it; 11. the need to prevent accidents and to minimise the consequences for the environment; 12. information published by public international organisations. See

Discharges to water Includes surface water and sewer (ie. direct and indirect) Trade effluent controls relate solely to the quality and quantity of the effluent discharged. Sewerage Undertakers have no powers to control the process producing the effluent, except in so far as the trade effluent consent limits may influence the choice of process by the discharger. See

Discharges to water - Indirect The IED permits discharge to sewer and co-treatment at a WwTW, providing that such discharge and treatment guarantees an equivalent level of protection of the environment, taken as a whole, as would be achieved if dedicated treatment on-site had been employed. Coupled with appropriate control at source, treatment at a WwTW can be effective. See

Pre-shredders Pre-shedders are not mandatory if management systems and existing practices effective. Will be reviewed with BAT Conclusions Existing practices can include shearing etc. Target for explosions = none BAT benchmark for explosions against best performing sites See

Indirect Discharge (to sewer) Discharge consented by sewerage undertaker Impact of discharge assessed as acceptable using H1 as part of application? Review existing data under discharge consent - data adequate ? yes no no yes IC to propose and implement monitoring plan – may go beyond what’s required under consent Agree monitoring programme with EA Permit issued with improvement conditions Permit issued specifying ongoing check monitoring IC to assess impact of the discharge using H1 Implement mitigation measures where necessary and/or revise monitoring plan Review under BREF

Direct Discharge (to watercourse) Discharge consented by EA Impact of discharge assessed as acceptable using H1 as part of application? Review existing data under discharge consent - data adequate ? yes no no yes IC to propose and implement monitoring plan – may go beyond what’s required under consent Agree monitoring programme with EA Permit issued with improvement conditions Permit issued specifying ongoing check monitoring IC to assess impact of the discharge using H1 Implement mitigation measures where necessary and/or revise monitoring plan Review under BREF

Table S3.1 Point source emissions to air – emission limits and monitoring requirements Emission point ref. & location Parameter Source Limit (including unit) Referenc e period Monitoring frequency Monitoring standard or method A1 Emissions control system exhaust   Total suspended particulates   Extraction System 20 mg/m3 or other level agreed in writing with the Environment Agency Hourly average Quarterly or other frequency agreed in writing with the Environment Agency In accordance with BS EN 13284-1or as agreed in writing with the Environment Agency.

Emissions to air and monitoring Agree reduced frequency with us if effective abatement and meeting limit consistently Can you meet the 20mg/m3 limit for point source emissions?* yes Monitor as per permit No / don’t know What can you meet, what’s the design spec of your plant? don’t know monitor Agree temporary alternative limit with us can’t use std method? Monitor as per permit Agree alternative monitoring with us Review in accordance with BREF Improvement condition to reduce emissions *assumption is all shredders have extraction and a point source emission