JBI Scoping Reviews “WIDS’IT’”- Walsh, 2016 (personal communication)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper Rob Sneyd (with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)

Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process

High Level Conference European Parliament Brussels Tuesday, 16 th September 2008 EU MHADIE Project Health and Disability Policy Recommendations Somnath.

Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews

Mixed methods synthesis ESRC Methods Festival 2006 James Thomas Institute of Education, University of London.

A systematic review of school-based skills building behavioural interventions for preventing sexually transmitted infections in young people Dr Jonathan.

Protocol Development.

Title of presentation By Presenter Greet the audience, introduce yourself and the topic of the presentation.

What do I do with the literature when I’ve found it? Alison Brettle, Lecturer (Information Specialist) School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Salford.

Systematic Reviews Dr Sharon Mickan Centre for Evidence-based Medicine

Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.

5.0 Types of Reviews. Indispensable Rules of the Review Process Transparency Documentable Replicable.

Mapping Studies – Why and How Andy Burn. Resources The idea of employing evidence-based practices in software engineering was proposed in (Kitchenham.

Introduction to meta-analysis in Review Manager (RevMan).

Undertaking Systematic Literature Reviews By Dr. Luke Pittaway Institute for Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development.

CHAPTER 2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS. 1. Selection of topic  2. Reviewing the literature  3. Development of theoretical and conceptual frameworks  4.

Breadth First Search

Chapter Three THE RESEARCH PROCESS

An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Shakila Thangaratinam Professor of Maternal and Perinatal Health Women’s Health Research Unit R & D Director of Women’s.

Developing Research Proposal Systematic Review Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT Rehabilitation Health Science.

Systematic reviews in the social sciences Sarah Whitehead, Cardiff Institute of Society and Health.

Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.

How to Critically Review an Article

Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing. The Literature Review ? “Literature reviews …… introduce a topic, summarise the main issues and provide.

Rapid Evidence Assessments: some practical considerations DfES Rapid Reviewing Seminar 17th November 2004.

Systematic Reviews.

Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.

Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland

(1) Systematic reviews that configure and aggregate data to answer all research questions David Gough Systematic Reviews for Complicated and Complex Questions,

LITERATURE REVIEW  A GENERAL GUIDE  MAIN SOURCE  HART, C. (1998), DOING A LITERATURE REVIEW: RELEASING THE SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH IMAGINATION.

Systematic reviews as a tool to plan new studies and interpret their results Introducing the THEME GROUP.

Workshop A. Development of complex interventions Rob Anderson, PCMD Nicky Britten, PCMD.

Writing and presenting a dissertation proposal requires high self-discipline and commitment. Three essential pre-writing actions:  Complete preliminary.

Quality in qualitative research ESRC research methods festival July 2008 Jane Lewis, NCB.

ESRC Research Methods Festival st July 2008 Exploring service user participation in the systematic review process Sarah Carr, Research Analyst,

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.

Research Report Writing Presentation

Journal Club <Insert topic> <Insert presenters name>

Systematic Reviews of Evidence Introduction & Applications AEA 2014 Claire Morgan Senior Research Associate, WestEd.

TITLE OF AUDIT Author Date of presentation. Background Why did you do the audit? e.g. high risk / high cost / frequent procedure? Concern that best practice.

MASTER'S THESIS SEMINAR DR. SHUAIQIANG WANG DEPARTMENT OF CS-IS, JYU.

Understanding Theory and Research Frameworks

Title Investigators and sites. Clinical Trial Proposal Presentation Template for open forum at the 2017 ASM.

Systematic mapping to inform decision making

John Nelson Opio; Edoardo Aromataris; Catalin Tufanaru

Best Practice Systematic Review

Review of Related Literature

TJTS505: Master's Thesis Seminar

Literature review Methods

Change Communications Plan Template

Planning your Dissertation

Research and Evidence Based Medicine

Research Methods Project

Change Communications Plan Template

The Cochrane Empty Reviews Meeting

Change Communications Plan Template

Crowd-sourcing an evaluation report

A Framework for Program Evaluation

THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE OF RESEARCH ON WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY INDICATORS IN WEST AFRICA: A SYSTEMATIC MAP TO GUIDE DECISION-MAKING Leah Salm1 . Roos.

Goal and Scope Rubric, 0.5 points

Clinical leadership strategies used to implement large-scale service change in NHS England Olivia Hartrick.

What are systematic reviews and why do we need them?

Current Policy Debates

The Literature Review Dr Areefa Albahri.

Research Proposal and Report

Tips for Creating and Delivering an Effective Presentation

Tips for Creating and Delivering an Effective Presentation

QUESTION: Compare and contrast the policies of Alexander II ( ) and Alexander III ( ) of Russia. (May 2006) Topic: Time Frame: Argument: Analyse:

The Cochrane Empty Reviews Meeting

Presentation transcript:

JBI Scoping Reviews “WIDS’IT’”- Walsh, 2016 (personal communication) Presented by Micah Peters micah.peters@adelaide.edu.au

Outline Indications Objectives, Questions, Inclusion Criteria A brief model of scoping reviews Frameworks for scoping reviews Breadth not quality Implications for research, policy, and practice Outline

Indications Map disparate or unknown evidence Precede a systematic review Map concept use Map how research has been done Develop a policy map Gaps analysis Indications

Objectives and Questions Research objectives and Review objectives Congruence between objectives Do you have the right review objective for your research objective? Review Objectives and Questions Are you asking the right questions? Questions and Sub-questions How many questions do you have? Objectives and Questions

Questions and Inclusion Criteria Congruence between questions and review inclusion criteria Do you have the right parameters to find the right evidence? P - opulation C - oncept C - ontext Questions and Inclusion Criteria

Scoping the evidence Synthesising the evidence A model

Synthesising the evidence Scoping the evidence A model

Previous Frameworks

The JBI Framework 1. Identifying the research objective 2. Clarifying the review objective and questions 3. Determining the inclusion criteria 4. Developing the a-priori protocol 5. Searching for and identifying the evidence 6. Extracting the Data 7. Mapping the Data 8. Discussing the Evidence 9. Making conclusions and giving recommendations The JBI Framework

What?! No critical appraisal?! Breadth of the evidence, not the quality Implications for policy and practice? Implications for research - Primary research - Secondary research What?! No critical appraisal?!

Methodological discussion, support, and publishing JBI Scoping Reviews Joannabriggslibrary.org jbi.synthesis@adelaide.edu.au micah.peters@adelaide.edu.au - Scoping review protocol template Methodological discussion, support, and publishing JBI Scoping Reviews

JBI Scoping Reviews Methodology Chapter Further reading

More further reading