Jeanie McHugo Meredith Davison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT QUALITY AND COST? The factors that lead to increased student learning and increased student.
Advertisements

Standard 22A Curricular Structure HT Accredited Curriculum.
Curriculum Design: The Basics 25 September 2012 Nicolene Murdoch Executive Director: Teaching, Learning & Quality Monash South Africa.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Outcomes, Assessment and Improvement Student Learning Outcomes Implementation at Crafton Hills College.
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
1 NEEDS BASED TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aland Russell Director of Technology Escuela Campo Alegre Documents available upon.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
“The great end of education is to discipline rather than furnish the mind; to train it to the use of its own powers, rather than fill it with the accumulation.
Project Based Learning What, Why & How. Objectives for Today Have you experience the beginning of a project (= Making your own project) Analyze your experience,
Integrating Technology & Media Into Instruction: The ASSURE Model
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Welcome Alabama Course of Study Technology Education Workshop.
Assessment 101 Office of Planning and Assessment.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Use of Curriculum Mapping in Program Assessment and Evaluation Pat Munzer, DHSc, RRT, FAARC Washburn University.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Celia Regimbal chapter Principles of Assessment 12.
Lesson Planning. WHO determines what we teach? Put the following in order from the broadest to the most specific. Lesson plan State standard National.
Meredith Davison Mike Roscoe
Jeanie McHugo Rachel Carlson
Learning Assessment Techniques
Enrollment Management
Writing Great Learning Outcomes
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Peer to Peer PD Accreditation Process
Curriculum Development
School – Based Assessment – Framework
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Rachel Carlson Jeanie McHugo
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Effective Outcomes Assessment
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Behind-the-Wheel Theory Course Introduction and Overview
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
Designing and Implementing Local Faculty Development Programs
Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD
Helping students know what they know
Purpose for Curriculum Mapping
Vision 20/20: Checks and Balances
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
recommendations for new teachers
From Big Ideas to Lesson Plans
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education
Model Types Instructional Decisions Associated Lesson Plans
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
Student Learning Outcome Assessment at the
GA Association of School Personnel Administrators
Designing and delivering a learner centred curriculum
Behind-the-Wheel Theory Course Introduction and Overview
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Jeanie McHugo Meredith Davison Program Directors 101 Curriculum Revision Jeanie McHugo Meredith Davison

Objectives Upon completion of this presentation, the participant will be able to: Describe the components of curriculum design and revision Identify and use programmatic data sources during the revision process Analyze previous experiences and identify strategies for improvement

Curriculum “The planned and unplanned experiences that students have while taking part in an educational program.” What are the curricular foundations for PA education? What is the curricular influence for your program?

Components of Intentional Curriculum Raw Material – willing student with prerequisite knowledge, skills and attitudes Curriculum Package Goals Courses Sequence Facilitators (teachers) Syllabi Lesson Plans Evaluation Instruments Physical Resources (desks, chairs, computers etc.)

Where Are You in the Revision Process? Tinkering at the margins Major overhaul needed

Plan Ahead know what finished product looks like understand institutional requirements changes must be consistent with your mission curricular essentials sequencing content and objectives syllabi, textbooks, rubrics, sequencing and exams delivery others requirements

Curriculum Mapping Subject/ System Topic Subtopic(s) Course/Term Content Hrs Cardiology CHF Acute Adult PA-600/F1 1 Chronic PA-600 Dermatology Infections Bacterial: cellulitis, furuncles, … Peds PA-601/Sp1 1.5 Examination Lesion morphology Geriatric PA-501 1 lect 1 lab Monitor what is taught, where and at what educational level (knowledge vs application and synthesis Curriculum mapping helps faculty understand what is planned for instruction. There are several models available PAEA Copyright 2016

Key Players Faculty course coordinator Course workgroup (temporary) Faculty curriculum committee Stakeholders: Faculty, Dean, Graduates, Preceptors, Employers & STUDENTS

Implementation/On-going Evaluation “Real-time” feedback from students and course facilitators Focus groups Classroom assessment techniques Student performance Student course evaluations

Ongoing Quality Improvement vs. Curriculum Revision Curriculum evaluation is a continuous process Institutional definitions and/or decisions may dictate your actions

The Unintended (Hidden) Curriculum: What Influences Student Learning? culture of the program faculty modeling peer interactions extra-curricular events (planned and unplanned)

Things to Remember…. Document the process as part of on-going self assessment (needed for ARC-PA) Be prepared to make real-time modifications based on student/facilitator feedback Listen, listen, listen….

Major Revisions Needed Why? When? What? Who?

Scenario Presentations Curriculum Revision Scenario Presentations

Acknowledgements Patrick Auth Grace Landel Matt Baker Bridget Calhoun Marvis Lary Tony Miller Dawn Morton-Rias PAEA Copyright 2016

Resources ARC-PA, Accreditation Standards for Physician Assistant Education, 4th edition. Hudak, N. M., Scott, V., Spear, S. B. & Hill, K. J. (2015). Reinventing the wheel: one program’s approach to redesign of didactic courses. Journal of Physician Assistand Education, 26(4): 204-207. Kern, D. Curriculum Development for Medical Education A Six- Step Approach. Pascarella, E. & Terenzini P. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass. Presenters acknowledge contributions from previous workshop facilitators including Matt Baker, Bridget Calhoun, Marvis Lary, Tony Miller & Dawn Morton Rios