Topic 2: Mind-brain type identity theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metaphysics Part II. Thought Experiment: Physical & Mental Properties A1. 2 more objects: quarters, books, grass… A2. 2 more physical descriptors: green,
Advertisements

© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Mental causation Michael Lacewing
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
Mind-Body Dualism. The Mind-Body Problem The problem of explaining how a mind is connected to and interacts with a body whose mind it is, or the problem.
Learning objective: To be able to explain the claim that the mind is ontologically distinct from the body; To understand Descartes’ conceivability argument.
Learning objective: To understand what is meant by epiphenomenalism and issues with it. epiphenomenalist dualism Causal redundancy.
Domesday: Purpose and methodology Monday 24 th November Do Now: Originally called the ‘Winchester Roll’ or ‘King’s Roll’, by 1180 it was known as ‘The.
The Justified True Belief Theory of Knowledge Today’s objectives: 1)To be able to explain the Justified True Belief theory of knowledge. 2)To learn the.
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism R1.When I look at a rose, I see something that is red. R2.The red thing cannot be the rose itself (since.
Need worksheet from yellow folder – arg from perceptual variation.
Philosophy of Mind materialism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 13 Minds and Bodies #2 (Physicalism) By David Kelsey.
Learning objective: To understand what Ryle thinks is a ‘category mistake’ To understand how he defends logical behaviourism.
What is an example of a secondary quality?
What is Psychology? Pages What is Psychology? Give me your own personal definition of Psychology.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
MGT6600 Week 5 Dr Ridhwan Fontaine Objectives of This Course This course has three key objectives, 1.To explain the Islamic perspective to management.
Recap on your whiteboards
Direct Realism Criticisms
Rules and Helpful Tips For Essay Writing
Exam feedback.
Warm – Up #1 1. What is psychology?
The Tripartite Definition of Knowledge
Answering long questions
What is eliminative materialism?
Topic 1: Logical behaviourism
The Paragraph A paragraph is a group of sentences stating one idea or one event. 4 types of writing : - Narrative : telling a story. - Descriptive : describing.
More is not better… Better is better
Spain and the New World Writing Frames
Are you ready for the Literacy Test?
IB Psych 10/16/17 Nothing Intros only… Today’s Agenda: Working on SAQ
Whiteboards – What is the external world?
What does it mean to say mental states are reducible
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
Timing is everything.
GCSE EXAM QUESTION GUIDANCE
Paper 1 – Question C and Question D
PHL 203 Theories of Reality
Introducing the Ideas One of Six Traits:
What did I google to find this picture?
Connection between body + mind
Chapter 1 Introduction: Matter and Measurement
Tuesday 3/21/17 Notebook Entry:
What keywords have we used so far
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
Get students ready for the lesson!
Textbook/Cornell Notes Practice
“No Regrets” by Edith Piaf
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
What is good / bad about this answer?
Welcome to A2 Psychology
The ‘Thought for the Week’ this week is ‘Being Hopeful and Visionary.’
Recap: What were the issues and responses?
Depth and Complexity Icons
CALCULATE Use numbers given in the question to work out an answer. Always show working.
How to structure an answer
Point – your simple answer to the question Evidence – a quotation “ …”
Year 12 reading for Religious Studies!
Writing to Express an Opinion
Recap – NO NOTES! What key ideas / terms / arguments can you remember from the two theories we’ve covered so far: Direct Realism Indirect Realism.
Clarify definition: to make something easier to understand.
Peacock Colors Personality Profile
Recap: What is multiple realisability? Why is it an issue for MBTIT?
Reading Reactions Write about what is happening in your book
Three Parts to a Logical Response:
Presentation transcript:

Topic 2: Mind-brain type identity theory Physicalism Topic 2: Mind-brain type identity theory Learning objective: To understand what is meant by mind-brain type identity theory Key Words Reductive ontological

What do you see?

What’s the theory? The mind IS the brain Mental states and processes are literally identical to physical ones (something in the brain) Facts about the mind are reducible to facts about the brain – so thoughts, dreams etc are just brain states. The identity theory hopes that research can and will eventually identify what each thought, feeling, desire is in the brain.

What does it mean to be identical? The terms mind and brain refer to the same thing; their qualities are identical. But the identity theorist is not saying talk of the mind means the same as talk of the brain (because if I say I love my husband I do not mean certain neurons are firing in my brain). But as a matter of empirical fact they happen to be the same. This is called an ‘ontological reduction’.

J. J. C. Smart ‘Sensations and Brain Processes’ Read the extract and highlight the important points. Answer: How does type identity theory solve the problem of mental causation? Read through pages 306-307 of orange book and write down the strengths of the theory.

LB vs. IT Which is more convincing at this stage and why?

Explain why the mind-brain type identity theory is a reductive theory of the mind (5 marks) A full, clear and precise explanation. The student make logical links between precisely identified points with no redundancy 4 A clear explanation, with logical links, but some imprecision/redundancy 3 The substantive content of the explanation is present and there is an attempt at logical linking. But the explanation is not full and/or precise 2 One or two relevant points made, but not precisely. The logical is unclear 1 Fragmented points, with no logical structure Nothing written worthy of credit