Duke Energy Coal Ash Beneficial Reuse Technologies Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAIR & MATS 2012 Southern Sectional AWMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference September 12, 2012 Chris Goodman, P.E. Environmental Strategy.
Advertisements

Year End Review January, 2015.
Triple Effect of Reject to Power on Joburg’s Waste Vision
Building for theBy Recycling Industrial Materials Industrial Materials Recycling Kimberly Cochran, PhD US EPA Office of Solid Waste AGC Building Division.
Coal Ash Ponds The Romeo and Juliet Story of Coal Fired Power Plants Society sees them as toxic together, but currently, one cannot exist without the other.
2014 Dan River Ash Release-Summary and Update NC Water Resources Congress October 30, 2014.
Implications of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Where Do We Stand on Regulations?
Engineering Technology Division
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 13 Energy Efficiency Module 13: SUPPLY-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Recycling Nuclear Waste: Potentials and Global Perspectives Mikael Nilsson Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of California,
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
1 9/15/2015 Gogita Todradze National Statistics Office of Georgia Institutional Arrangements for Energy Statistics in Georgia.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
CCR Rule: Consultant’s Perspective 2015 Air & Waste Management Association Meeting Callaway Gardens, GA Presented by: Randy Sullivan, Principal & Senior.
EPA’s Proposed CCB Regulations & Morgantown STAR Project 1 Shawn A. Seaman September 27, 2010
Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Conversion Technologies April 15, 2004.
Eco·Systems, Inc.. Beneficial Reuse of Industrial Byproducts Definition- turning an industrial byproduct into a valuable commodity Examples – Coal Combustion.
Alternatives Drying Class A Processing Dewatering Centrifuge, BFP Thickened Liquid Sludge Class A Land Application Incineration Pelletization Alkaline.
ADVANTAGES OF U.S. SOYBEAN MEAL IN DOMESTIC FEED RATIONS.
MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST CONTRACTING DIVISION DEFINING REQUIREMENTS.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
MICHAEL E. SCOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Available Information on the Beneficial Reuse of Coal Combustion Products 1.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
Boiler Operations, Maintenance and Performance Conference.
1 Implementing E.O : Opportunities for Industrial Materials Recycling Implementing E.O : Opportunities for Industrial Materials Recycling Federal.
Welcome Carol Berrigan Nuclear Energy Institute July 13, 2015.
Southern California Emerging Waste Technologies Forum July 27, 2006 Conversion Technology 101.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
Connecting the Dots: Policy, Markets and the Clean Energy Future New England Restructuring Roundtable Boston, MA September 30, 2016.
The Hydrogen Economy A strategy proposal for encouraging growth
Alex Glenn Duke Energy Florida President
Department of Environmental Quality
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Chapter 16: Global Sourcing and Procurement
Flexible Film Packaging Diversion Options
Integrated Resource Plan 2016
Waste Generation and Waste Disposal
Eilat - Eilot Conference November 2016
Riding the Innovation Wave - The Hunter’s opportunity to provide sustainable energy solutions to the global economy James McGregor Energy Systems Manager.
Market Operations Engagement Group EVSE Working Group – Principles
NC AWWA-WEA 97th Annual Conference
Engaging Energy Consumers Energy Action, Fuel Poverty & Climate Action Conference - March 2017 Aoife MacEvilly Commissioner for Energy Regulation Regulating.
Understanding Organizational Buying Behaviour
Beneficial Uses & Disposal of Coal Combustion Residues (CCRs)
Kansas Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency ’05 Conference
Australian Energy Scenarios Predicting Uncertainty
POWER PLANT THERMAL POWER STATION.
The Operation of Gravity Chutes, air slides and belt conveyers
Coal waste handling, pollution impacts and utilization
Marketing mix chapter no.3
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
HAZARDOUS WASTE.
Byron Woertz, Manager—System Adequacy Planning
Coal Combustion Products Quantities Produced and Disposed
European Federation of Concrete Admixtures Associations
Chesterfield Neighborhood Coal Ash Update January 9th, 2019
Byron Woertz, Manager—System Adequacy Planning
Sustainable Agricultural Use of Municipal Wastewater Sludge
Senator Dance Town Hall Coal Ash Update December 5, 2018
City of Janesville Wastewater Facility Plan Amendment Public Hearing
Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology and Solid Waste Disposal
About Boral Resources America’s largest manager and marketer of coal combustion products Only coal ash management company with operations coast to coast.
Presentation transcript:

Duke Energy Coal Ash Beneficial Reuse Technologies Study Presentation to the GWWMC Raleigh, NC November 9, 2016

Coal Ash Beneficial Use Program Duke Energy is committed to exploring safe and economic ways to recycle coal ash. So far in 2016, the company has recycled more than 58% of the total production ash (total CCPs >80% reuse) that is produced at our coal plants. The CCPs are currently used in concrete, cement, structural fills, wallboard, agricultural, misc. products. We’re committed to recycle as much material as we can, but this is driven by many factors including market demand and transportation costs. Ultimately, we seek to make investment and recycling decisions that benefit our customers. Status of coal ash beneficiation technology study per the CAMA and HB-630

Overview of CAMA Section 4.(e) - Requirements Coal Ash Management Act of 2014 / HB-630 Required study of CCP uses and markets Submittal to EMC and the CAMC August 1, 2016 Duke selected EPRI through RFP to conduct the “CAMA Study” Project Scope Overview Phase 1: Market Study Phase 2: Beneficiation Technologies Phase 3: Alternative and Innovative Technologies Present findings of RFP per HB-630 Section 4.(e) to the EMC before 08/01/16. Note: The reports were issued to Mr. Rowland, Chairman of EMC, on 7/18/16.

Duke Energy Coal Ash Beneficial Reuse Technologies Study Phase 1: Market Study

Market Drivers Supply – Produced + stored; Must be reliable and consistent supply Demand – Current and new uses Transportation – Bulk material of low to moderate value; transportation costs have a large impact on value and marketability Quality – Ash Characteristics (e.g. LOI, fineness, Ammonia / FGD/ other constituents, etc.) and Consistency of Supply. Price – “Hurdle Rate” equals cost of disposal. New laws (CAMA, HB-630) & regulatory environment for disposal should incentivize more product options for beneficial reuse. Regulatory/Public Perception Risk – Regulatory uncertainty and public perception influence market viability Competition – Coal fired generation has significantly decreased, but impetus among utilities to use both produced and stored CCPs.

Operating Coal Fired Duke Plant Sites

Retired Duke Coal Fired Plant Sites Buck 5.3 MT Weatherspoon 1.5 MT Dan River 2.8 MT HF Lee 6.0 MT Riverbend 4.9 MT Sutton 7.2 MT 7 Inactive CCP Sites 64 CCP impoundments 34 MT Stored CCPs Station Stored Tons Cape Fear 5.7 MT

Duke NC Coal Ash Market Map

Fly Ash Projections into Concrete Products Markets in NC Estimated Maximum Annual Fly Ash Demand into Concrete Products Estimated by 2015 to 2019 2020 to 2030 Duke 0.600 0.800 Leming (2015) 0.997 1.531

Duke NC - Coal Ash Quality CCPs at most sites do not meet NCDOT or ASTM specs for use in concrete, primarily LOI Belews Creek – Best quality and good sales in concrete markets Roxboro Beneficiation – Electrostatic Separation Limited Sales from other plants due to quality, consistency, or qty Data on quality and consistency limited

Other Current Ash Use Markets in NC

Phase 2: Beneficiation Technologies Duke Energy Coal Ash Beneficial Reuse Technologies Study Phase 2: Beneficiation Technologies

Options to feed Ready Mix Concrete Market Dry Beneficiation Selective Collection Air Classification Tribo-Electrostatic Separation Thermal Technology (FBC) Chemical Passivation Wet Beneficiation Thermal Beneficiation (SEFA STAR) Ash Recovery Froth Flotation Screening Hydraulic Separation

Tribo-electrostatic Separation Tampa Electric Big Bend Power Plant Longannet Power Plant Examples: Duke Roxboro Power Plant Tampa Electric-Big Bend Station South Mississippi EP -R.D. Morrow Plant RWE npower-Aberthaw Station

Thermal Beneficiation PMI Dense Phase FBC High Thermal Mass Long Retention Time Fluidizing gas = Combustion gas LOI Limitations Proven Track Record SEFA Dilute Phase FBC Short Retention Time Fluidizing gas ≠ Combustion gas Can go to Zero LOI Stand alone system Operated on ponded ash Proven Track Record LOI +++ Fineness + Uniformity Complexity ++++ Examples: PMI Carbon Burn Out® SEFA STAR®

Phase 3: Innovative Technologies Duke Energy Coal Ash Beneficial Reuse Technologies Study Phase 3: Innovative Technologies

Alternative and Innovative Technologies Objective Identify, categorize, and describe alternative and innovative technologies and products for the use of coal ash. Technologies that currently have limited or no commercial markets Assess technology maturity and potential market Approach Literature and internet searches Industry and vendor contacts Papers and conferences and Academia An Open Innovation Search process Technologies grouped into broad categories to facilitate comparison.

Technology Grouping Market Ready Technologies Mature Technologies Emerging Technologies Technologies with current limited market potential

Limited current market Market ready Emerging Mature Limited current market Flowable Fill Cenospheres Superpozzolans Aggregates Geopolymer Masonry units Alternative cement Wastewater stabilization Metal Composites Proppants Polymer composites Autoclaved concrete Zeolites Metal Recovery Rare earth recovery Nanotechnology Plasma vitrification

Limited current market Market ready Emerging Mature Limited current market Flowable Fill Cenospheres Superpozzolans Aggregates Geopolymer Masonry units Alternative cement Wastewater stabilization Metal Composites Proppants Polymer composites Autoclaved concrete Zeolites Metal Recovery Rare earth recovery Nanotechnology Plasma vitrification Colored ones have very limited acceptance in the US – or not cost competitive High Value Potential for large market

Recommendations for Beneficial Reuse Know your ash By unit and time: Due to changing coal supply, coal quality changes frequently, so testing by unit occurs on an as needed basis Core ponds: Underway at Allen, Buck, Cape Fear, Cliffside, HF Lee, Mayo, Weatherspoon, others Work with vendors to explore technologies / new products Evaluate the viability of the ash technologies. Testing is cheap HB-630: Mandate to install three (3) ash beneficiation units Evaluating new product options: brick, block, pavers, aggregates, etc. Submit RFP to better understand the markets No panacea exist Stay involved with our ash marketers to continually enhance market options

Thank You Any Questions???