ANOVA with SPSS Recap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEMORY PERSPECTIVES: DATA ANALYSIS Week 9 Practical.
Advertisements

Kruskal Wallis and the Friedman Test.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)-the General Linear Model (GLM)
SPSS Series 3: Repeated Measures ANOVA and MANOVA
N-way ANOVA. Two-factor ANOVA with equal replications Experimental design: 2  2 (or 2 2 ) factorial with n = 5 replicate Total number of observations:
Using Statistics in Research Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Using Statistics in Research Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Group Comparison Research
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 19 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Jeopardy! One-Way ANOVA Correlation & Regression Plots.
Lecture 16 Psyc 300A. What a Factorial Design Tells You Main effect: The effect of an IV on the DV, ignoring all other factors in the study. (Compare.
Causal Comparative Research: Purpose
Analysis of variance (2) Lecture 10. Normality Check Frequency histogram (Skewness & Kurtosis) Probability plot, K-S test Normality Check Frequency histogram.
Lecture 15 Psyc 300A. Example: Movie Preferences MenWomenMean Romantic364.5 Action745.5 Mean55.
ANOVA  Used to test difference of means between 3 or more groups. Assumptions: Independent samples Normal distribution Equal Variance.
Analysis of Variance & Multivariate Analysis of Variance
Repeated Measures ANOVA Used when the research design contains one factor on which participants are measured more than twice (dependent, or within- groups.
Chapter 9 Two-Sample Tests Part II: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Renee R. Ha, Ph.D. James C. Ha, Ph.D Integrative Statistics for the Social & Behavioral.
ANCOVA Lecture 9 Andrew Ainsworth. What is ANCOVA?
Basic Statistics Michael Hylin. Scientific Method Start w/ a question Gather information and resources (observe) Form hypothesis Perform experiment and.
Part IV Significantly Different: Using Inferential Statistics
Factorial Design Two Way ANOVAs
SPSS Series 1: ANOVA and Factorial ANOVA
Week 10 Chapter 10 - Hypothesis Testing III : The Analysis of Variance
TAUCHI – Tampere Unit for Computer-Human Interaction ERIT 2015: Data analysis and interpretation (1 & 2) Hanna Venesvirta Tampere Unit for Computer-Human.
Xuhua Xia Slide 1 MANOVA All statistical methods we have learned so far have only one continuous DV and one or more IVs which may be continuous or categorical.
Statistics Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Running Scheffe’s Multiple Comparison Test in Excel
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance.
Review. Statistics Types Descriptive – describe the data, create a picture of the data Mean – average of all scores Mode – score that appears the most.
10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs What types of evidence allow us to conclude that one variable causes another variable? How do experimental research.
ANCOVA. What is Analysis of Covariance? When you think of Ancova, you should think of sequential regression, because really that’s all it is Covariate(s)
Chapter 13 Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Quiz 11  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  post hoc tests.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Between Subjects Analysis of Variance PowerPoint.
Handout Twelve: Design & Analysis of Covariance
Inferential Statistics Overview. T-test SPSS Steps Open SPSS data file Click on ANALYZE Click on COMPARE MEANS Click on INDEPENDENT SAMPLES T TEST Select.
Handout Eight: Two-Way Between- Subjects Design with Interaction- Assumptions, & Analyses EPSE 592 Experimental Designs and Analysis in Educational Research.
Handout Ten: Mixed Design Analysis of Variance EPSE 592 Experimental Designs and Analysis in Educational Research Instructor: Dr. Amery Wu Handout Ten:
Covert Attention Results (Spring). Covert Attention Results (Fall ’05)
ANCOVA.
F-Tables & Basic Ratios. Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Some F-Table Exercises 2.Introduction to Basic Ratios [Between-Subject ANOVA] 3.Independent Samples.
MANOVA Lecture 12 Nuance stuff Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
MEMORY PERSPECTIVES: DATA ANALYSIS Week 9 Practical.
Chapter 11: Test for Comparing Group Means: Part I.
Oneway ANOVA comparing 3 or more means. Overall Purpose A Oneway ANOVA is used to compare three or more average scores. A Oneway ANOVA is used to compare.
Inferential Statistics Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
8 Experimental Research Design.
Categorical Variables in Regression
Research in Social Work Practice Salem State University
REGRESSION G&W p
Effect Sizes (continued)
Research Methodology Lecture No :25 (Hypothesis Testing – Difference in Groups)
Inferential Statistics
Design (3): quasi-experimental and non-experimental designs
Understanding and conducting
Chapter 11: Bivariate Statistics and Statistical Inference
Dr. Siti Nor Binti Yaacob
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Post Hoc or Multiple Comparison Testing
Interactions & Simple Effects finding the differences
Kin 304 Inferential Statistics
Statistics in SPSS Lecture 8
Multivariate Analysis: Analysis of Variance
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Analysis of Variance: repeated measures
MEMORY PERSPECTIVES: DATA ANALYSIS Week 9 Practical.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Graziano and Raulin Research Methods: Chapter 12
Presentation transcript:

ANOVA with SPSS Recap

Post hoc tests

Multifactorial Designs: Beginning Multivariate Analysis Read G&W 428-435

Excel file – Multifactorial ANOVA introduction More than one IV may influence a DV Sex Relationship Satisfaction Family Type

Interaction effects There can be many different types of interactions Interactions must be interpreted in the light of theory They are symmetric mathematically Main effects cannot be interpreted if there are interaction effects in the model Main effects are “marginal” to the interaction effects

Satisfaction is influenced by family background in both groups but not by sex Intact Disrupted

Multifactorial ANOVA introduction More than one IV may influence a DV Sex Relationship Satisfaction Family Type

Satisfaction is influenced by family background and by sex Intact Disrupted

Multifactorial ANOVA introduction More than one IV may influence a DV Sex Relationship Satisfaction Family Type

Satisfaction is influenced by family background only in one group Intact Disrupted

Multifactorial ANOVA introduction More than one IV may influence a DV Sex Relationship Satisfaction Family Type

Satisfaction is influenced by family background but the effect differs by sex Intact Disrupted

SPSS output: Family type effects

SPSS output: Sex effects

SPSS output: Family type and sex effects at the same time

SPSS output: Family type and sex effects at the same time and interdependent

SPSS output: Family type and sex effects at the same time and interdependent

Conceptually – interaction effects

Understanding the F statistics: Equal sample sizes Factor B 1 2 … m 1 2 k n Factor A

Understanding the F statistics: Equal sample sizes Variance of the attribute in the subjects in each group Factor B 1 2 … m 1 2 k n Factor A

Understanding the F statistics: Equal sample sizes Factor B 1 2 … m 1 2 k n Factor A

Understanding the F statistics: Equal sample sizes Factor B 1 2 … m 1 2 k n Factor A

Understanding the F statistics: Equal sample sizes Factor B 1 2 … m 1 2 k n Factor A

Reviewing multifactor F statistics Within group variance Factor B 1 2 … m 1 2 k n Between groups variance of Factor A Factor A Between groups variance of Factors A*B Remember: This subtracts Factor A and Factor B marginal variances Between groups variance of Factor B

Language of Multifactorial ANOVA The present research has a m*n design. Main (marginal) effects of Factor A were significant (not significant). Main (marginal) effects of Factor B were significant (not significant). Interaction effects of Factor A by Factor B were significant (not significant).

ANOVA Exercise

The problem A training program was designed to enhance teamwork skills. The designers of the program administered it to a group of 105 experimental and 105 control group subjects. The subjects were from low-middle-high SES (70 each). We have scores of post training skills.

What do we want to know? Hypotheses

What is the nature of the data?

Questions about interaction effects Did the experimental training work for all SES groups? Did the training have an SES bias? (alternative formulation) Is it possible that the training was particularly beneficial or particularly ineffective for a given SES? (e.g., low skill – low SES group)

Effects of training

Effects of SES

Both factors together

Interaction effect????

Who does it work for?

Table of means