ADR Comprehensive Standardisation TEST Inspection of Austria Closing Session AT CAA BMVIT, 12 May 2017 IC.PRS.STD.Closing.Session.1.1

Outline The inspection team Purpose of the ADR TEST inspections Specificities of the ADR domain Summary of results Next steps Your first feedback 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

The inspection team Trainee Team Leader Joaquin Lopez (EASA) Team Member / Sect. Mgr. Giulio De Crescenzo (EASA) Team Member Jozef De Moor (EASA) Emmanouil Vardakis (EASA) Observer Sarah Poralla (EASA) NSC Veronika Löblich (AT CAA) SFP Thomas Liebert (AT CAA) 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Managers Flight Standards Director: Jesper Rasmussen Head of ATM/ANS & ADR Department (acting): Gernot Kessler ADR Section Manager: Giulio De Crescenzo 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Objective of standardisation Overall objective: ~ (EC) No 216/2008 Standardisation objective: ~ (EU) No 628/2013 Establish and maintain a high uniform level of civil aviation safety in Europe. Monitor the application by the Competent Authorities of the applicable requirements as well as their uniform implementation. 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Purpose of the inspections Monitor the application by the AT Civil Aviation Authority of Basic Regulation and its Implementing Rules and assess their uniform implementation Assess AT CAA’s ability to discharge its safety oversight responsibilities Gather information in the context of the Continuous Monitoring Approach Collect information regarding the impact of implementation of BR and its IR (Follow-up findings raised in previous inspections) (… report the above to the Commission) 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Concept of ADR test inspections Assess the maturity of the ADR STD system to improve our internal processes and procedures Important for EASA to qualify team leaders and team members A possibility for the AT CAA to get familiar with standardisation inspections for aerodromes 2015 2016 2017 2018 initiation Q4 recruitment training / qualification procedures planning / test inspections fully operational 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Technical scope of the inspections BASIC REGULATION Reg. (EU) No 216/2008 AIR Initial Airworthiness Reg. 748/2012 Continuing Airworthiness Reg. 1321/2014 FCL/FSTD/MED Air Crew Reg. 1178/2011 OPS/RAMP Air Operations Reg. 965/2012 ATM/ANS ANS common reqs. Reg. 1035/2011 ATM/ANS safety oversight Reg. 1034/2011 ATCO Licensing Reg. 340/2015 SERA Reg. 923/2012 ADR Aerodromes Reg. 139/2014 + Occurrences Reg. 376/2014 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Specificities of the Aerodrome domain No common JAA background Wide range of flexibility tools to accommodate the large variety of aerodromes to ensure proportionality to deal with physical limitations … Complex structures of competent authorities for ADR Complex organisation structures of competent authorities Large competent authorities with regional offices Functional separation: CAs involved in aerodrome operations 6 MAR 14 Transition start 31 DEC 17 Transition end 592 total in scope 116 exemptions included 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Aerodromes in the EASA scope 28 EU states 4 EFTA states 7 WA states 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Inspection programme MON TUE WED THU FRI 08 09 10 11 12 AM - AT CAA PM Arrivals Visit Vienna Airport Departures 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Summary of Results No problem on accredited tasks Strong points of AT CAA Positive and constructive collaboration of CAA/VIE personnel; Open and positive approach towards ADR implementation; Quality oriented work; Motivated, professional and technically competent staff. Recommendations for improvement Alignment between national regulatory framework with EU regulations; Completeness and implementation of policies, processes and procedures. No problem on accredited tasks 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Verification of compliance at CA / UT Verification of Authority activities Undertakings are visited as samples to evaluate CA’s oversight. No findings, can be raised by EASA against undertakings, but all the undertakings’ non-compliances (UNC) detected shall be recorded and monitored by EASA. They can either: provide supporting evidence and/or be the consequence of a non- compliance of the CA (Type 1) not be directly correlated to a deficiency by the CA (Type 2) UT 1 C A UT 2 UT 3 Dealing with UNCs: UNCs (type 1) provide supporting evidence and/or are the consequence of a non-compliance of the CA with the applicable requirements. Managed by EASA and closed based on evidence submitted by CA. UNCs (type 2) cannot be directly correlated to a deficiency at the CA level, as it does not provide any evidence of a failure in the way the CA has discharged its oversight responsibilities. Directly managed by the CA in its capacity as CA, reporting the results to the Agency “Crosscheck” by verification of # undertakings 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Classification of findings non-compliance with the applicable requirements raising mainly standardisation concerns D non-compliance with the applicable requirements raising standardisation and safety concerns, if not timely corrected G immediate safety concern Presented by GDC? ISC 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Next steps C findings D&G* findings Findings managed and closed at individual level Notification CAP (D)&(G) Submission CAP (C) Submission C findings * For (G) findings, immediate corrections are required. 10w Preliminary Findings D&G* findings FCC 4w 2w 4w 2w 2w 6w (ideally) 6w (ideally) Comment DR AGREEMENT (D)&(G) AGREEMENT (C) T=0 Classif sent to CA 6 10 16 22 As soon as corrections and corrective actions of class D findings are received, they should be immediately analysed by the STL in charge and presented to the Section manager (or coordinator on his behalf) for final agreement / acceptance, which is to be tracked by means of a sign-off list. The STL in charge should do his utmost to reduce the agreement time as much as possible.   It is then important that the STL communicates to the Competent Authority the EASA agreement on corrections and corrective actions for class D findings in the shortest possible timeframe after they are processed. This shall be done by e-mail with a status report extracted from the database as attachment. Draft Report Final Report Internal EASA procedure says: CAP (D) & (G) immediately analysed and processed TL to keep agreement time as short as possible. Maximum agreement time Closing Session REPORTING PHASE FOLLOW-UP AND CLOSURE PHASE 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Follow-up actions Findings are managed and closed at individual level Finding closure also has an impact on the planning of future inspections (cfr. Average Reactivity Index). Preparation Visiting Notification /Reporting Follow-up finding’s closure finding’s closure Findings’ closure Findings are managed and closed at individual level X-CHECK ON-SITE Continuous Monitoring Status PLANNING INFO 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

In case of disagreement? ISC not timely corrected Continuous Monitoring Status Notify CA and request action Action not agreed within due time YES Monitor Assess Agreed action not duly implemented YES NO OK? INSIST? Update status EASA IN CONTROL NO EC IN CONTROL EC SR + RECs CA Article 22 Supplementary actions The Agency shall identify any failure to follow up a finding of non-conformity such as: corrective action not submitted within the period referred to in Article 17(1); corrective action not agreed by the Agency within the period referred to in Article 17(4)(b); corrective action not duly implemented. In the cases referred to in paragraph 1, the Agency shall request the competent authority to provide clarifications on the failure and to submit supplementary actions, setting a time-limit for the response. The Agency shall assess the consequence of the failure together with the response provided by the competent authority within the set time-limit. Based on the outcome of such assessment, the Agency may: agree with the supplementary actions submitted; or issue a supplementary report to the competent authority concerned and to the Commission. That report shall include the Agency's assessment and recommendations to the Commission, including when deemed necessary recommendations on the mutual recognition of certificate(s) issued by the competent authority. Without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, following receipt of the supplementary report referred to in paragraph 3(b), the Commission may take any of the following steps: address comments to the Member State concerned or request further explanation to clarify all or part of the findings of non-conformity; require the Agency to carry out an ad-hoc inspection to check the satisfactory implementation of corrections and corrective actions; initiate the procedure referred to in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 to decide whether certificates issued by the competent authority comply with the applicable requirements; initArticle 22 The Agency shall identify any failure to follow up a finding of non-conformity such as: corrective action not submitted within the period referred to in Article 17(1); corrective action not agreed by the Agency within the period referred to in Article 17(4)(b); In the cases referred to in paragraph 1, the Agency shall request the competent authority to provide clarifications on the failure and to submit supplementary actions, setting a time-limit for the response. The Agency shall assess the consequence of the failure together with the response provided by the competent authority within the set time-limit. Based on the outcome of such assessment, the Agency may: issue a supplementary report to the competent authority concerned and to the Commission. That report shall include the Agency's assessment and recommendations to the Commission, including when deemed necessary recommendations on the mutual recognition of certificate(s) issued by the competent authority. Without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, following receipt of the supplementary report referred to in paragraph 3(b), the Commission may take any of the following steps: address comments to the Member State concerned or request further explanation to clarify all or part of the findings of non-conformity; require the Agency to carry out an ad-hoc inspection to check the satisfactory implementation of corrections and corrective actions; initiate the procedure referred to in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 to decide whether certificates issued by the competent authority comply with the applicable requirements; initiate a procedure under Article 258 of the Treaty. iate a procedure under Article 258 of the Treaty. Disseminate SR Address comments to MS/CA Request MS / CA to explain Task EASA to further investigate Initiate de-recognition Initiate infringement 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

Types of inspections and inspection intervals CONTINUOUS MONITORING Off-site finding COMPREHENSIVE INSPECTION AD- HOC INSPECTION Interval as defined by the Multi-Annual Programme FOCUSED INSPECTION FOCUSED INSPECTION Off-site finding COMPREHENSIVE INSPECTION AD- HOC INSPECTION 12 May 2017 ADR.AT.05.2017

In case of doubts, please refer to the Mutual Expectation Paper THANK YOU Joaquin Lopez ADR Standardisation Team Leader joaquin.lopez@easa.europa.eu In case of doubts, please refer to the Mutual Expectation Paper

CTIF Commission Meeting Rescue and Fire Fighting at Airports ÖBFV / bmvit Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 CTIF Commission Meeting Rescue and Fire Fighting at Airports Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA 15.06.2017

Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 background 139/2014 training programme is reponsibility of aerodrome operator RFFS-fire chiefs started to develop a guideline in 2014 development was stopped by Accountable Managers RFFS-fire chiefs established working group within Austrian Firefighters‘ Association training programme was finished and approved in December 2016

Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 training of RFFS

Requirements for an admission to the RFFS Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 Requirements for an admission to the RFFS completed vocational training or completed technical school general fire-fighting suitability respiratory protection capability driving license of class C (E of advantage) in the case of applicants from Member States of the European Union with compulsory military service or compulsory civilian service: carried out military or civilian service good spoken and written German (sufficient skills to follow the RFFS-training) member of a volunteer fire brigade and / or a company fire brigade if the applicant is employed in the area of the first aid station acc. national legislation: training acc. operating instructions first aid station is an advantage

Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 basic training firefighter´s training in her/his own fire brigade according to specifications of the Austrian Firefighters´ Association (100 h) incl. the corresponding examination according to specifications of the regional Firefighters´ Association first aid (16 h) respiratory protection (16 h) incl. the examination according to specifications of the regional Firefighters´ Association

extended basic training Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 extended basic training aircraft familiarization (40 h) fundamentals of removal operations (according to AÖV) airport layout and orientation (20 h) human factors (8 h) CBRNE (16 h) communication (6 h) loading plan and operation of the equipment of the respective vehicle on which the employee is deployed (at the expense) operation of the respective vehicle and driving authorization of the respective vehicle on which the employee is used as a motorist (according to expenditure) basic preventive fire protection (according to expenditure) fire insert (16 h)

extended fire service training Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 extended fire service training fire insert (8 h) aircraft fire fighting (40 h)

training as RFFS-charge (OR1 – OR9) Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 training as RFFS-charge (OR1 – OR9) management tasks during aircraft fire fighting (20 h) removal training (according to AÖV) extended CBRNE according to specifications of the regional Firefighters´ Association technical training (20 h) according to specifications of the regional Firefighters´ Association completion of management level 1 according to specifications of the Austrian Firefighters´ Association extended preventive fire protection (20 h)

training as RFFS-incident commander (OF1 – OF5) Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 training as RFFS-incident commander (OF1 – OF5) completion of management level 2 according to specifications of the Austrian Firefighters´ Association training for incident commanders according to specifications of the regional Firefighters´ Association specialization special-purpose aircrafts (20 h) removal guide training (according to AÖV)

training as RFFS-fire chief Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 training as RFFS-fire chief specific training of the fire chief according to specifications of the regional Firefighters´ Association internship at an airport and / or professional fire brigade (112 h) fire protection officers according national legislation preventive fire protection (20 h) recommendation for leadership training

training RFFS approved by CAA Austria „approved“ by EASA Ing. Andreas M. Herndler, MBA MPA, IV/L3 training RFFS approved by CAA Austria „approved“ by EASA STD-Test-Inspection 05/2017 1 observation: „Not all the RFFS vehicles had a grid map available.”