Global Investing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AI-99998© 2013 American Funds Distributors, Inc. Figures are past results and are not predictive of results in future periods. Investments are not FDIC-insured,
Advertisements

AI-36904© 2013 American Funds Distributors, Inc. Figures are past results and are not predictive of results in future periods. Investments are not FDIC-insured,
Chapter 4 Return and Risks.
Chapter 4 Return and Risks.
First Quarter Investment Outlook Prepared February 6, 2015.
Global Dynamism Index (GDI) 2013 summary report Model developed by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)
Investment and Financial Services: What Every Financial Educator Should Know.
Copyright ©2005 Ibbotson Associates, Inc. Stocks and Bonds Securities offered through Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., a broker/dealer, 1300 S. Clinton.
© 2009 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. 3/1/2009 Stocks and Bonds.
© 2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. 3/1/2008 LCN Stocks and Bonds.
1 Introduction to Macroeconomics Chapter 20 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
International Portfolio Investment
Copyright ©2005 Ibbotson Associates, Inc. Global Investing Securities offered through Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., a broker/dealer, 1300 S. Clinton.
Asset Allocation and the Efficient Frontier: Optimizing a portfolio’s risk/return profile J.P. Morgan Investment Academy SM FOR INSTITUTIONAL USE ONLY.
TM. Step 1 Selecting your Benchmark Asset Allocation Step 1 Selecting your Benchmark Asset Allocation.
Investments: Analysis and Behavior
(0415) © 2015 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. By accessing this presentation, you agree to the following terms. If you do not agree to these.
Investing in the UAE CH 10. Investing in the UAE Introduction Why Investing in Global Markets? 1. Additional investment opportunities 2. Growth potential.
Better insight + Better process = Better results Beyond just bricks & mortar: global property securities Stephanie Fennessey Client Portfolio Manager,
Portfolio Management Lecture: 26 Course Code: MBF702.
Risk: The Volatility of Returns The uncertainty of an investment. The actual cash flows that we receive from a stock or bond investment may be different.
International Portfolio Investment
© 2009 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. 3/1/2009 Portfolio Diversification.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 The Case for International Diversification.
International Diversification
International Finance FIN456 ♦ Fall 2012 Michael Dimond.
Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk.
City of Hallandale Beach DB Plan Update November 17, 2014.
© 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. The images contained in the Presentations and Education modules are provided as a single user license (‘Authorized.
1 FIN 408 International Investment Factors affecting Risk and Return Size and Number of International Open-end Funds Global market Correlations Correlation.
A Tour of the World Chapter 1. © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved The Crisis Table 1-1 World Output Growth since 2000.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
1 International Finance Chapter 6 (b) Balance of Payments I: The Gains from Financial Globalization.
© 2008 RiverSource Distributors, Inc. All rights reserved. Securities products are distributed by RiverSource Distributors, Inc., Member FINRA. RiverSource.
© 2009 Transamerica Corporation. All rights reserved.. FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY. 1 Investing Made Simple © 2009 Transamerica Corporation. All rights reserved.
International Portfolio Theory and Diversification.
Chapter 4 Comparing Mutual Funds. Categories of Mutual Funds There are 4 main categories of mutual funds: –Money market funds. –Bond funds. –Stock funds.
Chapter Fifteen International Portfolio Investments Chapter Objectives: Why investors diversify their portfolios ( 证券组合 ) internationally. How much investors.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
MEMBERS Horizon – The Value of Risk Control
RUSSELL DEW FINANCIAL SERVICES
Presented by StanCorp Equities, Inc., member FINRA
Risk and Volatility.
Presented by StanCorp Equities, Inc., member FINRA
30% • 30-day Treasury bills • Intermediate-term government bonds
Principles of Investing
Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk
Recession 1 (Mar 2001–Nov 2001) • Income Return • Total Return –15%
Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness
International Equity Markets
GROWTH AND CRISIS IN THE Outlook for the World Economy
CHAPTER 8 Risk and Rates of Return
Taxes and Investment Performance
CHAPTER FIFTEEN Cleary / Jones Investments: Analysis and Management
SWARNAM S/UNIT 1/RISK & RETURN - CBS
19 Globalization and International Investing Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
Ibbotson® SBBI® Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation
Global stock prices (January 1, 1980—January 22, 2016)
2018 Annual Market Review.
FIN 440: International Finance
Money / Banking / Finance
2018 Annual Market Review.
Types of risk Welcome to today’s presentation. We’re here to help you make the most of your retirement plan and keep you informed of concepts that may.
2018 Annual Market Review.
Lecture 26. World Economic Outlook
NS3040 Fall Term 2018 Trends in International Trade 2017
2018 Annual Market Review.
Beyond Investment Illusions
Risk and Return Lessons from Market History
Modern Portfolio Concepts
Presentation transcript:

Global Investing

World Stock Market Capitalization Year-end 2013 • United States 18.8% International: • Other Europe • United Kingdom • Japan • Other Pacific • Canada 9.1% 54.4% World Stock Market Capitalization By ignoring investment opportunities outside of the United States, you are missing out on approximately half of the investable developed stock market opportunities in the world. This image illustrates the relative size of international and domestic markets at year-end 2013. The international markets represented in the image constitute those countries having developed economies, some of which had established markets before the United States. In 2013, the total developed world stock market capitalization was $31.9 trillion, with $14.6 trillion representing international stock market capitalization. With trade barriers reduced and markets becoming more open, there has been an increase in global business activity. The domestic (U.S.) stock market continues to represent a significant portion of the world stock market capitalization. However, if you choose to exclude international investments from your portfolio, you are ignoring approximately half of the world’s investable assets. About the data World Market Capitalization by Country is from the Morgan Stanley Capital International Blue Booksm and includes the following developed countries: Australia France Japan Spain Austria Germany Netherlands Sweden Belgium Hong Kong New Zealand Switzerland Canada Ireland Norway United Kingdom Denmark Israel Portugal United States Finland Italy Singapore The data is expressed in U.S. dollars. Stock market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the price per share by the number of outstanding shares and then summing all of the equities traded in a country or region. Estimates are not guaranteed. 8.7% 4.9% 4.1% Capitalization calculated at year-end 2014. Total market capitalization is $31.9 trillion. Estimates are not guaranteed. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

GDP Growth by Region Five-year average annual percentage change 2009–2013 India 6.5% Japan 0.5% Canada 1.3% United States 1.2% United Kingdom –0.2% China 8.9% Australia 2.5% Brazil 2.7% South Africa 1.9% U.A.E. 1.8% Russia GDP Growth by Region A number of important trends, both short- and long-term, have contributed to global growth over time. One clear sign of worldwide economic expansion is rising gross domestic product (GDP). This statistic measures the value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a given year. Foreign direct investments and exports are often considered the two major drivers of economic growth. Recently, however, this growth has slowed down, as many countries have been hit by the 2007–2009 global recession. Data may still indicate that GDP is rising, but it is clearly doing so at a much slower pace than in the past. This image highlights average 5-year GDP growth rates for different countries around the world. Of the selected countries, China and India posted the greatest GDP growth rates, averaging 8.9% and 6.5% per year, respectively. In fact, China has been Asia’s fastest growing economy over the past 20 years. As companies within these countries achieve strong results, they help fuel local stock markets and local economies. Because GDP measures a nation’s total output, it can provide a snapshot of a country’s economic condition. So, what does this number mean for investors? This number can be a good indicator for potential investment opportunities in international regions. The growth of the GDP in the U.S. and other developed countries (Canada, the United Kingdom) has been alarmingly low, on average, for the past five years; other countries and regions have experienced much greater growth. GDP numbers reflect the annual percentage change, averaged over the past five years. 2013 numbers are estimates. Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook Database, as of October 2013. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Global Stock Market Returns Highest and lowest historical annual returns for each region 1970–2013 Annual ranges of returns 125% 100 75 50 25 –25 –50 Pacific Europe International United States 107.5% 79.8% 69.9% 37.6% Global Stock Market Returns Understanding the historical range of returns of global investments provides valuable insight into their demonstrated risk. This image illustrates the ranges of annual returns for domestic and international composites, as well as the Europe and Pacific regional composites, over the period 1970 through 2013. These annual ranges of returns provide an indication of the historical volatility (risk) experienced by investments in various global markets. During this time frame Pacific stocks, for example, ranged from a high of 107.5% to a low of –36.2%. This range, relative to the others, suggests high volatility. In contrast, U.S. stocks had the narrowest range of returns, which implies that U.S. stocks experienced less volatility than investments in other regions of the world. Overall, the 1970–2013 period was a good time to be an international investor. For example, the best annual returns for all regions were higher than the best annual return for U.S. stocks (107.5%, 79.8%, and 69.9% versus 37.6%). Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500® index, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. International stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index, European stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe Index, and Pacific stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Pacific Index. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The data assumes reinvestment of income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. 10.4% 10.0% 10.7% 9.7% Compound annual return –37.0% –36.2% –43.1% –46.1% Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Each bar shows the range of annual total returns for each region over the time period analyzed. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Risk Level by Region Annual standard deviation 2004–2013 22.7% 22.1% 21.5% 21.4% 20 17.7% 16.3% 15 14.6% 10 Risk Level by Region International investing has grown rapidly in recent years. Behind this trend is the realization that global markets offer additional opportunities for investment and diversification potential. The factors that provide diversification, however, also contribute to the risk of international investing. It may be difficult for investors to understand all the political, economic, and social factors that influence foreign stock markets. The chart represents the average amount of risk, as measured by standard deviation over a 10-year period, for different regions and countries throughout the world. Foreign region stock markets such as Asia and the Pacific demonstrated the greatest amount of risk. The U.S. and Japan experienced the least amount of risk over the past 10 years. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. About the data Asian stocks in this example are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International All-Country Asia except Japan Index, Japanese stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Japan Index, Pacific stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Pacific except Japan Index, Canadian stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Canada Index, and European stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe except U.K. Index. U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general, and U.K. stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International U.K. Index. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Risk is measured by monthly annualized standard deviation. Standard deviation measures the fluctuation of returns around the arithmetic average return of the investment. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the variability (and thus risk) of the investment returns. 5 Asia Europe Pacific Canada U.K. Japan U.S. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Global Investing 1970–2013 • U.S. stocks • International stocks $100 10 1 0.50 $77.87 $59.81 10.4% 9.8 9.0 8.6 4.3 Compound annual return • U.S. stocks • International stocks • International bonds • U.S. bonds • U.S. inflation $42.84 $36.41 $6.20 Global Investing Along with the potential for higher returns, international investments can provide diversification benefits. This image illustrates the hypothetical growth of a $1 investment in U.S. stocks and bonds, international stocks and bonds, and inflation over the period January 1, 1970 through December 31, 2013. Of the asset classes shown, U.S. stocks accumulated the highest ending wealth value, and international stocks took second place. International bonds outperformed U.S. bonds over the time period analyzed. Since international markets do not always move parallel to U.S. markets, international securities can be an attractive addition to a domestic portfolio. When U.S. markets are down, international markets may be up, and vice versa. Therefore, diversifying with international securities may reduce the overall risk of a portfolio. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Government bonds and Treasury bills are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the United States government as to the timely payment of principal and interest, while returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International bonds are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. International stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. International bonds are represented by International Monetary Fund (IMF) International Financial Statistics (equally weighted portfolio of long-term government bonds and cash equivalents) from January 1970–December 1978, the Citigroup Non-U.S. 5+ Year Government Bond index from January 1979–December 1984, and the Citigroup Non-U.S. 5+ Year World Government Bond Index thereafter. U.S. government bonds are represented by the 20-year U.S. government bond and U.S. inflation by the Consumer Price Index. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Hypothetical value of $1 invested at the beginning of 1970. All values in U.S. dollars. Assumes reinvestment of income and no transaction costs or taxes. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Growth Through Global Investing Annual returns of top-performing developed global stock markets 2013 Greece 53% Finland 48% Ireland 42% Germany 32% United States 32% 2012 Belgium 41% Germany 32% Denmark 32% Singapore 31% United States 16% 2011 Ireland 14% New Zealand 6% United States 2% UK –3% United States 2% Growth Through Global Investing When compared to developed stock markets worldwide, the U.S. market has rarely been the top performer in any given year. This image presents the four best-performing developed stock markets worldwide compared to the U.S. market over the past four years. Out of the 23 countries examined, the U.S. ranked 15th in 2012. In fact, it seems that whenever world equity markets experienced a prosperous year, the U.S. market was not among the top performers. However, with world equity markets down drastically in 2011, the U.S. actually ranked 3rd behind Ireland and New Zealand. In 2013, the U.S. was very close to the four top-performing countries, with a 32% return. It is rare to find any single market that has consistently performed among the top global stock markets. Since it is nearly impossible to predict which market will be a top performer in a given year, it can be beneficial to hold a portfolio diversified across several countries. Moreover, the independent movement of global markets has provided considerable diversification benefits when held in combination with U.S. investments. While all stock markets experience ups and downs, these fluctuations may occur at different times for different markets. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, liquidity risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. About the data Equities for each country are represented by Morgan Stanley Capital International Indexes and the U.S. stock market by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The data assumes reinvestment of dividends and is expressed in U.S. dollars. Unlike domestic returns, foreign market returns consist of two main components: market performance and currency fluctuations. 2010 Sweden 35% Denmark 31% Hong Kong 23% Singapore 22% United States 15% Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns expressed in U.S. dollars. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Comparing U.S. and International Stock Performance Average returns over 10-year holding periods 25% • U.S. stocks • International stocks 20 15 10 Comparing U.S. and International Stock Performance In the past, international stock market investments have provided growth and diversification benefits. This image compares the performance of international and U.S. stocks over rolling 10-year holding periods from 1980 through 2013. For example, the two bars shown for 1989 represent the 10-year average return from 1980 through year-end 1989 for U.S. and international stocks. Notice that international stocks outperformed domestic stocks for 12 out of the 25 10-year holding periods shown. A primary benefit of investing internationally is diversification, as international markets may follow different economic cycles from those driving domestic markets. So, while all stock markets experience ups and downs, fluctuations may occur at different times for different markets. For example, when the U.S. economy is in a recession, international markets may still be growing, and vice versa. This behavior has historically helped to reduce the overall volatility (risk) of a portfolio. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500® index, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general, and international stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. All values are expressed in U.S. dollars. The average return represents a compound annual return. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The data assumes reinvestment of income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. 5 –5 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2013 2004 2007 2010 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Calculated using rolling 10-year average returns. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Domestic Versus Global 1970–2013 Domestic portfolio Global portfolio • U.S. stocks • U.S. bonds • International stocks 14% 40% 46% 60% 40% Domestic Versus Global Historically, adding international stocks to a portfolio of less volatile assets has increased return and decreased risk. This image illustrates the risk and return profiles of two hypothetical investment portfolios. The domestic portfolio, which excluded international stocks, experienced a higher average risk than the portfolio comprised of domestic and international investments. Although it may appear counterintuitive, the volatility of domestic (U.S.) portfolios can be reduced and the return increased by including international stocks. In this case, notice how, by diversifying with international stocks, the overall risk of the global portfolio was decreased and at the same time the return remained the same. Because international and domestic securities generally do not react identically to the same economic or market stimuli, combining these assets can often produce a more appealing risk and return tradeoff. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Government bonds are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the United States government as to the timely payment of principal and interest, while stocks are not guaranteed and have been more volatile than bonds. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500® index, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. U.S. government bonds are represented by the five-year U.S. government bond and international stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. All values are expressed in U.S. dollars. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Risk and return are measured by standard deviation and compound annual return, respectively. Standard deviation measures the fluctuation of returns around the arithmetic average return of the investment. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the variability (and thus risk) of the investment returns. The data assumes reinvestment of all income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. Return 9.8% Return 9.8% Risk 11.0% Risk 10.7% Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Risk and return are based on annual data over the time period analyzed. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Key Differences Between Developed and Emerging Markets Developed countries Established and stable economies with strong consumption activities and ample resources. Ex. Australia, Canada, Japan, Germany, U.K., U.S. Emerging countries Countries that are starting to participate globally by implementing reform programs and undergoing economic improvement. Ex. Brazil, China, Mexico, Thailand, Russia, India Key Differences Between Developed and Emerging Markets With approximately half of the world’s market capitalization abroad, domestic investors are bound to participate in international investing. Prior to investing, it is important that investors know and understand the difference between developed and emerging markets. Developed countries are established, with more stable economies, and often experience less risk than emerging markets while also providing attractive return potential. Emerging markets are often defined as less-developed countries that are just beginning to experience rapid growth and a stable currency. These areas are considered more risky because they carry additional political, economic and currency risks. An investor in emerging markets should be willing to accept volatile returns; there is a chance of higher returns at the risk of large losses. An upside to emerging markets is that their performance is generally less correlated with developed markets. As such, they can potentially play a role in diversifying a portfolio. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, liquidity risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Regional Performance Growth of $1,000 from 1988–2013 $100k Compound annual return $72,793 • Latin America 17.9% • U.S. 10.5 • Emerging Europe 8.9 • Emerging Asia 8.2 • Emerging Far East 7.8 • Int’l developed stocks 6.1 $13,420 10k $9,150 $7,736 $6,995 Regional Performance Along with the potential for higher returns, international investments can provide significant diversification benefits, specifically emerging market investments. This image illustrates the hypothetical growth of a $1,000 investment in U.S. stocks, international developed stocks, and four emerging economies: Europe, Far East, Asia and Latin America over the period January 1, 1988 through December 31, 2013. Of the asset classes shown, Latin American stocks easily accumulated the highest ending wealth during the time period analyzed. Notice how the U.S. stock index line surged relative to other areas throughout the 90s and then fell during the “lost decade.” The performance of international developed stocks compared with U.S. and emerging stocks was lackluster over this 26-year period, resulting in the lowest accumulation of wealth. Since emerging markets do not always move parallel to U.S. markets, they can be an attractive addition to a domestic portfolio. When U.S. markets are down, international developed and emerging markets may be up, and vice versa. Therefore, diversifying with emerging securities may reduce the overall risk of a portfolio. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are more risky than developed market investments. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. International developed stocks are represented by Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. Emerging Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Far East stocks are represented by the corresponding Morgan Stanley Capital Emerging Market Regional Indexes. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. All values are expressed in U.S. dollars. The data assumes reinvestment of all income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. $4,696 1k 700 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Emerging Market Performance Risk and return 2004–2013 31.2% 30% • Risk • Return 26.9% 23.8% 22.6% 20 15.5% 13.1% Emerging Market Performance Emerging markets are another possible international investment opportunity. The image shows the risk and return for four different emerging regions around the globe from 2004 to 2013. In comparison, the U.S. stock market had a risk and return of 14.6% and 7.4%, respectively, over the same time period. Developed international stock markets as measured by the MSCI EAFE had a risk and return of 18.2% and 7.4%, respectively, over the same time period. While the possibility of good returns for emerging markets exists, these returns are often accompanied by much greater risk. This is because emerging market economies and political systems are in a transitional state and tend to be much less stable than developed countries. This increases the chance for events such as currency devaluation and corruption in the political system. Furthermore, emerging market economies tend to be smaller than developed economies, so market liquidity and lack of available transparent financial reporting are major concerns. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are riskier than developed market investments. Risk is measured by monthly annualized standard deviation. Standard deviation measures the fluctuation of returns around the arithmetic average return of the investment. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the variability (and thus risk) of the investment returns. About the data Emerging Europe is represented by the International Finance Corporation (Investable) Emerging Europe Index, emerging Asia by the International Finance Corporation (Investable) Asia Index, emerging Latin America by the International Finance Corporation (Investable) Latin America Index, and emerging Mideast and Africa by the International Finance Corporation (Investable) Mideast/Africa Index. U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500® index, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general, and developed international stocks by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The data assumes reinvestment of income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. 11.7% 10 9.6% Emerging Europe Emerging Latin America Emerging Asia Emerging Mideast and Africa Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Undeveloped Opportunities 1994–2013 Returns as of December 2013 40% • Emerging markets • United States 32.4% 30 20 17.9% 15.2% 11.5% 10 9.2% 7.4% 5.7% –2.3% –10 1 year 5 year 10 year 20 year Growth of $10k Undeveloped Opportunities Many emerging markets have experienced strong returns in the past 20 years. With the rapid dissemination of technology, education, and globalization, it is not unreasonable for investors to want to pursue investments in these countries. Emerging markets have historically been more volatile than their developed counterparts. But what is important to remember is that the age-old adage of ‘investing for the long-term’ should apply to all portfolios, all allocation decisions, and all countries. The graph above illustrates the historical short- and long-term performance of emerging markets compared with U.S. markets. Emerging markets posted respectable returns, but also carried additional risk as shown by the volatility of the line graph. A hypothetical $10,000 invested in emerging markets would have grown to $30,311 in this 20-year time frame, compared with $58,355 for domestic investments. Both emerging markets and the U.S. were particularly hit and posted low returns during the global 2007–2009 recession and an uncertain world economic climate following events such as the Arab revolution, the tsunami in Japan and, more recently, the European sovereign debt crisis. However, as the line graph illustrates, the U.S. has experienced a strong recovery in the past few years, as opposed to emerging markets. When included in a portfolio, undeveloped economies not only provide additional return potential, but diversification benefits as well. However, investors considering emerging market investments for their portfolio must be comfortable with a higher-than-normal risk level. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, liquidity risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are riskier than developed market investments. About the data United States stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general, and emerging markets by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. $100k $58,355 $30,311 10 5 1994 1999 2004 2009 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Emerging Markets Experience a Wider Range of Returns 1988–2013 Developed markets Emerging markets 150% Return 125 100 75 50 25 –25 –50 –75 * compound annual return 20.0% 16.3% 11.0% 10.5% 8.5% Emerging Markets Experience a Wider Range of Returns When investors size up emerging markets, booming economic growth often becomes their focus. Therefore, it is easy to see what has drawn investors to emerging markets in recent decades: opportunity that they often cannot find elsewhere. In general, investors have been rewarded with solid returns. But investors must not forget the potential risks of emerging markets. Take for example the major collapse throughout Asia in 1997, when the Thai government was forced to dramatically devalue its currency. The result ricocheted throughout Asia as currencies in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia came under attack. Despite monetary rescue efforts, investor confidence was shaken and losses incurred. The image above illustrates the range of returns as well as the compound annual return of selected developed and emerging countries. Although both sets experienced growth, emerging markets experienced a much greater upside and often deeper downside. In addition, notice the white line as it represents the compound annual return for each country from 1988 to 2013: Mexico and Chile led the pack of emerging markets, while Australia and the U.S. were the leaders for developed countries. Despite the fact that some emerging markets outpaced developed countries, emerging markets can be volatile and are often considered more appropriate for long-term investors, who can handle potentially large fluctuations in returns. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are more risky than developed market investments. About the data United States equities are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. Equities for the other countries are represented by their respective Morgan Stanley Capital International country indexes in USD. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Keep in mind that the countries illustrated do not represent investment advice. The developed countries illustrated are a common range of investment options. Emerging-market countries were chosen based on availability of historical data; those with the longest stream of data were selected. 7.5% 6.3% * 0.8% Australia U.S. U.K. Japan Mexico Korea Taiwan Chile Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All values are expressed in U.S. dollars. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Global Market Downturns and Recoveries Periods of turbulence, 1988−2013 Number of downturns Greatest decline Average decline Average decline duration in months Average recovery duration in months* Emerging markets Asia Far East Europe Latin America 3 5 7 –73% –76% –75% –61% –57% –58% –53% –37% 25 15 64 67 27 19 Global Market Downturns and Recoveries A historic account of past downturns and recoveries can present a better picture of potential market performance. This especially makes sense in emerging markets, where investors are not necessarily familiar with foreign economic, political, and social events. There have been many U.S. equity market downturns over time, with varying levels of severity and different lengths of recovery period. The most severe downturn marked the start of the Great Depression, when stocks lost over 80% of their value. In this case, the recovery period was over 12 years. More recently, there was the 2001 market crash, during which stocks plummeted 44.7% and recovered only in October 2006, and the 2007–2009 bear market, with a 50.9% decline. Declines are not limited to the United States. Common examples are the Asian crisis in 1997 or the Russian financial crisis in 1998. The chart illustrates the number of bear markets in emerging economies since 1988. Latin America experienced the most downturns, but had less of an average decline and was the quickest to rebound relative to all other regions. Asia and the Far East, on the other hand, experienced fewer, but more severe, downturns that took time to crawl out of. Declines are part of the market cycle and occur for many different reasons. Sometimes stocks recover their value quickly, while other times the decline lasts for a while. Often, the decline is preceded by a period of high returns, which lulls investors into a false sense of security. Because no one can predict market declines with certainty, understanding the history, stability and strength of a region is essential for investors. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are more risky than developed market investments. About the data Asia, Europe, Far East, and Latin America are each represented by their corresponding Morgan Stanley Emerging Market Regional Index. International stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. Downturns in this example are defined by a time period when the stock market value declined by 20% or more from its peak, while the recovery period indicates the number of months from the trough of downturn to the market’s previous peak. Calculations for the average recovery duration do not include recovery from the 2007–2009 downturn, as the duration for this recovery is still unknown for all regions analyzed except the U.S. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The data assumes reinvestment of all income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. Developed markets International stocks 3 –56% –45% 21 32 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. *Calculations do not include recovery from the 2007–2009 downturn, as the recovery duration is still unknown for all regions except the U.S. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Correlations by Region 2004−2013 Emerging Developed Asia Europe Far East Latin America U.S. stocks International stocks Emerging Asia 1.00 Europe 0.83 1.00 Far East 0.99 0.83 1.00 Correlations by Region In terms of asset allocation, people look at international markets as a way to gain exposure to economic growth and opportunities outside the U.S. Another reason is for risk diversification in a portfolio. The risk diversification benefits of emerging markets can come from reasonably low correlation with both the U.S. and other developed markets. Correlation ranges from –1 to 1, with –1 indicating that the returns move perfectly opposite to one another, 0 indicating no relationship, and 1 indicating that the asset classes react exactly the same. High correlation suggests that combining assets may do little to lower the risk of a portfolio. Certainly, correlations among many countries have increased in recent years. Keep in mind that correlation among markets is only one variable supporting the benefits of international diversification. Investments still need to be evaluated for investor suitability, but understanding asset class behavior may help enhance the diversification benefits of investor portfolios. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are riskier than developed market investments. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500® Index, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. International stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index. Asia, Europe, Far East, and Latin America are each represented by their corresponding Morgan Stanley Emerging Market Regional Index. All correlations are based on monthly return data. Latin America 0.86 0.89 0.84 1.00 Developed U.S. stocks 0.77 0.73 0.76 0.73 1.00 International stocks 0.85 0.86 0.85 0.83 0.89 1.00 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Correlation ranges from –1 to 1, with –1 indicating that the returns move perfectly opposite to one another, 0 indicating no relationship, and 1 indicating that the asset classes react exactly the same. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Emerging Markets Can Improve Developed Portfolios 1988–2013 20% Return 16 12 8 4 • Developed portfolios Emerging- market stocks • Developed portfolios with emerging-market stocks Small stocks Large stocks Bonds Emerging Markets Can Improve Developed Portfolios Expanding the set of assets in a portfolio to include emerging market securities can improve the risk/return tradeoff of investment opportunities. An efficient frontier is the line that connects the combinations of securities that maximize expected return for a given level of expected risk (or that minimize expected risk for a given level of expected return). The comparison of the two efficient frontiers in this image makes a case for investing in emerging markets. Notice that by expanding the set of developed portfolios to include stocks from emerging countries and regions, you can improve the risk/return tradeoff of investment opportunities. In other words, for the period under examination, an investor could have achieved higher returns at given levels of risk. The improvement in the risk/return tradeoff is due to the relatively low correlation of the emerging market asset classes with the U.S. asset classes. As a result, points on the frontier that included emerging markets offered higher returns per unit of risk than points on the developed frontier. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Government bonds and Treasury bills are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the United States government as to the timely payment of principal and interest. Stocks are not guaranteed and have been more volatile than bonds. Furthermore, small stocks are more volatile than large stocks and are subject to significant price fluctuations, business risks, and are thinly traded. International investments involve special risks such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging market investments are riskier than developed market investments. About the data Large stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. Small stocks are represented by the Ibbotson® Small Company Stock Index. Bonds are represented by the 20-year U.S. government bond. Cash is represented by the U.S. 30 day T-bill. International developed stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index, while emerging markets are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index. All values are expressed in U.S. dollars. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Risk and return are measured by annual standard deviation and arithmetic average annual return, respectively. Standard deviation measures the fluctuation of returns around the arithmetic average return of the investment. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the variability (and thus risk) of the investment returns. The data assumes reinvestment of all income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs. Int’l developed stocks Cash 0% Risk 5 10 15 20 25 40 30 35 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

Global Winners and Losers 1999–2013 2007 2000 2002 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1999 2001 2003 2006 2004 2013 Highest returns 66.4 21.5 3.7 24.8 56.3 26.0 34.5 32.6 39.8 25.9 79.0 19.2 28.2 18.6 32.4 27.3 15.7 –0.8 17.8 39.2 20.7 14.0 26.9 11.6 10.3 32.5 15.1 9.2 18.0 23.3 26.0 –1.3 –2.4 14.2 28.8 14.6 11.9 15.8 10.8 –9.7 26.5 11.8 6.9 17.9 –2.3 21.0 –9.1 –3.0 –6.0 28.7 11.8 7.8 10.5 9.9 –37.0 25.9 10.1 2.1 16.0 –4.5 Global Winners and Losers When investing in the international landscape, it may be useful to analyze historical performance by country (or region) and category: U.S., international (developed), and emerging-market stocks and bonds. This image presents the past 15 years of performance for these six asset classes. It quickly becomes apparent that it is impossible to predict which asset class will be the best in any given year. Investors hoping for another excellent year for emerging-market stocks in 2008 and 2011 were certainly disappointed as this asset class dropped to the worst-performing position after years at the top. Similarly, U.S. bonds were the best performer in 2011, but the worst one in 2012 and 2013. This image may suggest that by taking advantage of opportunities abroad, you may experience higher returns than if you invested solely in the U.S. market. Also, since it is nearly impossible to predict which markets will be top performers in a given year, it may be beneficial to hold a portfolio diversified across several countries or regions. Moreover, the independent movement of global markets has provided considerable diversification benefits when held in combination with U.S. investments. By investing a portion of a portfolio in a number of different asset classes in different countries, portfolio volatility may be reduced. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. Stocks have been more volatile than bonds. International investments involve special risks, such as fluctuations in currency, foreign taxation, economic and political risks, and differences in accounting and financial standards. Emerging-market investments are more risky than developed market investments. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500® Index, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. U.S. bonds are represented by the 20-year U.S. government bond. International stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE®) Index, and international bonds by the Citigroup Non-U.S. 5+ Year World Government Bond Index. Emerging-market stocks are represented by the Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index, and emerging-market bonds by the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Plus. All values expressed in U.S. dollars. The countries/regions illustrated do not represent investment advice. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. –5.3 –14.0 –11.9 –15.7 18.7 10.9 4.9 6.8 6.5 –43.1 4.2 8.2 –11.7 3.5 –8.3 –9.0 –30.6 –21.2 –22.1 1.4 8.5 –7.3 1.2 5.5 –53.2 –14.9 5.8 –18.2 3.3 –11.4 Lowest returns • U.S. stocks • U.S. bonds • International stocks • International bonds • Emerging-market stocks • Emerging-market bonds Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.

The Case for Emerging-Market Bonds 2004−2013 Returns • U.S. stocks • Long-term government bonds • High-yield bonds • Emerging-market bonds 40% 20 –20 Last 1 year Last 3 years Last 5 years Last 10 years Rolling 12-month standard deviation The Case for Emerging-Market Bonds Investors have long been aware of both the diversification and performance benefits that may come from holding non-U.S. equity investments. A similar case can be made for the fixed-income side of a portfolio. Holding international bonds can add useful diversification, as foreign bond market performance does not generally correlate with domestic fixed income. And, if foreign bonds are denominated in different currencies, they can also provide investors with foreign currency exposure. Returns for fixed-income investments over the past 10 years have been strong. Over the last 5, 3, and 1 year periods, emerging market bonds have outperformed U.S. long-term government bonds. While this performance makes emerging bonds appear attractive, notice the level of risk in the bottom image. Between 2004 and 2007, as emerging debt markets gained confidence and stability, risk has decreased. In 2008, however, risk has increased once more across all bond categories as world markets entered a period of turmoil, and decreased somewhat in 2009, as markets started on the road to recovery. It is interesting to note how, between 2010 and 2012, the risk of emerging market bonds and high-yield bonds has actually been lower than that of U.S. stocks and long-term government bonds. Improvements in both economic policies and transparency should help to limit volatility going forward, but similar to the stock market, future results cannot be predicted. Emerging market debt carries unique risks and may not be suitable for certain investors. Returns and principal invested in stocks are not guaranteed. Emerging market investments are more risky than developed market investments. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Risk is measured by monthly annualized standard deviation. Standard deviation measures the fluctuation of returns around the arithmetic average return of the investment. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the variability (and thus risk) of the investment returns. About the data U.S. stocks are represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500®, which is an unmanaged group of securities and considered to be representative of the U.S. stock market in general. Long-term government bonds are represented by the 20-year U.S. government bond, high-yield bonds by the Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index, and emerging-market bonds by the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Plus. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. 10 20 30% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This is for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any investment. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. © 2014 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved.