PHWR Safety 2014 / CANSAS-2014 Workshop 2014 June Jun Yang AECL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Notre Dame Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Laboratories Senior and Junior laboratory courses.
Advertisements

Numerical Analysis for Influence of Cascade Solidity on the Performances of Cavitating Inducers Xiaojun Li Research Center of Fluid.
Chapter Four Fluid Dynamic
Lesson 17 HEAT GENERATION
Advanced Thermodynamics Note 6 Applications of Thermodynamics to Flow Processes Lecturer: 郭修伯.
Fluids Gases (compressible) and liquids (incompressible) – density of gases can change dramatically, while that of liquids much less so Gels, colloids,
Kern’s Description of Shell Side Flow in SHELL-AND-TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Another.
Chapter 4.2: Flow Across a Tube Bundle Heat Exchanger (Tube Bank)
Heating and Air Conditioning I
HTTF Analyses Using RELAP5-3D Paul D. Bayless RELAP5 International Users Seminar September 2010.
1 Dept. of Energy Technology, Div. of Applied Thermodynamics and Refrigeration Tube diameter influence on heat exchanger performance and design. Single.
K. Nazridoust, G. Ahmadi, and D. H
Engineering H191 - Drafting / CAD The Ohio State University Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Lab 4P. 1Autumn Quarter Transport Phenomena Lab 4.
Experimental Verification of Gas- Cooled T-Tube Divertor Performance L. Crosatti, D. Sadowski, S. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (June 14-15,
Central Tendency & Variability Dec. 7. Central Tendency Summarizing the characteristics of data Provide common reference point for comparing two groups.
Kern Method of SHELL-AND-TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER Analysis
Heat Exchangers with Cross Flow past Cylinders P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Another Common Industrial Application!!!
The Centrifugal Pump.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
Problem 6. Seebeck effect.
Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 7 Lecture 33 1 Similitude Analysis: Illustrative.
Pipe Sizing Basics Prof. Dr. Mahmoud Fouad Major & Minor Losses
1 ME421 Heat Exchanger Design Drain Water Heat Recovery System Project Presentation Group #5.
Propulsion: Axial Flow Compressor & Fan
Experimental Study of Graphite Dust Generated from Fuel Pebble Elements of HTRs Zhou Hongbo 1, Shen Ke 1, Yu Suyuan 2* Institute of Nuclear and New Energy.
Chapter Six Non-Newtonian Liquid.
Design Formulae for Mingled Shell-side stream P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Confluence Model for A Circuitous.
20 th June 20111Enrico Da Riva, V. Rao Project Request and Geometry constraints June 20 th 2011 Bdg 298 Enrico Da Riva,Vinod Singh Rao CFD GTK.
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
Measures of Central Tendency And Spread Understand the terms mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation.
Accuracy Based Generation of Thermodynamic Properties for Light Water in RELAP5-3D 2010 IRUG Meeting Cliff Davis.
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
ENTC-303Dr. Alvarado1 FLUID FRICTION AND PRESSURE LOSSES.
DESIGN OF CASCADE for AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSORS
30 th June 20111Enrico Da Riva, V. Rao Parametric study using Empirical Results June 30 th 2011 Bdg 298 Enrico Da Riva,Vinod Singh Rao CFD GTK.
Title: SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF AXISYMMETRIC CAVITATOR IN PARTIALY CAVITATING FLOW Department of Mechanical Engineering Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Presented.
Convection: Internal Flow ( )
Pressure – Volume – Temperature Relationship of Pure Fluids.
Enhanced heat transfer in confined pool boiling
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Post-test calculations of CERES experiments using ASTEC code Lajos Tarczal 1, Gabor Lajtha 2 1 Paks Nuclear Power.
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Forced Convection Heat Transfer in Spray Formed Copper and Nickel Foam Heat Exchanger.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 7 External flow.
Mi9 Some experimental measurements of the Diffuser flow in a Ducted Wind Turbine assisted by two ejectors Kypros F. Milidonis Department of Mechanical.
VG Pienaar, PT Slatter, NJ Alderman+ & NI Heywood+
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Compressive Flow in Nozzles
Internal Flow: General Considerations. Entrance Conditions Must distinguish between entrance and fully developed regions. Hydrodynamic Effects: Assume.
A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov
The Nature of Liquids.
A.Borovoi, S.Bogatov, V.Chudanov, V.Strizhov
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Power Consuming Fluid Machines - II
WELCOME. PARAMETRIC STUDIES ON AUTOMOTIVE RADIATORS PRESENTED BY JACKSON JOHNY Roll No:127 GUIDED BY Mr. SUMESH C.K Assistant professor SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL.
超臨界CO2在增強型地熱系統儲集層中取熱之研究-子計畫三 CO2在增強型地熱系統取熱模型之建構及效能分析
Audrey DUCLOS1, C. Proust2,3, J. Daubech2, and F. Verbecke1
Xiaomin Pang, Yanyan Chen, Xiaotao Wang, Wei Dai, Ercang Luo
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
HEAT EXCHANGER.
WHAT IS HX……??? Heat exchangers are equipment that transfer
Date of download: 3/4/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
MAE 5360: Hypersonic Airbreathing Engines
INTERNAL FORCED CONVECTION
Heat-transfer Equipment
Internal Flow: General Considerations
The Nature of Liquids.
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Subject Name: FLUID MECHANICS
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi
Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), Egypt
Presentation transcript:

PHWR Safety 2014 / CANSAS-2014 Workshop 2014 June 23-25 Jun Yang AECL PRESSURE DROP TESTS PERFORMED WITH EXTERNALLY AND INTERNALLY COOLED ANNULAR FUEL BUNDLES PHWR Safety 2014 / CANSAS-2014 Workshop 2014 June 23-25 Jun Yang AECL UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ AECL - OFFICIAL USE ONLY / À USAGE EXCLUSIF - EACL

Project Goal Test Facility Test Results Conclusions Outline UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Project Goal AECL is developing an externally and internally cooled annular fuel (ICAF) bundle, which is considered to have improved thermalhydraulic characteristics as compared to the traditional CANDU type bundles. This experimental program is proposed to investigate the hydraulic behavior of the ICAF bundle in support of the bundle development. The objectives of the single phase pressure drop experiment are to investigate the hydraulic characteristics of the ICAF bundle, obtain pressure drop related information of the ICAF bundle for code verification. The scope of the single phase pressure drop experiment is to obtain pressure distribution information, obtain bundle misalignment junction signature information, obtain flow split information. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Facility – Test Station The single phase pressure drop tests were performed in MR-2 horizontal test station with a string of three ICAF bundles positioned in an uncrept flow tube using deionised water as working fluid at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of 50°C. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Facility – Test Section Flow tube Bundle string Pressure Taps and Valve Banks UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Facility – ICAF Bundle The ICAF bundle consists of a two‑ends‑blocked central element , and 24 annular fuel elements arranged in two concentric rings UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Pressure Distribution Tests and Results The obtained pressure distribution data for the ICAF bundle cover a mass flow rate range of 7 kg/s to 18 kg/s, and a Reynolds number range of 23852 to 62535. The pressure loss increases with increasing mass flow rate, and the pressure loss coefficient decreases with increasing Reynolds number. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Pressure Distribution Tests and Results The one bundle overall pressure loss (over a whole bundle length of 495.3 mm) was calculated. The one bundle overall pressure loss of the aligned ICAF bundle is smaller than that for the standard bundle by approximately 25%. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Bundle Misalignment Junction Signature Tests and results The angle adjustment mechanism consisted of a worm drive set and a 10 turn potentiometer (or informally a pot). During the experiment, the minimum and the maximum measured angle of the bundle is 3° to 93°. The ICAF bundle aligns for every 45° rotation UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Bundle Misalignment Junction Signature Tests and results The shapes of the bundle misalignment junction signatures at different mass flow rates are the same, although the magnitudes of pressure drop are different. The determined most probable misalignment angle (defined as the smallest angle of misalignment between two bundles that provides the average junction pressure drop over 360°) for ICAF bundles is 7°. Focusing only the bundle misalignment angle from 0 to 45°, it was found that the minimum pressure drop occurred at 0 and 45°, and the maximum pressure drop occurred at approximately 14 and 31°. In addition, a local minimum was also observed at 22.5°. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Flow Split Tests and Results Flow split ratio: the ratio of the mass flow rate distributed to the internal flow channel to the total mass flow rate distributed to both external and internal flow channels. Focusing on the middle portion of an ICAF bundle (e.g., between Pressure Taps PT 9 and PT 16), the flow moving through the internal channel is considered to have no interference on the pressure drop over this portion (i.e., P 9 to P 16). This pressure drop is the only function of the mass flow rate distributed to the external flow channel, Comparison of Pressure Drop (P9-P16) Variation with Mass Flow Rate Between Aligned ICAF Bundles and ICAF Bundles with Internal Channel Blocked. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Flow Split Tests and Results Relationship of Mass Flow Rate as a Function of Pressure Drop (P9 P16) for ICAF Bundle with Internal Channel Blocked UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Test Results – Flow Split Tests and Results The flow split ratio is independent of the mass flow rate in single phase water flow in the absence of vapor generation. The determined flow split ratio for the alignment ICAF bundle varies between 24.05% and 24.96%, with an average value of 24.43% and a standard deviation of 0.31% for eight data points. The determined average flow split ratio of 24.43% is close to the internal channel to total channel cross sectional flow area ratio of 24.87%. The flow split ratio changes with the change in misalignment angle. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

Conclusions The one bundle overall pressure loss of the aligned ICAF bundle is smaller than that for the reference/standard bundle by approximately 25%. The determined most probable misalignment angle for ICAF bundles is 7° The determined flow split ratio is 24.43%. UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ

AECL - OFFICIAL USE ONLY / À USAGE EXCLUSIF - EACL