Having it both ways? Balancing personal and party representation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing for Equality Best-fit, medium-fit and non-favourable combinations of electoral systems and gender quotas © International IDEA.
Advertisements

Brief introduction on Logistic Regression
The Single Transferable Vote: Workings and Implications
Alternative Electoral Systems Read and précis notes will be checked before this Lecture is delivered … 1.
AP Comparative Government and Politics Sachem North High School
Elections, Electoral Reform, and 2010 The Purpose of Elections  They allow the ‘will of the people’ to be expressed  They provide for voter choice.
Lizzie Lee, Julie Hesaltine, Kate Larsen, and Lindsey Jones.
Elections – revision To review the different systems used in the UK.
Presidential Election 2011 The Who? Where? What? & How?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
Econ 140 Lecture 121 Prediction and Fit Lecture 12.
Exam 1 Review GOVT 120.
Electoral Systems.
Elections and Electoral Systems
Real Choices: Does It Matter What’s On the Ballot? Lawrence LeDuc Department of Political Science University of Toronto.
Single Transferable Vote. Multi Member Constituencies Only Voting is Preferential meaning voters indicate preference by numbers, In order of their favourite.
POLITICAL EFFECTS OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS: Simulation in Kosovo Arben Qirezi 9/15/2015 SUPPORTED BY.
Electoral systems: How much do we know? Organise yourselves into groups of no more than three. You will need to answer 20 questions on electoral systems.
Inequality and Political Participation (Carver Precinct) Anita Bahtia - Sarah Baker Nick Gamse - Andrew Morgan.
Building Blocks of Research Process Chapter 2: Alan Monroe.
Comment on Mark J. Roe and Travis Coan, Financial Markets and the Political Center of Gravity (May 3, 2015) June 6, 2015 Hideki Kanda University of Tokyo.
An overview of multi-criteria analysis techniques The main role of the techniques is to deal with the difficulties that human decision-makers have been.
Comparison of Voter Power in the 2008 Presidential Election using Three Distinct Methods for Electoral Vote Allocation Zubin Huang, Michael Landau, Stephen.
Exam 1 Review GOVT 120. Review: Levels of Analysis Theory: Concept 1 is related to Concept 2 Hypothesis: Variable 1 (IV) is related to Variable 2 (DV)
SA1: Living in a Democracy Electoral Systems. Proportional Representation Aims: Define Proportional Representation (PR) Examine different types of PR.
Tim McCarthy EDU Data Analysis II Dr. Ianni Fall 2013.
Electoral Systems Answering an essay question. Types of questions Questions will focus on FPTP and systems of PR (AMS and/or STV) You will be asked to.
Party Reputations and Government Priorities: How issue ownership and issue salience shape policy agendas in the US and the UK Jane Green, University of.
© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved Round 1Round 2 Final Jeopardy.
Assessing the Impact of Informality on Wages in Tanzania: Is There a Penalty for Women? Pablo Suárez Robles (University Paris-Est Créteil) 1.
Voting systems in elections First past the post system Supplementary vote system Additional vote system Single transferable vote system.
Today we will… Identify the information handling questions which will be assessed in Higher Modern Studies.
Building Blocks of Research Process
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Voting systems in elections
Exam 1 Review GOVT 120.
Elections Chapter 7.
Linkage Institutions.
Exam 1 Review GOVT 120.
CFE Democracy First Past the Post
Key Features of FPTP.
POSC 202A: Lecture Lecture: Substantive Significance, Relationship between Variables 1.
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
Voting systems in elections
Lesson 4: The Single Transferable Vote (STV)
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
The Electoral College Present.
Lesson 4: The Single Transferable Vote (STV)
Voting Systems in the UK –
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
Additional Member System
Proportional Representation Referendum
Foundations of Government
Approval Voting.
Electoral Reform in BC …….but, why? (or why not?)
Higher Modern Studies Essay Prep
Voting Systems in the UK –
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
Mobilization of Women and Minorities
Higher Modern Studies Paper 2017
American Government and Organization
QUESTION: Why and with what success did Alexander II impose so many reforms? Topic: Explain the reasons why Alexander II might have introduced reforms.
Warm Up – March 7 Answer the following questions on a post it:
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5
Workshop 1A Summary.
Elections and Electoral Systems
Lesson Starter Explain, in two sentences or less, the difference between PLURALITY electoral systems and PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION electoral systems.
Voting Systems in the UK –
Presentation transcript:

Having it both ways? Balancing personal and party representation Michael Marsh Department of Political Science Trinity College Dublin Presented Are PSAI Conference: Our Institutions Fit for Purpose? Political Reform in the Republic of Ireland TCD 22 June 2009

Objectives of PR-STV Provides a strong link between a particular representative and the voter and also allows voters to rank candidates according to any criterion, or collection of criteria they wish This still allows for a degree of proportional representation of parties BUT ability to do so constrained by the extent that party is important to voters But what is the nature of the link between voters and parties?

Proportional representation of parties When party structures preferences: ie people give high preference votes to party of first pref candidate OR When bigger parties[on first pref count] get most of the preferences on later counts

Extent of party voting in Ireland Irish national election study 2002

Who gets lower party preferences Irish national election study 2002

Voters and their TDs Mean rating on a 0-100 thermometer scale of first preference candidate is 79 in 2002 ALSO 69% of voters in 2002 and 71% in 2007 report speaking to their first choice candidate 32% contacted public rep in years 1997-2002 Half of the electorate was contacted by a candidate in 2002 and in 2007

Voting for person or party Only 20% mentioned ‘party’ in answer to an open ended question in 2002 People rate their first pref candidate higher than they rate that candidate’s party: 79>76 In closed ended questions, more people say they vote for the candidate than say they vote for the party And many say they would follow candidate to a different party

Would follow candidate Party or candidate in 2007   Would follow candidate to another party Most important for vote: Yes No Depends Total Party 4 32 40 Candidate 36 17 7 60 49 11 100 37 and 25 in 2002 Irish national election study 2007

What motivates candidate support? Bars indicate coefficient for factors in multivariate OLS regression. All variables range between 0 and 10. R2=.0.34. Party coefficients not shown.

Important that a TD… Irish national election study 2007

TDs should represent % ranking each as the most important: Irish national election study 2007

TD serving local concerns is a strength of the system? Q: The assumption that TDs should provide a local service is a strength of the Irish political system. Irish national election study 2007

When best party and best candidate differ … only Best party Neither 79 22 14 1 Only 14% of all voters vote for party of best candidate only ‘Best’ calculated from thermometer scores for each party and candidate: Based on Irish national election study 2002

Policy representation via parties? Do voters have different policy preferences? Yes Do voters for different parties have different preferences: not much Do voters see parties as offering different policy stances: even less Is there any correspondence between voter and party policy?: not really

Do voters have different policy preferences?

Do voters have different policy preferences?

Do voters for different parties have different preferences? Do voters see parties as offering different policy stances? Is there any correspondence between voter and party policy?

Summary Voters have a choice of party as well as person Many seem to take that, and for a majority, or at least significant minority, the candidate seems to matter more than the party Voters want candidates to represent local area, for essentially extractive purposes, to get private rather than public goods

Where does that leave parties? Parties probably much more important than this suggests, since few voters clearly pick candidate over party, although party evaluations may derive from popular candidates However, parties seem to be empty containers with respect to policy While there is a recognition of left and right, these concepts have no clear policy implications On classic left right issues, economic and social, little correspondence between parties and voters

Conclusion Perhaps in Ireland, balancing party and personal representation has a cost; policy representation is unclear There may be other aspects of policy, such as valence – who will do the best job at pursuing the widely agreed polices – which do link voters to parties Yet that implies more agreement on policies than we see in many instances In general then the creation of party representation on through personal representation is achieved with only limited success