Yellow-eyed penguin Stock-take: what did we learn?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
The Index for Inclusion. Why have an Index Forum? Purpose To offer regular opportunities to discuss school improvement with other neighbouring schools,
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: A Framework for Northeast BC Presentation of Research Results Science and Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Presented.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
The Resilient Coasts Initiative A Partnership Response.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
MAFMC 5-Year Strategic Plan Public Comments August 14, 2013.
Kaitiakitanga and the EEZ - a Ngāi Tahu perspective.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Impact assessment framework
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Module 2 Stakeholder analysis. What’s in Module 2  Why do stakeholder analysis ?  Identifying the stakeholders  Assessing stakeholders importance and.
Capacity Self-Assessment as a management tool for organisational development planning u A model used for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration,
School of SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE University of BRISTOL Shall we meet for coffee? Experiments in ways of bridging the researcher commissioner gap:
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Grandview High School March 9-10, 2009.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
SUBMISSION ON APP – Application to import and release the moth plant rust fungus Puccinia araujiae as a biological control agent for the weed moth.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Māori Board Members and the District Health Board Model: Experiences, Issues and Challenges Te Mata o Te Tau Weekly Seminar Series 27 July 2006 Dr Amohia.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
Chesapeake Bay Program
ADVOCACY Presentation by Baiko Suleman Dass at “DE WATSON LEADERSHIP ACADEMY” Semester training for Union Leaders and Cultural groups Date: Venue:
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
National Association For Court Management
Global Shelter Cluster Strategy Evaluation
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Learning from BC Coastal Environment 2006 Part I: Consulting with Audiences and Experts Lynne Bonner Linda Gilkeson.
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
How do you start a collaborative response?
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
Lifelong Learning Planning for Improvement 1st November 2017
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE BARCELONA CONVENTION
Reflections on the EQB: Opportunities for Deepening Public Engagement
Environment and Development Policy Section
Green infrastructure developments at EEA 2018
New Biogeographic process
Notes: Rapid assessments.
APMP Professional Certification
Presentation transcript:

Yellow-eyed penguin Stock-take: what did we learn?   Bruce McKinlay DOC, Dunedin Yvette Couch-Lewis Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, Christchurch Sue Murray Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust, Dunedin Kerri-Anne Edge Hill edge effect, Te Anau

Acknowledgement A lot of hardworking volunteers, researchers, managers, delivery staff and rūnanga gave willingly of their time to help us: thank you.

Background There is demand for an up to date strategy to guide Hioho Recovery 2014 Pūtea Tautiaki Hapori Fund grant for hoiho recovery to YEP Trust contingent upon: “a review of yellow-eyed penguin recovery with Terms of Reference to be developed jointly by Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust, Ngāi Tahu, and the Department of Conservation”. The Stock-take was initiated in 2015 and the report is to be released in the coming weeks.  The Stocktake Team was made up of representatives of the Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust, Ngai Tahu, and DOC. Explain these relationships Functions are DOC with statutorily responsible Treaty Partnership relationship with TRONT The Trust were identified as the is a DOC Partner relationship Community

Current Context The stock-take report is now being finalised by the Review Team. This is the first presentation of the preliminary results The draft report itself has not been approved by DOC.

Stage 2 A revised strategy for hoiho recovery The Departments process: to undertake a stocktake before being able to develop a future strategy. Two stages: Stage 1 Stock-take of progress against species recovery objectives in the existing Hoiho Recovery Plan 2000 - 2015 Stage 2 A revised strategy for hoiho recovery Why is it a staged capproach. To check: where strategies are working progress against current plan; relevance of the current plan elicit responses from partners. To inform a new strategy

Process Terms of Reference Process inclusive: capture perspectives and mātauranga of Ngāi Tahu Whānui (Treaty Partnership) Kaimahi and stakeholder perspectives and knowledge gathered Review progress against the current plan objectives and actions Provide platform for new species recovery strategy. Terms of reference for the review developed and provided the basis for the work completed to date. The stock-take is focussed on the objectives of the plan and associated kaitiakitanga and conservation of this species. The brief was to: Be inclusive: capture the perspectives/ mātauranga of Ngāi Tahu Whānui (Treaty Partnership); Kamahi/stakeholder perspectives gathered. Review progress against the objectives of the existing plan – the idea being that this information would then lead to establishing a critical platform for a new species Recovery Plan Review progress against the RP objectives and actions Identify gaps Provide critical platform for new species Recovery Plan

The Stock-take Team have remained focused on being objective and impartial and inclusive to ensure that that the process provides a robust and meaningful recovery strategy for hoiho that extends beyond the events of the recent breeding seasons.

Approach 51 Questions designed to: Elicited responses Characterise diversity of participants Assess progress against current plan Objectives and Actions Identify gaps in the existing strategy and address one areas of immediate concern Inform a new strategy Elicited responses Before Ngāi Tahu whānui could contribute to the stock-take it was deemed critical to bring together what was known of the whakapapa of hoiho as a working tool in establishing the kaupapa and future direction that Ngāi Tahu whānui wish to pursue. A paper on this topic was commissioned from Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, Heritage – Puna Mahara Team, Tribal Interests Group. A questionnaire based on the Hoiho Recovery Plan and other identified priorities was developed by the Stock-take Team (51 questions). Designed to: characterise the diversity of participants; specifically to develop an understanding about the participants past and present involvement with hoiho and to recognise specific mātauranga/knowledge and tautōhito/experience that informed their responses to the questions about the recovery plan objectives and actions Assess progress against the Recovery Plan Objectives and Actions regarding possible gaps in the existing strategy and one area of immediate concern: the Yellow-eyed Penguin Database The questionnaire was sent to all participants so that they could prepare for a meeting with the Stock-take Team, Ngāi Tahu representative, or opt to provide a written submission. Sent questionnaire and invited to participate: face-to-face, phone, video, written submission Contributions were received from 91 individuals from Auckland to Rakiura. We conducted individual and small-group interviews either face-to-face or by video/phone conference. A small number of written submissions were also received. Notes were compiled from each interview and returned to contributors to ensure we had captured their input truthfully. Peer-reviewed science publications; reports and student dissertations were included as a measure of progress against the RP objectives and actions. We reviewed the submission and looked for common comment and the exceptions. We drew conclusions form considering this range of material. Area of concern: e.g. Hoiho/Yellow-eyed Penguin Database

Kaupapa tīpoka Whānui saw it to be their responsibility as kaitiaki to be involved in managing the well-being of their taonga species, Te Hoiho: “A self-sustaining population of hoiho maintains its ecological range in balance with other species in the ecosystem. A self-sustaining population can sustain a cultural harvest for mahinga kai purposes by Ngāi Tahu.” The current recovery plan lacks a component that specifically covers the relationship Ngāi Tahu have with hoiho and their involvement as kaitiaki of the bird.

Contributors 91 people (Auckland to Rakiura) contributed: 25 individuals from 13 Ngāi Tahu Papatipu Rūnanga; 73 kaimahi/stakeholder groups. Scientists/ Managers. Notes compiled from each interview and returned to each contributor to ensure their input was captured truthfully. Peer-reviewed science publications; reports and student dissertations were includedTook a lot longer than originally thought.

Critical strategic issues Genuine engagement with Ngai Tahu Perspectives and role of Ngai Tahu are reflected in a new strategy Delivery of current objectives variable Changes in tourism: tourist behaviour, scale, policy Focusing on the best interests of the species in our work Sub-antarctic populations: represent different genetic diversity to mainland Significant issues in the marine environment Some objectives/actions of the current Recovery Plan have been met. However some have not resulted in any measureable and/or tangible benefit to the species.

Stocktake Recommendations to the DOC decision maker include A new hoiho strategy is suggested Perspectives of Ngāi Tahu be reflected DOC to provide leadership Recognition of the Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust as a key programme partner Interagency approach is required The current recovery plan is no longer fit-for-purpose and new direction is required to guide work done by DOC, its Treaty Partner Ngai Tahu, and hoiho conservation partners.  Greater understanding exists now as to the genetic structuring and distinctiveness of the mainland / Rakiura and Subantarctic populations including their role as kaitiakitanga of hoiho and their aspirations for mahinga kai/cultural use. to address pressures on hoiho across the marine and terrestrial environments they occupy.

Recommendations continued: Recovery objectives and actions must be SMART The full range of specialist technical and science knowledge/mātauranga must be sought. Covers the issues and priorities throughout the full geographic range of the species. Updated and relevant goal for the species. Acknowledgement of the range of hoiho partners and stakeholders. Structure the new strategy for hoiho around biologically meaningful populations of the species rather than taking a human-centric approach (i.e. Department of Conservation district boundaries; Summary of Recommendations 3). Specific, Measurable, Acheivable, Results-focussed and Time-bound.

In summary: The Stock-take has given us a species-wide perspective of where we and hoiho are at. Critical issues must be addressed to ensure the persistence of hoiho. Report is thorough. Took longer than expected. Conscious decsions to be broad and inclsive approach to provide a good foundation for Stage 2. Stengthened our relationship with Ngai Tahu and our understanding of their perspective and aspirations of mahing kai. Represents a comprehensive and critical assessment of the current hoiho recovery programme and recovery plan. 

It is inclusive of perspectives of all those who contributed. Summary continued It is inclusive of perspectives of all those who contributed. Once approved the stock-take report will rationale for guiding the development of a new hoiho recovery strategy. In addition to high-level recomendations, multiple objective- and action-specific recommendations are provided, relevant to the key themes of hoiho recovery including: predator control, habitat restoration, fisheries, penguin rehabilitation, advocacy, tourism impacts, population monitoring and priority research. the Treaty Partner: Ngāi Tahu, Yellow-eyed penguin Trust as key programme partner, hoiho conservation partners and kaimahi and stakeholder groups.

Thank you!