New Mexico State University “Every course a quality course.”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Twelve Step Program to Meeting Quality Matters Miley Grandjean New Mexico State University.
Advertisements

EPAS: Elevating the Postsecondary Aspirations of Students! Using ACTs EPAS Data Effectively Glenn Beer Louisiana Tech University
NWACC Library Instruction Program Teaching information literacy skills for academic success and lifelong learning.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Sandra Johnson, M.A. & M.S. Susie Ceppi- Bussmann, Ph.D. New Mexico State University.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Course Development Summer Institute Online Course Improvement Program Quality Matters National Conference San Antonio, TX November, 2015.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
12 Steps to Quality Online Courses: Helping Faculty Translate the Standards Jed Duggan & Miley Grandjean New Mexico State University.
Use of Quality Matters in the Faculty Mentor-Mentee Relationship
New Mexico State University “Every course a quality course.”
Presenters:. Rose Hill Pamela McGowan
Resident Educator Summative Assessment
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
Online Course Improvement Program 5 Years in Review
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Course Development Summer Institute Online Course Improvement Program
Holistically Forming Cohorts in Faculty Professional Development
Madalina Tincu, Ed. D. Mitchell Strauss, Ed. D.
MAKING THE MOST OF OUR NEW ONLINE and INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT
Twelve Step Program to Meeting Quality Matters
The Integration of Quality Matters™
Striking a balance: A hybrid approach to new faculty development Bridget Arend, Director of University Teaching Why we think it works 55% completed the.
Jed Duggan & Miley Grandjean New Mexico State University Both
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Accelerated Learning in Advanced Manufacturing
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Supporting Online Faculty
OTL Meets QM: Getting Started in an Online Course
Becoming an Online Teacher
Pittsburg State University
Using metrics to change the narrative
Graduate Student Professional Development
What is UDL? UDL at Towson Outputs Next Steps UDL Exchange
Taia L.C. Reid, Assistant Director of the Peer Educator Program
Distributed Education Personalization for Student Success
Center of eLearning Making Waves.
ISKME and GSC, IMLS Project Year 3 March 1, 2017
Teaching with Technology Conference Davina Pruitt-Mentle April 4, 2003
Professional Development
Online Teaching Conference
Integrating UD Into a Certificate Program in Online Learning
Coffee and Course Design
University of St. Francis
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
- Student & School Success - K-12 English Language Arts
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
The Home Base Professional Development Tool
What is Turnaround Leadership?
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
Adjunct Faculty Development Using the League’s
Change the GAME! Using Adobe Connect and Rubrics to
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Monday, September 24, :00pm-1:00pm
Mitchell Strauss, Ed. D & Madalina Tincu, Ed. D.
Learner-Centered Teaching: The Basics
Professor Lindsay Henning Program Director,
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
MAKING THE MOST OF OUR NEW ONLINE and INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Quality Matters How USFSP leads the way in online course excellence Nelson Poynter Library.
Dr. Sheri Conklin; Erika Hanson, Ginu Easow & Zach Morgan
Presentation transcript:

New Mexico State University “Every course a quality course.” A Professional Development Program for Faculty Teaching Blended and Online The Online Course Improvement Program (OCIP) New Mexico State University “Every course a quality course.”

Program Background Partnership with Associated Students of New Mexico State University and College of Extended Learning. OCIP began Fall 2009 Program launch January 2010 Started with 11 One Year Plus Fellows (1-Y+) Feb - June 2010 hosted 15 PD events

Program Goals 1. Assist faculty in enhanced web course design and delivery while reducing student's textbook cost. 2. Provide faculty instructional design services with a framework that supports peer interaction and best practices for online learning. 3. Facilitate participation in national digital content consortiums and relevant communities. 4. Create and support a culture of quality for online courses taught at NMSU. 5. Develop a scalable, customized professional development model.

Role of Quality Matters Quality Matters (QM) is the theoretical and organizational framework for the program. Employs QM's continuous improvement approach. Professional development online course and monthly PD activities are thematically organized around the QM Rubric Standards

Professional Development Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr QM1 QM2 QM3 QM4 QM5 QM6 QM7 QM8 PD follows a predictable learning cycle. QM thematic alignment of PD events- LTOT, workshop and/or webinar aligned to the 1Y+ PD course as much as possible Integration of the QM rubric in the PD course has been mentioned as a strength of OCIP.

Blended Approach Using the best delivery methodologies available to meet the learning objectives for the professional development curriculum. Combination of synchronous, asynchronous, face-to-face, online, and hybrid offerings Adobe Connect Skype PBworks(wiki) Google Docs Program website Mentoring LMS Canvas

Multiple Benefits Supports a variety of services and resources available in different formats. Allows for delivery of services beyond main campus faculty that includes community college campus and non-NMSU participants. Increased faculty engagement due to flexibility of access Participants can receive professional development credit Recorded webinar archives and resources are also posted online for anytime viewing.

Services Program services available to a global audience include: OCIP Resource Center (http://bit.ly/pQM0ZO) OCIP webinars Some program services are only available to NMSU faculty: Formal and informal course reviews with QM Rubric Let's Talk Online Teaching (LTOT) sessions Open Labs Workshops and Presentations

One Year Plus Fellowship 36-hour online PD course 12 hours self-selected PD Revise online course to pass a QM Review Collect student evaluation data on the course design Give back to larger community Mentoring from Instructional Consultant Peer support $2000 stipend 50 PD hours toward Promotion & Tenure Certificate of Completion Student technology fees paid only by Las Cruces campus students help fund the programs, therefore only LC campus faculty can receive stipend.

83% Completion Rate for 1Yr+ Fellowship Cohorts Applications Received Applicants Accepted Completions Cohort 1 Year 2009-2010 (Began January) 17 15 8 Cohort 2 Year 2010-2011 19 12 Cohort 3 Year 2011-2012 20 Cohort 4 Year 2012-2013 30 22 18 Cohort 5 Year 2013-2014 27 14 11 Cohort 6 Year 2014-2015 24 Cohort 7 TBA 83% Completion Rate for 1Yr+ Fellowship

QM1- Getting Started “A start here is so simple and helpful for students.” (Y3) “QM1 changed my life. 150 students and only one question about where to find something.” (Y5)

QM and Organization “I think my class is so much better organized; it’s easier to navigate for the students. They know what to do from the very beginning.” (Y2) “The OCIP Fellowship forced me to reexamine the way I structure online, not with respect to technology, but rather with access to and organization of content and the various ways to foster student interaction and engagement.” (Y4) Of their courses but also of themselves and their time!

QM2 Learning Objectives “Objectives started me getting to think about my past evaluations. I used to think the student did not try hard enough. I now know it might be me.” (Y3) “For both my face to face class and online, I think the biggest impact has been really paying attention to the learning objectives…then, aligning the activities and the assessments… which I had not done at all before.” (Y6) Deeper level of understanding of the importance of learning objectives

QM and Alignment “In addition, my face-to-face classes are now benefiting from my new understanding of course organization and alignment.” (Y1) “I now ensure my activities are aligned to my learning objectives. I know now, thanks to OCIP, how important it is to provide students the guidance on what they were learning and why they were learning it through clearly stated objectives and course goals.” (Y4)

Transfer to Face-to-face Courses “The OCIP course changed how I teach both online and face-to-face….Having the model of quality courses really helped me work through the steps and make meaningful changes to my courses. All online and hybrid courses that I teach and coordinate are influenced OCIP.” (Y1 & Y2) “I don't have any true 100% face to face anymore. There are things in my face-to- face classes that I realized are better done online as a result of the things that I learned in OCIP.” (Y1) “I feel more confident in my face-to-face teaching techniques due to what I have learned in OCIP.” (Y4)

Faculty Student Perspective “Being in the student role was eye-opening and strength of program.” (Y1) “I’m clearly thinking more about course design from the students’ point of view”. (Y4) “I got a much stronger sense of students’ needs from an online course”. (Y4) “...one thing that I’m doing more is taking the perspective of the student and thinking about my course design from their perspective and how I need to organize and spell things out and make things super clear.” (Y5) Placing instructors in a student role online provides new teaching perspectives It was an ah-ha! for many to be an online student!

What Students Are Saying “The layout of this class is wonderful.” “This class is the best online course I have ever taken.” “I liked the interaction between my peers and the availability of course material.”

What We Have Learned Learning from student perspective Using Quality Matters framework Positive “ripple” effect Peer/Mentor support Culture of quality is a process

Then and Now: Growing OCIP Expanded program offerings with the New2Online Program and Course Development Summer Institute. Partnering with the College of Business and Master of Social Work cohort focusing on online degree programs.

Then and Now: Growing OCIP Annual IIQ Celebration QM System-wide Subscription and Group Peer Reviewer Group Looking to address PD for Online Teaching Insuring Quality - Provost’s Focus Expanding Online Degree Programs

Thank you for attending! Questions?? Thank you for attending!