2016 AIIPA CONFERENCE Denver, Colorado May 15/18, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ignition Interlock Devices: An Overview John M. Priester NHTSA/ABA Judicial Fellow Administrative Law Judge Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals.
Advertisements

NM Statewide Traffic Records System Ignition Interlock Data Analysis Application System Project Certification Overview Prepared by: NM-DOT Traffic Safety.
TRAFFIC SAFETY BUREAU – PROGRAMS DIVISION Ignition Interlock Data Analysis Project (IIDA) Project Closeout Presentation January 27, 2010.
CHAPTER SIX TRAFFIC LAWS. I. Losing Your Driving Privilege A. Driving is a privilege, not a right B. Traffic Violations- 12 to 14 points in more than.
 Comprehensive review of DWI administrative license sanctions  Project Goal – Recommend effective sanctions that: › Reduce alcohol-related fatalities.
1 MELANIE’S LAW The New OUI Law WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE NEW LAW Edward P. Ryan Jr. O’Connor and Ryan, P.C. 61 Academy Street Fitchburg, MA
Closing the “No Car” Loophole In Ignition Interlock Legislation Research and Recommendations Richard Roth, PhD. Executive Director, Impact DWI Research.
Tiffini Diage University of Wisconsin, Madison. Objective  Ignition Interlock Device (IID) sentencing, impact on Wisconsin motor vehicle crashes? IID.
Alabama’s New Ignition Interlock Law Effective September 1, 2012 Patrick Mahaney Montgomery, Alabama.
CHAPTER SEVEN DRIVER PRIVILEGES & PENALTIES. The Driving Privilege pg110 1.This not a Right 2.Time of suspension varies 3.Restoration depends on types.
Driving Privileges & Penalties Chapter 7. Privilege? State Law Allows or requires an individuals driving privilege to be suspended for certain motor vehicle.
DUI AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY ART LUSSE JUNE 30, 2010 LAW & JUSTICE INTERIM COMMITTEE.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI) Slows your reaction time Affects your vision Make you overconfident and unable to concentrate Make more mistakes Can.
Chapter 7 DRIVER PRIVILEGES AND PENALTIES.
879 Productions Presents Copyright 2000 Alcohol, Drugs & Driving with Officer Darin “Crash” Leonard.
Effective and Ineffective Laws To Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD Executive Director, Impact DWI Citizen Lobbyist and Research Consultant Supported.
Legislative Update North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Transportation Services School Transportation Laws – House Bill 428 – Stop Arm Violation.
Roth 8/26/ Interlock Symposium1 New Mexico Ignition Interlock: Laws, Regulations, Utilization, Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Fairness 8.
Roth 3/25/ Lifesavers Conference1 Reducing DWI With Interlocks The New Mexico Experience Lifesavers Conference March 25-27, 2007 Richard Roth, PhD.
Iowa’s Impaired Driving Records Demonstration Project Traffic Records Forum July 16, 2003 Mary Jensen Iowa Department of Transportation Traffic Records.
Megan’s Law.
Interlock Requirements and Hardship Licensing
Blame it on the ALCOHOL. Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) amount of alcohol in your system based on a test of your breath, blood or urine. illegal to.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD ICADTS at TRB Sunday January 12, 2014.
 BAC =  0.08 =  OTHER DRUGS = Implied Consent Law Consent to submit certain tests Statutory Summary Suspension Law BAC 0.08 or greater – DL suspended.
Chapter 6 Driving Privileges and Penalties. How to Lose Driving Privileges failure to appear in court or to pay fines failure to pay surcharges driving.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS AND DRUNK DRIVING Richard Roth, PhD Lifesavers March 27, 2011 Abridged Version of Region 2 Ignition Interlock Institute Presentation.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE IGNITION INTERLOCK PROGRAM.
Classification of Offenses Criminal OffenseFelonyCapital felony Life felony Felony 1st degree Felony 2nd degree Felony 3rd degree Death or life imprisonment.
2014 ACT 158 Amendments to Ignition Interlock Laws October 1, 2014.
◦ Administered by Driver and Vehicle Services ◦ Almost 4000 participants currently enrolled ◦ Statute: §
Driver Education Chapter 7 Page 111 Driver Privileges and Penalties.
California Interlock Evaluation TRB: January, 2005 An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California Report authors: David J., DeYoung,
Virginia License Requirements Applicants for a Virginia learner’s permit must  be at least 15 years and 6 months old  complete a DL 1P learner’s permit.
1 COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSES. 2 PURPOSE OF THE CDL Mandated by the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of Public Law Title XII The federal.
IS AN IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE ESSENTIAL IN NJ If You are Convicted of DWI?
1 Special Supervision Services Program (SSS). Special Supervision Services Program History: Started in 1986 and allowed for individuals with a 5 year.
Status and Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock Laws Richard Roth, PhD 2012 MADD National Conference September 29, 2012 Research Supported By NM TSB, NHTSA,
Interlock Installations in the United States and Strategies to Increase Participation 4 th Annual AIIPA Conference Denver, Colorado May 15 - May 18, 2016.
Trends in Impaired Driving Legislation By Anne Teigen 4 th Annual Association of Ignition Interlock Program Administrators Conference May 18, 2016.
Enhanced Interlock Technology Christopher Morris, Virginia Dawn Blake, Washington.
Road Safety Research Office Ministry of Transportation of Ontario
Driver Privileges and Penalties
Using Advanced Interlock Device Features
Ch. 7: Driver Privileges & Penalties
Louisiana State Police Applied Technology Unit
Missouri Ignition Interlock Program
Pennsylvania Ignition Interlock Program
Reducing DWI With Interlocks The New Mexico Experience
RULES OF THE ROAD CHAPTER 6 NOTES.
Tara Casanova Powell TIRF USA
Maureen Perkins Impaired Driving Division
Tara Casanova Powell TIRF USA
CH 7: Privileges and Penalties
Analysis of New Mexico’s Drunk Driving
CHAPTER 7 – MANUAL DRIVER PRIVILEGES & PENALTIES
Florence Jett Deputy Director, Driver Services April 4, 2017
Chapter 7 Bell Ringer What are some reasons why an individual would lose their driving privileges?
DUI TICKET. What to do if you get a DUI ticket? 1. Hire a DUI Lawyer: Sohalia Sahami attorney at law, with over 20 years of experience in handling DUI.
Jennifer Huebner Davidson NHTSA AIIPA Conference May 23, 2017
Wyoming Ignition Interlock Program
HOW to process IID INSTALLS
Norris Expects Success.
Penalties for Driving Without a License in New Jersey
Ignition Interlock Separating Drinking From Driving®
Day 8/ Chapter 7 Bell Ringer
Driver Privileges and Penalties
GAHS Parking Presentation
Presentation transcript:

2016 AIIPA CONFERENCE Denver, Colorado May 15/18, 2016 Robert Lung Hawaii Ignition Interlock Program Manager Hawaii Department of Transportation Robert.kyf.lung@Hawaii.gov

I. Hawaii Implementation of the Ignition. Interlock Program. A I. Hawaii Implementation of the Ignition Interlock Program A. Started on January 1, 2011 B. Prior to the start date, no: 1. Elaborate Administrative Rules 2. No program with vendor on what to expect or what our needs were. 3. No law to enforce operational violations.

4. No consequences for violations. 5. Only meaningful violation was the circumvention or tampering of the interlock. a. Penalties: 1) 3 -30 days imprisonment 2) $25 - $1,000 fine. 3) Loss of IID privilege to operate vehicle. 6. The only tools the program had to work with.

II. Hawaii’s Law. A. Revocation of Driver’s License. 1 II. Hawaii’s Law A. Revocation of Driver’s License 1. 1st offense within 5 years – 1 yr. 2. 2nd offense within 5 years – 18 mos. 3. 3rd offense within 5 years – 2 yrs. 4. 3 or more becomes a Class C felony of up to 5 years imprisonment and revocation of driver’s license of 1 to 5 years.

III. Hawaii’s Data since implementation A. Number of installations: 1. 2011 = 1,279 2. 2012 = 1,694 3. 2013 = 1,959 4. 2014 = 1,832 5. 2015 = 1,735 6. 2016 = 574 as of May 4, 2016 7. TOTAL: 9,073

IV. Managing the numbers. A. Receive daily reports from vendor on IV. Managing the numbers A. Receive daily reports from vendor on the 30-day maintenance. Involves 30- 45. B. Involves reviewing each of the clients logs and noting any violations, patterns, and photos of violations. C. If needed, collect documents on violation for case. When appropriate, notify police to initiate criminal report.

D. ID clients that show excessive lockouts, failures, high BACs, other people blowing, refuse rolling tests, showing not picture of client blowing, and any other pertinent information. E. Analyze all of the summary data received on a monthly basis to determine problems areas.

F. Conduct monthly meeting with vendor F. Conduct monthly meeting with vendor and the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Officer to air out problems and determine what is or is not working. G. Researching and developing ways to increase the use of the interlock by convicted offenders.

V. Strengthening the Program. A. Passing legislation giving the DOT V. Strengthening the Program A. Passing legislation giving the DOT more authority to make Administrative Rules. B. Develop rules and penalties that will increase the interlock period for clients if violations occur – compliance requirements.

VI. Reciprocity - Another story but a problem to be reckoned with.

QUESTIONS? Robert Lung Hawaii Ignition Interlock Program Manager Robert.kyf.lung@Hawaii.gov (808) 587-6302