Geometric and Semantic Matching for Cultural Heritage Artefacts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harvesting the Fitzwilliam Shaun Osborne OA Forum, Bath September 2003.
Advertisements

ARROW Plus is a Best Practice Network selected under the ICT Policy Support Programme (ICT PSP) DEMO or How does the ARROW system look.
UKOLN is supported by: Bridget Robinson and Ann Chapman From analytical model to implementation and beyond CD Focus Schema Forum, CBI Conference Centre.
Feature-based 3D Reassembly Devi Parikh Mentor: Rahul Sukthankar September 14, 2006.
An introduction to the work of the Scottish Archive Network Internet access to the written history of Scotland.
HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON.
Archaeology & Cultural Heritage AWG Manolis Vavalis CERETETH.
Programming Fundamentals. Programming concepts and understanding of the essentials of programming languages form the basis of computing.
Identifying Patterns in Road Networks Topographic Data and Maps Henri Lahtinen Arto Majoinen.
Overview of Computer Vision CS491E/791E. What is Computer Vision? Deals with the development of the theoretical and algorithmic basis by which useful.
‘european digital library’ (EDL) Julie Verleyen TEL-ME-MOR / M-CAST Seminar on Subject Access Prague, 24 November 2006.
1 / 1509 / 17 / 14 Digital preservation of architectural 3D data Rosetta in the context of the DURAARK project IGeLU Conference Oxford, September 17 th.
00/4/103DVIP-011 Part Three: Descriptions of 3-D Objects and Scenes.
Name: Group: Teacher: 1. AO1 AO2 AO3 AO4 AO5 2 Out-of-town shopping You work in a large advertising agency that has just won the contract to advertise.
Computer Graphics recipes for analyzing and enhancing shape information Endowing 3D shapes with Semantics in Virtual Worlds Michela Mortara, Chiara Catalano,
AdvisorStudent Dr. Jia Li Shaojun Liu Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Oakland University 3D Shape Classification Using Conformal Mapping In.
Lessons learned within international collaboration in the area of digital preservation of cultural heritage Gábor KAPOSI – MTA SZTAKI Tibor SZKALICZKI.
Parametric & 3-D Solid Modeling
Harmonising without Harm: towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology Maja Žumer (University of Ljubljana) & Patrick.
1 Adaptation of Design Techniques for CAD How CAD systems are used Jimmy Lam The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Aims and Objectives “ The Archaeology Data Service (ADS) supports research, learning and teaching with high quality and dependable digital resources.
Multimodal Interaction Dr. Mike Spann
- 1/22 - Centre for Digital Video Processing C E N T R E F O R D I G I T A L V I D E O P R O C E S S I N G DIGIFACT: Digitisation of Museum Artefacts Facilitating.
Metadata, the CARARE Aggregation service and 3D ICONS Kate Fernie, MDR Partners, UK.
Need for Semantics  Now models represent just the object appearance  We need to represent also its  Properties  Roles  Behaviour  Services  … 
CSCE 5013 Computer Vision Fall 2011 Prof. John Gauch
EUscreen: Examining An Aggregator ’ s Role in Digital Preservation Samantha Losben Digital Preservation - Final Project December 15, 2010.
Level 2 IT Users Qualification – Unit 1 Improving Productivity Chris.
Sally MacDonald Yean-Hoon Ong Mona Hess Francesca Millar E-Curator 3D colour scans for remote object identification and assessment Dr Ian Brown Dr Graeme.
Datasets on the GRID David Adams PPDG All Hands Meeting Catalogs and Datasets session June 11, 2003 BNL.
1 24 September BREAKOUT :30 1)Review of Metadata Standards Directory (DCC version and GitHub) 2)Introduction of Metadata Standards Catalog.
Digitization Programmes National Library of the Czech Republic Adolf Knoll
Thinking & Reasoning Skills Problem Solving. Aims of Session To develop a taxonomy of problem solving skills relating to the specification To explore.
1 Exploring time and space in the annotation of museum catalogues: The Sloane virtual exhibition experience Stephen Stead Vienna November 2014 University.
E-Science and us Peter Robinson ITSEE, University of Birmingham.
A Systemic Approach for Effective Semantic Access to Cultural Content Ilianna Kollia, Vassilis Tzouvaras, Nasos Drosopoulos and George Stamou Presenter:
3D Imaging: Literature Review By Gennifer Majors Conservation in Practice Sarah Foskett.
Save the Sea Turtle L.S.E. 3 rd grade PBL presentation.
Chapter 15 To accompany Helping Children Learn Math Cdn Ed, Reys et al. ©2010 John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd.
A computer-assisted constraint-based system for assembling fragmented objects G. Palmas, N. Pietroni, P. Cignoni, R. Scopigno Digital Heritage 2013 International.
Recording the Context of Action for Process Documentation Ian Wootten Cardiff University, UK
Additional Homework Additional Homework Year 8s ICT Department.
Foundation Subjects. Identifying shapes in our environment. Knowledge, skills and understanding Exploring and developing ideas 1c) collect visual and.
Your Interactive Guide to the Digital World Discovering Computers 2012 Chapter 12 Exploring Information System Development.
PARTHENOS-project.eu EOSC market demand for art, humanties and cultural heritage Amsterdam– EGI Conference– 7/4/2016 Franco Niccolucci Scientific Coordinator,
HORIZON 2020 The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation SC6 CULT-COOP Albert GAUTHIER DG Connect Unit G2 Luxembourg.
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
WP5: Semantic Multimedia
TextCrowd – Collaborative semantic enrichment of text-based datasets
DIGITIZATION OF PAPER DOCUMENTS OF INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY’S LIBRARY
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ)
Semantic Database Builder
Sketching.
Workflows in archaeology & heritage sciences
Authors: Khaled Abdelsalam Mohamed Amr Kamel
Cheng-Ming Huang, Wen-Hung Liao Department of Computer Science
Unit 3 Digital Imaging Plan and produce computer graphics Name: Group:
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Metadata for research outputs management
Code Analysis, Repository and Modelling for e-Neuroscience
IS-ENES Cases Seven use cases are listed as data lifecycle steps A B C
Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University Library May 2004
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
The Dimensions of Archaeology: Time, Space, and Form
Webinar for [Name of Group] [Name of Institution]
Code Analysis, Repository and Modelling for e-Neuroscience
Spring- Off with your head! Summer – Impact!
Metadata supported full-text search in a web archive
TOWARDS EFFICIENT AND CONTINUING USAGE OF THE DIGITAL CULTURE ECOSYSTEM FOR LEARNING PURPOSES Desislava Paneva-Marinova, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics,
Presentation transcript:

Geometric and Semantic Matching for Cultural Heritage Artefacts Stephen C. Phillips IT Innovation

https://www.flickr.com/photos/lunamodule/ This is Cyprus © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

This is a jigsaw of Cyprus – I expect we could all do it © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

What if lots of pieces were missing? © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

What if it was in 3D? © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Cracked Faded Eroded Front Back What if the pieces were 2500 years old and were all faded, cracked and with the edges worn away so that they didn’t actually fit together any more? Front Back © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge British Museum, London Cyprus Museum, Cyprus What if they were dispersed across 4 museums and private collections? Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Jigsaws in 3D most pieces missing all the edges worn off many puzzles jumbled together pieces spread across many countries So this is the problem © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Re-Assembly Re-Unification Re-Association Similarity Search _______________ Similarity Search This is what GRAVITATE will do © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Re-Assembly You have some (eroded) pieces. The computer fits them together. This is hard in 2 dimensions, never mind in 3D! Localised geometry Colour descriptors Localised detail 3D descriptors © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Re-Unification Head in the British Museum Re-unify 3D models of the statue 3D print copies for re-unification Re-unify statue in a virtual museum Statue in the Cyprus Museum © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Re-Association Data in another museum catalogue Artefact with semantic description Material, decoration, size, shape, period, style, glaze, … © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Re-Association Find similarities leading to new insights about past cultures © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

How? © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

What’s the data? © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Fragments of Terracotta Statues from Salamis © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

We need to Gather all the Knowledge Catalogue data with text descriptions Chemical analysis Archaeological papers X-ray fluorescence Excavation notes 3D scanning  models © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

We need to Gather all the Knowledge Catalogue data with text descriptions Chemical analysis Archaeological papers X-ray fluorescence Excavation notes 3D scanning  models © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

We need to Gather all the Knowledge The British Museum has 2.5M objects described in CIDOC CRM Catalogue data from Ashmolean, Fitzwilliam and Cyprus museums is now mapped to the same data model Catalogue data with text descriptions Archaeological papers Object  hasNote  “…lots of free-form text added by the curator” Using Natural Language Processing to extract and encode meaning from this text: References to papers, to catalogue entries Parts and features Conservation condition Measurements …  CIDOC CRM / CRMarchaeo / etc Excavation notes © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

We need to Gather all the Knowledge All fragments (211) are scanned, in a variety of resolutions and with a variety of scanners Volume, area thickness, curvature, … Chemical analysis Colour, texture, distance from convex hull, … X-ray fluorescence Feature detection Part annotation 3D scanning  models Faceting: front / back / fracture CH Artefact Partonomy CRMdig © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Faceting Assume local fold model Measure local fold angle Select locally salient angles Connect to form facet curves Determine the facet types Robust for our fragments Very few parameters 90ᵒ © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Feature Detection Morphological and stylistic feature detection and characterization Reasoning on similarity among fragments © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Using CH Artefact Partonomy within CIDOC-CRM Instantiated in class structure of CIDOC-CRM ExG: Expansion by GRAVITATE inherit its functionality, maximize acceptance use semi-automatic annotation tools © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

How do I use it? © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Six views in the dashboard Inspection Users can inspect 3D fragments and metadata and run a search Fragment 3D assets can be processed (faceting, geometric characterisation, feature identification) and annotated ReAssembly Exploration Datasets can be explored according to specific selected properties History To preserve the list of operations performed in the session Clipboard To save all the data the user is interested in (e.g. notes, models, annotation) © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Six views in the dashboard Inspection Users can inspect 3D fragments and metadata and run a search Fragment 3D assets can be processed (faceting, geometric characterisation, feature identification) and annotated ReAssembly Exploration Datasets can be explored according to specific selected properties History To preserve the list of operations performed in the session Clipboard To save all the data the user is interested in (e.g. notes, models, annotation) © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Six views in the dashboard Inspection Users can inspect 3D fragments and metadata and run a search Fragment 3D assets can be processed (faceting, geometric characterisation, feature identification) and annotated ReAssembly Exploration Datasets can be explored according to specific selected properties History To preserve the list of operations performed in the session Clipboard To save all the data the user is interested in (e.g. notes, models, annotation) © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Six views in the dashboard Inspection Users can inspect 3D fragments and metadata and run a search Fragment 3D assets can be processed (faceting, geometric characterisation, feature identification) and annotated ReAssembly Exploration Datasets can be explored according to specific selected properties History To preserve the list of operations performed in the session Clipboard To save all the data the user is interested in (e.g. notes, models, annotation) © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Six views in the dashboard Inspection Users can inspect 3D fragments and metadata and run a search Fragment 3D assets can be processed (faceting, geometric characterisation, feature identification) and annotated ReAssembly Exploration Datasets can be explored according to specific selected properties History To preserve the list of operations performed in the session  Provenance and argumentation Clipboard To save all the data the user is interested in (e.g. notes, models, annotation) © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

© Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Prototype © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

And Finally: ReAssembly Jigsaws in 3D most pieces missing all the edges worn off many puzzles jumbled together pieces spread across many countries Use all the data to guide the process Selection by Similarity Positioning clues Matching Mating © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Mannequin © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Matching: geometry-based © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Mating Mating digitally mimics gluing of the fragments We place selected fragments in their optimal relative position based on: Geometric complementarity Skin pattern continuity Semantic constraints Global alignment Mathematical morphology used Final approval of proposed assemblage is requested of the user (SotA mating from predecessor PRESIOUS) © Copyright University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other GRAVITATE partners, 2015-2016

Gravitate-project.eu Coordinator: Stephen C Phillips scp@it-innovation.soton.ac.uk Gravitate-project.eu