Analysis of Low Activity Waste Streams and Volumes in Decommissioning NPPs  Lisa Edwards Sr. Program Manager, EPRI LLW Forum April 13-14, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adam H. Levin AHL Consulting May 14, BWR – Boiling Water Reactor DOE – Department of Energy DSC – Dry Storage Canister ISF – Interim Storage Facility.
Advertisements

1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
California Energy Commission Overview of the 1976 Moratorium and It’s Impact on California’s Low-Carbon Future California Senate Energy, Utilities and.
Setting the Stage: Review of 2013 IEPR Nuclear Recommendations Danielle Osborn Mills Former Senior Nuclear Policy Advisor to the California Energy Commission.
The Nuclear Option Dr Robert Hawley CBE, FRSE, FREng.
Capabilities & Competencies An Introduction to EnergySolutions September 19, 2007 Scott Baskett Erik Vogeley.
John Wagner Oak Ridge National Laboratory Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project U.S. Department of Energy 10 th Meeting of the U.S.-Argentina.
The US NRC’s Power Reactor Decommissioning Process Michael F
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
SAFESPUR 9/7/08 1 Innovation in Nuclear Decommissioning: New Technologies and Research, SAFESPUR Forum, July 9, 2008 G.R. Elder Bradtec Decon Technologies.
Group New Projects Related to Decommissioning. 29 th May 2008 KNPP Richard Benbow – Head of Kozloduy PMU.
VERMONT YANKEE Transitioning into SAFSTOR ​SEPTEMBER 2, 2015 Paul Paradis Director Decommissioning.
August 4,  Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS) ceased power operations on December 29, 2014 after 633 days of continuous power operation.
MODULE “COST ESTIMATION, CALCULATION AND COST CONTROL” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle 1. NUCLEAR FUEL Nuclear fuel is the energy source of nuclear reactors and an essential element of the reactor core. The heat energy.
1 West Valley Demonstration Project FY 2014 Budget Briefing Bryan C. Bower May 22, 2013.
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
November 12,  As of September 30, 2015, the ENVY NDT Balance was $595,733,175 ◦ Changes in the NDT are due to market losses/gains, reimbursement.
Introduction Radioactive waste in Iraq arises mainly from decommissioning of destroyed nuclear facilities and waste related to previous nuclear research.
RESPONSIBLE – ACCOUNTABLE – TRANSPARENT – DEMOCRATIC Overview Of CAN-NIRS Comments Tim Judson Nuclear Information & Resource Service Contact: (301)
Vermont Yankee- The Last Yankee Standing Bev Good Entergy Nuclear- Sr. Project Manager Boston, MA July 29,
Nuclear Fleet: Configuration Management Benchmarking Group 2016 June 6, 2016.
Vermont Yankee. Boiling Water Reactor Reactor Building Carbon steel 370 Ci/m3 Concrete 3.8 Ci/m3 Spent fuel pool.
ISOE-Europe 3/25/04 1 San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning Eric M. Goldin Eric M. Goldin Southern California Edison Company.
Nuclear Energy 2014: Status and Outlook Paul Genoa Nuclear Energy Institute.
Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy Current Status of Shutdown Sites Activities Vermont.
Decommissioning San Onofre
Radioactive Waste Management Infrastructure in Egypt:
Nuclear Power Plant Basics
EPRI Comments Re: NRC “Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”
“Status of the ReACTOR Decommissioning Program” October 7, 2016 LLW Forum Ted Smith, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Decommissioning Issues
STATUS OF NJ NUCLEAR PLANTS SINCE LAST MEETING
State of the Nuclear Industry and Current Initiatives
John Christian President, Logistics, Processing and Disposal
John Christian President, Logistics, Processing and Disposal
Lisa Edwards Sr. Program Manager, EPRI LLW Forum April 13-14, 2016
Implementation of the Revised Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning,
Charlotte, NC Charlotte as an energy and nuclear leader in the US:
At-Risk Nuclear Plants: Challenges and Opportunities
NRC Update of Low Level Waste Emerging Issues
Lisa Edwards Senior Program Manager LLW Forum April, 2017
Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Update
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
Regulatory Guide 1.21 – Reporting of LLW shipped
Joseph D. Anderson, Chief
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
CR3 and Crystal River Energy Complex
Transportation of Radwaste from Exelon Sites Mark Ross – Exelon Corporate Manager Radwaste Date: 10/07/2016.
Challenges Facing Nuclear Operatoring Plants Today
EPRI Development of Nuclear Power Plant Implementation Guide for NRC Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Presented.
CN−242 03b–12/ID52 Exposure Scenario and Pathway
Clive 2018 Disposal Update presented by Dan Shrum
License Transfer Transaction
Overview of NRC Low-Level Waste Activities and Initiatives
Status of Disposal Capabilities for Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Theresa J. Kliczewski GTCC EIS Document Manager Office of.
NRC’s Ongoing Rulemaking Activities: Recent Developments and Path Forward April 17, 2018 Spring 2018 Low-Level Waste Forum San Francisco, CA Maria Arribas-Colon,
Future Direction of the Nuclear Industry: Developing a Path Forward
NRC’s Low-Level Radioactive Waste Program
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
The Future of Nuclear Power
Old and Uncompetitive Nuclear Plants
Spent Fuel Storage and Transport for Shutdown and Decommissioning Nuclear Plants Rod McCullum November 28, 2018.
IAEA International Workshop on Safe Disposal of LLW
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Steven J. Maheras International Conference on the Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors: Learning from the Past, Enabling the Future June.
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Low Activity Waste Streams and Volumes in Decommissioning NPPs  Lisa Edwards Sr. Program Manager, EPRI LLW Forum April 13-14, 2016

Overview Decommissioning of a nuclear power plant involves the safe disposition of a very large quantity of radioactive, hazardous and conventional waste These projects have used various waste disposal and interim storage options, and have developed successful methods for handling the large quantities of decommissioning waste These experiences provide important lessons learned and successful strategies that can reduce decommissioning cost, schedule and complexity EPRI has captured these lessons learned in a recently published report Review of Waste Management Best Practices during Nuclear Plant Decommissioning, 3002005252.

D S I T US Power Reactors Decommissioning Status Four Sites Twelve Sites Seven Sites Three Sites Source: US NRC Website 3

Global Outlook for Decommissioning To date, about 100 commercial power plants have shutdown worldwide and only 13 have completed decommissioning An estimated 100 or more plants will shut down in the next 10 years Active dismantlement activities currently underway at nearly 50 plants

Recent Shutdown/Planned for Shutdown US Plants Unplanned Reactor Shutdowns Crystal River Unit 3 - Crystal River, Florida (February 2013) Kewaunee Power Station - Kewaunee Wisconsin (May 2013) San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 3 - San Clemente, California (June 2013) Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station - Vernon, Vermont (December 2014) Reactors that Plan Early Shutdown Fitzpatrick Nuclear Station - Oswego, New York (Announced Shutdown for 2017) Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Forked River, New Jersey (Announced Shutdown for 2019) Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Plymouth, MA (Announced Shutdown for 2019) What are the Economic Drivers Leading to Pre-mature Plant Closures? Low Cost Gas Subsidized Renewable Energy Sources (Wind, Solar) Deregulated Markets Pressures Power Grid Restrictions Undervalued Carbon Effects Plant Capital Improvements

Waste Volumes for US Decommissioning Projects Waste Class Plant Name Connecticut Yankee ft3 Maine Yankee ft3 Rancho Seco ft3 San Onofre Unit 1 ft3 Trojan ft3 Class A 3,754,572 3,224,000 608,713 1,680,558 Not Available Class B/C 10,354 20,000 3,284 1,050 > Class C (GTCC) Not Available 378 96 Total 3,764,926 3,244,000 612,375 1,681,704 275,000 Decom- missioning Strategy Little Decon- tamination of Buildings & Equipment Little Decon- tamination of Buildings & Equipment Buildings Decon- taminated, Little Decon of Equipment Large Difference in Volumes between Plants that Decontaminated Buildings Compared to those that Disposed of All RCA Buildings As Radioactive Waste

What Makes Up Decommissioning LLW? Radioactive Waste Material Volume for Connecticut Yankee ft3 Percent of Total Volume Waste Class Primary Types of Materials Primary Components & High Dose Waste 10,354 0.3% B & C Segmented Reactor Internals, Chemical Decontamination Resins Building Debris 3,166,000 84% A Concrete and Rebar Soil 492,000 13.1% Mostly for Groundwater Remediation Dredging Spoils 84,671 2.25% Mostly to Allow Barge Shipment of Reactor Vessel Asphalt 10,014 RCA Asphalt Mixed Waste 1,887 0.05% PCB Paint Contamination Total 3,764,926 100%   Most of the Class A Waste would quality as BSFR or Exemption Under 20.2002

Global Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities The majority of nations employ a waste classification program that is based in whole or part, on the IAEA system with a few using a U. S. based classification approach Most countries have access to a disposal site for low and intermediate level waste and some include an option for very low level waste (VLLW) VLLW trench and waste emplacement at ANDRA’s Morvilliers facility in France

Projected Volumes of Radwaste through the Current Licensed Life of US Power Plants 69% of this waste is from decommissioning Graph conservatively assumes that only 2/3 of Class A decommissioning waste would qualify as VLLW Estimated Cumulative Savings from new VLLW Classification - $6 Billion

Selected EPRI Reports Related to Decommissioning Waste Management Decommissioning Low Level Waste Management and Reduction Guide, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. 1999. TR-110234. Decommissioning Waste Management Workshop Proceedings, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. 2000. 1000006. Remediation Technology: Hazardous Waste Workshop Proceedings, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. 1999. TR-112875. Basis for National and International Low Activity and Very Low Level Waste Disposal Classifications, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. 2012. 1024844. Concrete Characterization and Dose Modeling During Plant Decommissioning, Detailed Experiences 1993 – 2007, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. 2008. 1015502. Proceeding: The 10th International Decommissioning and Radioactive Waste Management Workshop, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. 2012. 1026514.