LIGO LAB R&D PROGRAM TECHNICAL REVIEW, OCT 02

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G v1 H1 Squeezer Experiment Update L-V Meeting, Caltech, March 18, 2009 ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO Ping Koy Lam, Nergis Mavalvala, David McClelland,
Advertisements

LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
G R LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer LIGO Advanced R&D Review M. Zucker 8 October, 2002.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
PALM-3000 Management Update A. Bouchez Team Meeting #9 10/22/2008.
Review of HAM Suspension Designs for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson HAM Isolation Requirements Review Caltech, July 11th 2005.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Facilities Modifications (FAC) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO: Detector Organization, Responsibilities, Authority and Decision Tree: SUS and COC Dennis Coyne, Carol Wilkinson, David.
G R PHOTON ACTUATION R&D PROGRAM Michael Smith 8 Oct 02.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
LSC Meeting August ‘04 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, Hanford Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team August.
G R Advanced LIGO Seismic Isolation R&D Dennis Coyne 8 Oct 2002.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 HAM Suspensions Update Advanced LIGO Suspensions LIGO-Virgo Meeting March 2009 Derek Bridges representing Advanced LIGO.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Louisiana,
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
Update on Advanced LIGO suspension design and technology development towards the quad noise prototype Caroline A. Cantley for Advanced LIGO Suspension.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Advanced LIGO Suspension Status Caroline A. Cantley Advanced LIGO Suspension Team / University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, LLO March 2004.
G M 1 HAM-SAS CCB information 22 Feb 06 Coyne, Shoemaker, Wilkinson.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
LIGO-G D LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO R&D Review The PSL Peter King & Rich Abbott October 8, 2002.
Update on Suspension Activities for Advanced LIGO Caroline A. Cantley University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, Livingston, March 2003 (Technical.
Prototype Quadruple Pendulum Update – Part 1 Norna Robertson and Calum Torrie University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Hanford,
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
LSC Meeting March ‘05 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team March 2006 LIGO-G Z.
ECOOL Meeting 03/26/10 1 Low-E cooler baseline decisions: 1.FNAL’s cooling section “as is” – with weak solenoids, correctors, etc. (to prevent over focusing.
February 26, 2001LIGO-G B-P1 LIGO Future Operations (FY ) Budgets, Schedules, and Milestones NSF Review February 26, 2000 Hanford, Washington.
M. Gilchriese Items from Talks U.S. Pixel Meeting Santa Cruz July 2003.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2003 SC Pixel Meeting N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube WBS Santa Cruz Cost Workshop July 9, 2003.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
CMS Upgrade Workshop, FNAL, Nov 19-21, O.Prokofiev CMS Upgrade Workshop Updated ME4/2 chamber construction costs and prototype Status and plans.
Advanced LIGO UK 1 LIGO-G Z Development issues for the UK Advanced LIGO project Caroline Cantley Glasgow University for the UK Advanced LIGO Team.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Cost and Production Schedule September 2002.
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Cost and Schedule Rebaseline April 25, 2005 NCSX Project Re-baseline Review April 25, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
LIGO-G D 1 R&D Technical Review LIGO Lab October 8, 2002 Core Optics.
G D H1 Squeezer Experiment L-V Meeting, LAL Orsay, June 11, 2008 ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO Ping Koy Lam, Nergis Mavalvala, David McClelland,
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
ELENA installation progress F. Butin / ELENA collaboration.
Update on the Fused Silica Suspension for Advanced LIGO Giles Hammond, on behalf of the Suspension Team L-V Meeting, Amsterdam, 22 nd -25 th September.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI)
Status of the Mechanics at Ciemat.
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Advanced LIGO Quad Prototype Janeen Romie LSC, March 2004
Lasti Update July 25, 2007 LIGO-G Z
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Advanced R&D Lab Review
IKCA CEA Technical ANNEXES Follow up 18th DECEMBER 2015.
Presentation transcript:

LIGO LAB R&D PROGRAM TECHNICAL REVIEW, OCT 02 SUSPENSIONS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JANEEN ROMIE OCTOBER 8, 2002 SUSPENSION TEAM, CIT: P. WILLEMS, C. TORRIE, M. BARTON, H. ARMANDULA, J. ROMIE SUSPENSION TEAM, GEO: N. ROBERTSON, J. HOUGH, H. WARD, K. STRAIN, D. ROBERTSON, E. ELLIFFE, R. JONES, M. PLISSI, C. CANTLEY, G. CAGNOLI, D. CROOKS, A. HEPTONSTALL, P. SNEDDON, S. ROWAN LIGO II

LIGO LAB R&D CURRENT STATUS ONE MODE CLEANER CONTROLS PROTOTYPE ASSEMBLED. SECOND PROTOTYPE, FOR LASTI, READY FOR ASSEMBLY. RECYCLING MIRROR MODELING PROGRESSING. MIT QUAD PROTOTYPE STILL UNDERGOING TESTING. GEO PORTION OF MC ELECTRONICS DUE ~OCTOBER 12. CIT PORTION OF MC ELECTRONICS DUE ~ OCTOBER 12. DSPACE SYSTEMS UP AND GOING AT CIT AND LASTI. 3D TEAMWORKS AS A COLLABORATIVE TOOL IS UP AND WORKING. LIGO II

LIGO LAB R&D 2003 MILESTONES AND GOALS OPTIMIZE CIT MODE CLEANER CONTROLS PROTOTYPE – WINCH, LIBRARY OF ANGLED BLADE CLAMPS, EDDY CURRENT DAMPERS, JIGS & CATCHER. MODE CLEANER CONTROLS PROTOTYPE DELIVERED AND TESTED AT LASTI – MID DECEMBER (DEPENDENT ON SEISMIC CHAMBER AVAILABILITY.) RECYCLING MIRROR CONTROLS PROTOTYPE DELIVERED AND TESTED AT LASTI – MID FEBRUARY LASTI CAVITY TEST – MID MARCH HAM CAVITY PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW – MID JUNE FABRICATE AND ASSEMBLE END TEST MASS QUAD CONTROLS PROTOTYPE – MID SEPTEMBER LIGO II

LIGO LAB R&D TECH RISKS & OPPORTUNITIES MAGNETIC INTERACTION BETWEEN SUS AND SEI – START QUANTIFICATION IN OCTOBER REPEATABILITY AND DURABILITY OF FIBERS/RIBBONS HANDLING/SAFETY OF QUAD OPTICS AND SUSPENSIONS. OPPORTUNITIES EDDY CURRENT DAMPING ELECTROSTATIC LESS NOISY SHADOW SENSOR INTERFEROMETRIC SENSOR FINE TUNING OF TEST MASS DC POSITION LIGO II

LIGO LAB SUS R&D SCHEDULE ISSUES SUSPENSION SCHEDULE IS DEPENDENT ON SEISMIC UPGRADE SCHEDULE. PREPARING THE SYNCHROTRON LAB SPACE HAS BEEN SLOWER THAN EXPECTED. BLADE FABRICATION AND TESTING IS TIME CONSUMING, AS EXPECTED. DOCUMENTATION TAKES TIME AWAY FROM THE LAB – BUT IS NECESSARY. LIGO II

LIGO LAB SUS R&D FY2002 BUDGET & ACTUALS EQUIPMENT 5.10 SUSPENSIONS & FIBERS ACCOUNT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES Phil L.’s BUDGET$200,552 ACTUAL $59,933 5.16 LASTI PROTOTYPE FAB ACCOUNT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES Phil L.’s BUDGET $87,500 ACTUAL $112,991 5.17 CIT PROTOTYPE FAB ACCOUNT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES Phil L.’s BUDGET $67,500 ACTUAL $96,953 Total budget: $355,552 Total actual: $269,577 LIGO II

LIGO LAB SUS R&D FY2003 COST BASELINE & ISSUES EQUIPMENT Advanced Suspensions & Fibers – $1244k budgeted for equipment, subcontracts, materials and supplies (see http://ligo.caltech.edu/~tfrey/rd2003/FY2003.htm) New estimate comes to $1144k for 5.10, 5.16 and 5.17. Risks: Dspace not enough, new HAM install fixtures required. LIGO II

LIGO LAB SUS R&D FY03 COST BASELINE & ISSUES LIGO II

LIGO LAB SUS R&D FY2003 COST BASELINE & ISSUES LABOR ACTUAL CIT LABOR FROM R&D: PHIL, HELENA: 1.75 FTEs CIT LABOR FROM OPS.: CALUM, JANEEN, MARK: ~2.75 FTEs CIT LABOR FROM OPTS AVAILABLE: ELECT. ENGS/TECHS.: ~0.25 FTE TOTAL: ~5 ASSESSED NEED TOTAL: ~6.5 CONCLUSION: UNDERSTAFFED NOTE: THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE GEO LABOR. LIGO II

LIGO LAB SUS R&D STAFFING ISSUES PERSONNEL NEEDED AT CIT: A MECH. LAB TECHNICIAN (A MYRON-PERSON) – 0.5 FTE A MECH. DRAFTER/DESIGNER – 1 FTE PERSONNEL NEEDED AT LASTI DURING CONTROLS PROTOTYPE TESTING (ABOVE AND BEYOND CIT AND GEO VISITORS.) PHYSICIST - 2 MONTHS TECHNICIAN - 1 MONTH GEO HAS ~7 FTEs WORKING ON ADLIGO SUSPENSIONS AND MATERIALS/FIBERS. INTERACTIONS ARE WORKING WELL. LIGO II