Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 - Fluency Assessment
Advertisements

Kindergarten Reading at PS 11
The Running Record The Running Record is a record or errors, or miscues, that readers make as they are reading. Why do we use Running Records? to evaluate.
The School District of Philadelphia
The School District of Philadelphia
Running Records Guided Reading, Good First Teaching for All Children, Fountas & Pinnell.
Please sit with your CMA groups.
Primary Reading Focus Group
DRA Training Lyndhurst Public Schools K- 3 Elba Castrovinci September 2013.
 Running are a method of recording a student’s reading behavior. Running Records provide teachers with information that can be analyzed to determine.
Why do we use Running Records?
Developmental Reading Assessment Second Edition K-3 Presented by Rebecca Pilver.
Running Records.
Developmental Reading Assessment Thompson School District Fall 2012
Intermediate DRA Training
Developmental Reading Assessment-NEW TEACHERS 2012.
Reading Assessment Chapter 11. Differentiated Instruction is needed because:  The range of reading abilities widens at each succeeding grade level. 
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
How can I help my child with reading at Home? 1. Motivating Kids to Read Studies show that the more children read, the better readers and writers they.
RUNNING RECORDS GUIDED READING &. © STEPS Professional Development3 THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL OF READING connecting comparing Reading Strategies synthesising.
The Developmental Reading Assessment
Stacey Dahmer Dana Grant
C&I 209: MA/RR and Retells- Putting the Pieces Together
Analytical Reading Inventory Grades 4-8. What? The ARI is an informal, individualized reading inventory. This inventory will allow you to analyze decoding,
Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System Training
Session 3 REFINING YOUR READING WORKSHOP.  Using assessment information to inform instruction  Making instructional decisions from data  Prompting.
Using Running Records to Inform Instruction
Informal Reading Inventory Dr. Melissa Comer Tennessee Tech University.
Constructivism Theory and Assessing and Teaching Literacy Across the Curriculum Dr. Elaine Roberts.
September 8,  Analyze Running Record for Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus  Review calculating reading level of texts  Practice using Miscue.
Using Running Records to Inform Instruction. Today you will learn… What is a Running Record How to score a Running Record Cueing System: Meaning, Structure,
+ Entrance Slip 1 What are the main issues, questions or concerns you have about students learning to read (curriculum, instruction and assessment) in.
Qualitative Reading Inventory
EDS 711 Overview MKSanford.wikispaces.com Syllabus.
Fountas and Pinnell Resources Christ Our Holy Redeemer 2015.
Welcome To: ILA Lingo Discussion Danielle Grzybek, Reading Specialist Soaring to New Heights in Reading.
Strategic Teaching and Evaluation of Progress
Rigby Refresher Training
DRA DEVELOPMENTAL READING ASSESSMENT DeEtte Wick Victoria.
Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment Review. Testing Reminders alternate texts test all three levels administer the oral reading, coding, miscue analysis.
Kwayaciiwin Education Resource Centre KERC Ayn Harris
Overview of DRA2 (Developmental Reading Assessment) Middle School Presentation Cathy Rosso Stephanie Williams May 2012.
GREENSBURG SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT March 2013 Unpacking the Standards Skype Session Benchmark Assessment Continuum of.
Benchmark Assessment System
+ Literacy Assessment Authentic and Formative. + Reading Levels Independent: % Students who score at this level do not need assistance to be successful.
Literacy Design Session 3 January 26, Today’s Agenda Part One: Miscue Analysis.
Running Records Assessment that drives instruction
Improving Reading Fluency
Guided Reading Southfields KS1.
Preparation for End of Key Stage 1 Testing 2017
SATs KS1 – YEAR 2 We all matter.
1st Grade Curriculum Night
Developmental Reading Assessment 2 (K-3)
The Goal of Guided Reading
Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment 2 Workshop
Running records Group Members: Kathy Gongora, Meliza Magana, Jose Botes and Aisha Ramos.
Why do we use Running Records?
Balanced Assessment Facilitated by Kristen Giuliano
Exploring the Interactive Read-Aloud
Running Records Ana Coca Fort Worth ISD
Reading Seminar TUESDAY 27 February 2018.
Year 2: How to help your child
Developmental Reading Assessment
Reading Across the Curriculum
Section VI: Comprehension
Now What? Part 2 By Cindy Marcum
Reading in the Upper Grades
Meet Me at The Table Guided Reading K-2.
Using Phonemic Awareness &
DRA 2 in K-1 Administering, Scoring, and Analyzing the Developmental Reading Assessment.
Presentation transcript:

Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System CCTCA 2017 Presented by Erin Warburton Dr. Oakley School

Why Conduct an Informal Reading Assessment? To guide teacher practice To organize guided reading groups To help students in selecting “just right” books To stock classroom or school libraries with books that students can access To have a starting benchmark in order to measure progress

Or, as Fountas and Pinnell say... “By observing students one-on-one as they read original, precisely leveled books, and engaging in comprehension conversations that go beyond retelling, teachers are better able to make informed decisions and connect assessment to instruction”.

Kits 1 and 2 Kit 1 is levels A-N, approximately kindergarten/grade 1 through grade 2 Kit 2 is levels L-Z, approximately grade 3 through grade 8

What’s In the Assessment Kit? Assessment Guide- information on how to use this tool Assessment Forms CDs- includes assessment forms, data management forms and professional development information Optional Assessment Student Forms- word lists Continuum of Literacy Learning- information about each reading level and related literacy lessons One fiction and one non-fiction book for every level Calculator/Stopwatch tool

Where-to-Start Word Lists Ask student to read the list one level below his/her grade level 3rd graders should begin with the grade 2 word lists* If the student reads 16 to 20 words on the list correctly, go to the next level If the student reads less than 16 words correctly, then stop and begin the text reading at the level indicated in the “Where-to-Start” chart

Assessment Procedures “Administering the Benchmark Assessment” Movie Clip Assessment Procedures “Administering the Benchmark Assessment” ** Comprehension and story length relevant to levels L-N are in fact true for levels L-Z

Reading Assessment Procedures Photocopy required “Recording Forms” for oral reading starting at the “Where to Start” level suggested on the Word Lists testing Work one-to-one with a student Show the student the book Read the introduction aloud to the student Start calculator/stopwatch Student starts reading while teacher records miscues on record sheet If the student encounters the black rectangle, stop the calculator/stopwatch and ask the student to read silently until the end of the book

Teacher analyses miscues, records fluency score and calculates reading rate Ask the general question: What happened in the book? After, read the question prompts if more information is needed Key understandings include: Within the Text Beyond the Text About the Text – starts at Level L Bonus point for additional understanding

Oral Reading Analysis Miscues include: Substitutions Omissions Insertions Skipping lines Words “told” by the Teacher You need to record all student miscues You do not need to use the exact miscue coding indicated in the test manual You can create your own marking system

Unique Scoring Criteria If the student misreads the same word several times in a text it is one error each time missed. If the student misreads the same proper noun several times in a text it is one error the first time and no error after that even if a different substitution is made. If the student skips a line it is one error per word skipped. If the student asks the teacher for a word, first say “you try it”, if they get it right it is not a miscue.

Scoring: Special Cases If a student skips a full page of print intervene and tell them - do not count this as an error. No matter how many attempts a student makes at a word, score only one error for each word. If a student loses their place ask them to start over at a good starting point and restart your coding – do not count this as an error. While we may not personally agree with the F&P scoring criteria we need to apply them consistently or the test results become less valid

Oral Reading demonstration

Partner Practice Work in a group of 2 (student and teacher) The “student” reads the story “as printed” - Be aware it contains errors The “teacher” records the student’s miscues Discuss the miscues and determine an accuracy rate

Oral Reading Analysis and Accuracy Rate REVIEW Oral Reading Analysis and Accuracy Rate

Oral Reading Analysis/Accuracy Rate Total of 7 errors and 2 self corrections 97% accuracy rate – continue with comprehension conversation

Scoring: Oral Reading (Decoding) Levels A-K Levels L-Z Independent Levels A-K -95-100% accuracy Instructional Levels A-K -90-94% accuracy Independent Levels L-Z -98-100% accuracy Instructional Levels L-Z -95-97% accuracy If the student does not meet the minimum accuracy threshold do not ask the comprehension questions.

Determining Reading Levels Levels A-K A student can read this text independently if they can decode 95- 100% of the words accurately, with excellent or satisfactory comprehension A student can read this text instructionally if they can decode 90- 94% of the words accurately, with satisfactory or excellent comprehension Or, a student can read this text instructionally if they can decode 95- 100% of the words accurately with limited comprehension

Determining Reading Levels Levels L-Z A student can read this text independently if they can decode 98- 100% of the words accurately, with excellent or satisfactory comprehension A student can read this text instructionally if they can decode 95- 97% of the words accurately, with satisfactory or excellent comprehension Or, a student can read this text instructionally if they can decode 98- 100% of the words accurately with limited comprehension

When Do I Stop? Continue testing until the text is too hard (oral reading is lower than 90% accuracy for Levels A-K OR lower than 95% accuracy for Levels L-Z OR comprehension is unsatisfactory) A student can be instructional over several levels It may take several reading sessions before a difficult level is reached

Writing Assessment For every book, there is a “Writing About Reading Prompt” This assessment is optional Teachers may choose to use this assessment in order to see if the student can produce writing that relates to a given criteria Background knowledge would have been activated through the reading

Miscue Analysis Why did the student make that miscue (error)? Only analyze errors of substitution. Only do a miscue analysis on their highest instructional level. When analyzing miscues, only read up to the point where the miscue occurred. Ex: A sentence reads, “I went to the kitten and picked her up”, and the student reads “I went to the kitchen and picked her up”. When examining this miscue, we will only read “I went to the kitchen”, as this is all the information the student had when they made the error.

Miscues might be... Meaning. Ask yourself: does the error make sense in the context of the story read so far? Some examples include: “dance” read instead of “ballet” “puppy” read instead of “dog” “apple” read instead of “apricot”

Miscues might be... Structural/Syntax. Ask yourself, does the miscue follow English language rules for grammar and syntax? (Syntax and structure miscues almost always occur with either visual or meaning miscues)

Miscues might be… Visual. Ask yourself: is there a visual similarity between the miscue and the word? Some examples include: “cool” for “cold” “sweat” for “sweet” “throg” for“through”

Miscues might be… Two or three of M,S,and V. Examples: the text reads “We went to the photographer to get our photos taken”. The student reads “we went to the photocopier to get our photos taken” We only look at “we went to the photocopier” Ask: does it make sense? Can we go to photocopiers? Yes. Does it follow the syntax rules of our language? Yes. Are there similarities between the letters/words photographer and photocopier? Yes. This miscue is M,S,V

Movie Clip “Miscue Analysis” F & P Professional Development CD “Elliot’s Analysis”

Continuum of Literacy Learning and IPP Targets Consider a specific literacy behaviour on which to focus instruction. Reflect punctuation through appropriate pausing and intonation while reading orally (Level E) Take apart compound words to solve them (Level H) Self correct when errors detract from the meaning of the text (Level L) Infer characters feeling and motivations through reading their dialogue (Level M) Understand the relationship between the setting and the plot of a story (Level M)

Continuum of Literacy Learning and IPP Targets Consider a specific literacy behaviour on which to focus instruction. Express changes in ideas or knowledge after reading a tex (Level O) Notice and interpret figurative language and discuss how it adds to the meaning or enjoyment of text (Level S) Talk about how the author built interest and suspense across a story (Level V) Evaluate whether social issues and different cultural groups are accurately represented in a fiction or non-fiction text (Level Y)

Questions?

Contact Information Erin Warburton emwarburton@cbe.ab.ca