Small Business Committee Meeting Co-sponsored by the D.C. Bar Government Contracts and Litigation Section October 12, 2016 Holland & Knight

Agenda Update on Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., v. United States Supreme Court decision- Joe Hornyak, Holland & Knight All Small Mentor Protégé and Kingdomware Update Guest Speakers-Ken Dodds, the Director for the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Office of Policy, Planning, and Liaison, John Klein Associate General Counsel for Procurement Law Other noteworthy SBA regulations or initiatives Upcoming Events

Update Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. , v Update Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., v. United States Supreme Court decision Joe Hornyak, Holland & Knight

Kindomware Technologies, Inc. v. U.S. Long-running series of GAO and Court of Federal Claims bid protests decided by U.S. Supreme Court on June 16, 2016. The Veterans-specific "Rule of Two" provides that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) "shall award contracts" by restricting competition to veteran-owned small businesses if the CO reasonably expects that at least two such businesses will submit offers at a fair and reasonable price. See backup slide. The VA contended that this VA-specific Rule of Two does not apply when procuring supplies or services via the Federal Supply Services (FSS) program (i.e., GSA Schedules contracts). GAO disagreed and ruled that the VA-specific Rule of Two applies to FSS orders. The Courts of Federal Claims and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit disagreed with GAO and agreed with the VA.

Kindomware Technologies, Inc. v. U.S. (cont.) The Supreme Court rejected the VA's position and overruled the lower courts, finding: The Rule of Two is mandatory even where the Government meets its veteran contracting goals. FSS orders are "contracts" within meaning of §8127(d); the VA-specific Rule of Two applies to FSS orders

Kindomware Technologies, Inc. v. U.S. (cont.) On June 22, 2016, the VA issued Acquisition Policy Flash! 16-16 mandating immediate compliance with Kingdomware for all new requirements and even some previously- awarded IDIQ contracts. Broader issues for consideration by SBA from Supreme Court ruling: Does the Small Business Act’s Rule of Two apply to FSS orders (contrary to long line of GAO decisions)?

Kindomware Technologies, Inc. v. U.S. (cont.) GAO Decisions in Aldevra protest October 16, 2015 GAO Decision: Small Business Act’s Rule of Two does not apply to orders under FSS contracts. September 27, 2016 GAO Decision: Aldevra’s request for reconsideration denied because Kingdomware was not intended to be retroactive.

Backup Slides:

Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 644: . . . (j) Small business reservation (1) Each contract for the purchase of goods and services that has an anticipated value greater than $2,500 but not greater than $100,000 shall be reserved exclusively for small business concerns unless the contracting officer is unable to obtain offers from two or more small business concerns that are competitive with market prices and are competitive with regard to the quality and delivery of the goods or services being purchased. (Emphasis added)

Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, 38 U.S.C. § 8127 . . . (d) Use of Restricted Competition. ̶ Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), for purposes of meeting the goals under subsection (a), and in accordance with this section, a contracting officer of the Department shall award contracts on the basis of competition restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans if the contracting officer has a reasonable expectation that two or more small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans will submit offers and that the award can be made at a fair and reasonable price that offers best value to the United States. (Emphasis added)

Ken Dodds, the Director for the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Office of Policy, Planning, and Liaison John Klein Associate General Counsel for Procurement Law, SBA

All Small Mentor Protégé Update Kenneth Dodds Director, Office of Policy, Planning & Liaison Small Business Administration October, 2016

Mentor Protégé Final Rule One for 8(a) BD and One for All Other Small Businesses Joint Venture Agreement must be in Writing Joint Venture may not be populated (except for administrative personnel) Joint Venture must be separately identified in SAM as JV All Mentor Protégés will be Approved by the Office of Business Development Joint Venture must certify it will comply with performance requirements, and report to SBA and the CO on performance

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Change from mentor must have good financial condition to Mentor must demonstrate that it can fulfill its mentor protégé obligations Mentor can have up to 3 proteges total at any one time Small business may be both a protégé and a mentor at the same time Proteges must qualify as small for primary NAICS or secondary NAICS – applies to 8(a) Protégé may have up to 2 mentors in its lifetime in any program

Mentor Protégé Final Rule SBA will not verify small business or socioeconomic status – may be protested 8(a) mentor/protégé may notify SBA that it is transferring relationship to small MP relationship after graduation Project manager does not need to be employee of the firm at time of offer, but need letter of intent. Cannot be former employee of the mentor. Mentors will not be required to divest at end of relationship

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Three years, with three year extension, but reviewed annually to ensure protégé is receiving identified assistance and contracts are being properly performed by appropriate parties Past performance and experience of JV members or subs must be considered by the CO Protégé must identify all other mentor protégé relationships At the conclusion of a relationship, protégé must report on whether it benefitted

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Protégé must perform 40% of work performed by JV, and 40% of aggregate performed by members of the JV at any tier All Mentors must be for-profit HUBZone JV rules align with other programs Applicants may request reconsideration of denial

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Mentor that fails to provide assistance: may result in termination of the agreement; mentor prohibited from acting as mentor for two years; SBA may request for agency to stop work and/or allow protégé to perform May be grounds for debarment

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Mentor may transfer relationship to purchaser Size of an approved 8(a) JV may be protested SBA’s set aside programs are available outside the U.S. 8(a) Social Disadvantage – provide facts or evidence to support claims of negative impact 8(a) control – managerial experience need not be in same or similar industry

Mentor Protégé Final Rule 8(a) Application – Tax forms not required but may be requested Wet signature not required Not all past convictions will be submitted to OIG Economic disadvantage narrative not required Dominance of Entity owned concerns – SBA will compare firm’s share compared to overall small business share at a national, 6 digit NAICS level Entity owned concerns – individual may manage only 2 Participants

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Members or directors of NHO need not have the technical expertise or license, but must have managerial experience needed to run concern NHO – establish economic disadvantage based on status of Native Hawaiians, not managers. Once established, will not be required for second NHO unless intent is to serve a different population Sole Source awards to Entity Owned Concerns above $22 million – CO must provide justification with offering letter Changes to Primary NAICS codes for entity owned concerns – Concern will have an opportunity to provide explanation. Second firm with identical NAICS code may not be allowed to receive any more contracts in that code 8(a) firm may request suspension in the case of a disaster or government shutdown

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Entity Owned Benefits Reporting – Align with Entity’s Fiscal Year, not annual review Reverse Auctions – Small business rules apply, such as the rule of two and requirement for a Certificate of Competency SBA may request reconsideration in any OHA proceeding

Mentor Protégé Final Rule Mentor Protégé programs of other agencies Within one year of August 24, 2016, the head of an agency must submit a plan for any program the agency seeks to continue Does not apply to DoD 81 FR 48558 (July 25, 2016, effective August 24, 2016)

Contact Information Kenneth Dodds Director, Office of Policy, Planning & Liaison 202-619-1766 kenneth.dodds@sba.gov John Klein Associate General Counsel for Procurement Law 202-619-1776 John.klein@sba.gov

Other Noteworthy SBA Regulations or Initiatives

Upcoming Events

Upcoming Events Demonstration of GSA’s Data2Decisions tool; guest speaker Josh Royko October 19, 2016, 10:00am to 12:00pm at Northrop Grumman RSVP to Jason Baccus Winning GWACs, IDIQs, and Task Orders for Federal Contractors October 27, 2016, 8:30am to 4:00pm at the Tower Club Co-sponsored with the Lohfeld Group EIP Awards Dinner & Fall Conference at the Tysons Corner Westin November 16, 2016: EIP Awards from 6:00pm to 10:00pm November 17, 2016: Fall Training Conference from 8:00am to 6:00pm Nominate an EIP Award Recipient by Friday, October 14

Thank You!