© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Liver cholesterol (mg/g)

Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 1. Functional properties of sweet potato flour (SPF), glutinous rice flour (GRF) button mushroom powder (BMP) and composite gluten-free flour fortified.

Steamed black soybeans

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Bread formulation for two kilograms of dough

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. Syneresis percentage of sweet potato flour (SPF), glutinous rice flour (GRF) and composite gluten-free flour fortified with BMP and inulin, stored.

Natural Breakfast Cereal

Thermotolerant coliforms

Neutrient detergent fiber %

Mean in positive samples1 (µg/kg) Highest value found (µg/kg)

Figure 2. Evaluation of Gelidium elegans extract on cell viability in 3T3-L1 cells. 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes (1x104 cells/well) were seeded on 96-well plates.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Frequency of RTEC Consumption in Terms of Gender

Table 4. RTEC Consumption in Terms of Place of Residence

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Daily Percentage HMF Intake

Table 1. Formulation of gluten-free cake

Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 9, doi: /jfnr

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Titratable acidity (g/100g)

Cations (mg/l) Wavelength Trace Elements (µg/l) Wavelength

Anti-nutrients content Trypsin inhibitor (TIU/g)

between groups. Data were expressed as Means ± SDs

Management Philosophy

Table 2. Characteristics of the prepared activated carbons

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Sensory evaluation of mayonnaise samples

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Anthropometric parameters

Table 1. Commercial Characteristics of Canned White Asparagus

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

% of inhibition of hydrolysis (INH)

Bambara groundnut accessions

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Bambara groundnut accessions

Table 1. Proximate Composition of New Groundnut Accessions

Acid value (as oleic acid) Peroxide value (meq / kg)*

Financial Development

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Sugar contents of the examined food samples (g/100 g)

Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Total soluble substance (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Solid-liquid ratio (B)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Period of heat treatment at 80°C(min.)

Ingredients/100g dry sample

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 4. Monosaccharides (mg/100 g) of Epicarp, Flesh and pitted doum fruit Monosaccharides Epicarp Flesh Pitted fruit Arabinose 0.80±0.056a ND Glucose 240.00±1.730c 406.00±1.956a 349.00±1.740b Xylose 0.60±0.044b 0.70±0.114b 0.86±0.044a fructose 112.30±0.794a 43.33±0.929b 47.6±1.060c Total 353.70±2.468c 450.30±2.429a 397.46±2.815b The results represent the mean ±standard deviation of the analysis performed in triplicate. Data with different superscript letters in the same row were significantly different (P <0.05). ND: Not detected. Waleed Aboshora et al. Physicochemical, Nutritional and Functional Properties of the Epicarp, Flesh and Pitted Sample of Doum Fruit (Hyphaene Thebaica). Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, 180-186. doi:10.12691/jfnr-2-4-8 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.