Socio-economic impact of research infrastructures: European XFEL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © NOKIA Stocholm/ /EO. 2 © NOKIA Stocholm/ /EO Issues Evolution of Innovation Policies Systemic approach Business perspective Future.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
WIPO Conference on Building Partnerships for Mobilizing Resources for Development Thematic Session 2 Science, Technology and Innovation for Development.
Training and Mobility of Managers and Technical staff Carlo Rizzuto Chair Sincrotrone Trieste roma 2010 sept-oct.
Driving Innovation Robert Lowson National Contact Point FP7 Space Cork 17 September 2012 The United Kingdom; a major force in space 1.
Principal Patent Analyst
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
Driving the Next Generation of Economic Development Research Education Outreach Economic Engagement.
Tõnis Mets Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Aleksei Kelli, Ave Mets University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia Tiit Tiimann Kaunas, May.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research Infrastructures and Horizon 2020 The EU Framework.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
INSTALLATION OF CAPACITOR BANKS IN COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRY BUILDINGS African Regional NAMA Workshop Kigali, Rwanda, 2015 By: Kennedy Amankwa, Energy Commission,
Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation Jiyoung Park
January THE ISSUE Launch Event. Leicester. THE ISSUE Traffic- Health- Environment. Intelligent Solutions Sustaining Urban Economies. Professor.
National Natural Science Foundation of China initiative research and talent training in fundamental sciences An organization which supports initiative.
International Telecommunication Union Committed to connecting the world 4 th ITU Green Standards Week Giulio Ceccarini, Patent Examiner WG on sustainable.
Toolbox CRC programme managers – Dag Kavlie, RCN Analysis of indicators used for CRC Monitoring and Evaluation Ljubljana, 15 September 2009.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Technology and Innovation Development Award (TIDA) Presenter Dr Michael Ryan SFI.
Research Funding 101 Coventry University | 7 th June 2014 | Dr Lynsey McCulloch.
FP7 – Capacities Research Infrastructures and Research for the Benefit of SMEs.
Marketing at DESY Building Bridges from Science to Market Christian Mennrich HEPTech Workshop on Marketing Sofia,
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
Monitoring R&D as a Methodological Tool for Impact Studies Stig Slipersæter Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education Centre for.
Introductory to the English “NMS” Model The English National Measurement System (NMS) is –in short – described, as illustration of an efficient National.
ESFRI & e-Infrastructure Collaborations, EGEE’09 Krzysztof Wrona September 21 st, 2009 European XFEL.
UK INNOVATION SURVEY 2005 CIS4 – Introduction and Guide A brief introduction to the survey Some description of the data and analytical results, special.
A Data Centre for Science and Industry Roadmap. INNOVATION NETWORKING DATA PROCESSING DATA REPOSITORY.
1 The Use of Surveys in Determining Outcomes of Research, Technology and Development Programs Presented at:Joint CES / AEA Conference Presented.
Date, location Open Access policy guidelines for research institutions Name Logo area.
A European Open Science Cloud
Knowledge Transfer Accelerating Innovation. slide 1 The Knowledge Transfer Group at the HR Induction Program (session II) 6 th September 2011 Enrico Chesta.
MERIT1 Does collaboration improve innovation outputs? Anthony Arundel & Catalina Bordoy MERIT, University of Maastricht Forthcoming in Caloghirou, Y.,
© ARVIR Balancing Funding Priorities for Innovation Projects; Does the South African Government Address the Issue of Portfolio Management?
WP leaders meeting R. Aleksan October 5 th, 2009 TIARA 1.Objectives 2.General Context 3.Building TIARA 4.Conclusion.
EiroForum School on Instrumentation 2013, CERN, May Thomas Tschentscher European XFEL.
Launch event ICRI 2016, Cape Town - South Africa Launch event ICRI 2016 Cape Town South Africa Gabriela Pastori, Chair of Health and Food Strategy Working.
Evaluation and Impact Assessment of European FP for R&D :
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
Entrepreneurship and Business Management
Knowledge Transfer at CERN
STRATEGIC ACADEMIC UNIT “PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGIES”
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
MSc-Student Activities at the European XFEL
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda
Introducing European XFEL Enlightening Science
WP1 – Smart City Energy Assessment and User Requirements
Ways to industry participation in CLIC 24th October, 2017
EMBL – European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Bulgaria’s research landscape and the context of CERN collaboration
What is €5 billion worth? Magda Gunn, IMI Scientific Project Manager.
Sustainable EU Research Infrastructures
Science parks and technological support at ELI Beamlines
On the Knowledge Based Economy in Bosnia and Herzegovina
project results and conclusions
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
ESS Cooperation: New Financial supporting frameworks?
Transfer of Medical Devices Manufacturing Technology
Sustainable buildings
ERASMUS+ Teachex: Teaching excellence in Israel
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
CERN: from fundamental sciences to daily applications
Socio-Economic Impact of ESS
Presentation transcript:

Socio-economic impact of research infrastructures: European XFEL ICRI, 4 October 2016 Claudia Burger

European XFEL - a leading new research facility The European XFEL (X-Ray Free- Electron Laser) is a new research facility in Northern Germany. From 2017 on, it will provide scientists and industrial researchers with an outstanding new tool to investigate the structure of matter as well as important problems in medical research, new and sustainable energy sources, and the development of materials for new technologies and a better environment. Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

European XFEL - a leading new research facility Established as a non-profit corporation in 2009 on the basis of an intergovernmental Convention Supported by 11 partner countries Germany covers 58% of the costs; Russia contributes 27%; each of the other international shareholders 1–3% Total budget for construction (including commissioning) 1.22 billion € at 2005 prices 670 M€ contributed in cash, over 550 M€ IKC 300 staff members (+240 FTE at DESY) Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Visible progress in construction and installation of equipment Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Opportunities: biology, medicine, pharmacology Molecular movies reveal biochemical processes Causes of protein misfolding  treatments for Alzheimer’s, BSE, etc. Understanding enzymatic action in greater detail  better medicines, fewer side effects Viewing mechanisms of infection High intensity X-rays show structures in greater detail Searching for weaknesses in viral and bacterial outer coats Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Opportunities: chemistry and materials science Atomic-level imaging can uncover action of catalysts Better catalytic converters lessen impact of emissions Less toxic production processes Studying structure and properties of materials as never before How properties (e.g. durability, conductivity, magnetism) manifest Reducing atoms needed to store digital information  ultrahigh-capacity hard drives Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Opportunities: many other areas Photonics Photosensitive materials for computers, lasers, transistors Nanotechnology Structure and behaviour of nanomaterials Environmental research Energy sources based on photosynthesis Studying structure and activity of pollutants Energy research Better energy transfer  more efficient solar cells Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Socio-economic impact: Questions faced Internal vs. external evaluation Local level Regional International Global Ex ante vs ex post Construction vs operation phase One-off evaluation vs. continous monitoring Compete for public funds Strategic decision-making Identify common indicators Problems: Causality, time lag, opportunity costs Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Socio-economic impact during the construction phase Direct benefits Employment (internal and at cooperation partners) Revenues for suppliers and cooperating institutes Indirect benefits Innovation through procurement and in-kind contributions (success stories!) Staff turnover (technology transfer through human capital) International cooperation! Internal project to identify induced innovation during the construction phase Effect on income Kind of knowledge transfer Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Socio-economic impact during the operation phase Expectation: Main socio-economic impact of the European XFEL will result from the scientific output of the facility (new knowledge) that intentionally “spills over” to the economy/society (utilization of new knowledge  new technologies, new goods) Possible indicators for direct and indirect benefits (some initial ideas): Employment and staff turnover (technology transfer through human capital) Suppliers: revenues and induced innovation through procurement New applications of patents, license and correlated income at the industry Spin-offs Citations in industrial and technology publications Dissemination via social media and website visits … Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Socio-economic impact via EIROforum members: some examples CERN Where the World Wide Web was born ILL 1/3 of public scientific proposals for experiments were directly or strongly linked to industrial / commercial application (2015 study) ESRF ~ 40% of academic users state that the research they carry out at ESRF has applications in industrial R&D Proprietary research in structural biology and X-ray imaging dominate beam time sales EMBL Scientists solved the atomic structure of the fundamental enzyme for influenza virus replication, resulting in new opportunities for anti-influenza drug design Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016

Conclusions We strongly support the approach to make the socio- economic impact of research infrastructures visible. We observe long-term impacts and complex causal links. It‘s tempting to concentrate on the „easy-to-measure“ indicators but they might not be the most relevant. It‘s necessary and challenging to find meaningful indicators, based on a common concept and a common understanding on the limits of the applied methodology. There will be no one-fits-all standard model due to the heterogeneity of research infrastructures. Claudia Burger European XFEL GmbH 4 October 2016