Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Common Agricultural Policy
Advertisements

Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income Update December 2005.
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
CAP Reform Ref: CAPreform feb07.
The Common Agricultural Policy Jo Eldridge, Alison Fox, Lizzie Simpson, George Tickell and Chris Wenzinger,
International Trade Policy Trade Restrictions: Tariffs Focuses on barriers to free trade.
International Economics Tenth Edition
International Economics Tenth Edition
G LOBAL E CONOMICS Chapter 7. I MPORTS AND E XPORTS Importsproducts brought in from a foreign country. Exportsproducts sent to a foreign country for sale.
Nontariff Trade Barriers
A Macroeconomic Theory of the Open-Economy. Outline:  Develop a model to study forces that determine the open economy variables (NX, NFI, RER)  How.
Jozsef Popp Director Research Institute for Agricultural Economics Budapest „Vision of long-term agricultural and rural development in the EU” May 25-26,
Economic Implications of the AUS-FTA for U.S. Dairy Markets and Policy Presentation by Joseph Balagtas at the Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy.
14 A Macroeconomic Theory of the Open Economy. Open Economies An open economy is one that interacts freely with other economies around the world.
Dairy Disputes in North America: A Case Study Tom Cox University of Wisconsin-Madison Danny Le Roy The University of Lethbridge Ellen Goddard University.
The Choice for Agriculture A vision on the future of Dutch agriculture Gerrit Meester Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality Utrecht, 24 February.
Net Exports and International Finance Read Chapter 15 pages I The International Sector: An Introduction A)The Case for Trade 1) A country has a.
May 2001European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2 1 European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General 28th February 2003 Inventory.
Sample exam paper Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Deutschland Future policies for rural Europe 2013 and beyond – delivering sustainable rural land management in a changing Europe “Relationships with developing.
AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM IN THE WTO The Road Ahead.
COTTON MARKET IN TURKEY. CONTENT I. Introduction II. General View Of The Market Cotton Production in Turkey Cotton Production in Turkey Cotton Consumption.
U.S. Cotton Perspective The Next Steps for Africa October 26, 2006 Woodrow Wilson Center Washington, DC.
Exchange Rates and Agricultural Trade Chapter 17.
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)  After a long time of food shortages suffered by Europe throughout WWII.  Established in 1957 with the Rome Treaty upon.
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Medium-term prospects and impact assessment of the CAP reform EU - 15 & EU European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage Learning 9 Application: International Trade.
Chapter 7.1 Trade Between Nations.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN TURKEY: Developments in the Framework of EU Accession Erol H. ÇAKMAK Department of Economics Middle East Technical University (METU),
International Flow of Funds 2 2 Chapter South-Western/Thomson Learning © 2006.
1 Chapter 7 Section 1 Global Economics Objectives Describe how international trade benefits consumers. Explain the significance of currency exchange rates.
The Impact of EU Export Subsidy Elimination on World Markets Susan E. Leetmaa.
Intervention Models Applied to Evaluate Impacts of Sanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade Sílvia H. G. de Miranda Geraldo S.A. de C. Barros ESALQ – University.
May 5, Begin Unit 6: 10-15% of AP Macro Exam Open Economy: International Trade and Finance 2.Comparative Advantage Review On Website 3.Unit 6 Lesson.
The Common Agricultural Policy and its impact on the developing countries.
Analysis of Protectionist Trade Policies in Agriculture Dr. George Norton Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech Copyright 2008 AAEC 3204.
The Chinese Agricultural Sector after Admittance to the WTO Won W. Koo Director and Professor Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies North Dakota.
Farm policy reform: the European experience Dan Rotenberg, Counselor - Agriculture Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S. Domestic and trade.
1 Chapter 21 International Trade and Finance ©2004 Thomson/South-Western Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary Summary Practice Quiz.
1 Implications of a Doha Agreement for Agricultural Markets in Sudan Imad Eldin Elfadil Abdel Karim University of Khartoum - Sudan David Abler Penn State.
Government Intervention in the Market. Government Intervention in the Market The Control of Prices.
Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade Sachin Chintawar, Lynn Kennedy, John V. Westra.
Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural.
International Economics Tenth Edition
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE Lecture 6. Balance of Payment (Accounting of transactions) – Current Account – Capital Account Current Account (Purchase Summary)
2 - Decoupling - A more sustainable system of direct payments European Council Berlin 1999 Agenda 2000 EU Institutions Member States Civil Society European.
Dairy Disputes in North America: A Case Study Tom Cox University of Wisconsin-Madison Danny Le Roy The University of Lethbridge Ellen Goddard University.
International Economics International Economics Tenth Edition Trade Restrictions: Tariffs Dominick Salvatore John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Salvatore: International.
Common market organisation for cereals in EU 30th March 2012 in Belgrade Workshop on Market intervention and public warehouses Dr. Peter Bohlen.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002 Key Facts of Trade Economic Basis For Trade Comparative Advantage Production Possibilities Trading Possibilities Lines.
The “Health Check” of the CAP reform: Impact Assessment DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and Lessons learned for the Future
The Fluctuation in the price of rice market
AIM: How can U. S. trade impact us as consumers
IMPACTS OF EU INTEGRATION ON TURKISH AGRICULTURE
Open Economy Macroeconomics
Loanable Fund and Exchange Markets
Macroeconomic Theory of Open Economy
IMPACTS OF EU INTEGRATION ON TURKISH AGRICULTURE
International Economics Tenth Edition
Unit 8: International Trade & Finance
Open Economy Macroeconomics
The Producer Support Estimate
International Economics
International Economics
Macroeconomic Theory of Open Economy
OPEN ECONOMY MACROECONOMICS
International Trade and Tariff
Macroeconomic Theory of Open Economy
Presentation transcript:

Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade Sachin Chintawar, Lynn Kennedy, John V. Westra

Introduction U.S. cereals exports account for over $13 billion dollars in annual sale. Policies in the EU as a major importer of cereals affect U.S. and world prices. Change in the trade flow attributed to the changes in domestic policies of the EU. Mac Sharry Reforms Agenda 2000 Reforms Exchange rates changes in the EU Expiration of the Blair House Accord GATT and WTO Compliance – compelling factors to reforms of the CAP

Common Agricultural Policy Objectives: Increase Agricultural Productivity Ensure fair standard of living Stabilize markets Assure availability of supplies Consumers pay reasonable prices

Design of the CAP Common Agricultural Policy Structural Policies Market European Agricultural Guidance & Guarantee Fund

Typical Design of the CAP for Cereals TARGET PRICE THRESHOLD PRICE INTERVENTION PRICE IMPORT LEVY EXPORT SUBSIDY WORLD PRICE IMPORTS EXPORTS

Mac Sharry Reforms The Why Question? Decreasing world prices for cereals & dairy GATT Compliance Objectives: Reduction of cereal support prices by 35% Area Payments to cereal producers Compulsory set-aside qualify for area payments Tradable bonds for milk quota system.

Significance for Cereals PRICE PRIOR TO REFORMS IMPORT PRICE UNDER GATT AREA AID PAID AT FLAT RATE (54.34 ECU/TON) +55% TARGET PRICES (131.11 ECU/TON) TARIFF EQUIVALENT (1995 - 140 ECU/TON INTERVENTION PRICE (119.19) 2000 – 95 ECU/TON) EXPORT REFUNDS IMPORTS EXPORTS

Agenda 2000 Reforms Granting area payments 15% reduction in intervention prices for cereals Increase set-aside requirements . - Area Payment Scheme - Regionalization Scheme - Environmental measures

Objectives of the Study Effects of the CAP Reforms on the bilateral cereal trade Welfare Implications to farmers, consumers and Government in each of the trading entities

Data and Methodology Five commodity fifteen country model. U.S. considered as a trading partner. Variables included (A)

Modifications to the Raw Data Prior to 1995 three prices were defined by the EU for calculating different support prices – Target Prices, Threshold Prices, Intervention Prices. Calculating Import Levies Calculating Export Refunds Calculating Production Refunds Apparent Production and Apparent Consumption

Econometric Model Specification Static, Partial equilibrium model Simultaneous – Incorporating interdependence of Demand and Supply Iterative, Linear, Three Stage LS equation system is developed. Model incorporates two dummy variables to capture significant effects of the CAP Reforms on cereal trade.

Econometric Model Specification Supply Equation (I) Demand Side System Inventory Demand (II) Import Demand (III) Export Demand (IV) Domestic Demand (V)

Estimation Results Results for Wheat (1) Results for Rye (2) Results for Barley (3) Results for Maize (4) Results for Oats (5)

Results & Discussions Welfare effects – Producers in EU lose both due to removal of production refunds and decreased domestic prices U.S. exports show substantial increase since the ratio of U.S. exports to total exports to EU was significant in most cases. Price elasticities of demand indicate the degree to which consumers will increase their purchases in response to decline in domestic prices in the EU.

Conclusions and Summary Reforms have had significant effect on cereal trade – Advocates Free Trade More open markets – higher export potential for the U.S. Decreased welfare of domestic farmers in EU – Can they be compensated? Forms impetus for analyzing effects of new policies

Cereal Imports by U.S. compared to ROW

BACK lndmpr Log of Domestic Price U.S. Dollars per Ton Variable Name Definition Units lndmpr Log of Domestic Price U.S. Dollars per Ton (lnprod+lnimpq)/lnconp Log of Ratio of Apparent production to Apparent consumption 1000 Tons lnconp Log of Consumption mref Dummy Variable capturing the effect of Mac Sharry Reforms aref Dummy Variable capturing the effect of Agenda 2000 Reforms lnopstk Log of Opening Stocks lngdp Log of Gross Domestic Product Million U.S. Dollars lnworldp Log of World Price lnexpr Log of Export Refund lnexrt Log of Exchange Rates Domestic Currency per U.S. Dollar lnimpl Log of Import Levies lnimpqu/lnimpq Log of Ratio of Imports from United States to Total Imports lnprodr Log of Production Refunds lnexpq Log of Export Quantity lnimpq Log of Import Quantity lnprod Log of Domestic Production BACK

Calculating Import Levies

Calculating World Prices BACK

Calculating Export Refunds BACK

Calculating Production Refunds BACK

Apparent Production & Consumption BACK

Supply Equation BACK

Inventory Demand BACK

Import Demand BACK

Export Demand BACK

Domestic Demand BACK Inverse Demand Function – Equation Normalizing on Prices – thus closing the model

ESTIMATES FOR WHEAT Variable No. of Countries Comments Inventory Demand Domestic Price 8 Ratio of Production to Consumption 9 Domestic Demand Consumption 12 Opening Stocks 6 MREF 10 AREF 11 GDP Export Demand 4 World Price 2 Export Refunds Exchange Rates 5 Variable Countires Import Demand Domestic Price 4 World Price 6 Import Levies 3 Exchange Rates 5 MREF AREF Ratio of U.S. to total Imports 10 GDP 9 Supply 11 Production Refunds 8

ESTIMATES FOR RYE Variable No. of Countries Comments Inventory Demand Domestic Price 8 Ratio of Production to Consumption 10 Domestic Demand Consumption 7 Opening Stocks 2 MREF 4 AREF 9 GDP Export Demand 5 World Price 6 Export Refunds Exchange Rates 3 1 Variable Countries Import Demand Domestic Price 12 World Price Import Levies 4 Exchange Rates 3 MREF AREF Ratio of U.S. to total Imports GDP 6 Supply 10 Production Refunds 5 9

ESTIMATES FOR CORN Variable No. of Countries Comments Inventory Demand Domestic Price 9 Ratio of Production to Consumption 11 Domestic Demand Consumption 3 Opening Stocks 7 MREF 12 AREF GDP Export Demand 4 World Price 5 Export Refunds Exchange Rates 8 6 Variable Countries Import Demand Domestic Price 9 World Price 1 Import Levies 4 Exchange Rates 6 MREF AREF 5 Ratio of U.S. to total Imports GDP 7 Supply 11 Production Refunds 3

ESTIMATES FOR BARLEY Variable No. of Countries Comments Inventory Demand Domestic Price 7 Ratio of Production to Consumption 13 Domestic Demand Consumption Opening Stocks 4 MREF 11 AREF 12 GDP Export Demand 3 World Price Export Refunds 5 Exchange Rates 2 Variable Countires Import Demand Domestic Price 6 World Price 1 Import Levies 4 Exchange Rates MREF 5 AREF 3 Ratio of U.S. to total Imports GDP 7 Supply 11 Production Refunds 8

ESTIMATES FOR OATS Variable No. of Countries Comments Inventory Demand Domestic Price 5 Ratio of Production to Consumption 12 Domestic Demand Consumption 7 Opening Stocks 4 MREF AREF 10 GDP 9 Export Demand World Price 2 Export Refunds Exchange Rates 3 6 Variable Countries Import Demand Domestic Price 3 World Price Import Levies 2 Exchange Rates 6 MREF AREF 5 Ratio of U.S. to total Imports GDP 4 Supply Production Refunds