Factors affecting the accuracy of memory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Are You A Good Eyewitness? Are You A Good Eyewitness?
Advertisements

When Memory Fails: Why we Forget. Memory: The persistence of learning over time. Encoding Storage Retrieval.
Two cities… Both have big bridges… Otherwise, not much else in common.
Recalling Memories Memory is affected by the nature of your engagement with the information Levels-of-Processing Theory.
Forgetting Memory.
Repression- Freud Freud came up with the idea that we forcibly forget facts that provoke anxiety or unhappiness, therefore protecting ourselves against.
Thinking About How You Read
Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.
Reliability of one cognitive process
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
READ LIKE A READER Thinking About How You Read – Reading Strategies.
Memory Construction We sometimes alter our memories as we encode or retrieve them. Your expectations, schemas, environment may alter your memories. Elizabeth.
Memory Failure Why do we forget?. Retrieval Failure Some memories may still be encoded, but we fail to retrieve them Retrieval cues can sometimes help.
Forgetting: the loss of information over time. People tend to remember better soon after learning it than after a long delay—over time we begin to forget.
Preview p.20 Could you be an impartial jury member in a trial of a parent accused of sexual abuse based on a recovered memory? Or of a therapist being.
The Cognitive Interview – Fisher and Geiselman (1995) Can I describe the various techniques used in the cognitive interview? Can I describe research studies.
STRATEGIES FOR MEMORY IMPROVEMENT Cognitive Psychology.
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Getting you thinking: Extension: Read the ‘Apply your knowledge’ section on p55. Discuss the task with your neighbour.
The Persistence of Memory
Diego arrived at a party and was introduced in order to Edgar, Dania, Chris, and Rodolfo. Later in the evening he could only remember Edgar’s name. This.
Explanations of forgetting
Forgetting.
1. Unlearning a phobia by retrieval + drug 2. Recovered memories
The following scene is a reconstruction of a real life event
Evidence to support the ‘Cue Dependency’ theory of forgetting
Proactive or retroactive interference?
MEMORY: THE EYEWITNESS ON TRIAL
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
Chapter 9 Memory pt. 3: Motivated Forgetting and Memory Reconstruction
Multiple choice questions
Thinking About How You Read
Memory Construction “To Some Degree All Memory is False”
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
Pros & Cons of Testimonial Evidence
How do we revise for geography?
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Forgetting Lecture Notes Key: ^ means discuss before notes
Monday, November 6 Assessments: Upcoming Dates: Today’s topic:
Let’s recap some key word definitions!
Lesson Plan: Oral history interview with whole class or group
Forgetting Lecture Notes Key: ^ means discuss before notes
AO3 anxiety – ethical issues
Retrieval Failure Theory of Forgetting
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
Evidence to support the ‘Cue Dependency’ theory of forgetting
Lesson Plan: Oral history interview with whole class or group
Lost in a Shopping Mall Loftus & Pickrell 1995.
Processes of Memory Lecture Notes Key: ^ means discuss before notes
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Unit 4: Memory
Trace decay theory - Hebb Cue-Dependency- Tulving
Thinking About How You Read
Ex: Locker Combinations, Old phone numbers
Forgetting & Memory Construction
Memory (Cognition) AP Psychology Essential Task:
what have we learned from past two lessons?
Memory Boxes Group Challenge.
Unit 7 Part Ia: Memory (Cognition)
Memory and Learning Our brains are often compared to computers in the way that we process information. We must: Encode, Store, then Retrieve info.
Becoming an Active Reader
BELL RINGER What did you learn about memory from reviewing the PowerPoint? Write down 5 facts.
Introductory Topics in Psychology: Paper 1
The reliability of one cognitive process
The cognitive area.
Experiment 1: Aim, sample, method and procedure
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
G © Copyright The PiXL Club Ltd, 2017.
Lesson 4.
Unit 2: Memory (Cognition)
Presentation transcript:

Factors affecting the accuracy of memory Interference Context False memories

Have you ever re-organised your drawers but you keep going back to where you used to store something? Interference Forgetting may occur if two similar memories compete with each other. One memory prevents us accessing another memory, e.g. phone numbers or post codes. Definition of interference in your key words glossary Have you ever tried to recall some Spanish vocab but the French words keep popping into your head? Do you ever move apps around on your phone but keep touching their old location?

Interference – Evidence from studies McGeoch and McDonald (1931) Results: Method: 12 participants had to learn 10 words until they could recall them with 100% accuracy. They were then shown a new list of words List 1 = synonyms of old list List 2 = antonyms of old list List 3 = unrelated words compared to old list List 4 = nonsense syllables List 5 = 3 digit numbers Control group = given no new list

Context Context = the general setting or environment in which activities happen Studies on context have shown that recall of information is higher if learning and recall take place in the same context One study used divers as participants. They were asked to learn a list of words. One group was asked to learn the words on shore and recall them under water, the second group was asked to learn and recall the words underwater. The recall was higher when both learning and recall happened in the same context

Context – Evidence from Studies Godden and Baddeley (1975) 18 divers as participants. Divers had to listen to a list of 36 unrelated words either on the dry beach (D) or under water (W) They were tested after 4 minutes to see how many of the words they could remember. Group 1: Learnt on beach and tested on beach (DD) Group 2: Learnt under water and tested on beach (WD) Group 3: Learnt on beach and tested under water (DW) Group 4: Learnt under water and tested under water (WW) They were asked to learn a list of words. One group was asked to learn the words on shore and recall them under water, the second group was asked to learn and recall the words underwater. The recall was higher when both learning and recall happened in the same context

Context – Evidence from Studies Godden and Baddeley (1975) Conclusion This suggests that the context of learning acts as a trigger when trying to remember the information – context enhances the accuracy of memory Evaluation It was done in a natural environment (not a lab) so might mimic real life more  List-learning isn’t representative of most memories Context – Evidence from Studies Godden and Baddeley (1975)

Context – Evidence from Studies Aggleton and Waskett (1999) Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about the Jorvik Viking Centre 3 years after visiting. One group was put in a room with the same smell as JVC – they had better recall Can you think of a smell that triggers a memory for you? Would the same happen with tastes? Or sounds?

How could we use the idea of context enhancing the accuracy of our memory to our advantage?

False Memories A false memory is remembering something that didn’t happen. It is very easy to ‘plant’ a false memory in someone’s mind Elizabeth Loftus – highly influential psychologist in the field of memory. Has been an expert witness in many criminal trials, including Michael Jackson’s

False Memories Some therapists aim to ‘recover’ memories in their patients. In some cases these turn out to be false memories – alien abductions, child abuse, past lives

False Memories – Evidence from Studies Loftus and Pickrell’s (1995) ‘Lost in the Mall’ study Method: 24 participants (3 male, 21 female) ages 18-53 Relatives supplied researchers with 3 true stories from childhood Researchers made up 4th story about being lost in a mall, with details supplied by relatives, e.g. favourite shops, who was most likely to be with them etc. Participants read all 4 stories and then wrote down their memory of the events. They were asked to write down memories again a few weeks later. Participants were debriefed and asked to guess which story was false Results: 25% of participants recalled the false story 19 / 24 participants correctly identified the false story Evaluation: Being lost is not as traumatic as child abuse – would these memories behave in the same way? Ethical issues – might the study have left a false memory in the participants’ brains? Important application to real life – eye witness testimony

False Memories In 1975, Australian psychologist Donald Thomson was visiting the USA and was arrested for rape – the victim identified Thompson in a line up. He had an alibi – at the time of the attack he was appearing live on TV talking about eye witness testimony!