Performance Incentive Funding

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

January 29, Participation: By 2015, close the gaps in enrollment rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students.. Success: By 2015, award 210,000.

Advertisements

THECB 7/2006 Closing the Gaps, by 2015 July 20, 2006.

UNIVERSITIES FY 2015 Spring 2014 State Share of Instruction.

Tuition and Fee Proposal Committee November 20, 2013

SSBTN Links to Texas Student Success Points Dr. Cynthia Ferrell Associate Director, Student Success Initiatives The University of Texas at Austin.

1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.

THECB 7/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Progress Report Presentation for: Texas Community College Teachers Association David W. Gardner July 30, 2007.

THECB 1/2008 Report on Closing the Gaps Success Progress January 24, 2008.

Accelerated Action Plan THECB 9/2009. What was the process? Staff from across the agency: Studied activities and literature on successful practices Reviewed.

GPA At the end of this lesson students should be able to define, calculate and discus the importance of a GPA.

Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: The Indiana Experience Teresa Lubbers, Indiana Commissioner for Higher.

HBCU AND HBGI PHASE I DATA Presented By: Karen W. Johnson National Association of HBCU Title III Administrators, Inc. Annual Conference June 21-24, 2010.

The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.

PERFORMANCE FUNDS. New Performance Funding Allocation Criteria Each university metric is evaluated based on Excellence or Improvement and has five benchmarks.

New State Grant and Scholarship Programs

Higher Education Incentive Funding University of Texas at San Antonio.

PAUL TURCOTTE PROGRAM DIRECTOR TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD TO THE TASSCUBO BUDGET COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2013 Outcomes-Based Funding.

November 5, 2010 Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now.

THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011.

UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 Legislative Appropriations.

THECB 4/2003 Progress Toward Participation and Success goals of Closing the Gaps by 2015.

TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD WEBINAR APRIL 9, 2014 Outcomes-Based Formula Funding for Universities.

THECB 7/2003 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Education Commission of the States National Forum Session July 15, 2003.

Evolving Schools, Evolving Workplaces in the Bluegrass: Building a Career Pipeline Tuesday, August 5, 2014 Jaleh Rezaie, Ph.D. Director, STEM-H Institute.

THECB 7/2004 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Progress Report, July 2004.

1 Regents Education Program September 26, 2006 Student Financial Aid.

Introduced as part of FY 15 President’s Recommended Budget Purpose: To award Colleges for increasing Facilities and Administrative (F&A) cost recoveries.

Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall 2012 Enrollment & Completion Update Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 15,

IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education Performance Funding Model IBHE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.

THECB Legislative Agenda Promoting Student Success Aligning Funding with State Education and Economic Development Goals Commissioner Raymund Paredes.

THECB 7/2002 Closing the Gaps: 2002 Progress Report.

ALSDE/A+ College Ready Parent Information. What is the ALSDE/A+ College Ready AP Initiative? 2.

Career and College Promise Successfully Moving “Ready” Students Through the Educational System.

THECB 7/2007 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Glenda Barron and Joe Stafford October 5, 2007.

North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Performance-Based Funding Metrics Board of Trustees Meeting November 16, 2012 Chancellor Harold.

SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.

Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.

1 Leadership Alliance !Buenos Dias!. A Commitment to Excellence “ The quality of a person’s life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence,

July 28, 2011 THECB 6/2011 Closing the Gaps 2011 Progress Report.

March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Texas Higher Education Finance and the Formulas Coordinating Board Meeting, April 28, 2016.

March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Texas Higher Education Finance and the Formulas Committee on Affordability, Accountability and Planning March.

December 3, 2009 Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now.

Closing the Gaps Progress Report Julie Eklund Interim Assistant Commissioner Strategic Planning and Funding Presentation to Coordinating Board July 23,

THECB 10/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Presentation for: 2007 Governing Board Conference David W. Gardner October 29, 2007.

July 26, 2012 Closing the Gaps Progress Report. THECB 7/2012 ENROLLMENT GROWTH IS WELL ABOVE CLOSING THE GAPS TARGET 532, , ,483.

Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding

Outcomes-Based Funding

Trends in Higher Education Series

Florida Board of Governors Performance & Accountability Committee

TEXAS Grant Program Report

Performance Funding Model University of North Florida

FY 2014 Budget Review & FY 2015 Budget oUTlook

Texas Association of Community Colleges

Research Doctorates Conferred,

Zell Miller Scholarship

UTRGV – Peer Profile February 2018.

Early Childhood Educators Scholarship jointly administered by: Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.

SCC Degrees & Certificates Awarded Academic Year to Academic Year

SCC Degrees & Certificates Awarded Academic Year to Academic Year

University of Hawai‘i Community Colleges

Trends in Higher Education Series

Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2013 Dollars (in Millions), to

Report on the TEXAS Grant Program for Fiscal Year 2014

Stacey Silverman, PhD Academic Quality and Workforce February 1, 2019

Presentation transcript:

Performance Incentive Funding Initiative created by the 80th Texas Legislature THECB directed to develop methodology to allocate $100 million in FY 2009 to: Institutions for improvements in degrees awarded weighted for critical fields and at-risk students Reward institutions that graduate more transfer students Encourage institutions to bolster advising and tutoring programs to assure more at-risk students achieve Funded by a separate appropriation $80 Million for incentives $20 Million for Top 10 Percent Scholarshps

FY09 Incentive Funding UTSA received $4,984,867 or 6.2% of the total available to academic institutions. UT System schools received 35.7%. UTSA received 17.4% of the UT total amount. Based on: Percentage Improvement in # of degrees produced: increase in average number of degrees awarded in 2 most recent years (2007 and 2008) compared to the preceding years (2005 and 2006) Degrees Produced: average # of degrees awarded (2006, 2007 and 2008)

At Risk Students At-risk includes student who: received Pell grant at any time during last 10 years enrolled as 1st time undergraduate at the age of 20+ enrolled as part-time (i.e. less than 12 hours), first-time undergraduates within the last 10 years; or earned a GED within the last 6 years or had an SAT/ACT score less than the national average.

Weighting Factors The specific weights assigned are: Non-critical field/Not At-Risk Student – 1 point Non-critical field/At Risk Student – 2 points Critical field / Not At Risk Student – 2 points Critical field/At-Risk Student – 3 points

Weighting Factors The specific weights assigned are: Non-critical field/Not At-Risk Student – 1 point Non-critical field/At Risk Student – 2 points Critical field / Not At Risk Student – 2 points Critical field/At-Risk Student – 3 points

Critical Field Those areas identified in Closing the Gaps Computer Science Math Engineering Physical Science Nursing / Allied Health Teachers (includes only those students who have obtained State Board for Educator Certification) – only one with a quality measure