Examination Boards – briefing for secretaries

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1. Whats the Quality & Validation? 2.
Advertisements

Running effective Boards of Examiners Malcolm Dixon 15 th March 2012.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Registry
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
Assessment Boards and Assessment Regulations Board Terms of Reference Secretary’s role.
Extenuating Circumstances Briefing for Chairs of Extenuating Circumstances Groups and Professional Support Staff.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY CONTINUOUS AUDIT BRIEFING Quality Assurance Services.
External Examiners’ Briefing  Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Operational Guidance for Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
The External Examiner at Anglia Ruskin Anglia Ruskin’s Organisational Structure 5 faculties 29 departments 50+ programmes numerous pathways and modules.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1 By: Nehal Osman.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
 Maintain records  Keep minutes  Prepare and read executive board report  Sign authorizations for payment  Come to meetings prepared.
Sigma 101 Paper Work Goals and Objectives To spark interest in brothers to seek leadership roles at all levels of Sigma. To have consistent and timely.
NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION 2011 Essential Policies Diane R. Schulman, Ph.D. Director, Academic Initiatives, and Secretary of Senate.
End of Session 2015 Part Four Post Exam Board Welcome to Post Exam Board, the fourth session in a series of End of Session workshops brought to you by.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Changes to the Taught Assessment Regulations Academic Services Ailsa Taylor April 2013
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law March 2015.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
OCNLR arrangements for final external moderation and the AVA awards board Summer 2010.
Annual General Meetings Planning for Success. What is the AGM for ? The required Annual General Meeting of your club. Open to all members. Public statement.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Equity and Access Plans and ANU Student Support.
OPERATION OF ASSESSMENT BOARDS Academic year 2012/2013.
External Examiners’ Workshop The role of the external examiner and its requirements at the University of Brighton Professor Stephen Denyer Pro-Vice-Chancellor.
Student and Academic Services Implementation of the Senate Regulations for Assessment & Award Open Briefings for Colleges 3-9 May 2013.
Spring/Summer 2016 Academic Services – Quality and Standards Joanna MacDonnell – Director of Education Paul Cecil – Quality & Standards Manager Examination.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Assessment in DE contexts.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s key examination and assessment regulations Mr Paul Cecil Quality and Standards Manager (Academic Standards.
Meetings What are they for? Roles and responsibilities? Role of the Chairperson?
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
MEETINGS & ELECTIONS Saturday, July 22, 2017
Field and Award Board Workshop
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
Examination Boards and assessment regulations
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Psychology at UWS BA (Hons) Psychology BSc (Hons) Psychology
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
The School Point of View
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Field & Award Board Workshop
Meeting Quality Standards when working in collaboration
Guide 3: Examining Procedures at Liverpool Hope
External Examiner Briefing Session
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Progression and Advancement
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Welcome and Induction Event for new External Examiners 2016
How will my Degree be Classified
Role of the External Examiner
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Academic Misconduct Policy
Presentation transcript:

Examination Boards – briefing for secretaries Spring/Summer 2017 Academic Services – Quality and Standards Paul Cecil – Quality & Standards Manager Anna McCall – Quality & Standards Advisor

Introduction and agenda Welcome and introductions Context Documentation and references Role Changes to content for 2016/17 [see SCA17-08] Standardized statistical reports Non-attendance of external examiners Use of telephone or other telecommunication technology Membership Accuracy of attendance records Type of Board Q&A

Context Formal decisions of the University Culmination of all student study The official record of decisions and can be used in appeals, complaints and legal challenges Only an exam board can confirm an award A matter of public record that transforms the lives of our students

Documentation and References Background / contextual information Centrally produced decision guides will be made available for all Boards in 2017. Secretaries to ensure all paperwork is in place Documentation and References GEAR Applies to all taught courses leading to a University of Brighton award Available to all staff, students and external examiners Decisions Guides Area Examination Boards Progressing students at Course Examination Boards Final year students at Course Examination Boards GEAR https://staff.brighton.ac.uk/reg/acs/docs/GEAR2015-2016.pdf

Secretary role (GEAR E10) preparing and circulating agenda papers; having available at the meeting information pertinent to individual students, particularly any information previously submitted by students in support of mitigating circumstances and any submitted medical certificates; assembling all documentation for the meeting; minuting the meeting in such a way that all decisions are unambiguously and fully recorded, particularly in cases where a judgement has been difficult for any reason; preparing of pass lists marked with the date of publication.

Changes for 2017 Boards The following were approved by ASC/Academic Board for changes in-year (2017) All boards considering modules must consider a statistical report (Ac Services to provide standard report via InfoView) If external examiners do not attend new rules and requirements apply – see SCA17-08 Use of telephone/Skype now allowed with Exam Board Chair permission (does not need central approval)

Membership All constitutions and members must be approved by Sub- Committee for Assessment (SCA) Substitutions must be approved by Chair of SCA (refer to Academic Services) Non-listed staff cannot attend/participate. Observers allowed with permission of Chair (but cannot participate) No quorum – all members expected to attend Absences to be notified to Chair of Academic Board* Chair of Examination Board determines whether Board can proceed Incorrect attendance can compromise decision of Board and lead to upheld complaints/appeals. * conventionally managed via minuting unless exceptional circumstances

Attendance records A list of all attending must be maintained Use signing lists Minutes must include all people present (even if NOT on membership)

Examination boards Module Stage of study Award Area Examination Boards: Make decisions about students registered on individual modules (without reference to their performance on other modules) Considers statistical data on module Stage of study Course Examination Boards: Consider overall profile of each student enrolled on course Consider mitigating circumstances claims Applies misconduct penalties Consider eligibility to progress from one stage of study to the next Consider eligibility for final and interim awards Some courses have Joint Area and Course Boards Award

Examination boards Module Stage of study Award Single Tier Boards: Make decisions about students registered on individual modules (without reference to their performance on other modules) Considers statistical data on module Stage of study And then… Consider overall profile of each student enrolled on course Consider mitigating circumstances claims Applies misconduct penalties Consider eligibility to progress from one stage of study to the next Consider eligibility for final and interim awards Award

Questions?