Brett Shapiro for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Advanced LIGO Upgrade Giles Hammond, SUPA, University of Glasgow on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration.
Advertisements

Dennis Ugolini, Trinity University Bite of Science Session, TEP 2014 February 13, 2014 Catching the Gravitational Waves.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
Modal Damping of a Quad Pendulum for Advanced Gravitational Wave Detectors Brett Shapiro Nergis Mavalvala Kamal Youcef-Toumi ACC 2012 – Montreal June 27.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Who? Presented By: Bonnie Wooley.
LIGO Present and Future
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G M GWIC16-Dec-02 LIGO Status Barry Barish GWIC 16-Dec-02.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage – Scientist LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
G R 1 Ground-based GW interferometers in the LISA epoch David Shoemaker MIT LIGO 20 July 02.
Advanced LIGO: our future in gravitational astronomy K.A. Strain for the LIGO Science Collaboration NAM 2008 LIGO-G K.
G D LIGO Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory ETH Zürich, October 2008 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 August 30, 2006 G Status of LIGO Overview of LIGO – Gravitational wave detection Report on fifth science run – Data taking started in November.
Actuator Sizing of a Quad Pendulum for Gravitational Wave Detectors Brett Shapiro Kamal Youcef-Toumi Nergis Mavalvala ACC 2011 – San Francisco June 29.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO-G Opening the Gravitational Wave Window Gabriela González Louisiana State University LSC spokesperson For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Status of the search for gravitational waves with LIGO Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration Legnaro, July.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Liberal Arts Faculty Forum – Sept. 18th, 2007 LIGO-G Z The search for gravitational waves Marco Cavaglià Department of Physics and Astronomy University.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Advanced LIGO Status Report
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
The Status of Advanced LIGO: Light at the end of the Tunnels Jeffrey S. Kissel, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April APS Meeting, Savannah, GA April.
Searching for gravitational waves with lasers
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
NSF/ LIGO Review Rainer Weiss Cambridge, Mass October 23, 2002
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Actuator Sizing of a Quad Pendulum for Gravitational Wave Detectors
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Status of Interferometers and Data Analysis
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
THE NEXT GENERATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
LIGO detectors: past, present and future
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Brennan Hughey for the LSC May 12th, 2008
Mechanical Loss Measurements of Coated Substrates for Gravitational Wave Interferometry Thaddeus Baringer1, Gregory Harry1, Jonathan Newport1, Hannah Faire1,
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
LIGO Scientific Collaboration Abilene Christian University
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
Overview of Advanced LIGO
Status of LIGO Overview of LIGO Report on fifth science run Summary
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Brett Shapiro for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO Status Brett Shapiro for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration May 21, 2010 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 LIGO - G1000500

13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 Gravitational Waves Supernova Merging Black Holes Pulsar Wave of strain amplitude h Supernovae Asymmetry required Coalescing Binaries Black Holes or Neutron Stars Mergers Pulsars Asymmetry required Stochastic Background (Big bang, etc.) 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) Funded by Hanford, WA Two 4 km and one 2 km long interferometers at 2 sites in the US Michelson interferometers with Fabry-Pérot arms Optical path enclosed in vacuum Sensitive to strains around 10-21 -> 10-18mrms Livingston, LA 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

Dominant noise sources Initial LIGO Noise Dominant noise sources Seismic below 40 Hz – Optics are suspended Suspension thermal from 40 Hz to 200 Hz Shot Noise above 200 Hz 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

Initial LIGO Accomplishments Reached design sensitivity ~ 10 W laser, shot noise limited Seismic isolation, suspensions (Close to) thermal noise limits First Generation Noise Demonstrated important technologies Thermal compensation interferometer controls Data provided real astrophysics Crab pulsar primarily not spinning down from GW GRB070201 was not neutron star inspiral in M31 Stochastic limit beat Big Bang Nucleosynthesis GRB070201 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 Advanced LIGO Quantum noise limited in much of band Thermal noise in most sensitive region About factor of 10 better sensitivity Expected sensitivity Neutron star inspirals to about 200 Mpc, ~40/yr 10 MO black hole inspirals to 775 Mpc, ~30/y LIGO infrastructure designed for a progression of instruments Nominal 30 year lifetime All subsystems to be replaced and upgraded More powerful laser – from 10W to 180 W Larger test masses – from 10 kg to 40 kg More aggressive seismic isolation Lower thermal noise coatings Advanced LIGO Astronomical Reach 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 Seismic Isolation Overall Isolation 9 to 10 orders of magnitude at 10 Hz. ISI and Quad in LIGO Vacuum Chamber Prototype ISI and Quad at MIT 7 cascaded stages of seismic isolation External Hydraulic Pre-Isolator (HEPI). Active isolation up to 10 Hz. 2 stage Internal Seismic Isolation (ISI). Active isolation up to 30 Hz, passive above. 4 stage Quadruple Pendulum (Quad). Mirror is the final stage. Passive isolation above 1 Hz. 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

Mirrors Suspend from Glass Fibers Developed by the University of Glasgow Suspension thermal noise suppressed by suspending low loss fused silica test masses from fused silica fibers. 0.6m long, 400 µm diameter silica fibers pulled from 3 mm diameter stock and laser welded between the two silica lower stages of the quadruple pendulum. 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

Advanced LIGO Schedule 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Installation Pre-assembly happening now Testing Likely first science run Other observatories around the world collecting data during this time. 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 Conclusions First generation detectors at design sensitivity gave new astrophysical upper limits Plan on real gravitational astronomy Range of technologies to improve sensitivity Active and passive isolation Monolithic silica suspensions Improved coatings Higher laser power Larger test masses Network of detectors with comparable sensitivity operating ~2015 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 10

LIGO Scientific Collaboration University of Michigan University of Minnesota The University of Mississippi Massachusetts Inst. of Technology Monash University Montana State University Moscow State University National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Northwestern University University of Oregon Pennsylvania State University Rochester Inst. of Technology Rutherford Appleton Lab University of Rochester San Jose State University Univ. of Sannio at Benevento, and Univ. of Salerno University of Sheffield University of Southampton Southeastern Louisiana Univ. Southern Univ. and A&M College Stanford University University of Strathclyde Syracuse University Univ. of Texas at Austin Univ. of Texas at Brownsville Trinity University Tsinghua University Universitat de les Illes Balears Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst University of Western Australia Univ. of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Washington State University University of Washington Australian Consortium for Interferometric Gravitational Astronomy The Univ. of Adelaide Andrews University The Australian National Univ. The University of Birmingham California Inst. of Technology Cardiff University Carleton College Charles Sturt Univ. Columbia University CSU Fullerton Embry Riddle Aeronautical Univ. Eötvös Loránd University University of Florida German/British Collaboration for the Detection of Gravitational Waves University of Glasgow Goddard Space Flight Center Leibniz Universität Hannover Hobart & William Smith Colleges Inst. of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences India Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics Louisiana State University Louisiana Tech University Loyola University New Orleans University of Maryland Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500 Backup Slides 13th Eastern Gravity Meeting - G1000500

Readout DC rather than RF sensing Dual recycled (signal & power) Michelson with Fabry-Perot arms Offers flexibility in instrument response Can provide narrowband sensitivity Critical advantage: can distribute optical power in interferometer as desired Output mode cleaner DC rather than RF sensing Offset ~ 1 pm at interferometer dark fringe Best signal-to-noise ratio Simplifies laser, photodetection requirements Perfect overlap between signal & local oscillator Easier to upgrade to quantum non- demolition in future 13

Laser and Optics 180 W end-pumped Nd:YAG rod injection locked needed Backup efforts in slabs & fiber lasers Frequency stabilization 10 Hz/Hz1/2 at 10 Hz required Development at Max-Planck Hannover, Laser Zentrum Hannover Silica chosen as substrate material Improved thermal noise performance from original anticipation Some concerns about unknowns with sapphire (absorption, construction,…) Coatings dominate thermal noise & optical absorption Progress reducing f with doping See talk by Matt Abernathy 14