Integrative Research Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MITERRA-EUROPE Assessment of nitrogen flows in agriculture of EU-27
Advertisements

Q: What is important for good policy (local and global)? A: Good information and viable options Hayden Montgomery Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
Enhancing cooperation in agricultural greenhouse gas research Structure, Vision and Work plans for Research Groups and Cross-cutting Groups.
Consequences for land use and water Plant/KeGr Jan Verhagen & Peter Troch.
Soil Carbon & Nitrogen Cycling Cross-Cutting Research Group Outputs of Orléans 1st meeting ACTION PLAN / Short-term.
6 The Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics Pty Ltd Case-studies on past EU-Australian research collaborations.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Management impacts on the C balance in agricultural ecosystems Jean-François Soussana 1 Martin Wattenbach 2, Pete Smith 2 1. INRA, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
The Carbon Benefits Project: Modelling, Measurement and Monitoring Approximately 30% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions come from land use and land use.
Global Research Alliance Fellowships U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Atf animal task force Martin Scholten, chair Animal Task Force GAA 4 th multi-stakeholder meeting October, 2013 – Ottawa Animal Task Force: a science.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
MAGHG: Monitoring and Assessment of GHG Emissions and Mitigation Potentials in Agriculture: Focus on GHG Emissions from organic soils Riccardo Biancalani.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
CTCN: Support implementation of NAMAs
Case Study 1 Canadian Prairies: Soil C management Biophysical information M. Boehm, B. McConkey & H. Janzen Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada How can we.
Assessment of Different Quantification Approaches and Application of Multiple Practices for a Single Farm Unit Dennis Haak, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada.
African Regional Workshop on NAMAs Domestic Measuring Reporting and Verification Allison Towle & Alexandra Soezer 18 August 2015  Kigali, Rwanda.
The development of a full understanding of the diversity of livestock systems and indentifying priority areas for improving the quantification and mitigation.
GEO Strategic Target on Climate (Carbon) Facilitate a comprehensive global carbon observation and analysis system in support of decision-making, including.
Possibilities for C / GHG mitigation in agricultural lands Pete Smith Professor of Soils & Global Change School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen,
Climate mitigation by agriculture in Europe Pete Smith School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
GHG EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURE Climate Change Workshop December 12, 2000.
Agriculture Agriculture Sector Inventory Training Workshop, Agriculture Sector 7/72008 Khartoum Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources.
Leading Partners in Science The initial stock-take of GHG inventory &mitigation research activities in Alliance member countries: Insights, lessons and.
Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe Regional Workshop on NAMAs Domestic Measuring Reporting and Verification Allison Towle & Daniela Carrington 13 June 2015.
Whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emission abatement strategies for dairy farms Richard Rawnsley, Karen Christie, and Rob Kildare.
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Agriculture Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Ankara, March 2016.
Reducing Emissions from Livestock Research Program Research Program structure and objectives Progress on contracts etc Understand Expectations – DAFF and.
JOHN MULDOWNEY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND THE MARINE JULY 2016 Climate Action – Implications for the Beef Sector.
Presented by: Alice Willett, UK Presented to: FAO; 18 October 2016, Rome, Italy Animal Health and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity Network.
10 November 2016 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Contributions to rice competitiveness and sustainability in Latin America and The Caribbean (LAC) Eduardo Graterol, Executive Director.
Flagship: Inventories – Making it Count
The C sequestration efficiency of soils
13 July 2016 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Review of CRG 2016 meeting, Phoenix AZ
GRA Flagships Hayden Montgomery GRA Special Representative
2 September 2017 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Chair, FACCE-JPI Governing Board
GRA Flagships.
13 / 07/ 2016 SAI Platform Rice Project Group and GRA Priorities.
Livestock – compelling figures
Integrative Research Group
2 September 2017 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
For the Wimmera/Mallee in Vic:
Integrative Research Group
Determining Agricultural Soil Carbon Stock Changes in Canada
Jean-Mari Peltier Counselor to the Administrator on Agriculture Policy
Croplands Research Group Meeting
South Africa’s Approach to implementing REDD+
Value Chain Emissions Accounting Framework
Component 2- Peatland This component is currently led by
Flagship Project on Reducing GHG Intensity of Rice Systems
WP2013 Challenge 6.1 Coping with climate change
Review of 2015 CRG meeting Joint Croplands and I&M Meeting – Brasilia BRAZIL – July 2015.
Paddy Rice Research Group
The role of gas in developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
Research Group Co-chairs’ Report
Climate Change Mitigation: Research Needs
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.1 Coping with climate change European Commission Research.
Soil Gross Nutrient Balances
Francisco de la Chesnaye, USEPA Carol Jones, USDA/ERS
Bettina Hedden-Dunkhorst and Paul Vlek
International Soil Carbon Network
SusCatt Increasing productivity, resource efficiency and product quality to increase the economic competitiveness of forage and grazing based cattle.
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
NDC GLOBAL CONFERENCE How transformational change promotes ambitious NDCs - assessing the potential of policies Government Secretariat of Climate Change.
Presentation transcript:

Integrative Research Group PRRG meeting, Stuttgart, AR, USA, 3-15 July 2016 Integrative Research Group Brian McConkey, Jean-François Soussana, Lee Nelson Canada, France, Australia

Integrative Research Group (IRG) Its overarching aim is to develop the knowledge and capabilities to estimate, monitor, and project GHG emissions within and across agricultural systems through research, development, and knowledge transfer. Its actions involves applying, reporting, monitoring, and/or verifying greenhouse gas emission estimates across farming systems to subnational, national, and supranational scales. Work with and between the existing Livestock Research Group (LRG), Cropland Research Group (CRG) and Paddy Rice Research Group (PRRG)

IRG Builds and expands on the work of the former C&N Cycling and Inventories and Monitoring Cross-Cutting Groups Members and partners participate and connect with IRG for cross-cutting issues that do not fit well under one of the Livestock, Cropland, and/or Paddy Rice Research Groups Science such as: livestock-land interactions, carbon sequestration Science-policy interface such as: inventories, mitigation costing for farming systems Integrated analyses involving mitigation and adaptation Work done through networks that assemble necessary expertise and resources to accomplish their goals 5 networks currently Grasslands, Field-Scale, Carbon Sequestration, Farm- and Regional-Scale, GHG Inventories

Grassland Network Builds on former Grassland network within the Livestock Research Group Coordinators: Fernando Lattanzi (INIA, Uruguay), Karl Richards (Teagasc, Ireland), Data and best management practices for grasslands (by region, and by practice, for productivity, quality, soil carbon, N2O, etc.). Three topics of interest: Grassland management and greenhouse gases emissions, Costing best practices (e.g. for tropical pasture intensification), Mixed systems (temporary grasslands, integrated systems). Links to Livestock Research Group (e.g. for grazing and feeding regimes, manure management, integrated grassland and livestock management, etc.). Links to Croplands Research Group (e.g. for sown grasslands, crop rotations, etc.).

Field-Scale Network Field (point) scale (builds on the former soil C-N cycling cross-cutting group) Coordinators: Pete Smith (Aberdeen U., UK), Jean-Francois Soussana (INRA, France), Integrating models and data at the field scale for grasslands, crops and mixed systems Crop and grassland models intercomparison and benchmarking for yields and GHGs (work done in the previous C&N group, almost finished), Climate sensitivity of GHG models, Modeling mitigation and adaptation options, Statistical emulators for upscaling. Links to Croplands Research Group (CRG) activities (e.g. GRAMP modeling platform, data bases) and to Livestock Research Group activities (e.g. for GHG balance modeling of livestock systems).

Carbon Sequestration Network New network Coordinators: Denis Angers (AAFC, Canada), Claire Chenu (AgroParisTech, France), Soil carbon sequestration potential across spatial and temporal scales and developing reliable low-cost monitoring and verification methods. Data base showing soil C sequestration (or loss) rates vs. systems and practices, with effects on productivity, C-N-water cycles and non-CO2 GHGs (to be linked with data bases from other groups), Simple soil models for advancing process understanding (e.g. mean residence time, stabilization, etc.), Meta-analyses and modeling showing soil C sequestration potential and associated effects of increased soil OM, Methods for soil carbon monitoring, reporting and verifying (MRV) at local scale. Integrates knowledge on soil carbon across networks and in collaboration with the CRG, LRG and PRRG.

Farm- and Regional-Scale Network New network Coordinators: Richard Eckard (Melbourne U., Australia), Petr Havlik (IIASA, Austria), Generic and robust understanding of reducing GHG emissions and storing soil carbon through improved practices and changes in production systems at scales ranging from the farm to the region, also including agricultural landscapes. Demonstration farm network showing effects of improved practices, Simple farm scale calculators showing changes in productivity, soil carbon and adaptation/mitigation strategies, Pilot regions assessment studies, A toolbox for developing national/ regional studies. This will be achieved through integration of knowledge across networks and in collaboration with the CRG, LRG and PRRG groups.

GHG Inventories Network Builds on the former Inventories and Methods Cross-Cutting Group Coordinators: Brian Mc Conkey (AAF, Canada), Jan Verhagen (WUR, Netherlands). Improving national GHG inventories, systems level and all gases, options for improved activity description, for Tier 2 and Tier 3 in sub-sectors, mobilizing GRA activities for use by countries for inventories and national communications Guidance on how to improve inventories, including data on activities, Moving to Tier 2, sharing examples from countries, Emission factors and activity data for farming systems This network will integrate knowledge from other networks and groups and translate it in formats that can advance national inventories and communications.

IRG Operation The IRG will reach its goals through the actions of the individual networks, cross-network collaborations, and collaborations between networks and LRG, CRG, and/or PRRG IRG work is guided by the co-chairs and the network coordinators with input from RG co-chairs, and Member representatives to the IRG Networks have freedom to involve expertise and resources from outside GRA and its partners All networks will contribute to cross-cutting activities, such as capacity building, knowledge transfer and communication Communication, interaction, and coordination between networks and with other RGs are critical

Paddy Rice Research Group and IRG What are the opportunities that the PRRG would like to collaborate with the IRG What topics and which networks? Funding, human resources, and partners? What are some valuable outputs that could be produced within 12 months from that collaboration?