New Teacher Program for Induction Contract Teachers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Teacher Performance Assessment System The Processes.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Teacher Evaluation Model
What it means for New Teachers
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Amphitheater Career Ladder Orientation
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
ADEPT Framework
Beginning Teacher Support Program (BTSP) Jed Stus; Executive Director of Professional Development & Support What Mentors Need to Know and Do to Start the.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Facilitating Problem-Based Learning and Collaborative Methods in the Classroom Ryan Hedstrom Ph.D. Jeff Beer ATC Manchester University.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
What it means for New Teachers
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Polices, procedures & protocols
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation System
SPE 578 STUDY perfect education/spe578study.com
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Our Partnership: Who’s Who!
Teacher Evaluation Training
Deliberate Practice PGP
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
New Teacher Evaluation Process
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Intern & Mentor Teacher Orientation - ITL
Stage 1 and 2 Mentor Training
Mentor training Wednesday 13th February 2013.
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Partnerships & Outreach
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
FCPS New Teacher Induction Program and Other Initiatives
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
HSSD Teacher Evaluation Process
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Presentation transcript:

New Teacher Program for Induction Contract Teachers Orientation – August 22-23, 2016 Anderson School District Two based on South Carolina State Guidelines - ADEPT

Section 1 Teams Assistance Members Mentors Timeline Important Dates Flow Chart for New Teacher Induction Program Induction Contract

Section 2 Induction Syllabus Peer Observation Reflection Form Induction Class Attendance Grading Rubric Peer Observation Reflection Form Requirement of 1 peer observation per month (Sept., Oct., Nov., Jan., Feb., Mar.) 6 total Mentor Collaboration Log ADEPT Performance Standards, Key Elements, and Focus Areas

ADEPT Mission: “To elevate and reinvigorate our teaching profession to ensure a quality teaching force for the next generation.” What is ADEPT? Assisting Developing, and Evaluating Professional Teaching

ADEPT Domains, Performance Standards, and Key Elements Planning (APS 1, 2, 3) Instruction (APS 4, 5, 6, 7) Environment (APS 8, 9) Professionalism (APS 10) ***Student Growth*** 10 ADEPT Performance Standards 34 Key Elements (the critical components of the each standard) At the center of the Domains of ADEPT is student achievement.

Domains and APSs Planning Professionalism Instruction Environment STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Trainer Notes: Summarize the interrelationships among the domains and APSs. Then, explain that all components of effective teaching relate to student achievement. Environment APS 8 APS 9

Section 3 – ADEPT Legislation Flow Chart Contract Types ADEPT Processes District Options

Section 4 New Teacher Induction Program Components: Comprehensive Orientation Assistance Team Mentor Building Administrator Other (additional teacher, building administrator, district office staff ) Assistance Team Observations/Meetings/duties Mentors – must observe/meet at least every 2 weeks; newly trained mentors will complete 1 mentoring cycle observation. Others – must observe/ meet at least once a month Induction Teacher Observations/Consultations Peer Observations – required New Teacher Induction Course Conferences (first semester/second semester) Documentation (NTI-1, NTI-2, & NTI-3)

Reminder: Induction Teacher/Mentor Communication Log Section 5 The Mentor’s Role and Responsibilities: Reminder: Induction Teacher/Mentor Communication Log (Submit a copy each month to Kim Murray and also to your Induction teacher. Please be timely with your submitting your monthly logs.)

(ADEPT Performance Standards) Section 6 ADEPT Overview – Revised: June 2006 1st phase: Developing – Teacher Education Programs in Colleges and Universities 2nd phase: Assisting – Induction Program (Research shows that providing support to new teachers enhances teaching performance, increases student achievement and improves teacher retention.) Formative evaluation: Focus is on enhancing strengths and improving weaknesses. 3rd phase: Formal Evaluation – consequential decisions are made based on teaching performance. 4th & final phase: Informal Evaluation – GBE – focus is on professional development (falls on the teacher – self-directed goals-based process). (ADEPT Performance Standards)

detail the 10 ADEPT Performance Standards (APS) Pages 6 – 20 detail the 10 ADEPT Performance Standards (APS) and the Key Elements under each standard.

(Required Data Sources and Timelines) ADEPT Section 7 (Required Data Sources and Timelines) Induction – State Mentoring Guidelines Summative Evaluation – now called SAFE-T 4 Domains Identified 10 ADEPT Performance Standards (APS): 34 Key Elements Online Portfolio (Evidence collected from the following 6 sources) LRP (APS 1) Unit Work Sample (UWS) – (APSs 2,3) Classroom Observations (APSs 4-9) Reflections on Instruction and Student Learning (APSs 4-9) Professional Review (APS 10) Self-Assessment and Professional Growth and Development Plan (APS 10)

Section 8 Forms For Observations (Assistant Team Members) Observation Record ADEPT Data Collection New Teacher Induction Program Log (NTI-1) – Responsibility of the Induction Teacher to maintain and keep up-to-date. This must be turned in for 1st and 2nd semester with the Collection Notebook. Forms must be signed by teacher and assistance team members. Feedback (Consensus of the Assistance Team) First Semester (NTI-2) Second Semester (NTI-3)

Section 9 Formal Evaluation Consensus Report SAFE-T Guidelines – Very Important (Goal – to have all Induction Teachers ready for formal evaluation next year.) Form A—SLO/Long Range Plan with Reflection/Professional Growth and Development Plan TT2—Unit Work Sample (short range plans) TT3—Reflection on Instruction from Observation TT4—Professional Self-Assessment (APS 10) Assessment Process and Forms for SAFE-T Formal Evaluation Consensus Report

Section 10 PowerPoint on Expectations of the Unit Work Sample Professional Growth and Development Plan If the teacher is in need for additional goals, they may be added to Form A in the appropriate section. The Assistance Team will work closely with the Induction Teacher to identify growth areas.

Mentors Meetings- 3:30 – 4:30 @ D.O. Staff Development Room: 1st – August 22 or 23, 2016 (Orientation Meeting) 2nd – May 1, 2017 (End-of-the-Year Meeting) Collaboration Logs: Monthly – due the last day of each month (electronic submission – to Kim Murray) Surveys will be given to Induction Teachers and also to mentors to help with evaluation and improvement of programs. Stipend: Given in the last check of the year.

Long Range Plans—Form A District Form: - Forms are included in the notebook/online for Induction Teachers Induction Teachers will: Complete a long range plan for all subjects/courses taught. For Form A, Induction teachers will use the class in which they are creating their SLOs to complete the LRP reflections. Reflections will not need to be completed for every subject, every class. This is combined in Form A.

Teacher Reflection on Instruction and Student Learning (TT3) For their Digital Portfolio, Induction teachers will be asked to choose 4 administrative observations (2 during 1st semester and 2 during 2nd semester) and write a reflection on these 4 observations using the SAFE-T observation form ( TT3 – Reflection on Instruction and Student Learning). These reflections are to be placed in the online portfolio. www.ed.sc.gov ---- Programs & Services -----ADEPT ---Evaluating Educators --- SAFE-T Templates

Provided for Induction Teachers Books of Study: The Essential 55 – Ron Clark What Great Teachers Do Differently – Todd Whitaker Advanced Classroom Management – Gary Alderman Motivating Students – Carolyn Chapman & Nicole Vagle Battling Boredom – Byran Harris Care Enough to Discipline—L. S. Anderson

Year at a Glance Induction teachers have already attended: Classroom Management Session– Dr. Gary Alderman Mentor/Mentee Collaboration Day New Teacher Orientation and Introduction to District Instructional Procedures Summer Technology Institute Throughout the Year: Topics of Concern/Interest for Induction Teachers Teacher of the Year Panel—Parent Communication Falling Through the Cracks—Lowest Achievers and GT Darkness to Light Training Field Trip SAFE-T Guidelines/Tips for Teachers Getting Ready for Formal Evaluation

Please do not hesitate to call if you should need our help in any way. Questions? Concerns? Please do not hesitate to call if you should need our help in any way.

Induction Teachers Performance Evaluation Appeals Don’t forget to sign the Induction Contract Syllabus Timeline Online Portfolio RCA